LEAVE THE KIDS ALONE.Decisions · Consequences · Evidence

Complete Sources · page 1 of 7

context

The IACHR’s 1980 Argentina report describes the military’s 24 March 1976 act taking power, dissolving legislatures, removing senior judges and suspending political and union activity.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
dated institutional account of public measures or complaint · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 1976-03-24 · source-attributed historical subject date.

Date basis and original source clocks

Reportedmilitaryactdate;notIACHRreportpublicationorprivateauthorisation. Calendar year bounds indicate precision only, not verified appointment or departure dates. Historical subject dates are retrospective documentary context, not first-publication evidence. Source document/edition dates and unknown first online publication dates remain separate. No new private order, incident coordinates, individual responsibility or current status is inferred.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Argentina 1980, ChapterI political and legal system ↗

Publisher: Inter-American Commission on Human Rights

Exact passage: ChapterI.A3 andB1(b);C2–5asrights-assessmentcontext.

Source establishes: Described24March1976militaryact:takeover,dissolution/removalandsuspendedpolitical/unionactivity.

Document date: 1980 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: ChapterI.A3,B1(b),C2–5andD:publicmeasures,rationaleandquoted6November1974Decree1368;notoriginalmilitaryactscan.

Access limitations

IACHR account of acts and competing rationales; not original private authorisation or a current legal opinion.

First online publication not established; report/edition and incident clocks are separate.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

valid_prior_A4_pin_reused_original_institutional_HTML_selected_passages_reread_live · HR-ARCHIVE-FAMILY-IACHR-AR1980

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-SRC-AR-IACHR1@a18b86a6fb0f1400

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: a18b86a6fb0f1400af9ae961720dc071e219d2ea0abebfaae480734811b59041. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Reportedmilitaryactdate;notIACHRreportpublicationorprivateauthorisation. Calendar year bounds indicate precision only, not verified appointment or departure dates. Historical subject dates are retrospective documentary context, not first-publication evidence. Source document/edition dates and unknown first online publication dates remain separate. No new private order, incident coordinates, individual responsibility or current status is inferred.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

The IACHR report’s description of public measures, the junta’s rationale, a family complaint and government response are different source voices. No personal responsibility follows solely from office or a legal-regime signature. The child-disappearance statement is historical and omits private identifiers; it supplies no current fate or death finding.

Legal distinction

Exact dated judicial/commission/institutional voice retained. No AI verdict, criminal-conviction upgrade, individual guilt from office, current legal status or entire-war personal toll.

Casualty scope: The IACHR’s 1980 Argentina report describes the military’s 24 March 1976 act taking power, dissolving legislatures, removing senior judges and suspending political and union activity. The IACHR report’s description of public measures, the junta’s rationale, a family complaint and the government response are different source voices. Personal responsibility does not follow solely from office or a signature on a legal instrument. The child-disappearance statement is historical and omits private identifiers; it supplies no current fate or death finding.

Record A4-B07-AR-ACT · exact wording SHA-256 a27ea9a7ff99e2d110da4e228726462c5a32c881a69df7e253369ea796291fe3

Report a correction →
human consequence

The IACHR’s 1980 Argentina report reproduces a complaint that a three-month-old child disappeared after the 24 November 1976 operation in La Plata, and a 1978 government response saying searches had not located her. These are the complaint and response recorded at the time, not verified present-day whereabouts.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
dated institutional account of public measures or complaint · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 1978-05-11 · source-labelled government response; operation reported on 24 November 1976, exact disappearance time unknown.

Date basis and original source clocks

Useincidentanchoronlywithreportedlabel;1978responseisnotdisappearanceday.Sourcecorrespondencechronologyisawkwardandnotreconstructed. The complete compound statement becomes available at its last explicit documentary date. The separate dated records remain intact; no continuous crime/harm interval is created. The 24 November 1976 operation is complaint-reported; exact disappearance day and current fate are not established. The 1978 response is not the disappearance date. The source chronology is internally awkward and is not reconstructed. Source document/edition dates and unknown first online publication dates remain separate. No new private order, incident coordinates, individual responsibility or current status is inferred.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Argentina 1980, ChapterIII disappeared persons ↗

Publisher: Inter-American Commission on Human Rights

Exact passage: ChapterIII.C6,Case2553:complaint28November1977andgovernmentresponse11May1978.

Source establishes: Complaint of a three-month-old missing after the24November1976operation and contemporaneous unsuccessful-search response; no verified death or current status.

Document date: 1980 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: ChapterIII.C6,Case2553complaint/responseandchronologydiscrepancy;notunderlyingwitnessproof,currentwhereaboutsororiginalcorrespondenceauthentication.

Access limitations

Dated attributed complaint and response, not current whereabouts or proof of a specific abductor. Correspondence chronology is internally awkward; not reconstructed.

First online publication not established; report/edition and incident clocks are separate.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

valid_prior_A4_pin_reused_original_institutional_HTML_selected_passages_reread_live · HR-ARCHIVE-FAMILY-IACHR-AR1980

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-SRC-AR-IACHR3@e8b977983b06999c

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: e8b977983b06999c0fd19e4dcbfb7050d83fcf3e04af6b55a02a92d1053f1136. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Useincidentanchoronlywithreportedlabel;1978responseisnotdisappearanceday.Sourcecorrespondencechronologyisawkwardandnotreconstructed. The complete compound statement becomes available at its last explicit documentary date. The separate dated records remain intact; no continuous crime/harm interval is created. The 24 November 1976 operation is complaint-reported; exact disappearance day and current fate are not established. The 1978 response is not the disappearance date. The source chronology is internally awkward and is not reconstructed. Source document/edition dates and unknown first online publication dates remain separate. No new private order, incident coordinates, individual responsibility or current status is inferred.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

The IACHR report’s description of public measures, the junta’s rationale, a family complaint and government response are different source voices. No personal responsibility follows solely from office or a legal-regime signature. The child-disappearance statement is historical and omits private identifiers; it supplies no current fate or death finding.

Legal distinction

Exact dated judicial/commission/institutional voice retained. No AI verdict, criminal-conviction upgrade, individual guilt from office, current legal status or entire-war personal toll.

Casualty scope: The IACHR’s 1980 Argentina report reproduces a complaint that a three-month-old child disappeared after the 24 November 1976 operation in La Plata, and a 1978 government response saying searches had not located her. These are the complaint and response recorded at the time, not verified present-day whereabouts. The IACHR report’s description of public measures, the junta’s rationale, a family complaint and the government response are different source voices. Personal responsibility does not follow solely from office or a signature on a legal instrument. The child-disappearance statement is historical and omits private identifiers; it supplies no current fate or death finding.

Record A4-B07-AR-CLARA · exact wording SHA-256 c2042e379fa42ad8c719cbe95ee3bdb15b46f4833ca2439a65cb24fa6e98e5c8

Report a correction →
context

The IACHR’s 1980 report distinguishes the junta’s anti-subversion rationale from its assessment of rights restrictions. It notes that Argentina’s state of siege had been declared in November 1974, before the March 1976 coup.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
dated institutional account of public measures or complaint · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 1976-03-24 · later of two discrete legal-context dates.

Date basis and original source clocks

Twolegalclocks,notacontinuousharmperiod. PrimarywordingretainsNovember1974andMarch1976. The complete compound statement becomes available at its last explicit documentary date. The separate dated records remain intact; no continuous crime/harm interval is created. 6 November 1974 and 24 March 1976 are distinct legal-context dates. Source document/edition dates and unknown first online publication dates remain separate. No new private order, incident coordinates, individual responsibility or current status is inferred.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Argentina 1980, ChapterI political and legal system ↗

Publisher: Inter-American Commission on Human Rights

Exact passage: ChapterI.A2,B1(b),C3andD;quotedDecree1368of6November1974.

Source establishes: Distinguishesjuntarationalefromrightsassessmentandpre-coupstate-of-siegedecree.

Document date: 1980 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: ChapterI.A3,B1(b),C2–5andD:publicmeasures,rationaleandquoted6November1974Decree1368;notoriginalmilitaryactscan.

Access limitations

IACHR account of acts and competing rationales; not original private authorisation or a current legal opinion.

First online publication not established; report/edition and incident clocks are separate.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

valid_prior_A4_pin_reused_original_institutional_HTML_selected_passages_reread_live · HR-ARCHIVE-FAMILY-IACHR-AR1980

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-SRC-AR-IACHR1@a18b86a6fb0f1400

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: a18b86a6fb0f1400af9ae961720dc071e219d2ea0abebfaae480734811b59041. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Twolegalclocks,notacontinuousharmperiod. PrimarywordingretainsNovember1974andMarch1976. The complete compound statement becomes available at its last explicit documentary date. The separate dated records remain intact; no continuous crime/harm interval is created. 6 November 1974 and 24 March 1976 are distinct legal-context dates. Source document/edition dates and unknown first online publication dates remain separate. No new private order, incident coordinates, individual responsibility or current status is inferred.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

The IACHR report’s description of public measures, the junta’s rationale, a family complaint and government response are different source voices. No personal responsibility follows solely from office or a legal-regime signature. The child-disappearance statement is historical and omits private identifiers; it supplies no current fate or death finding.

Legal distinction

Exact dated judicial/commission/institutional voice retained. No AI verdict, criminal-conviction upgrade, individual guilt from office, current legal status or entire-war personal toll.

Casualty scope: The IACHR’s 1980 report distinguishes the junta’s anti-subversion rationale from its assessment of rights restrictions. It notes that Argentina’s state of siege had been declared in November 1974, before the March 1976 coup. The IACHR report’s description of public measures, the junta’s rationale, a family complaint and the government response are different source voices. Personal responsibility does not follow solely from office or a signature on a legal instrument. The child-disappearance statement is historical and omits private identifiers; it supplies no current fate or death finding.

Record A4-B07-AR-RATIONALE · exact wording SHA-256 63bfcfe0636580523f110b7ec7a6c0e4a85533e7fb71b5e564587e8b9aea48e6

Report a correction →
decision

CAVR reports that President Soeharto first announced an amnesty offer in November 1977 and that the offer was subsequently renewed.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
explicit commission or institutional attribution · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 1977-11 · source-attributed month; exact announcement day unknown.

Date basis and original source clocks

Retrospective source-defined historical subject, not first-publication availability. Calendar bounds express year/month precision only; no first-day appointment, incident date or annual distribution is inferred. The complete observation becomes available at the latest supported bound. Office periods do not prove an order; the two Panggabean roles and 1978 transition remain separately stated in the exact wording. The 2005 report date is not a verified first-online publication date. No casualty total is allocated to a person.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Chega!, Part 8 Responsibility and Accountability ↗

Publisher: CAVR (National Security Archive-hosted copy)

Exact passage: Part8 physical/printed21,surrendered/captured-persons paragraph

Source establishes: November1977public offer and subsequent renewal; not safe implementation.

Document date: 2005 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Selected copied commission pages independently read. Underlying Indonesian orders, files, witnesses and diplomatic originals not independently authenticated. GWU host contextual page identifies its report-copy role.

Access limitations

Commission attribution/causal analysis, not individual court conviction. Part7.3explicitly limits knowledge of internal policy. No national total is allocated to a named individual.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

valid_prior_A4_independent_pin_and_scope_reused_with_targeted_binding_clarification · HR-ARCHIVE-FAMILY-CAVR-CHEGA

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-SRC-ET-CAVR8@efba62796b202768

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: efba62796b20276824f14f652e6154dcecd77dfb4c43a5bd77b1f186e50d8842. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Retrospective source-defined subject period; first online publication and exact incident days are not established. No interpolation within the observation period.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

CAVR’s commission findings, office roster and statistical estimates have different scopes. The1974–1999mortality estimate is not a1976toll or a named person’s total. Displacement events are not unique people. Policy-causation analysis and amnesty assurances do not establish an individual kill order or safe implementation.

Legal distinction

Exact dated judicial/commission/institutional voice retained. No AI verdict, criminal-conviction upgrade, individual guilt from office, current legal status or entire-war personal toll.

Casualty scope: Displacement events are not unique people. Mortality is a source-defined minimum-bound estimate combining killings and excess hunger/illness deaths; neither a 1976-only toll nor a personal total. Reported margins remain visible. No components added to the total.

Record A4-B07-ET-AMNESTY · exact wording SHA-256 62c9eddf130577254831c4632fd6cfaa38a879cb581d1c9d9eb719ad81dad45f

Report a correction →
context

CAVR concluded that Indonesian military displacement, destruction of food sources and restrictions on movement produced famine in East Timor in 1977–1979. It examined rainfall records and rejected drought as the explanation.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
explicit commission or institutional attribution · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 1977–1979 · source-defined historical period; exact days unknown.

Date basis and original source clocks

Retrospective source-defined historical subject, not first-publication availability. Calendar bounds express year/month precision only; no first-day appointment, incident date or annual distribution is inferred. The complete observation becomes available at the latest supported bound. Office periods do not prove an order; the two Panggabean roles and 1978 transition remain separately stated in the exact wording. The 2005 report date is not a verified first-online publication date. No casualty total is allocated to a person.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Chega!, Part 8 Responsibility and Accountability ↗

Publisher: CAVR (National Security Archive-hosted copy)

Exact passage: Part8 physical/printed37–40,Responsibility for famine and deaths by deprivation; rainfall paragraph on38

Source establishes: Commission causal assessment of food destruction, displacement, movement restrictions and famine,1977–1979; rainfall analysis.

Document date: 2005 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Selected copied commission pages independently read. Underlying Indonesian orders, files, witnesses and diplomatic originals not independently authenticated. GWU host contextual page identifies its report-copy role.

Access limitations

Commission attribution/causal analysis, not individual court conviction. Part7.3explicitly limits knowledge of internal policy. No national total is allocated to a named individual.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

valid_prior_A4_independent_pin_and_scope_reused_with_targeted_binding_clarification · HR-ARCHIVE-FAMILY-CAVR-CHEGA

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-SRC-ET-CAVR8@efba62796b202768

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: efba62796b20276824f14f652e6154dcecd77dfb4c43a5bd77b1f186e50d8842. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Retrospective source-defined subject period; first online publication and exact incident days are not established. No interpolation within the observation period.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

CAVR’s commission findings, office roster and statistical estimates have different scopes. The1974–1999mortality estimate is not a1976toll or a named person’s total. Displacement events are not unique people. Policy-causation analysis and amnesty assurances do not establish an individual kill order or safe implementation.

Commission analysis, not a newly authenticated individual order or a judicial conviction. Part8’s broad hunger-death narrative is not silently substituted for Part6’s statistical estimate.

Legal distinction

Exact dated judicial/commission/institutional voice retained. No AI verdict, criminal-conviction upgrade, individual guilt from office, current legal status or entire-war personal toll.

Casualty scope: Displacement events are not unique people. Mortality is a source-defined minimum-bound estimate combining killings and excess hunger/illness deaths; neither a 1976-only toll nor a personal total. Reported margins remain visible. No components added to the total.

Record A4-B07-ET-FAMINE · exact wording SHA-256 19e0cc40e4ac96161e1da05479be1ed863f3606f8afbe9c066d5848c4a59f61e

Report a correction →
context

CAVR reports that some Fretilin/Falintil members surrendered under amnesty assurances and were subsequently executed or disappeared. The amnesty announcement alone does not establish safe implementation.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
explicit commission or institutional attribution · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 1977–1979 · source-defined historical period; exact days unknown.

Date basis and original source clocks

Retrospective source-defined historical subject, not first-publication availability. Calendar bounds express year/month precision only; no first-day appointment, incident date or annual distribution is inferred. The complete observation becomes available at the latest supported bound. Office periods do not prove an order; the two Panggabean roles and 1978 transition remain separately stated in the exact wording. The 2005 report date is not a verified first-online publication date. No casualty total is allocated to a person.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Chega!, Part 8 Responsibility and Accountability ↗

Publisher: CAVR (National Security Archive-hosted copy)

Exact passage: Part8 physical/printed21 and48,surrendered/captured-person passages

Source establishes: Reported post-surrender outcomes despite assurances; no personal subsequent order inferred.

Document date: 2005 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Selected copied commission pages independently read. Underlying Indonesian orders, files, witnesses and diplomatic originals not independently authenticated. GWU host contextual page identifies its report-copy role.

Access limitations

Commission attribution/causal analysis, not individual court conviction. Part7.3explicitly limits knowledge of internal policy. No national total is allocated to a named individual.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

valid_prior_A4_independent_pin_and_scope_reused_with_targeted_binding_clarification · HR-ARCHIVE-FAMILY-CAVR-CHEGA

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-SRC-ET-CAVR8@efba62796b202768

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: efba62796b20276824f14f652e6154dcecd77dfb4c43a5bd77b1f186e50d8842. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Retrospective source-defined subject period; first online publication and exact incident days are not established. No interpolation within the observation period.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

CAVR’s commission findings, office roster and statistical estimates have different scopes. The1974–1999mortality estimate is not a1976toll or a named person’s total. Displacement events are not unique people. Policy-causation analysis and amnesty assurances do not establish an individual kill order or safe implementation.

Legal distinction

Exact dated judicial/commission/institutional voice retained. No AI verdict, criminal-conviction upgrade, individual guilt from office, current legal status or entire-war personal toll.

Casualty scope: Displacement events are not unique people. Mortality is a source-defined minimum-bound estimate combining killings and excess hunger/illness deaths; neither a 1976-only toll nor a personal total. Reported margins remain visible. No components added to the total.

Record A4-B07-ET-LIMITS · exact wording SHA-256 555c19237949098ece26459e5b9439c2c758c88ff6785ad953159591408fb254

Report a correction →
human consequence

For 1974–1999, CAVR gives a minimum-bound conflict-related mortality estimate of 102,800, with a reported margin of ±12,000. It derives this from estimated killings and excess hunger-and-illness deaths; it is not a toll for 1976 alone or a personal casualty total.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
explicit commission or institutional attribution · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 1974–1999 · source-defined historical period; exact days unknown.

Date basis and original source clocks

Retrospective source-defined historical subject, not first-publication availability. Calendar bounds express year/month precision only; no first-day appointment, incident date or annual distribution is inferred. The complete observation becomes available at the latest supported bound. Office periods do not prove an order; the two Panggabean roles and 1978 transition remain separately stated in the exact wording. The 2005 report date is not a verified first-online publication date. No casualty total is allocated to a person.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Chega!, Part 6 Profile of Human Rights Violations ↗

Publisher: CAVR/HRDAG (ETAN-hosted corrected copy)

Exact passage: Part6 physical/printed3,paragraph8 and1974–1999heading

Source establishes: Minimum-bound102,800±12,000estimate and included components,not1976/personal total.

Document date: 2005 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Selected original-work hosted PDF page extracted/read, rendered and visually checked. Statistical model/data not rerun.

Access limitations

Estimates, margins and event/population definitions retained. WestTimor refugee camps were excluded from interview coverage. B02annex reports2,024moves versus Part6’s2,011events; unresolved.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

valid_prior_A4_independent_pin_and_scope_reused_with_targeted_binding_clarification · HR-ARCHIVE-FAMILY-CAVR-CHEGA

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-SRC-ET-CAVR6@3783a8b44e551f11

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 3783a8b44e551f113522eff8a815ebe63a0ad5fa31d2b997b9cb13f3d4c8f18b. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Retrospective source-defined subject period; first online publication and exact incident days are not established. No interpolation within the observation period.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

CAVR’s commission findings, office roster and statistical estimates have different scopes. The1974–1999mortality estimate is not a1976toll or a named person’s total. Displacement events are not unique people. Policy-causation analysis and amnesty assurances do not establish an individual kill order or safe implementation.

Legal distinction

Exact dated judicial/commission/institutional voice retained. No AI verdict, criminal-conviction upgrade, individual guilt from office, current legal status or entire-war personal toll.

Casualty scope: Displacement events are not unique people. Mortality is a source-defined minimum-bound estimate combining killings and excess hunger/illness deaths; neither a 1976-only toll nor a personal total. Reported margins remain visible. No components added to the total.

Record A4-B07-ET-MORTALITY · exact wording SHA-256 f38618a757e34b6dd01c9ae82b02f84dbdc634c208936bed13f9d23740e1fe31

Report a correction →
context

CAVR’s command roster lists Soeharto as President for 1967–1998. That roster entry supplies year precision, not exact starting and ending days or proof of a particular order.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
explicit commission or institutional attribution · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 1967–1998 · source-defined historical period; exact days unknown.

Date basis and original source clocks

Retrospective source-defined historical subject, not first-publication availability. Calendar bounds express year/month precision only; no first-day appointment, incident date or annual distribution is inferred. The complete observation becomes available at the latest supported bound. Office periods do not prove an order; the two Panggabean roles and 1978 transition remain separately stated in the exact wording. The 2005 report date is not a verified first-online publication date. No casualty total is allocated to a person.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Chega!, Part 8 Annex 3 Persons with High-Level Command Responsibility ↗

Publisher: CAVR (ETAN-hosted copy)

Exact passage: Part8 Annex3,physical1,Members of Government,Soeharto entry

Source establishes: Year-precision office roster only.

Document date: 2005 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Selected source page independently read. No full nine-page roster/underlying personnel-file review.

Access limitations

Hosted commission copy; years only. Maradean/Maraden spellings differ across report parts. Office and command roster alone does not prove a particular criminal order.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

valid_prior_A4_independent_pin_and_scope_reused_with_targeted_binding_clarification · HR-ARCHIVE-FAMILY-CAVR-CHEGA

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-SRC-ET-COMMAND@d9090a859a37ef83

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: d9090a859a37ef8317bde03b64c4273dfc8f6aedf1ce757057a790dc359fe10e. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Retrospective source-defined subject period; first online publication and exact incident days are not established. No interpolation within the observation period.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

CAVR’s commission findings, office roster and statistical estimates have different scopes. The1974–1999mortality estimate is not a1976toll or a named person’s total. Displacement events are not unique people. Policy-causation analysis and amnesty assurances do not establish an individual kill order or safe implementation.

Legal distinction

Exact dated judicial/commission/institutional voice retained. No AI verdict, criminal-conviction upgrade, individual guilt from office, current legal status or entire-war personal toll.

Casualty scope: Displacement events are not unique people. Mortality is a source-defined minimum-bound estimate combining killings and excess hunger/illness deaths; neither a 1976-only toll nor a personal total. Reported margins remain visible. No components added to the total.

Record A4-B07-ET-OFFICES · exact wording SHA-256 36987bbd396a2984406ffb6031dc4ef97d5ff1f153ed7f8156099d3683a53849

Report a correction →
context

CAVR’s roster lists Maraden Panggabean as Minister of Defence and Security for 1973–1978 and coordinating minister for political affairs and security for 1978–1983.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
explicit commission or institutional attribution · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 1973–1983 · source-defined historical period; exact days unknown.

Date basis and original source clocks

Retrospective source-defined historical subject, not first-publication availability. Calendar bounds express year/month precision only; no first-day appointment, incident date or annual distribution is inferred. The complete observation becomes available at the latest supported bound. Office periods do not prove an order; the two Panggabean roles and 1978 transition remain separately stated in the exact wording. The 2005 report date is not a verified first-online publication date. No casualty total is allocated to a person.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Chega!, Part 8 Annex 3 Persons with High-Level Command Responsibility ↗

Publisher: CAVR (ETAN-hosted copy)

Exact passage: Part8 Annex3,physical1,Panggabean entry

Source establishes: Two office periods; no exact transition day or decision.

Document date: 2005 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Selected source page independently read. No full nine-page roster/underlying personnel-file review.

Access limitations

Hosted commission copy; years only. Maradean/Maraden spellings differ across report parts. Office and command roster alone does not prove a particular criminal order.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

valid_prior_A4_independent_pin_and_scope_reused_with_targeted_binding_clarification · HR-ARCHIVE-FAMILY-CAVR-CHEGA

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-SRC-ET-COMMAND@d9090a859a37ef83

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: d9090a859a37ef8317bde03b64c4273dfc8f6aedf1ce757057a790dc359fe10e. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Retrospective source-defined subject period; first online publication and exact incident days are not established. No interpolation within the observation period.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

CAVR’s commission findings, office roster and statistical estimates have different scopes. The1974–1999mortality estimate is not a1976toll or a named person’s total. Displacement events are not unique people. Policy-causation analysis and amnesty assurances do not establish an individual kill order or safe implementation.

Name spelling differs between the roster and narrative; retain the native spellings in source metadata. No exact tenure boundary or personal order is inferred.

Legal distinction

Exact dated judicial/commission/institutional voice retained. No AI verdict, criminal-conviction upgrade, individual guilt from office, current legal status or entire-war personal toll.

Casualty scope: Displacement events are not unique people. Mortality is a source-defined minimum-bound estimate combining killings and excess hunger/illness deaths; neither a 1976-only toll nor a personal total. Reported margins remain visible. No components added to the total.

Record A4-B07-ET-PANG-OFFICE · exact wording SHA-256 afb6b11acac7a5cb5bc3b61f473d868a8d584b1fc1e43cfbb1ec9a9aa8e561a0

Report a correction →
human consequence

CAVR estimates 59,800 displacement events in East Timor in 1976, with a reported margin of ±7,200. Events of displacement are not a count of distinct displaced people.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
explicit commission or institutional attribution · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 1976 · source-defined historical period; exact days unknown.

Date basis and original source clocks

Retrospective source-defined historical subject, not first-publication availability. Calendar bounds express year/month precision only; no first-day appointment, incident date or annual distribution is inferred. The complete observation becomes available at the latest supported bound. Office periods do not prove an order; the two Panggabean roles and 1978 transition remain separately stated in the exact wording. The 2005 report date is not a verified first-online publication date. No casualty total is allocated to a person.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Chega!, Part 6 Profile of Human Rights Violations ↗

Publisher: CAVR/HRDAG (ETAN-hosted corrected copy)

Exact passage: Part6 physical/printed3,paragraphs11–14 and notes3–6

Source establishes: 1976displacement-event estimate59,800±7,200,not unique people.

Document date: 2005 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Selected original-work hosted PDF page extracted/read, rendered and visually checked. Statistical model/data not rerun.

Access limitations

Estimates, margins and event/population definitions retained. WestTimor refugee camps were excluded from interview coverage. B02annex reports2,024moves versus Part6’s2,011events; unresolved.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

valid_prior_A4_independent_pin_and_scope_reused_with_targeted_binding_clarification · HR-ARCHIVE-FAMILY-CAVR-CHEGA

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-SRC-ET-CAVR6@3783a8b44e551f11

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 3783a8b44e551f113522eff8a815ebe63a0ad5fa31d2b997b9cb13f3d4c8f18b. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Retrospective source-defined subject period; first online publication and exact incident days are not established. No interpolation within the observation period.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

CAVR’s commission findings, office roster and statistical estimates have different scopes. The1974–1999mortality estimate is not a1976toll or a named person’s total. Displacement events are not unique people. Policy-causation analysis and amnesty assurances do not establish an individual kill order or safe implementation.

Legal distinction

Exact dated judicial/commission/institutional voice retained. No AI verdict, criminal-conviction upgrade, individual guilt from office, current legal status or entire-war personal toll.

Casualty scope: Displacement events are not unique people. Mortality is a source-defined minimum-bound estimate combining killings and excess hunger/illness deaths; neither a 1976-only toll nor a personal total. Reported margins remain visible. No components added to the total.

Record A4-B07-ET-STATS · exact wording SHA-256 07dbdb91aee66a565adb9d4d90020365f6b42023230d64c4e816f151a53ee274

Report a correction →
human consequence

The Hague Court of Appeal’s 2022 judgment found 75 deaths under Count 3 concerning 14–17 August 1978. It separately described one death and grievous bodily harm under Count 2; these categories are not presented here as a combined unique-person total.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
dated judicial or institutional account · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 14–17 August 1978 · Count 3 subject interval; finding dated 8 June 2022.

Date basis and original source clocks

Retrospective judicial account: the 1978 subject period, the appeal judgment on 8 June 2022 and the English publication on 2 September 2022 are distinct. Month bounds do not establish exact tenure days. No presence at executions, later cassation outcome or individual casualty allocation is inferred.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

ECLI:NL:GHDHA:2022:1674, English appeal judgment ↗

Publisher: Court of Appeal The Hague

Exact passage: Chapter3 Count3; section14 Conclusion and21disposition;13.3.4excluded later period

Source establishes: Court-found75Count3deaths and distinct Count2death/injury; no combined unique-person total.

Document date: 2022-06-08 · Publication date: 2022-09-02

Actual review scope: Selected original cached XML sections independently read; live endpoint unavailable through web reader. Dutch original sections15/21 additionally compared. Original1978letters/interviews and later cassation not reviewed.

Access limitations

English section15contains an inconsistent did-not-commit phrase, contradicted by its section21and Dutch original. Publication metadata2September2022 is separate from8Junejudgment. Defendant/victim anonymisation retained.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

valid_prior_A4_independent_pin_and_scope_reused_with_targeted_binding_clarification · HR-ARCHIVE-FAMILY-ETH-GOJ-APPEAL

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-SRC-ETH-JUDGMENT@190769e026d0cfb7

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 190769e026d0cfb75bd8026b8143d02c54321582148faaee85831de41c59bf54. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

This is a dated 2022 judicial account of separate 1978 events; no contemporary 1978 source availability or later cassation outcome is asserted.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Keep the judicial defendant anonymised in substantive statements. English section15has an inconsistent negative phrase; Dutch sections15/21and the English disposition confirm the proven counts and life sentence.8June2022is the judgment date;2Septemberis English publication metadata. Preserve acquittals, excluded later period and absence of established execution-site presence; no later cassation finality is asserted.

Legal distinction

Exact dated judicial/commission/institutional voice retained. No AI verdict, criminal-conviction upgrade, individual guilt from office, current legal status or entire-war personal toll.

Casualty scope: Count 3 and Count 2 remain separate. No combined unique-person, child, civilian-only or personal total is inferred. Count 2 remains in the exact statement without assigning it Count 3 dates.

Record A4-B07-ETH-DEAD · exact wording SHA-256 ee0086b3e6b6cdbb9acc473982b4ce513c7776efc8549f56d91a4ba3c0b0be68

Report a correction →
context

The Hague appeal judgment records challenges to document authenticity and participation. It did not find the defendant’s presence at the executions proven, acquitted him in respect of specified people, and excluded the Count 4 period after August 1978.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
dated judicial or institutional account · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 2022-06-08 · dated appeal judgment, not later cassation or English publication.

Date basis and original source clocks

Retrospective judicial account: the 1978 subject period, the appeal judgment on 8 June 2022 and the English publication on 2 September 2022 are distinct. Month bounds do not establish exact tenure days. No presence at executions, later cassation outcome or individual casualty allocation is inferred.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

ECLI:NL:GHDHA:2022:1674, English appeal judgment ↗

Publisher: Court of Appeal The Hague

Exact passage: Sections12.3,13.3.3–13.3.4,13.6.1 and21

Source establishes: Document/participation challenges, specified acquittals, missing execution presence and excluded Count4period afterAugust1978.

Document date: 2022-06-08 · Publication date: 2022-09-02

Actual review scope: Selected original cached XML sections independently read; live endpoint unavailable through web reader. Dutch original sections15/21 additionally compared. Original1978letters/interviews and later cassation not reviewed.

Access limitations

English section15contains an inconsistent did-not-commit phrase, contradicted by its section21and Dutch original. Publication metadata2September2022 is separate from8Junejudgment. Defendant/victim anonymisation retained.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

valid_prior_A4_independent_pin_and_scope_reused_with_targeted_binding_clarification · HR-ARCHIVE-FAMILY-ETH-GOJ-APPEAL

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-SRC-ETH-JUDGMENT@190769e026d0cfb7

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 190769e026d0cfb75bd8026b8143d02c54321582148faaee85831de41c59bf54. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

This is a dated 2022 judicial account of separate 1978 events; no contemporary 1978 source availability or later cassation outcome is asserted.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Keep the judicial defendant anonymised in substantive statements. English section15has an inconsistent negative phrase; Dutch sections15/21and the English disposition confirm the proven counts and life sentence.8June2022is the judgment date;2Septemberis English publication metadata. Preserve acquittals, excluded later period and absence of established execution-site presence; no later cassation finality is asserted.

Legal distinction

Exact dated judicial/commission/institutional voice retained. No AI verdict, criminal-conviction upgrade, individual guilt from office, current legal status or entire-war personal toll.

Casualty scope: Count 3 and Count 2 remain separate. No combined unique-person, child, civilian-only or personal total is inferred. Count 2 remains in the exact statement without assigning it Count 3 dates.

Record A4-B07-ETH-DEFENCE · exact wording SHA-256 5fe152606abaa4144f4335866d0e66d5f2e2094b4cf244d15220a4cbb7e966aa

Report a correction →
context

The Hague Court of Appeal’s 2022 judgment describes its defendant as chairman of Gojjam’s revolutionary coordinating campaign committee and the Derg’s permanent representative there, present at least from February through August 1978.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
dated judicial or institutional account · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: February–August 1978 · retrospective judicial account; month precision, not exact tenure boundaries.

Date basis and original source clocks

Retrospective judicial account: the 1978 subject period, the appeal judgment on 8 June 2022 and the English publication on 2 September 2022 are distinct. Month bounds do not establish exact tenure days. No presence at executions, later cassation outcome or individual casualty allocation is inferred.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

ECLI:NL:GHDHA:2022:1674, English appeal judgment ↗

Publisher: Court of Appeal The Hague

Exact passage: Section13.2,role and period-in-Gojjam subsections

Source establishes: Anonymised defendant roles and minimum February–August1978presence.

Document date: 2022-06-08 · Publication date: 2022-09-02

Actual review scope: Selected original cached XML sections independently read; live endpoint unavailable through web reader. Dutch original sections15/21 additionally compared. Original1978letters/interviews and later cassation not reviewed.

Access limitations

English section15contains an inconsistent did-not-commit phrase, contradicted by its section21and Dutch original. Publication metadata2September2022 is separate from8Junejudgment. Defendant/victim anonymisation retained.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

valid_prior_A4_independent_pin_and_scope_reused_with_targeted_binding_clarification · HR-ARCHIVE-FAMILY-ETH-GOJ-APPEAL

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-SRC-ETH-JUDGMENT@190769e026d0cfb7

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 190769e026d0cfb75bd8026b8143d02c54321582148faaee85831de41c59bf54. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

This is a dated 2022 judicial account of separate 1978 events; no contemporary 1978 source availability or later cassation outcome is asserted.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Keep the judicial defendant anonymised in substantive statements. English section15has an inconsistent negative phrase; Dutch sections15/21and the English disposition confirm the proven counts and life sentence.8June2022is the judgment date;2Septemberis English publication metadata. Preserve acquittals, excluded later period and absence of established execution-site presence; no later cassation finality is asserted.

Legal distinction

Exact dated judicial/commission/institutional voice retained. No AI verdict, criminal-conviction upgrade, individual guilt from office, current legal status or entire-war personal toll.

Casualty scope: Count 3 and Count 2 remain separate. No combined unique-person, child, civilian-only or personal total is inferred. Count 2 remains in the exact statement without assigning it Count 3 dates.

Record A4-B07-ETH-OFFICE · exact wording SHA-256 f83df791ecc35dec30194fd35af47786002fa6847972a1d58519c546a047ee2d

Report a correction →
decision

The Hague Court of Appeal found in 2022 that its defendant signed orders to detain and kill prisoners in Gojjam in 1978. It did not find his presence at the executions established.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
dated judicial or institutional account · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: February–August 1978 · retrospective judicial account; month precision, not exact tenure boundaries.

Date basis and original source clocks

Retrospective judicial account: the 1978 subject period, the appeal judgment on 8 June 2022 and the English publication on 2 September 2022 are distinct. Month bounds do not establish exact tenure days. No presence at executions, later cassation outcome or individual casualty allocation is inferred.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

ECLI:NL:GHDHA:2022:1674, English appeal judgment ↗

Publisher: Court of Appeal The Hague

Exact passage: Sections12.3 and13.6.1,final factual conclusions;13.6.2,Count3

Source establishes: Judicial signature/order assessment and absence of established execution presence.

Document date: 2022-06-08 · Publication date: 2022-09-02

Actual review scope: Selected original cached XML sections independently read; live endpoint unavailable through web reader. Dutch original sections15/21 additionally compared. Original1978letters/interviews and later cassation not reviewed.

Access limitations

English section15contains an inconsistent did-not-commit phrase, contradicted by its section21and Dutch original. Publication metadata2September2022 is separate from8Junejudgment. Defendant/victim anonymisation retained.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

valid_prior_A4_independent_pin_and_scope_reused_with_targeted_binding_clarification · HR-ARCHIVE-FAMILY-ETH-GOJ-APPEAL

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-SRC-ETH-JUDGMENT@190769e026d0cfb7

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 190769e026d0cfb75bd8026b8143d02c54321582148faaee85831de41c59bf54. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

This is a dated 2022 judicial account of separate 1978 events; no contemporary 1978 source availability or later cassation outcome is asserted.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Keep the judicial defendant anonymised in substantive statements. English section15has an inconsistent negative phrase; Dutch sections15/21and the English disposition confirm the proven counts and life sentence.8June2022is the judgment date;2Septemberis English publication metadata. Preserve acquittals, excluded later period and absence of established execution-site presence; no later cassation finality is asserted.

Legal distinction

Exact dated judicial/commission/institutional voice retained. No AI verdict, criminal-conviction upgrade, individual guilt from office, current legal status or entire-war personal toll.

Casualty scope: Count 3 and Count 2 remain separate. No combined unique-person, child, civilian-only or personal total is inferred. Count 2 remains in the exact statement without assigning it Count 3 dates.

Record A4-B07-ETH-ORDER · exact wording SHA-256 fa4a20839cdd7b718e5a3c606193083020225b3022b8f3c6f71b778811bf19cd

Report a correction →
human consequence

CEH concluded that Guatemalan army members killed 53 Maya Q’eqchi’ civilians and injured 47 at Panzós on 29 May 1978. Its notes preserve competing counts; these figures must not be added to the earlier IACHR account.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
explicit commission or institutional attribution · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 1978-05-29 · source-attributed historical subject date.

Date basis and original source clocks

Source-definedPanzósincident,withlatercommissionassessmentseparate. Calendar year bounds indicate precision only, not verified appointment or departure dates. Historical subject dates are retrospective documentary context, not first-publication evidence. Source document/edition dates and unknown first online publication dates remain separate. No new private order, incident coordinates, individual responsibility or current status is inferred.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Guatemala, memoria del silencio, TomoVI, case 9 Panzos ↗

Publisher: CEH/UNOPS (Plaza Publica-hosted copy)

Exact passage: Case9,physical15/printed18,notes36–37;physical18/printed21,conclusionVI.

Source establishes: CEHconcludes53MayaQ’eqchi’civilianskilledand47injured;notesretainothercounts.

Document date: 1999-06 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Case9selectedphysical13–15,17–18/printed16–18,20–21independentlyreread;notentirevolumeorunderlyingwitness/exhumation/cableauthentication.

Access limitations

Hosted commission report, not a criminal conviction. Different testimony/press counts and earlier IACHR account remain unresolved. Do not name the unnamed ordering lieutenant from the mayor/president entries.

First online publication not established; report/edition and incident clocks are separate.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

valid_prior_A4_source_pin_reused_selected_original_cached_PDF_passages_reread · HR-ARCHIVE-FAMILY-CEH-GT

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-SRC-GT-CEH@aa80448953e78257

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: aa80448953e78257fbf92c8ac8e2516066ba1de16b2a10af58c7065d60b7389e. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Source-definedPanzósincident,withlatercommissionassessmentseparate. Calendar year bounds indicate precision only, not verified appointment or departure dates. Historical subject dates are retrospective documentary context, not first-publication evidence. Source document/edition dates and unknown first online publication dates remain separate. No new private order, incident coordinates, individual responsibility or current status is inferred.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

CEH’s53deaths/47injuries and the earlier IACHRmore-than130deaths concern the same Panzós incident with unresolved definitions and disagreement. Do not add them, infer child counts or substitute a mayor/president for the unnamed lieutenant. Preserve the government’s self-defence account and the commission’s contrary conclusion; these are not personal criminal convictions.

Legal distinction

Exact dated judicial/commission/institutional voice retained. No AI verdict, criminal-conviction upgrade, individual guilt from office, current legal status or entire-war personal toll.

Casualty scope: CEH concluded that Guatemalan army members killed 53 Maya Q’eqchi’ civilians and injured 47 at Panzós on 29 May 1978. Its notes preserve competing counts; these figures must not be added to the earlier IACHR account. CEH’s 53 deaths and 47 injuries and the earlier IACHR account of more than 130 deaths concern the same Panzós incident, with unresolved definitions and disagreement. Do not add them, infer child counts or substitute a mayor or president for the unnamed lieutenant. Preserve the government’s self-defence account and the commission’s contrary conclusion; these are not personal criminal convictions.

Record A4-B07-GT-COUNTS · exact wording SHA-256 a0c118dec47b9ac8c9330fc020e7a51d46b1483350d184a9da7eeccaba15c134

Report a correction →
context

CEH records the Guatemalan government and army’s self-defence explanation for Panzós, alongside differing accounts of how shooting began. The commission rejected self-defence as justification for the army’s disproportionate force.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
explicit commission or institutional attribution · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Context collection; no single event date assigned.

Date basis and original source clocks

PublicresponsesandlaterCEHassessmentaredifferentclocks;notallspoken/decidedonincidentday. No single date is assigned to the combined incident context and later assessment. The underlying incident anchor is retained separately; public responses and the later commission assessment are not all dated to that day. Source document/edition dates and unknown first online publication dates remain separate. No new private order, incident coordinates, individual responsibility or current status is inferred.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Guatemala, memoria del silencio, TomoVI, case 9 Panzos ↗

Publisher: CEH/UNOPS (Plaza Publica-hosted copy)

Exact passage: Case9,physical14/printed17,onsetaccounts;physical17–18/printed20–21,sectionVandconclusionVI.

Source establishes: Government/armyself-defenceexplanation,differingonsetaccountsandCEH’sdisproportionate-force/self-defencerejection.

Document date: 1999-06 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Case9selectedphysical13–15,17–18/printed16–18,20–21independentlyreread;notentirevolumeorunderlyingwitness/exhumation/cableauthentication.

Access limitations

Hosted commission report, not a criminal conviction. Different testimony/press counts and earlier IACHR account remain unresolved. Do not name the unnamed ordering lieutenant from the mayor/president entries.

First online publication not established; report/edition and incident clocks are separate.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

valid_prior_A4_source_pin_reused_selected_original_cached_PDF_passages_reread · HR-ARCHIVE-FAMILY-CEH-GT

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-SRC-GT-CEH@aa80448953e78257

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: aa80448953e78257fbf92c8ac8e2516066ba1de16b2a10af58c7065d60b7389e. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

PublicresponsesandlaterCEHassessmentaredifferentclocks;notallspoken/decidedonincidentday. No single date is assigned to the combined incident context and later assessment. The underlying incident anchor is retained separately; public responses and the later commission assessment are not all dated to that day. Source document/edition dates and unknown first online publication dates remain separate. No new private order, incident coordinates, individual responsibility or current status is inferred.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

CEH’s53deaths/47injuries and the earlier IACHRmore-than130deaths concern the same Panzós incident with unresolved definitions and disagreement. Do not add them, infer child counts or substitute a mayor/president for the unnamed lieutenant. Preserve the government’s self-defence account and the commission’s contrary conclusion; these are not personal criminal convictions.

Legal distinction

Exact dated judicial/commission/institutional voice retained. No AI verdict, criminal-conviction upgrade, individual guilt from office, current legal status or entire-war personal toll.

Casualty scope: CEH records the Guatemalan government and army’s self-defence explanation for Panzós, alongside differing accounts of how shooting began. The commission rejected self-defence as justification for the army’s disproportionate force. CEH’s 53 deaths and 47 injuries and the earlier IACHR account of more than 130 deaths concern the same Panzós incident, with unresolved definitions and disagreement. Do not add them, infer child counts or substitute a mayor or president for the unnamed lieutenant. Preserve the government’s self-defence account and the commission’s contrary conclusion; these are not personal criminal convictions.

Record A4-B07-GT-DEFENCE · exact wording SHA-256 51feaceb85cfaa5f9aa912d803721cb5ac1d091924358e8328c9305fef436691

Report a correction →
human consequence

The IACHR’s 1981 Guatemala report says, on information and testimony received, that more than 130 people were killed at Panzós on 29 May 1978 and that the number injured was undetermined. This differs from CEH’s later account and is not added to it.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
explicit commission or institutional attribution · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 1978-05-29 · source-attributed historical subject date.

Date basis and original source clocks

Historicalincidentdate;13October1981isreportdate,noteventorfirstonlinepublication. Calendar year bounds indicate precision only, not verified appointment or departure dates. Historical subject dates are retrospective documentary context, not first-publication evidence. Source document/edition dates and unknown first online publication dates remain separate. No new private order, incident coordinates, individual responsibility or current status is inferred.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Guatemala1981, ChapterII.D(a), Deaths in Panzos ↗

Publisher: Inter-American Commission on Human Rights

Exact passage: ChapterII.D,subsection(a),paragraph2,Deaths in Panzos;header13October1981.

Source establishes: EarlierIACHRaccountreportsmorethan130deathsandundeterminedinjuriesbasedoninformation/testimonyreceived.

Document date: 1981-10-13 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: ChapterII.D(a),paragraph2and13October1981header;Panzóssubsectioninformation/testimonyscope.

Access limitations

Report on information/testimony received; different earlier source definition from CEH. No identity-level matching or addition.

First online publication not established; report/edition and incident clocks are separate.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

valid_prior_A4_pin_reused_original_institutional_HTML_selected_passages_reread_live · HR-ARCHIVE-FAMILY-IACHR-GT1981

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-SRC-GT-IACHR@e18bd8b6d3920772

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: e18bd8b6d3920772bc0f86037b1068ca2ec08bcac5204a93dd893c552e17be5f. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Historicalincidentdate;13October1981isreportdate,noteventorfirstonlinepublication. Calendar year bounds indicate precision only, not verified appointment or departure dates. Historical subject dates are retrospective documentary context, not first-publication evidence. Source document/edition dates and unknown first online publication dates remain separate. No new private order, incident coordinates, individual responsibility or current status is inferred.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

CEH’s53deaths/47injuries and the earlier IACHRmore-than130deaths concern the same Panzós incident with unresolved definitions and disagreement. Do not add them, infer child counts or substitute a mayor/president for the unnamed lieutenant. Preserve the government’s self-defence account and the commission’s contrary conclusion; these are not personal criminal convictions.

Legal distinction

Exact dated judicial/commission/institutional voice retained. No AI verdict, criminal-conviction upgrade, individual guilt from office, current legal status or entire-war personal toll.

Casualty scope: The IACHR’s 1981 Guatemala report says, on information and testimony received, that more than 130 people were killed at Panzós on 29 May 1978 and that the number injured was undetermined. This differs from CEH’s later account and is not added to it. CEH’s 53 deaths and 47 injuries and the earlier IACHR account of more than 130 deaths concern the same Panzós incident, with unresolved definitions and disagreement. Do not add them, infer child counts or substitute a mayor or president for the unnamed lieutenant. Preserve the government’s self-defence account and the commission’s contrary conclusion; these are not personal criminal convictions.

Record A4-B07-GT-IACHR-COUNT · exact wording SHA-256 e3f2ffac8e29dd555627c8430e0c4f05281738bd2f33472b81cd0c67c0641d7a

Report a correction →
context

CEH’s Panzós account identifies Walter Overdick as mayor and Laugerud as president in its discussion of the incident and public responses. Those references do not establish complete tenures or make either man the lieutenant who ordered the firing.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
explicit commission or institutional attribution · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 1978 · source-attested office context; exact tenure dates unknown.

Date basis and original source clocks

Attested1978context,notanewindividualdecisionorcompleteofficeinterval. Calendar year bounds indicate precision only, not verified appointment or departure dates. Historical subject dates are retrospective documentary context, not first-publication evidence. Source document/edition dates and unknown first online publication dates remain separate. No new private order, incident coordinates, individual responsibility or current status is inferred.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Guatemala, memoria del silencio, TomoVI, case 9 Panzos ↗

Publisher: CEH/UNOPS (Plaza Publica-hosted copy)

Exact passage: Case9,physical13/printed16,mayorcontext;physical17–18/printed20–21,publicresponsesandWalterOverdick/Laugerudreferences.

Source establishes: Onlysource-attestedmayor/presidentcontexts;neitheridentifiedastheorderinglieutenant.

Document date: 1999-06 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Case9selectedphysical13–15,17–18/printed16–18,20–21independentlyreread;notentirevolumeorunderlyingwitness/exhumation/cableauthentication.

Access limitations

Hosted commission report, not a criminal conviction. Different testimony/press counts and earlier IACHR account remain unresolved. Do not name the unnamed ordering lieutenant from the mayor/president entries.

First online publication not established; report/edition and incident clocks are separate.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

valid_prior_A4_source_pin_reused_selected_original_cached_PDF_passages_reread · HR-ARCHIVE-FAMILY-CEH-GT

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-SRC-GT-CEH@aa80448953e78257

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: aa80448953e78257fbf92c8ac8e2516066ba1de16b2a10af58c7065d60b7389e. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Attested1978context,notanewindividualdecisionorcompleteofficeinterval. Calendar year bounds indicate precision only, not verified appointment or departure dates. Historical subject dates are retrospective documentary context, not first-publication evidence. Source document/edition dates and unknown first online publication dates remain separate. No new private order, incident coordinates, individual responsibility or current status is inferred.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

CEH’s53deaths/47injuries and the earlier IACHRmore-than130deaths concern the same Panzós incident with unresolved definitions and disagreement. Do not add them, infer child counts or substitute a mayor/president for the unnamed lieutenant. Preserve the government’s self-defence account and the commission’s contrary conclusion; these are not personal criminal convictions.

Legal distinction

Exact dated judicial/commission/institutional voice retained. No AI verdict, criminal-conviction upgrade, individual guilt from office, current legal status or entire-war personal toll.

Casualty scope: CEH’s Panzós account identifies Walter Overdick as mayor and Laugerud as president in its discussion of the incident and public responses. Those references do not establish complete tenures or make either man the lieutenant who ordered the firing. CEH’s 53 deaths and 47 injuries and the earlier IACHR account of more than 130 deaths concern the same Panzós incident, with unresolved definitions and disagreement. Do not add them, infer child counts or substitute a mayor or president for the unnamed lieutenant. Preserve the government’s self-defence account and the commission’s contrary conclusion; these are not personal criminal convictions.

Record A4-B07-GT-OFFICES · exact wording SHA-256 1a0501dcc2b1404cb552b623eec93a9f973e862431554f52dbf8d8425c2e9436

Report a correction →
decision

CEH attributes the order to fire on the crowd at Panzós on 29 May 1978 to the lieutenant leading the troops. The reviewed passage does not name that lieutenant.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
explicit commission or institutional attribution · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 1978-05-29 · source-attributed historical subject date.

Date basis and original source clocks

Incident/actiondateinCase9;reporteditionis1999,notaprivateordersigningclock. Calendar year bounds indicate precision only, not verified appointment or departure dates. Historical subject dates are retrospective documentary context, not first-publication evidence. Source document/edition dates and unknown first online publication dates remain separate. No new private order, incident coordinates, individual responsibility or current status is inferred.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Guatemala, memoria del silencio, TomoVI, case 9 Panzos ↗

Publisher: CEH/UNOPS (Plaza Publica-hosted copy)

Exact passage: Case9,physical14/printed17,firingparagraphandnotes31–32.

Source establishes: CEHattributesfiringordertothelieutenantleadingtroops;passagedoesnotnamehim.

Document date: 1999-06 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Case9selectedphysical13–15,17–18/printed16–18,20–21independentlyreread;notentirevolumeorunderlyingwitness/exhumation/cableauthentication.

Access limitations

Hosted commission report, not a criminal conviction. Different testimony/press counts and earlier IACHR account remain unresolved. Do not name the unnamed ordering lieutenant from the mayor/president entries.

First online publication not established; report/edition and incident clocks are separate.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

valid_prior_A4_source_pin_reused_selected_original_cached_PDF_passages_reread · HR-ARCHIVE-FAMILY-CEH-GT

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-SRC-GT-CEH@aa80448953e78257

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: aa80448953e78257fbf92c8ac8e2516066ba1de16b2a10af58c7065d60b7389e. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Incident/actiondateinCase9;reporteditionis1999,notaprivateordersigningclock. Calendar year bounds indicate precision only, not verified appointment or departure dates. Historical subject dates are retrospective documentary context, not first-publication evidence. Source document/edition dates and unknown first online publication dates remain separate. No new private order, incident coordinates, individual responsibility or current status is inferred.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

CEH’s53deaths/47injuries and the earlier IACHRmore-than130deaths concern the same Panzós incident with unresolved definitions and disagreement. Do not add them, infer child counts or substitute a mayor/president for the unnamed lieutenant. Preserve the government’s self-defence account and the commission’s contrary conclusion; these are not personal criminal convictions.

Legal distinction

Exact dated judicial/commission/institutional voice retained. No AI verdict, criminal-conviction upgrade, individual guilt from office, current legal status or entire-war personal toll.

Casualty scope: CEH attributes the order to fire on the crowd at Panzós on 29 May 1978 to the lieutenant leading the troops. The reviewed passage does not name that lieutenant. CEH’s 53 deaths and 47 injuries and the earlier IACHR account of more than 130 deaths concern the same Panzós incident, with unresolved definitions and disagreement. Do not add them, infer child counts or substitute a mayor or president for the unnamed lieutenant. Preserve the government’s self-defence account and the commission’s contrary conclusion; these are not personal criminal convictions.

Record A4-B07-GT-ORDER · exact wording SHA-256 2b5a05c6c4d1549694f60a061b5ba1985fcd354ad092d6757b8a0212c726dcf6

Report a correction →
context

On 3 February 2012, the ECCC Supreme Court Chamber dismissed Duch’s defence appeal and replaced his 35-year trial sentence with life imprisonment.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
dated judicial or institutional account · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 2012-02-03 · documented judicial date.

Date basis and original source clocks

F28 cover and disposition; judgment date, not first online publication. Month bounds are calendar coverage only; no first-day appointment or occurrence is asserted. Trial judgment: 2010-07-26. Appeal judgment: 2012-02-03. First online publication: not established. Same-family sources are not independent corroboration.

Sources (2) · exact passages & limitations

Kaing Guek Eav alias Duch, Case 001 Appeal Judgment, F28 ↗

Publisher: Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, Supreme Court Chamber

Exact passage: F28 cover, physical/printed page 1; section VIII Disposition, physical/printed page 320.

Source establishes: The dated appeal dismisses the defence appeal, quashes the formal 35-year trial sentence and enters life imprisonment.

Document date: 2012-02-03 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Cover, selected appellate disposition and relevant dissent paragraphs; not the entire 350-page judgment or later cases.

Access limitations

The formal trial term was 35 years before the five-year unlawful-detention remedy and credit. Partial dissent at pages 323–324 concerns remedy, not whether life imprisonment was warranted.

First online publication date not independently established; judgment date, historical occurrence and retrieval date are separate clocks.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

original_institutional_source_selected_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-FAMILY-ECCC-001

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B02-SRC-KM-F28@3c2bf2f3ca24eaf2

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: Not established. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Kaing Guek Eav: official charged-person profile ↗

Publisher: Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia

Exact passage: Profile chronology, 2012 > 3 February, note 21; Convictions and Sentences > Sentences, 26 July 2010 trial bullet (note 24) and 3 February 2012 appeal bullet (note 25).

Source establishes: The institutional summary confirms the appeal date and life sentence and separately explains the trial’s 35-year term reduced to 30 by the five-year remedy.

Document date: Not established · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Substantive official profile chronology, conviction/sentence sections, final Key Findings bullet and note 36 tooltip; linked underlying Case 002 evidence not independently reviewed.

Access limitations

Same institutional family as the other ECCC sources; attribution is mandatory and does not constitute a new AI determination of guilt.

First online publication date not independently established; judgment date, historical occurrence and retrieval date are separate clocks.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

original_institutional_source_selected_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-FAMILY-ECCC-001

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-SRC-DUCH-PROFILE@81ad627771f76cc1

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: Not established. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

All three sources are in the ECCC Case 001 institutional family; multiple citations are not independent investigations.

Judicial findings retain the named chamber and procedural stage. AI review is neither human editorial approval nor a judicial determination.

No new geographic arc, precise private decision location, or personal whole-conflict death toll is authorised.

Previously reviewed B02 appeal representation remains an alias, not a new historical unit.

Legal distinction

Exact dated judicial/commission/institutional voice retained. No AI verdict, criminal-conviction upgrade, individual guilt from office, current legal status or entire-war personal toll.

Casualty scope: Mixed detainee minimum only, not a national civilian toll or a personal allocation; no sum with later editions.

Record A4-B07-KM-APPEAL · exact wording SHA-256 2d7c9aa3942947b6c3a265a34d87701a634bba802d95f173e5f7e4662da180b0

Report a correction →
human consequence

Paragraph 340 of the ECCC’s 2010 judgment gives a minimum of 12,272 detainees who died or were executed in the S-21 system. The judgment also uses execution wording in its sentencing discussion; this is a source-defined minimum, not a national civilian death toll.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
dated judicial or institutional account · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 2010-07-26 · judicial finding; historical order/casualty dates not established.

Date basis and original source clocks

Inherited case/operation context only; source minimum is not dated death by death. Finding date is 26 July 2010. Replay introduces the dated judicial finding, not a newly dated private order or death. Historical context remains 1975 to 1979-01-07. Trial judgment: 2010-07-26. Appeal judgment: not applicable. First online publication: not established. Same-family sources are not independent corroboration.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Kaing Guek Eav alias Duch, Case 001 Trial Judgment, E188 ↗

Publisher: Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, Trial Chamber

Exact passage: E188 paragraphs 339–341 and note 619, physical PDF page 126 / printed page 120; paragraphs 597–598, physical PDF page 212 / printed page 206.

Source establishes: Paragraph 340 supports a minimum of 12,272 detainees who died or were executed. Paragraphs 597–598 support the observation that sentencing discussion uses execution wording. Note 619 and incomplete enumeration limit precision.

Document date: 2010-07-26 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Selected paragraphs and relevant page context of the original 281-page judgment; not the complete record, underlying orders or prisoner list.

Access limitations

Single source-defined mixed minimum, not an exact complete count, national total, civilian-only population, or individual whole-conflict toll.

First online publication date not independently established; judgment date, historical occurrence and retrieval date are separate clocks.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

original_institutional_source_selected_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-FAMILY-ECCC-001

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-SRC-DUCH-JUDGMENT@e853c917a9801f9a

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: Not established. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

All three sources are in the ECCC Case 001 institutional family; multiple citations are not independent investigations.

Judicial findings retain the named chamber and procedural stage. AI review is neither human editorial approval nor a judicial determination.

No new geographic arc, precise private decision location, or personal whole-conflict death toll is authorised.

Paragraph 340’s mixed died-or-executed definition controls the quantitative display. Paragraph 597’s stronger wording is disclosed without silently upgrading the metric.

Legal distinction

Exact dated judicial/commission/institutional voice retained. No AI verdict, criminal-conviction upgrade, individual guilt from office, current legal status or entire-war personal toll.

Casualty scope: Mixed detainee minimum only, not a national civilian toll or a personal allocation; no sum with later editions.

Record A4-B07-KM-DEATHS · exact wording SHA-256 1c6ed492377c29d303d63036ed2ea2a438481ee7d98bf8f19dce2c29aea88e48

Report a correction →
context

In 2010 the ECCC Trial Chamber rejected Duch’s duress defence, while considering the coercive climate and his position in the hierarchy when sentencing. The Supreme Court Chamber replaced the trial sentence with life imprisonment in 2012.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
dated judicial or institutional account · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 2012-02-03 · combined judicial record; separate trial 2010-07-26 and appeal 2012-02-03.

Date basis and original source clocks

Two judicial dates; never a continuous crime period or private orders clock. This compound statement becomes fully available at the later documented legal stage. The two discrete judgment dates are preserved separately, never as a continuous crime or harm interval. Trial judgment: 2010-07-26. Appeal judgment: 2012-02-03. First online publication: not established. Same-family sources are not independent corroboration.

Sources (2) · exact passages & limitations

Kaing Guek Eav alias Duch, Case 001 Trial Judgment, E188 ↗

Publisher: Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, Trial Chamber

Exact passage: E188 paragraphs 555–558, physical PDF pages 198–199 / printed pages 192–193.

Source establishes: The Trial Chamber rejected duress while separately considering the coercive climate and hierarchical position in sentencing. No appellate proposition is attributed to this trial PDF.

Document date: 2010-07-26 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Selected paragraphs and relevant page context of the original 281-page judgment; not the complete record, underlying orders or prisoner list.

Access limitations

Same institutional family as the other ECCC sources; attribution is mandatory and does not constitute a new AI determination of guilt.

First online publication date not independently established; judgment date, historical occurrence and retrieval date are separate clocks.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

original_institutional_source_selected_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-FAMILY-ECCC-001

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-SRC-DUCH-JUDGMENT@e853c917a9801f9a

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: Not established. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Kaing Guek Eav alias Duch, Case 001 Appeal Judgment, F28 ↗

Publisher: Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, Supreme Court Chamber

Exact passage: F28 cover, physical/printed page 1; section VIII Disposition, physical/printed page 320.

Source establishes: The 2012 Supreme Court Chamber quashed the trial sentence and entered life imprisonment. This appellate disposition is not the source of the trial duress reasoning.

Document date: 2012-02-03 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Cover, selected appellate disposition and relevant dissent paragraphs; not the entire 350-page judgment or later cases.

Access limitations

Same institutional family as the other ECCC sources; attribution is mandatory and does not constitute a new AI determination of guilt.

First online publication date not independently established; judgment date, historical occurrence and retrieval date are separate clocks.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

original_institutional_source_selected_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-FAMILY-ECCC-001

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B02-SRC-KM-F28@3c2bf2f3ca24eaf2

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: Not established. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

All three sources are in the ECCC Case 001 institutional family; multiple citations are not independent investigations.

Judicial findings retain the named chamber and procedural stage. AI review is neither human editorial approval nor a judicial determination.

No new geographic arc, precise private decision location, or personal whole-conflict death toll is authorised.

The inherited native decision ID is provenance linkage to the orders research grouping only. It is not a new 2010 or 2012 Duch order.

Legal distinction

Exact dated judicial/commission/institutional voice retained. No AI verdict, criminal-conviction upgrade, individual guilt from office, current legal status or entire-war personal toll.

Casualty scope: Mixed detainee minimum only, not a national civilian toll or a personal allocation; no sum with later editions.

Record A4-B07-KM-DEFENCE · exact wording SHA-256 242c20787721de50d109db918d0d8159f390c376d5c218573a21e8f3e074acf1

Report a correction →
context

The ECCC Trial Chamber found that Duch was S-21 deputy from October 1975 to March 1976 and chairman from March 1976 until its abandonment on 7 January 1979.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
dated judicial or institutional account · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 1975-10 to 1979-01-07 · source-defined tenure span.

Date basis and original source clocks

E188 paragraph 530; two office intervals, not a single appointment on an invented day. Month bounds are calendar coverage only; no first-day appointment or occurrence is asserted. Trial judgment: 2010-07-26. Appeal judgment: not applicable. First online publication: not established. Same-family sources are not independent corroboration.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Kaing Guek Eav alias Duch, Case 001 Trial Judgment, E188 ↗

Publisher: Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, Trial Chamber

Exact passage: E188 paragraph 530, physical PDF page 189 / printed page 183.

Source establishes: Trial Chamber findings on Duch’s deputy period from October 1975 to March 1976 and chairmanship from March 1976 to abandonment on 7 January 1979.

Document date: 2010-07-26 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Selected paragraphs and relevant page context of the original 281-page judgment; not the complete record, underlying orders or prisoner list.

Access limitations

Same institutional family as the other ECCC sources; attribution is mandatory and does not constitute a new AI determination of guilt.

First online publication date not independently established; judgment date, historical occurrence and retrieval date are separate clocks.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

original_institutional_source_selected_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-FAMILY-ECCC-001

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-SRC-DUCH-JUDGMENT@e853c917a9801f9a

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: Not established. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

All three sources are in the ECCC Case 001 institutional family; multiple citations are not independent investigations.

Judicial findings retain the named chamber and procedural stage. AI review is neither human editorial approval nor a judicial determination.

No new geographic arc, precise private decision location, or personal whole-conflict death toll is authorised.

The profile’s 6 January cessation and 7 January fleeing are distinct events; they do not replace the quoted trial finding of abandonment on 7 January.

Legal distinction

Exact dated judicial/commission/institutional voice retained. No AI verdict, criminal-conviction upgrade, individual guilt from office, current legal status or entire-war personal toll.

Casualty scope: Mixed detainee minimum only, not a national civilian toll or a personal allocation; no sum with later editions.

Record A4-B07-KM-OFFICE · exact wording SHA-256 d32a51f10230e8d8797741df2515c9b0ff0f8c03dd35eddeccfef166b5039ed4

Report a correction →
decision

The ECCC’s 2010 Trial Chamber judgment found that Duch issued, passed down or transmitted orders to S-21 staff to arrest, torture and execute detainees, substantially contributing to crimes later committed there.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
dated judicial or institutional account · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 2010-07-26 · judicial finding; historical order/casualty dates not established.

Date basis and original source clocks

Paragraph 530 bounds tenure only. Paragraph 531 supports the orders finding, not a dated private authorisation. Replay introduces the dated judicial finding, not a newly dated private order or death. Historical context remains 1975-10 to 1979-01-07. Trial judgment: 2010-07-26. Appeal judgment: not applicable. First online publication: not established. Same-family sources are not independent corroboration.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Kaing Guek Eav alias Duch, Case 001 Trial Judgment, E188 ↗

Publisher: Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, Trial Chamber

Exact passage: E188 paragraph 531, physical PDF page 190 / printed page 184; tenure context only in paragraph 530, physical 189 / printed 183.

Source establishes: The court expressly found issuance, passage or transmission of arrest, torture and execution orders and substantial contribution; office holding alone is not the evidentiary basis.

Document date: 2010-07-26 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Selected paragraphs and relevant page context of the original 281-page judgment; not the complete record, underlying orders or prisoner list.

Access limitations

High-risk personal criminal conduct is reported as an identified judicial finding, not an AI verdict. Exact individual order dates, signing sites and underlying orders have not been authenticated.

First online publication date not independently established; judgment date, historical occurrence and retrieval date are separate clocks.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

original_institutional_source_selected_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-FAMILY-ECCC-001

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-SRC-DUCH-JUDGMENT@e853c917a9801f9a

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: Not established. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

All three sources are in the ECCC Case 001 institutional family; multiple citations are not independent investigations.

Judicial findings retain the named chamber and procedural stage. AI review is neither human editorial approval nor a judicial determination.

No new geographic arc, precise private decision location, or personal whole-conflict death toll is authorised.

No new uncorroborated allegation: the primary words expressly attribute the finding to the 2010 Trial Chamber. No underlying order authentication claimed.

Legal distinction

Exact dated judicial/commission/institutional voice retained. No AI verdict, criminal-conviction upgrade, individual guilt from office, current legal status or entire-war personal toll.

Casualty scope: Mixed detainee minimum only, not a national civilian toll or a personal allocation; no sum with later editions.

Record A4-B07-KM-ORDERS · exact wording SHA-256 40fd9e91e4257f9dbc3463bd713f6a9ced153cd2300aeb505b86b810b397d074

Report a correction →
context

The ECCC’s official Duch profile dates the move of S-21 detainees to the former Pohnea Yat school in Phnom Penh to April 1976.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
dated judicial or institutional account · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 1976-04 · month precision; exact day unknown.

Date basis and original source clocks

Profile April 1976 entry; no day supplied. Month bounds are calendar coverage only; no first-day appointment or occurrence is asserted. Trial judgment: not applicable. Appeal judgment: not applicable. First online publication: not established. Same-family sources are not independent corroboration.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Kaing Guek Eav: official charged-person profile ↗

Publisher: Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia

Exact passage: Official profile chronology, 1976 > April, note 13.

Source establishes: The official profile places the transfer of detainees to the former Pohnea Yat school in Phnom Penh in April 1976.

Document date: Not established · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Substantive official profile chronology, conviction/sentence sections, final Key Findings bullet and note 36 tooltip; linked underlying Case 002 evidence not independently reviewed.

Access limitations

An institutional timeline summary, not a newly authenticated transfer order; exact day and private authorisation date/location not established.

First online publication date not independently established; judgment date, historical occurrence and retrieval date are separate clocks.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

original_institutional_source_selected_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-FAMILY-ECCC-001

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-SRC-DUCH-PROFILE@81ad627771f76cc1

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: Not established. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

All three sources are in the ECCC Case 001 institutional family; multiple citations are not independent investigations.

Judicial findings retain the named chamber and procedural stage. AI review is neither human editorial approval nor a judicial determination.

No new geographic arc, precise private decision location, or personal whole-conflict death toll is authorised.

The native event ID is a case grouping; the relocation claim does not assert that all grouped harms occurred on the relocation date.

Legal distinction

Exact dated judicial/commission/institutional voice retained. No AI verdict, criminal-conviction upgrade, individual guilt from office, current legal status or entire-war personal toll.

Casualty scope: Mixed detainee minimum only, not a national civilian toll or a personal allocation; no sum with later editions.

Record A4-B07-KM-RELOCATION · exact wording SHA-256 9f35257f4216f3700333c8b80276b7e3cb0df675aac5b3beff38d15f23995dea

Report a correction →
human consequence

The Truth Commission’s account states that Archbishop Romero was shot and killed at the Hospital de la Divina Providencia chapel on 24 March 1980.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
explicit commission or institutional attribution · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 1980-03-24 · source-attributed single-event occurrence, not report publication.

Date basis and original source clocks

The 1980 occurrence, 1984–1993 procedural context, 1993 commission report/circulation and 2000 IACHR report are separate clocks. Calendar context bounds are not exact incident dates; first online publication remains unknown. State responsibility is not individual criminal conviction.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

S/25500, Commission on the Truth for El Salvador ↗

Publisher: United Nations

Exact passage: S/25500physical/printed130–131,killing narrative before Findings and Finding1(c)

Source establishes: 24March1980shooting death at chapel,one person only.

Document date: 1993-03-15 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Original scanned pages129–131andcovervisually read. Empty extraction was not treated as text evidence. No full252-page review or independent authentication of underlying witnesses/diary.

Access limitations

Truth Commission finding, not a personal criminal conviction. Report presented15March1993, transmitting letter29March, UNcirculation1April. Alleged gunman identification remained contested.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

valid_prior_A4_independent_pin_and_scope_reused_with_targeted_binding_clarification · HR-ARCHIVE-FAMILY-UN-S25500

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-SRC-SV-UN-ORIGINAL@adc3936229872fef

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: adc3936229872fefe80644f545d12530e59d93a966371d25b42100e827ce7df5. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Source-attributed commission/institutional account; no individual criminal conviction, identified gunman or current legal-status conclusion is inferred.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Commission attribution of the assassination order/organisation and IACHRstate responsibility are distinct from individual criminal conviction. The gunman is not established as Regalado or Saravia. Preserve contrary accounts and the difference between the1980event,1993report and2000IACHRfinding; paragraph157is on the official continuation page.

Legal distinction

Exact dated judicial/commission/institutional voice retained. No AI verdict, criminal-conviction upgrade, individual guilt from office, current legal status or entire-war personal toll.

Casualty scope: One reported death in this specific event only. No wider war total, personal perpetrator allocation or inferred injured count.

Record A4-B07-SV-DEAD · exact wording SHA-256 199963aaf323f6d8b37cd076b56705b97a398d79ba6b7bc56358e65c8bc13f10

Report a correction →
context

The Truth Commission records D’Aubuisson’s claim blaming guerrillas and a 1988 ruling rejecting Garay’s testimony. It also records Regalado’s denial and the investigative commission’s lack of convincing evidence that he participated; this review does not identify him as the gunman.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
explicit commission or institutional attribution · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 1984–1993 · source-defined defence/procedural context; individual dates are not established by these bounds.

Date basis and original source clocks

The 1980 occurrence, 1984–1993 procedural context, 1993 commission report/circulation and 2000 IACHR report are separate clocks. Calendar context bounds are not exact incident dates; first online publication remains unknown. State responsibility is not individual criminal conviction.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

S/25500, Commission on the Truth for El Salvador ↗

Publisher: United Nations

Exact passage: S/25500physical/printed129–130,accusations,Supreme Court ruling and alleged-gunman sections

Source establishes: Contrary guerrilla-blame account,1988testimony ruling and lack of convincing gunman identification.

Document date: 1993-03-15 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Original scanned pages129–131andcovervisually read. Empty extraction was not treated as text evidence. No full252-page review or independent authentication of underlying witnesses/diary.

Access limitations

Truth Commission finding, not a personal criminal conviction. Report presented15March1993, transmitting letter29March, UNcirculation1April. Alleged gunman identification remained contested.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

valid_prior_A4_independent_pin_and_scope_reused_with_targeted_binding_clarification · HR-ARCHIVE-FAMILY-UN-S25500

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-SRC-SV-UN-ORIGINAL@adc3936229872fef

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: adc3936229872fefe80644f545d12530e59d93a966371d25b42100e827ce7df5. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Source-attributed commission/institutional account; no individual criminal conviction, identified gunman or current legal-status conclusion is inferred.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Commission attribution of the assassination order/organisation and IACHRstate responsibility are distinct from individual criminal conviction. The gunman is not established as Regalado or Saravia. Preserve contrary accounts and the difference between the1980event,1993report and2000IACHRfinding; paragraph157is on the official continuation page.

Legal distinction

Exact dated judicial/commission/institutional voice retained. No AI verdict, criminal-conviction upgrade, individual guilt from office, current legal status or entire-war personal toll.

Casualty scope: One reported death in this specific event only. No wider war total, personal perpetrator allocation or inferred injured count.

Record A4-B07-SV-DEFENCE · exact wording SHA-256 1f375e3328377797ed33959fd3b82bc55f9051eb08c4e29f1a29bb783a9e7cb7

Report a correction →
context

In Report 37/00 of 13 April 2000, the IACHR concluded that El Salvador violated Romero’s right to life and, to the detriment of his relatives, judicial guarantees and effective judicial protection. This is a finding of state responsibility, not a criminal conviction of D’Aubuisson.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
explicit commission or institutional attribution · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 2000-04-13 · dated IACHR state-responsibility report, not a personal criminal conviction or first online publication.

Date basis and original source clocks

The 1980 occurrence, 1984–1993 procedural context, 1993 commission report/circulation and 2000 IACHR report are separate clocks. Calendar context bounds are not exact incident dates; first online publication remains unknown. State responsibility is not individual criminal conviction.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

IACHR Report37/00, Case11.481, Romero — official continuation ↗

Publisher: Inter-American Commission on Human Rights

Exact passage: ElSalvador11.481a.htm,sectionVII,paragraph157

Source establishes: Exact state responsibility conclusion,right to life and relatives’ judicial rights. First page does not contain this paragraph.

Document date: 2000-04-13 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Original official continuation body newly read through web reader; no payload capture or source-byte match asserted.

Access limitations

Direct official body read, but no cached payload hash. Findings are as-of2000, not current procedural status or a personal criminal conviction.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

valid_prior_A4_independent_pin_and_scope_reused_with_targeted_binding_clarification · HR-ARCHIVE-FAMILY-IACHR-SV-ROMERO

Edition: A4-SRC-SV-IACHR-CONTINUATION@web-20261029

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: Not established. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Source-attributed commission/institutional account; no individual criminal conviction, identified gunman or current legal-status conclusion is inferred.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Commission attribution of the assassination order/organisation and IACHRstate responsibility are distinct from individual criminal conviction. The gunman is not established as Regalado or Saravia. Preserve contrary accounts and the difference between the1980event,1993report and2000IACHRfinding; paragraph157is on the official continuation page.

Legal distinction

Exact dated judicial/commission/institutional voice retained. No AI verdict, criminal-conviction upgrade, individual guilt from office, current legal status or entire-war personal toll.

Casualty scope: One reported death in this specific event only. No wider war total, personal perpetrator allocation or inferred injured count.

Record A4-B07-SV-STATE · exact wording SHA-256 8005e941a70f7d2a3c7fe3d59ab4ffd60b09eb774caab55e9e31ec6cab74c53a

Report a correction →
context

In his 19 October 1976 telegram, Ambassador Robert Hill reported Guzzetti’s account of an earlier U.S. visit and assessed that he had returned convinced human-rights concerns would not cause a serious confrontation with Washington.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record or identified copy · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 1976-10-19 · dated diplomatic telegram.

Date basis and original source clocks

Dated telegram and assessment; reported 15 October conversation is separate, not a proven downstream consequence Source document and first-online publication clocks are separate. Later contrary accounts are introduced on their own documentary dates. No operational order, personal casualty attribution or new geography is inferred.

Sources (2) · exact passages & limitations

Telegram6871, FRUS1969-1976 volE11 part2 doc57 ↗

Publisher: US Ambassador Robert C.Hill; State Department archival transcription

Exact passage: paras1,4,6,9; pp172-174

Source establishes: FRUSdoc57paragraphs1–9distinguish the15Octoberconversation,19Octobertelegram, Guzzetti’s retrospective account and Hill’s own comment. Doc58contests that interpretation; no Argentine cabinet transcript or independently established policy consequence is claimed.

Document date: 1976-10-19 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Same volume document57,telegram6871,19October1976,paragraphs1–9especially9

Access limitations

Guzzetti’s account nested in Hill’s report; Hill’s comment is an assessment, not an Argentine cabinet transcript. Departmentreply disputes the interpretation.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

official_primary_source_selected_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B02-FAMILY-US-AR1976

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B02-SRC-AR-FRUS57@193b749fb301cfbc

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 193b749fb301cfbc14141adc5e869389e16501e6b25b1e3ad4b001bff40c3004. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_qualified_wording

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Telegram262786, FRUS1969-1976 volE11 part2 doc58 ↗

Publisher: US State Department; drafted Shlaudeman, approved Kissinger and Robinson

Exact passage: Telegram262786,22October1976, paragraphs1–4

Source establishes: FRUSdoc57paragraphs1–9distinguish the15Octoberconversation,19Octobertelegram, Guzzetti’s retrospective account and Hill’s own comment. Doc58contests that interpretation; no Argentine cabinet transcript or independently established policy consequence is claimed.

Document date: 1976-10-22 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Same volume document58,telegram262786,22October1976,paragraphs1–4

Access limitations

Interested official account of what was conveyed; neither misunderstanding nor implementation is independently adjudicated.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

official_primary_source_selected_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B02-FAMILY-US-AR1976

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B02-SRC-AR-FRUS58@7fb784366c25ed68

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 7fb784366c25ed6820cbaf76dc445781d36292f210341fc53e9267a6bba10fc4. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: contrary_official_interpretation

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Report of speech and ambassador interpretation; not a cabinet transcript, victim tally or judicial finding.

These are dated diplomatic records and differing official interpretations, not documented operational orders, a complete policy account or personal allocation of Argentine casualties. Keep the encouragement, human-rights warnings and contradictory October reply together. The June memorandum’s original date and the editors’ calendar-based meeting date differ.

Legal distinction

Diplomatic messaging, attributed official position or partial judicial dissent only. Not initiation, a killing order, acquittal or new criminal classification.

Casualty scope: No new casualty observation, alternative numeric count, personal allocation or change to existing source-defined observations.

Record A4-B12-B02-AR-HILL-ASSESSMENT · exact wording SHA-256 82e4bf2b13b62f656692009d1b23823d248a730eecc8b708ab805618f3040834

Report a correction →
context

The published U.S. memorandum of the 10 June 1976 Kissinger–Guzzetti meeting records Kissinger offering support and urging that necessary actions be done quickly, while also urging a quick return to normal procedures and saying U.S. help on the “terrorist front” was limited.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record or identified copy · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 1976-06-10 · dated diplomatic meeting.

Date basis and original source clocks

FRUS editors date the meeting from calendar evidence; original memorandum date 1976-06-06 remains separately recorded Source document and first-online publication clocks are separate. Later contrary accounts are introduced on their own documentary dates. No operational order, personal casualty attribution or new geography is inferred.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Memorandum of conversation, FRUS1969-1976 volE11 part2 doc48 ↗

Publisher: US State Department, official archival transcription

Exact passage: pp138-141, Secretary turns and source note1

Source establishes: FRUSdoc48printed138–141contains both encouragement and limits. Its source note says the original memorandum was dated6June but editors date the meeting10Junefrom the Secretary’s calendar. This is recorded diplomatic messaging, not a documented order for Argentine killings.

Document date: 1976-06-06 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: FRUS1969–1976VolumeE11Part2document48,printed138–141and source-note1

Access limitations

Meeting editor-dated10June1976from calendar although original memorandum says6June. No unrecorded private conversation or operational killing instruction inferred.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

official_primary_source_selected_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B02-FAMILY-US-AR1976

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B02-SRC-AR-FRUS48@ce362db2173e9bad

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: ce362db2173e9badad5f67a6a478533fb901d9379b88533d7eee26195fb4db6f. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_qualified_wording

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Diplomatic encouragement is documented; an order to abduct, torture or kill a particular victim is not established. Memo datedJune6; archival editor usesJune10 calendar evidence. Unrecorded private segment remains unknown.

These are dated diplomatic records and differing official interpretations, not documented operational orders, a complete policy account or personal allocation of Argentine casualties. Keep the encouragement, human-rights warnings and contradictory October reply together. The June memorandum’s original date and the editors’ calendar-based meeting date differ.

Legal distinction

Diplomatic messaging, attributed official position or partial judicial dissent only. Not initiation, a killing order, acquittal or new criminal classification.

Casualty scope: No new casualty observation, alternative numeric count, personal allocation or change to existing source-defined observations.

Record A4-B12-B02-AR-JUNE-MESSAGING · exact wording SHA-256 2e604f7838369147e799d20a671200b499fa3dbbe54bc355171abc3f16b442d5

Report a correction →
context

The U.S. record of the 7 October 1976 meeting records Kissinger expressing support for Argentine success and urging speed, while saying restoration of freedoms would help. It also records discussion of U.S. votes on Argentine loans.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record or identified copy · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 1976-10-07 · dated diplomatic meeting.

Date basis and original source clocks

Recorded diplomatic meeting; contrary 22 October interpretation remains separately available, not backdated to this meeting Source document and first-online publication clocks are separate. Later contrary accounts are introduced on their own documentary dates. No operational order, personal casualty attribution or new geography is inferred.

Sources (2) · exact passages & limitations

Memorandum of conversation, FRUS1969-1976 volE11 part2 doc56 ↗

Publisher: US State Department, official archival transcription

Exact passage: printedp170, Secretary turns beginning Look and The human rights problem; p171; source note1

Source establishes: FRUSdoc56printed169–171contains the encouragement, Congressclock, freedoms and loan discussion; the full relevant exchanges and source note were read. Subsequentdoc58disputes Guzzetti’s interpretation of U.S. warnings. No operational killing instruction or guaranteed loan delivery is inferred.

Document date: 1976-10-07 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Same volume document56,printed169–171and source note1, meeting7October1976

Access limitations

Recorded diplomatic messaging, not an attack order, proven benefit or agreement that abuses were lawful. Later official interpretations conflict.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

official_primary_source_selected_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B02-FAMILY-US-AR1976

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B02-SRC-AR-FRUS56@44c3e4534566134d

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 44c3e4534566134d983b8fbd3de6d878ec8a52531e86b9fa5eae56eba2d75a63. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_qualified_wording

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Telegram262786, FRUS1969-1976 volE11 part2 doc58 ↗

Publisher: US State Department; drafted Shlaudeman, approved Kissinger and Robinson

Exact passage: Telegram262786,22October1976, paragraphs1–4

Source establishes: FRUSdoc56printed169–171contains the encouragement, Congressclock, freedoms and loan discussion; the full relevant exchanges and source note were read. Subsequentdoc58disputes Guzzetti’s interpretation of U.S. warnings. No operational killing instruction or guaranteed loan delivery is inferred.

Document date: 1976-10-22 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Same volume document58,telegram262786,22October1976,paragraphs1–4

Access limitations

Interested official account of what was conveyed; neither misunderstanding nor implementation is independently adjudicated.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

official_primary_source_selected_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B02-FAMILY-US-AR1976

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B02-SRC-AR-FRUS58@7fb784366c25ed68

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 7fb784366c25ed6820cbaf76dc445781d36292f210341fc53e9267a6bba10fc4. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: contrary_official_interpretation

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Preserve all parts of the recorded message. No downstream kidnapping order or allocated casualty total established by this memorandum.

These are dated diplomatic records and differing official interpretations, not documented operational orders, a complete policy account or personal allocation of Argentine casualties. Keep the encouragement, human-rights warnings and contradictory October reply together. The June memorandum’s original date and the editors’ calendar-based meeting date differ.

Legal distinction

Diplomatic messaging, attributed official position or partial judicial dissent only. Not initiation, a killing order, acquittal or new criminal classification.

Casualty scope: No new casualty observation, alternative numeric count, personal allocation or change to existing source-defined observations.

Record A4-B12-B02-AR-OCT-MESSAGING · exact wording SHA-256 2390aea27efb3b65c65426c459a6da2d2a20068de9591d2d1719fb54fbe00e83

Report a correction →
context

The State Department’s 22 October 1976 reply disputed Guzzetti’s interpretation, saying U.S. officials had conveyed serious concern about Argentine security-force abuses. It described loan voting as conditional on conditions improving.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record or identified copy · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 1976-10-22 · dated diplomatic telegram.

Date basis and original source clocks

Dated contrary official reply; not a finding that either interpretation or implementation is independently established Source document and first-online publication clocks are separate. Later contrary accounts are introduced on their own documentary dates. No operational order, personal casualty attribution or new geography is inferred.

Sources (2) · exact passages & limitations

Telegram262786, FRUS1969-1976 volE11 part2 doc58 ↗

Publisher: US State Department; drafted Shlaudeman, approved Kissinger and Robinson

Exact passage: paras1-4, pp174-175; source note1

Source establishes: FRUSdoc58paragraphs1–4states the reply from AssistantSecretaryShlaudemantoAmbassadorHill, distinguishes arrest/trial from disappearance/shooting and requests continued warnings. It is the Department’s official account, not proof that recipients understood or implemented it.

Document date: 1976-10-22 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Same volume document58,telegram262786,22October1976,paragraphs1–4

Access limitations

Interested official account of what was conveyed; neither misunderstanding nor implementation is independently adjudicated.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

official_primary_source_selected_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B02-FAMILY-US-AR1976

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B02-SRC-AR-FRUS58@7fb784366c25ed68

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 7fb784366c25ed6820cbaf76dc445781d36292f210341fc53e9267a6bba10fc4. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_qualified_wording

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Telegram6871, FRUS1969-1976 volE11 part2 doc57 ↗

Publisher: US Ambassador Robert C.Hill; State Department archival transcription

Exact passage: Telegram6871,19October1976, paragraphs1–9, especially9

Source establishes: FRUSdoc58paragraphs1–4states the reply from AssistantSecretaryShlaudemantoAmbassadorHill, distinguishes arrest/trial from disappearance/shooting and requests continued warnings. It is the Department’s official account, not proof that recipients understood or implemented it.

Document date: 1976-10-19 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Same volume document57,telegram6871,19October1976,paragraphs1–9especially9

Access limitations

Guzzetti’s account nested in Hill’s report; Hill’s comment is an assessment, not an Argentine cabinet transcript. Departmentreply disputes the interpretation.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

official_primary_source_selected_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B02-FAMILY-US-AR1976

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B02-SRC-AR-FRUS57@193b749fb301cfbc

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 193b749fb301cfbc14141adc5e869389e16501e6b25b1e3ad4b001bff40c3004. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: contrasting_ambassador_assessment

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Contrary official account retained alongside the memoranda and Hill report. Signature or approval does not prove personal authorship of each phrase.

These are dated diplomatic records and differing official interpretations, not documented operational orders, a complete policy account or personal allocation of Argentine casualties. Keep the encouragement, human-rights warnings and contradictory October reply together. The June memorandum’s original date and the editors’ calendar-based meeting date differ.

Legal distinction

Diplomatic messaging, attributed official position or partial judicial dissent only. Not initiation, a killing order, acquittal or new criminal classification.

Casualty scope: No new casualty observation, alternative numeric count, personal allocation or change to existing source-defined observations.

Record A4-B12-B02-AR-WASHINGTON-REPLY · exact wording SHA-256 aff7beb6b115bfc4136cb87c6d44cf6f43c587adb053ac72bb135da8d3441d58

Report a correction →
context

Ambassador Ortiz’s telegram of 3 October 1979 records President Lucas García saying the Panzós shooting predated his term, resulted from troops panicking and had an exaggerated reported death toll. These were Lucas’s explanations, not verified findings.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record or identified copy · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 1979-10-03 · dated diplomatic telegram.

Date basis and original source clocks

Dated telegram recording2October conversation; not a new 1979 massacre or verified alternative casualty count Source document and first-online publication clocks are separate. Later contrary accounts are introduced on their own documentary dates. No operational order, personal casualty attribution or new geography is inferred.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Telegram6616, Embassy Guatemala to Department of State, FRUS1977-1980 volXV doc35 ↗

Publisher: US Embassy Guatemala; official State Department archival transcription

Exact passage: para11, pp100-101; opening datesOctober3 cable, October2 meeting

Source establishes: FRUSdoc35paragraph11records the position during2Octobermeeting; CEH and IACHR attributed findings already reviewed inBatch07 supply distinct contrary accounts and counts. No original inquiry establishing Lucas’s explanation was read.

Document date: 1979-10-03 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: FRUS1977–1980VolumeXVdocument35,telegram6616,3October1979,paragraphs7–14especially8–9and11

Access limitations

Lucas’s Panzósexplanation is an official position; implication about Cancinos is expressly the ambassador’s interpretation and lacks a documented act/order. Existing CEH/IACHRcontrary findings remain separately reviewed, not overwritten.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

official_primary_source_selected_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B02-FAMILY-US-GT1979

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B02-SRC-GT-FRUS35@e5233e0b63325537

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: e5233e0b63325537493ecd4ac5f92af85bb2666b11bcccc023d6125df7b73ea3. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_qualified_wording

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

The denial is attributed, not accepted as truth. It supplies no numerical alternative. It is not a personal order by Lucas or proof of Laugerud’s personal order.

Lucas García’s explanation is an attributed official position; it does not override the separately reviewed CEH or IACHR findings. Ortiz’s interpretation of an implication about another murder is not a documented personal instruction or a finding of guilt.

Legal distinction

Diplomatic messaging, attributed official position or partial judicial dissent only. Not initiation, a killing order, acquittal or new criminal classification.

Casualty scope: No new casualty observation, alternative numeric count, personal allocation or change to existing source-defined observations.

Record A4-B12-B02-GT-DENIAL · exact wording SHA-256 d6c38a89aa9d222128b6f2053a5e0153c5ad530c79861dc303052dd15bae9b3f

Report a correction →
context

In Duch’s 2012 appeal, the two partially dissenting judges agreed that life imprisonment was warranted but disagreed with denying a remedy for his unlawful pretrial detention. Their dissent did not seek an acquittal.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record or identified copy · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 2012-02-03 · dated partial dissent.

Date basis and original source clocks

Dated partial dissent, not the historical incident or an acquittal Source document and first-online publication clocks are separate. Later contrary accounts are introduced on their own documentary dates. No operational order, personal casualty attribution or new geography is inferred.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Kaing Guek Eav alias Duch, Case001 appeal judgment F28 ↗

Publisher: ECCC Supreme Court Chamber

Exact passage: IX.Partially dissenting joint opinion paras1-4, PDFpp323-324

Source establishes: F28physical323–324, partialjointdissentparagraphs1–4 expressly state concurrence on life and disagreement on detention remedy. The majority’s attribution/remedy approach and the dissent remain separate.

Document date: 2012-02-03 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Physical/printed323–324, partial joint dissent paragraphs1–4

Access limitations

Partial dissent on detention remedy; majority outcome, concurrence on life and disagreement on remedy distinguished. Not an acquittal.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

official_primary_source_selected_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-FAMILY-ECCC-001

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B02-SRC-KM-F28@3c2bf2f3ca24eaf2

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 3c2bf2f3ca24eaf222389981d1a0052a7ccd679be3f8bb906d1495ca89e88d36. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_qualified_wording

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Dissent concerns remedy for detention, not an acquittal or rejection of S-21 crimes.

A partial dissent on the remedy for unlawful pretrial detention is distinct from the majority’s disposition and from the convictions. It did not reject life imprisonment or seek an acquittal.

Legal distinction

Diplomatic messaging, attributed official position or partial judicial dissent only. Not initiation, a killing order, acquittal or new criminal classification.

Casualty scope: No new casualty observation, alternative numeric count, personal allocation or change to existing source-defined observations.

Record A4-B12-B02-KM-DISSENT · exact wording SHA-256 fde03b1b8c5d26c2ddd3f6c98d9463629c8d2c00810fc5d7b7886f25667f43e3

Report a correction →
context

The judgment signed on 19 November 2004 in Doe v. Saravia awarded J. Doe ten million U.S. dollars against Álvaro Rafael Saravia after default and an evidentiary hearing. It was filed and entered on the civil docket on 24 November.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record or identified copy · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 2004-11-19 · civil judgment signature; filing/entry24November is separate.

Date basis and original source clocks

The assassination subject day24March1980, civil judgment signature19November2004 and findings filing24November2004 remain separate. Retrospective civil findings replay at their filing date, not as newly occurring acts. Exact individual instruction, completion and payment dates and first online publication remain unknown.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

J.Doe v Alvaro Rafael Saravia, CIV-F-03-6249 OWW LJO, Judgment ↗

Publisher: US District Court, Eastern District of California; CJA hosted scan

Exact passage: PDFpp1-3: default/hearing and relief p1; signature p2; civil docket certificate p3

Source establishes: Allthreejudgmentscanpagesvisuallyread:page1default13April/hearing24Augustand2–3September,amount;page2signature/date;page3service24November. Compensatory/punitive components are not separatejudgments. No criminal conviction, payment or present enforcement is established.

Document date: 2004-11-19 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: All3physicalpages;1default/hearing/award,2signature19November2004,3filing/service24November2004

Access limitations

Civil default plus evidentiary hearing, not personal criminal conviction. No present payment/enforcement, redacted plaintiff identity or private-address export.

Original institutional document URL: Not established. Identified reviewed copy URL ↗. A hosted copy does not establish original institutional custody.

Provenance, custody and reuse

identified_primary_document_copy_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B02-FAMILY-SARAVIA2004

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B02-SRC-SV-JUDGMENT@2973181f05321dfe

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 2973181f05321dfe3b8e815da2a0a17e8e4dfb0ab93c0d73cd0496b515dd75b6. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_qualified_wording

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Redacted civil court copies hosted by plaintiff counsel; not court-hosted original custody or authenticated underlying testimony. No map connection activated.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

SignedNovember19, filedNovember24; counsel describes oral rulingSeptember3. No criminal conviction, current fugitive status or damages recovery inferred. Monetary relief is not a casualty quantity.

These are redacted U.S. civil court documents hosted by plaintiff counsel CJA. The judgment followed default and an evidentiary hearing; the findings cite testimony, complaint and earlier Commission material. They are not individual criminal convictions or proof of later payment/enforcement. The 19 November signature and 24 November filing/service dates are distinct. No redactions, victim identities or private addresses are reconstructed or exported.

Legal distinction

Source-attributed civil default judgment and evidentiary findings; not an individual criminal conviction. D’Aubuisson was not the defendant in this judgment. No present payment, enforcement, fugitive status, unnamed shooter identity or redacted identity is inferred.

Casualty scope: Same single Romero death already recorded in A4-B07-SV-DEAD; this additional court account is not a second victim or observation. The monetary civil award is not a casualty quantity. No personal toll or wider conflict total.

Record A4-B12-B02-SV-CIVIL-JUDGMENT · exact wording SHA-256 752b38fc501edaf08190bae53c36eeb9bde07e02e2c21ec26e48a09b44ac3232

Report a correction →
human consequence

The civil court’s findings record Archbishop Romero being shot at the Hospital of Divine Providence chapel on 24 March 1980 and pronounced dead on arrival at the Policlínica.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record or identified copy · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 1980-03-24 · source-attributed occurrence; same previously recorded death.

Date basis and original source clocks

The assassination subject day24March1980, civil judgment signature19November2004 and findings filing24November2004 remain separate. Retrospective civil findings replay at their filing date, not as newly occurring acts. Exact individual instruction, completion and payment dates and first online publication remain unknown.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

J.Doe v Saravia, redacted Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law ↗

Publisher: US District Court, Eastern District of California; CJA hosted scan

Exact passage: paras40-42 p12; paras50-52 p14

Source establishes: Findingsparagraph40and42physical12and50–52physical14support the site and outcome; the instantdeathradioaccount repeated inparagraph44is a different reported statement, not substituted for the court’s arrival account.

Document date: Not established · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Physical1courtidentity/file-stamp;10–14paragraphs34–52;35–42instruction/shooting;47–48completion/payment;50–52death

Access limitations

Redacted original court-document scan hosted by plaintiff counsel CJA, not court-hosted bytes. Civildefaultrecord draws on complaint, testimony and prior Commission material; full93pages and hearing transcripts not wholly reviewed.

Original institutional document URL: Not established. Identified reviewed copy URL ↗. A hosted copy does not establish original institutional custody.

Provenance, custody and reuse

identified_primary_document_copy_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B02-FAMILY-SARAVIA2004

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B02-SRC-SV-FINDINGS@a1f05950d9817470

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: a1f05950d981747096e24b31b9360361304ee467e4cb41abab2428cc9030ad67. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_qualified_wording

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Redacted civil court copies hosted by plaintiff counsel; not court-hosted original custody or authenticated underlying testimony. No map connection activated.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Same single death already recorded in B01; not an additional victim.

These are redacted U.S. civil court documents hosted by plaintiff counsel CJA. The judgment followed default and an evidentiary hearing; the findings cite testimony, complaint and earlier Commission material. They are not individual criminal convictions or proof of later payment/enforcement. The 19 November signature and 24 November filing/service dates are distinct. No redactions, victim identities or private addresses are reconstructed or exported.

Legal distinction

Source-attributed civil default judgment and evidentiary findings; not an individual criminal conviction. D’Aubuisson was not the defendant in this judgment. No present payment, enforcement, fugitive status, unnamed shooter identity or redacted identity is inferred.

Casualty scope: Same single Romero death already recorded in A4-B07-SV-DEAD; this additional court account is not a second victim or observation. The monetary civil award is not a casualty quantity. No personal toll or wider conflict total.

Record A4-B12-B02-SV-DEATH · exact wording SHA-256 b6947c9129280a9c516abf0d3ff273963b1986423db818bfdcf7979bf21b6e46

Report a correction →
decision

The U.S. civil court’s 2004 findings in Doe v. Saravia recount Garay’s testimony that Saravia directed him to drive an armed man who then shot Archbishop Romero.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record or identified copy · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 2004-11-24 · retrospective civil findings filed;1980subject, exact individual instruction/completion/payment times not established.

Date basis and original source clocks

The assassination subject day24March1980, civil judgment signature19November2004 and findings filing24November2004 remain separate. Retrospective civil findings replay at their filing date, not as newly occurring acts. Exact individual instruction, completion and payment dates and first online publication remain unknown.

Sources (2) · exact passages & limitations

J.Doe v Saravia, redacted Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law ↗

Publisher: US District Court, Eastern District of California; CJA hosted scan

Exact passage: paras35-42, PDF/printedpp11-12

Source establishes: Scannedfindingsparagraphs35–42,physical11–12state the instruction, weapon and shooting. The court record draws on testimony, complaint and earlier Commission material; underlying transcripts were not independently read. Civildefault/evidentiaryhearing is not a criminal conviction.

Document date: Not established · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Physical1courtidentity/file-stamp;10–14paragraphs34–52;35–42instruction/shooting;47–48completion/payment;50–52death

Access limitations

Redacted original court-document scan hosted by plaintiff counsel CJA, not court-hosted bytes. Civildefaultrecord draws on complaint, testimony and prior Commission material; full93pages and hearing transcripts not wholly reviewed.

Original institutional document URL: Not established. Identified reviewed copy URL ↗. A hosted copy does not establish original institutional custody.

Provenance, custody and reuse

identified_primary_document_copy_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B02-FAMILY-SARAVIA2004

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B02-SRC-SV-FINDINGS@a1f05950d9817470

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: a1f05950d981747096e24b31b9360361304ee467e4cb41abab2428cc9030ad67. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_qualified_wording

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

J.Doe v Alvaro Rafael Saravia, CIV-F-03-6249 OWW LJO, Judgment ↗

Publisher: US District Court, Eastern District of California; CJA hosted scan

Exact passage: Physical1–3, default, evidentiary hearing, judgment signature19November2004 and filing/service24November

Source establishes: Scannedfindingsparagraphs35–42,physical11–12state the instruction, weapon and shooting. The court record draws on testimony, complaint and earlier Commission material; underlying transcripts were not independently read. Civildefault/evidentiaryhearing is not a criminal conviction.

Document date: 2004-11-19 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: All3physicalpages;1default/hearing/award,2signature19November2004,3filing/service24November2004

Access limitations

Procedural limitation only; this judgment does not independently prove the individual acts described in the findings.

Civil default plus evidentiary hearing, not personal criminal conviction. No present payment/enforcement, redacted plaintiff identity or private-address export.

Original institutional document URL: Not established. Identified reviewed copy URL ↗. A hosted copy does not establish original institutional custody.

Provenance, custody and reuse

identified_primary_document_copy_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B02-FAMILY-SARAVIA2004

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B02-SRC-SV-JUDGMENT@2973181f05321dfe

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 2973181f05321dfe3b8e815da2a0a17e8e4dfb0ab93c0d73cd0496b515dd75b6. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: civil_procedure_limit

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Redacted civil court copies hosted by plaintiff counsel; not court-hosted original custody or authenticated underlying testimony. No map connection activated.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Underlying August24,2004 hearing transcript not separately obtained. This is a civil finding; shooter name not established by reviewed passages.

These are redacted U.S. civil court documents hosted by plaintiff counsel CJA. The judgment followed default and an evidentiary hearing; the findings cite testimony, complaint and earlier Commission material. They are not individual criminal convictions or proof of later payment/enforcement. The 19 November signature and 24 November filing/service dates are distinct. No redactions, victim identities or private addresses are reconstructed or exported.

Legal distinction

Source-attributed civil default judgment and evidentiary findings; not an individual criminal conviction. D’Aubuisson was not the defendant in this judgment. No present payment, enforcement, fugitive status, unnamed shooter identity or redacted identity is inferred.

Casualty scope: Same single Romero death already recorded in A4-B07-SV-DEAD; this additional court account is not a second victim or observation. The monetary civil award is not a casualty quantity. No personal toll or wider conflict total.

Record A4-B12-B02-SV-DRIVER-ORDER · exact wording SHA-256 40e28b9ac1558bdc8864dfb85408f430cb59579f37924501d12a434155a549d3

Report a correction →
decision

Those civil findings describe Saravia organising the assassination operation, later reporting its completion to D’Aubuisson and delivering money for the assassin. This is a civil court account, not a personal criminal conviction.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record or identified copy · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 2004-11-24 · retrospective civil findings filed;1980subject, exact individual instruction/completion/payment times not established.

Date basis and original source clocks

The assassination subject day24March1980, civil judgment signature19November2004 and findings filing24November2004 remain separate. Retrospective civil findings replay at their filing date, not as newly occurring acts. Exact individual instruction, completion and payment dates and first online publication remain unknown.

Sources (2) · exact passages & limitations

J.Doe v Saravia, redacted Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law ↗

Publisher: US District Court, Eastern District of California; CJA hosted scan

Exact passage: para34 pp10-11; paras47-48 pp13-14

Source establishes: Findingsparagraph34acrossphysical10–11and47–48across13–14support the described acts. Complaint/Commission citations and reported hearing testimony are distinguished; no identification of the unnamed gunman or present procedural status is inferred.

Document date: Not established · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Physical1courtidentity/file-stamp;10–14paragraphs34–52;35–42instruction/shooting;47–48completion/payment;50–52death

Access limitations

Redacted original court-document scan hosted by plaintiff counsel CJA, not court-hosted bytes. Civildefaultrecord draws on complaint, testimony and prior Commission material; full93pages and hearing transcripts not wholly reviewed.

Original institutional document URL: Not established. Identified reviewed copy URL ↗. A hosted copy does not establish original institutional custody.

Provenance, custody and reuse

identified_primary_document_copy_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B02-FAMILY-SARAVIA2004

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B02-SRC-SV-FINDINGS@a1f05950d9817470

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: a1f05950d981747096e24b31b9360361304ee467e4cb41abab2428cc9030ad67. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_qualified_wording

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

J.Doe v Alvaro Rafael Saravia, CIV-F-03-6249 OWW LJO, Judgment ↗

Publisher: US District Court, Eastern District of California; CJA hosted scan

Exact passage: Physical1–3, default and evidentiary-hearing procedure; signature19November/filing24November2004

Source establishes: Findingsparagraph34acrossphysical10–11and47–48across13–14support the described acts. Complaint/Commission citations and reported hearing testimony are distinguished; no identification of the unnamed gunman or present procedural status is inferred.

Document date: 2004-11-19 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: All3physicalpages;1default/hearing/award,2signature19November2004,3filing/service24November2004

Access limitations

Procedural limitation only; this judgment does not independently prove the individual acts described in the findings.

Civil default plus evidentiary hearing, not personal criminal conviction. No present payment/enforcement, redacted plaintiff identity or private-address export.

Original institutional document URL: Not established. Identified reviewed copy URL ↗. A hosted copy does not establish original institutional custody.

Provenance, custody and reuse

identified_primary_document_copy_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B02-FAMILY-SARAVIA2004

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B02-SRC-SV-JUDGMENT@2973181f05321dfe

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 2973181f05321dfe3b8e815da2a0a17e8e4dfb0ab93c0d73cd0496b515dd75b6. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: civil_procedure_limit

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Redacted civil court copies hosted by plaintiff counsel; not court-hosted original custody or authenticated underlying testimony. No map connection activated.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Findings cite the1993 Truth Commission and IACHR as well as witness testimony: source dependence is explicit. D’Aubuisson was not the defendant in this judgment.

These are redacted U.S. civil court documents hosted by plaintiff counsel CJA. The judgment followed default and an evidentiary hearing; the findings cite testimony, complaint and earlier Commission material. They are not individual criminal convictions or proof of later payment/enforcement. The 19 November signature and 24 November filing/service dates are distinct. No redactions, victim identities or private addresses are reconstructed or exported.

Legal distinction

Source-attributed civil default judgment and evidentiary findings; not an individual criminal conviction. D’Aubuisson was not the defendant in this judgment. No present payment, enforcement, fugitive status, unnamed shooter identity or redacted identity is inferred.

Casualty scope: Same single Romero death already recorded in A4-B07-SV-DEAD; this additional court account is not a second victim or observation. The monetary civil award is not a casualty quantity. No personal toll or wider conflict total.

Record A4-B12-B02-SV-OPERATION · exact wording SHA-256 a7ef56eebfa2bd8b38652a86a1cddcd1cfa9e8bd107b5333af2b5f059f488818

Report a correction →
decision

CAVR records Moerdani announcing renewed plans to crush the resistance on 17 August 1983.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record or identified copy · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 1983-08-17 · source-attributed historical subject.

Date basis and original source clocks

Retrospective CAVR subject clock, not first publication. April and September bounds express month precision, not verified first-day events. The undated letter is not dated from its planned operation month or the phrase shortly after10June. Received names have no exact date. Report/publication dates remain unknown in this reviewed source metadata; no date inferred from URL paths or earlier editions. Chronology alone does not establish causation.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Chega! Part3: The History of the Conflict ↗

Publisher: Commission for Reception,Truth and Reconciliation in Timor-Leste(CAVR); copy hosted by EastTimor and IndonesiaActionNetwork

Exact passage: Part3,paragraph427

Source establishes: Part3paragraph427 dates and quotes the announcement; no original recording/transcript was independently acquired. Do not recast it as a civilian-execution order or the start of the operation.

Document date: Not established · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Physical/printed103–105, paragraphs414,417–428; selected paragraphs414/417/418/420/421/425/427/428

Access limitations

Commission report in ETAN-hosted English copy, not original institutional custody. Same family across chapters. Original appointments, letter, speech and underlying interviews not separately authenticated. Publication date unknown;2006URLpath is not proof.

Original institutional document URL: Not established. Identified reviewed copy URL ↗. A hosted copy does not establish original institutional custody.

Provenance, custody and reuse

identified_primary_document_copy_independently_read · CAVR-CHEGA

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B37-EDITION-CAVR-3@a56b2151be5cfb61

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: a56b2151be5cfb61741eca4adcc72540725d86564847f7469f96fba1a90f1f23. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_qualified_wording

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Identified English report copies; no original private order, letter, recording or underlying witness authentication. No new geographic connection activated.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Original recording/transcript not obtained. Public offensive announcement does not establish a personal civilian-execution order.

These are attributed CAVR accounts in English copies hosted by ETAN, not newly authenticated original orders, letters, recordings or witness files. Chapters belong to one report family. Historical office, planning, announcement and operational dates remain separate. Reported attacks and later reprisals do not transfer personal responsibility between actors.

Legal distinction

Source-attributed commission account, not an Engineering finding of criminal guilt or complete conflict initiation.

Casualty scope: Military deaths, incident accounts, competing informant estimates, table entries, received names and unknown child quantities remain separate. No sums, confidence intervals, verified unique-person total, personal allocation or reprisals attributed to an earlier attack commander.

Record A4-B12-ET83-ANNOUNCE · exact wording SHA-256 c1b5d71141a52461c7bdb87ffc3ecf4f17246267f6ca6e5e85ebf6a4908e1836

Report a correction →
decision

CAVR’s Chega! report records President Soeharto appointing General Benny Moerdani commander-in-chief of ABRI on 28 March 1983.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record or identified copy · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 1983-03-28 · source-attributed historical subject.

Date basis and original source clocks

Retrospective CAVR subject clock, not first publication. April and September bounds express month precision, not verified first-day events. The undated letter is not dated from its planned operation month or the phrase shortly after10June. Received names have no exact date. Report/publication dates remain unknown in this reviewed source metadata; no date inferred from URL paths or earlier editions. Chronology alone does not establish causation.

Sources (2) · exact passages & limitations

Chega! Part3: The History of the Conflict ↗

Publisher: Commission for Reception,Truth and Reconciliation in Timor-Leste(CAVR); copy hosted by EastTimor and IndonesiaActionNetwork

Exact passage: Part3,paragraph414

Source establishes: Part3 paragraph414 states the appointing actor, office and date; Annex8.3page2 independently checked within the same report family confirms the then-held office. This is not an appointment as Defence Minister or a personal killing order.

Document date: Not established · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Physical/printed103–105, paragraphs414,417–428; selected paragraphs414/417/418/420/421/425/427/428

Access limitations

Commission report in ETAN-hosted English copy, not original institutional custody. Same family across chapters. Original appointments, letter, speech and underlying interviews not separately authenticated. Publication date unknown;2006URLpath is not proof.

Original institutional document URL: Not established. Identified reviewed copy URL ↗. A hosted copy does not establish original institutional custody.

Provenance, custody and reuse

identified_primary_document_copy_independently_read · CAVR-CHEGA

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B37-EDITION-CAVR-3@a56b2151be5cfb61

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: a56b2151be5cfb61741eca4adcc72540725d86564847f7469f96fba1a90f1f23. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_qualified_wording

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Chega! Part8 Annex3: High-Level Command Responsibility ↗

Publisher: Commission for Reception,Truth and Reconciliation in Timor-Leste(CAVR); copy hosted by EastTimor and IndonesiaActionNetwork

Exact passage: Physical2, Commander-in-Chief roster; physical1 distinguishes later ministerial office

Source establishes: Part3 paragraph414 states the appointing actor, office and date; Annex8.3page2 independently checked within the same report family confirms the then-held office. This is not an appointment as Defence Minister or a personal killing order.

Document date: Not established · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Physical2, Commander-in-Chief ArmedForces entry; page1for ministerial-role contrast

Access limitations

Office tenure is not a particular decision or individual responsibility for every operation.

Original institutional document URL: Not established. Identified reviewed copy URL ↗. A hosted copy does not establish original institutional custody.

Provenance, custody and reuse

identified_primary_document_copy_independently_read · CAVR-CHEGA

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B37-EDITION-CAVR-8A3@d9090a859a37ef83

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: d9090a859a37ef8317bde03b64c4273dfc8f6aedf1ce757057a790dc359fe10e. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: historical_office_context

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Identified English report copies; no original private order, letter, recording or underlying witness authentication. No new geographic connection activated.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Appointment is not proof of a killing order or personal responsibility for every later operation.

These are attributed CAVR accounts in English copies hosted by ETAN, not newly authenticated original orders, letters, recordings or witness files. Chapters belong to one report family. Historical office, planning, announcement and operational dates remain separate. Reported attacks and later reprisals do not transfer personal responsibility between actors.

Legal distinction

Source-attributed commission account, not an Engineering finding of criminal guilt or complete conflict initiation.

Casualty scope: Military deaths, incident accounts, competing informant estimates, table entries, received names and unknown child quantities remain separate. No sums, confidence intervals, verified unique-person total, personal allocation or reprisals attributed to an earlier attack commander.

Record A4-B12-ET83-APPOINT · exact wording SHA-256 76f04f0dce526c4ba909e9825f60fe50e645cb3681360d5c31510ebb891be2ce

Report a correction →
decision

CAVR’s unlawful-killings chapter reports a joint Falintil–Ratih attack at Kraras on 8 August 1983 under Virgilio dos Anjos’s command, killing fourteen Indonesian soldiers. Its history chapter gives a lower bound of at least twelve for that attack.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record or identified copy · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 1983-08-08 · source-attributed historical subject.

Date basis and original source clocks

Retrospective CAVR subject clock, not first publication. April and September bounds express month precision, not verified first-day events. The undated letter is not dated from its planned operation month or the phrase shortly after10June. Received names have no exact date. Report/publication dates remain unknown in this reviewed source metadata; no date inferred from URL paths or earlier editions. Chronology alone does not establish causation.

Sources (2) · exact passages & limitations

Chega! Chapter7.2: Unlawful Killings and Enforced Disappearances ↗

Publisher: Commission for Reception,Truth and Reconciliation in Timor-Leste(CAVR); copy hosted by EastTimor and IndonesiaActionNetwork

Exact passage: Chapter7.2,paragraph523

Source establishes: Chapter7.2paragraph523 states command/date/fourteen;Part3paragraph425 uses at least12andHansipterminology, with surrounding522/footnoteexplaining militia reorganisation. These are source views of one attack, not26deaths or attribution of later Indonesian reprisals to the attack commander.

Document date: Not established · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Physical/printed168–172, paragraphs519–529, Tables16–18; Tables17spans170–171

Access limitations

Competing informant counts, numbered entries and received names overlap and are not a reconciled census. No raw tables, witness/victim names, graphic descriptions or inferred child totals exported.

Original institutional document URL: Not established. Identified reviewed copy URL ↗. A hosted copy does not establish original institutional custody.

Provenance, custody and reuse

identified_primary_document_copy_independently_read · CAVR-CHEGA

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B37-EDITION-CAVR-72@3d08160d288fd146

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 3d08160d288fd146fbb62bde6f50a5e1f36f0581854582d40bdd0a37f381c54c. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_qualified_wording

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Chega! Part3: The History of the Conflict ↗

Publisher: Commission for Reception,Truth and Reconciliation in Timor-Leste(CAVR); copy hosted by EastTimor and IndonesiaActionNetwork

Exact passage: Physical105, paragraph425 and Hansip/Ratih context footnote

Source establishes: Chapter7.2paragraph523 states command/date/fourteen;Part3paragraph425 uses at least12andHansipterminology, with surrounding522/footnoteexplaining militia reorganisation. These are source views of one attack, not26deaths or attribution of later Indonesian reprisals to the attack commander.

Document date: Not established · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Physical/printed103–105, paragraphs414,417–428; selected paragraphs414/417/418/420/421/425/427/428

Access limitations

Commission report in ETAN-hosted English copy, not original institutional custody. Same family across chapters. Original appointments, letter, speech and underlying interviews not separately authenticated. Publication date unknown;2006URLpath is not proof.

Original institutional document URL: Not established. Identified reviewed copy URL ↗. A hosted copy does not establish original institutional custody.

Provenance, custody and reuse

identified_primary_document_copy_independently_read · CAVR-CHEGA

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B37-EDITION-CAVR-3@a56b2151be5cfb61

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: a56b2151be5cfb61741eca4adcc72540725d86564847f7469f96fba1a90f1f23. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: alternative_lower_bound_and_terminology_context

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Identified English report copies; no original private order, letter, recording or underlying witness authentication. No new geographic connection activated.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Military personnel deaths, not a civilian count or automatic war-crime classification. Part3paragraph425gives a compatible lowerbound of at least12. No attribution of subsequent Indonesian reprisals to dosAnjos.

These are attributed CAVR accounts in English copies hosted by ETAN, not newly authenticated original orders, letters, recordings or witness files. Chapters belong to one report family. Historical office, planning, announcement and operational dates remain separate. Reported attacks and later reprisals do not transfer personal responsibility between actors.

Legal distinction

Source-attributed commission account, not an Engineering finding of criminal guilt or complete conflict initiation.

Casualty scope: Military deaths, incident accounts, competing informant estimates, table entries, received names and unknown child quantities remain separate. No sums, confidence intervals, verified unique-person total, personal allocation or reprisals attributed to an earlier attack commander.

Record A4-B12-ET83-ATTACK · exact wording SHA-256 ea560460d8e74c6371339d4b20977b8b26e5a1f43943b3a8ac1232cc0981e7f8

Report a correction →
human consequence

CAVR’s table of reported Caraubalu victims contains fifty-five numbered entries. Those entries are not independently verified unique identities or additional deaths beyond the competing estimates.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record or identified copy · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 1983-09-16 · table subject date, table publication unknown.

Date basis and original source clocks

Retrospective CAVR subject clock, not first publication. April and September bounds express month precision, not verified first-day events. The undated letter is not dated from its planned operation month or the phrase shortly after10June. Received names have no exact date. Report/publication dates remain unknown in this reviewed source metadata; no date inferred from URL paths or earlier editions. Chronology alone does not establish causation.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Chega! Chapter7.2: Unlawful Killings and Enforced Disappearances ↗

Publisher: Commission for Reception,Truth and Reconciliation in Timor-Leste(CAVR); copy hosted by EastTimor and IndonesiaActionNetwork

Exact passage: Chapter7.2,Table17,entries1–55

Source establishes: Table17 spans physical170–171 and is numbered1–55. Two entries identify children through a parent rather than supplying separate names; no victim-name or age-table export is approved.

Document date: Not established · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Physical/printed168–172, paragraphs519–529, Tables16–18; Tables17spans170–171

Access limitations

Competing informant counts, numbered entries and received names overlap and are not a reconciled census. No raw tables, witness/victim names, graphic descriptions or inferred child totals exported.

Original institutional document URL: Not established. Identified reviewed copy URL ↗. A hosted copy does not establish original institutional custody.

Provenance, custody and reuse

identified_primary_document_copy_independently_read · CAVR-CHEGA

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B37-EDITION-CAVR-72@3d08160d288fd146

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 3d08160d288fd146fbb62bde6f50a5e1f36f0581854582d40bdd0a37f381c54c. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_qualified_wording

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Identified English report copies; no original private order, letter, recording or underlying witness authentication. No new geographic connection activated.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Numbered entries are not independently verified unique identities or additional deaths beyond the informant estimates. Two children are described through a parent; do not invent missing names.

Competing incident estimates, table entries and received names are overlapping source representations. Do not add them or turn ranges into confidence intervals, entries into verified unique identities, or named/listed ages into a complete child toll. No victim names, graphic testimony or raw tables are approved for export.

Legal distinction

Source-attributed commission account, not an Engineering finding of criminal guilt or complete conflict initiation.

Casualty scope: Military deaths, incident accounts, competing informant estimates, table entries, received names and unknown child quantities remain separate. No sums, confidence intervals, verified unique-person total, personal allocation or reprisals attributed to an earlier attack commander.

Record A4-B12-ET83-CARA-LIST · exact wording SHA-256 c7b499fd15aa5f793ed84bcde45f0e126a34de5e5aba0ba0d4f103a50243c0ad

Report a correction →
human consequence

For the reported Caraubalu killings of 16 September 1983, CAVR records differing informant figures ranging from eighteen to fifty-four victims. This is a range of accounts, not a verified statistical interval.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record or identified copy · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 1983-09-16 · source-attributed historical subject.

Date basis and original source clocks

Retrospective CAVR subject clock, not first publication. April and September bounds express month precision, not verified first-day events. The undated letter is not dated from its planned operation month or the phrase shortly after10June. Received names have no exact date. Report/publication dates remain unknown in this reviewed source metadata; no date inferred from URL paths or earlier editions. Chronology alone does not establish causation.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Chega! Chapter7.2: Unlawful Killings and Enforced Disappearances ↗

Publisher: Commission for Reception,Truth and Reconciliation in Timor-Leste(CAVR); copy hosted by EastTimor and IndonesiaActionNetwork

Exact passage: Chapter7.2,paragraphs526–527

Source establishes: Paragraphs526–527 and the527footnote identify the incident and competing18/26/54reports. The separate55numberedtableentries are a different evidentiary representation, not an added group.

Document date: Not established · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Physical/printed168–172, paragraphs519–529, Tables16–18; Tables17spans170–171

Access limitations

Competing informant counts, numbered entries and received names overlap and are not a reconciled census. No raw tables, witness/victim names, graphic descriptions or inferred child totals exported.

Original institutional document URL: Not established. Identified reviewed copy URL ↗. A hosted copy does not establish original institutional custody.

Provenance, custody and reuse

identified_primary_document_copy_independently_read · CAVR-CHEGA

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B37-EDITION-CAVR-72@3d08160d288fd146

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 3d08160d288fd146fbb62bde6f50a5e1f36f0581854582d40bdd0a37f381c54c. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_qualified_wording

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Identified English report copies; no original private order, letter, recording or underlying witness authentication. No new geographic connection activated.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

A range of competing reports, not a statistical confidence interval or reconciled total. Table17separately contains55numberedentries; no silent harmonisation.

Competing incident estimates, table entries and received names are overlapping source representations. Do not add them or turn ranges into confidence intervals, entries into verified unique identities, or named/listed ages into a complete child toll. No victim names, graphic testimony or raw tables are approved for export.

Legal distinction

Source-attributed commission account, not an Engineering finding of criminal guilt or complete conflict initiation.

Casualty scope: Military deaths, incident accounts, competing informant estimates, table entries, received names and unknown child quantities remain separate. No sums, confidence intervals, verified unique-person total, personal allocation or reprisals attributed to an earlier attack commander.

Record A4-B12-ET83-CARA-RANGE · exact wording SHA-256 2577f9f9b8d82a075bd7b6495947c34eebd112678e59394f888c92bc86418c57

Report a correction →
human consequence

CAVR’s Caraubalu account includes women and children among those reportedly executed. The reviewed account does not establish a complete child death toll.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record or identified copy · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 1983-09-16 · source-attributed historical subject.

Date basis and original source clocks

Retrospective CAVR subject clock, not first publication. April and September bounds express month precision, not verified first-day events. The undated letter is not dated from its planned operation month or the phrase shortly after10June. Received names have no exact date. Report/publication dates remain unknown in this reviewed source metadata; no date inferred from URL paths or earlier editions. Chronology alone does not establish causation.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Chega! Chapter7.2: Unlawful Killings and Enforced Disappearances ↗

Publisher: Commission for Reception,Truth and Reconciliation in Timor-Leste(CAVR); copy hosted by EastTimor and IndonesiaActionNetwork

Exact passage: Chapter7.2,paragraph526

Source establishes: Chapter7.2paragraph526 includes women and children; the survivor quotation and Table17provide additional accounts but no independently enumerated complete child cohort. No graphic testimony or child names are exported.

Document date: Not established · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Physical/printed168–172, paragraphs519–529, Tables16–18; Tables17spans170–171

Access limitations

Competing informant counts, numbered entries and received names overlap and are not a reconciled census. No raw tables, witness/victim names, graphic descriptions or inferred child totals exported.

Original institutional document URL: Not established. Identified reviewed copy URL ↗. A hosted copy does not establish original institutional custody.

Provenance, custody and reuse

identified_primary_document_copy_independently_read · CAVR-CHEGA

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B37-EDITION-CAVR-72@3d08160d288fd146

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 3d08160d288fd146fbb62bde6f50a5e1f36f0581854582d40bdd0a37f381c54c. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_qualified_wording

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Identified English report copies; no original private order, letter, recording or underlying witness authentication. No new geographic connection activated.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

No complete child-death or injury total established; do not derive a full child toll from the victim table or extrapolate witness descriptions.

Competing incident estimates, table entries and received names are overlapping source representations. Do not add them or turn ranges into confidence intervals, entries into verified unique identities, or named/listed ages into a complete child toll. No victim names, graphic testimony or raw tables are approved for export.

Legal distinction

Source-attributed commission account, not an Engineering finding of criminal guilt or complete conflict initiation.

Casualty scope: Military deaths, incident accounts, competing informant estimates, table entries, received names and unknown child quantities remain separate. No sums, confidence intervals, verified unique-person total, personal allocation or reprisals attributed to an earlier attack commander.

Record A4-B12-ET83-CHILDREN · exact wording SHA-256 e0317432270058760711f959f321cb08f50132a278987aae37f49688276ea7aa

Report a correction →
decision

CAVR reproduces Governor Mário Carrascalão’s 2003 recollection that, at an April 1983 meeting, Moerdani gave officials three months to pursue a peaceful solution in East Timor.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record or identified copy · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 1983-04 · source-defined month, exact day unknown.

Date basis and original source clocks

Retrospective CAVR subject clock, not first publication. April and September bounds express month precision, not verified first-day events. The undated letter is not dated from its planned operation month or the phrase shortly after10June. Received names have no exact date. Report/publication dates remain unknown in this reviewed source metadata; no date inferred from URL paths or earlier editions. Chronology alone does not establish causation.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Chega! Part3: The History of the Conflict ↗

Publisher: Commission for Reception,Truth and Reconciliation in Timor-Leste(CAVR); copy hosted by EastTimor and IndonesiaActionNetwork

Exact passage: Part3,paragraph417,2003Carrascalãointerview

Source establishes: Part3paragraph417 describes Moerdani’s12Aprilvisit and summons on the following day, then quotes a retrospective2003interview. No original meeting minutes or private signing time was acquired.

Document date: Not established · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Physical/printed103–105, paragraphs414,417–428; selected paragraphs414/417/418/420/421/425/427/428

Access limitations

Commission report in ETAN-hosted English copy, not original institutional custody. Same family across chapters. Original appointments, letter, speech and underlying interviews not separately authenticated. Publication date unknown;2006URLpath is not proof.

Original institutional document URL: Not established. Identified reviewed copy URL ↗. A hosted copy does not establish original institutional custody.

Provenance, custody and reuse

identified_primary_document_copy_independently_read · CAVR-CHEGA

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B37-EDITION-CAVR-3@a56b2151be5cfb61

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: a56b2151be5cfb61741eca4adcc72540725d86564847f7469f96fba1a90f1f23. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_qualified_wording

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Identified English report copies; no original private order, letter, recording or underlying witness authentication. No new geographic connection activated.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Retrospective interview, not original meeting minutes or a signed directive. Paragraph417describes12Aprilvisit and nextdaysummons; exact private meeting time is not reconstructed.

These are attributed CAVR accounts in English copies hosted by ETAN, not newly authenticated original orders, letters, recordings or witness files. Chapters belong to one report family. Historical office, planning, announcement and operational dates remain separate. Reported attacks and later reprisals do not transfer personal responsibility between actors.

Legal distinction

Source-attributed commission account, not an Engineering finding of criminal guilt or complete conflict initiation.

Casualty scope: Military deaths, incident accounts, competing informant estimates, table entries, received names and unknown child quantities remain separate. No sums, confidence intervals, verified unique-person total, personal allocation or reprisals attributed to an earlier attack commander.

Record A4-B12-ET83-DEADLINE · exact wording SHA-256 a7c57ac2e82a0afd2e14b0d0b29b52bb9b9f8ea562b51c35499caeb928d85157

Report a correction →
human consequence

CAVR reports being told that Indonesian troops killed four or five people who had remained in Kraras and burned most of its houses on 7 September 1983.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record or identified copy · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 1983-09-07 · source-attributed historical subject.

Date basis and original source clocks

Retrospective CAVR subject clock, not first publication. April and September bounds express month precision, not verified first-day events. The undated letter is not dated from its planned operation month or the phrase shortly after10June. Received names have no exact date. Report/publication dates remain unknown in this reviewed source metadata; no date inferred from URL paths or earlier editions. Chronology alone does not establish causation.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Chega! Chapter7.2: Unlawful Killings and Enforced Disappearances ↗

Publisher: Commission for Reception,Truth and Reconciliation in Timor-Leste(CAVR); copy hosted by EastTimor and IndonesiaActionNetwork

Exact passage: Chapter7.2,paragraph525

Source establishes: Chapter7.2paragraph525 gives this reported incident estimate; it does not identify an individual order giver or a full district/retaliation toll.

Document date: Not established · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Physical/printed168–172, paragraphs519–529, Tables16–18; Tables17spans170–171

Access limitations

Competing informant counts, numbered entries and received names overlap and are not a reconciled census. No raw tables, witness/victim names, graphic descriptions or inferred child totals exported.

Original institutional document URL: Not established. Identified reviewed copy URL ↗. A hosted copy does not establish original institutional custody.

Provenance, custody and reuse

identified_primary_document_copy_independently_read · CAVR-CHEGA

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B37-EDITION-CAVR-72@3d08160d288fd146

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 3d08160d288fd146fbb62bde6f50a5e1f36f0581854582d40bdd0a37f381c54c. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_qualified_wording

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Identified English report copies; no original private order, letter, recording or underlying witness authentication. No new geographic connection activated.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Not a complete district or whole-retaliation toll. The passage does not identify a personal order giver or classify every resident’s legal status.

These are attributed CAVR accounts in English copies hosted by ETAN, not newly authenticated original orders, letters, recordings or witness files. Chapters belong to one report family. Historical office, planning, announcement and operational dates remain separate. Reported attacks and later reprisals do not transfer personal responsibility between actors.

Legal distinction

Source-attributed commission account, not an Engineering finding of criminal guilt or complete conflict initiation.

Casualty scope: Military deaths, incident accounts, competing informant estimates, table entries, received names and unknown child quantities remain separate. No sums, confidence intervals, verified unique-person total, personal allocation or reprisals attributed to an earlier attack commander.

Record A4-B12-ET83-KRARAS · exact wording SHA-256 11ffb24a17db96e666de2fa4e3c8b99f14385ad2b711aca928ec4f9bd56253d9

Report a correction →
decision

CAVR quotes a letter in which Moerdani told Xanana Gusmão that Operation Persatuan was being prepared for August 1983. The report places the letter shortly after 10 June; the original letter and its exact date were not reviewed.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record or identified copy · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Context collection; no single event date assigned.

Date basis and original source clocks

Retrospective CAVR subject clock, not first publication. April and September bounds express month precision, not verified first-day events. The undated letter is not dated from its planned operation month or the phrase shortly after10June. Received names have no exact date. Report/publication dates remain unknown in this reviewed source metadata; no date inferred from URL paths or earlier editions. Chronology alone does not establish causation.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Chega! Part3: The History of the Conflict ↗

Publisher: Commission for Reception,Truth and Reconciliation in Timor-Leste(CAVR); copy hosted by EastTimor and IndonesiaActionNetwork

Exact passage: Part3,paragraph418,letterpassage; paragraph419context

Source establishes: Part3paragraph418 gives the letter extract;419 explains planned timing and428 separately dates the operation’s start toSeptember. A planned August start is not an actual start.

Document date: Not established · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Physical/printed103–105, paragraphs414,417–428; selected paragraphs414/417/418/420/421/425/427/428

Access limitations

Commission report in ETAN-hosted English copy, not original institutional custody. Same family across chapters. Original appointments, letter, speech and underlying interviews not separately authenticated. Publication date unknown;2006URLpath is not proof.

Original institutional document URL: Not established. Identified reviewed copy URL ↗. A hosted copy does not establish original institutional custody.

Provenance, custody and reuse

identified_primary_document_copy_independently_read · CAVR-CHEGA

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B37-EDITION-CAVR-3@a56b2151be5cfb61

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: a56b2151be5cfb61741eca4adcc72540725d86564847f7469f96fba1a90f1f23. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_qualified_wording

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Identified English report copies; no original private order, letter, recording or underlying witness authentication. No new geographic connection activated.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Source says shortly after10June; exact letter date and original letter not obtained. Preparation for August is not proof the operation began then.

These are attributed CAVR accounts in English copies hosted by ETAN, not newly authenticated original orders, letters, recordings or witness files. Chapters belong to one report family. Historical office, planning, announcement and operational dates remain separate. Reported attacks and later reprisals do not transfer personal responsibility between actors.

Legal distinction

Source-attributed commission account, not an Engineering finding of criminal guilt or complete conflict initiation.

Casualty scope: Military deaths, incident accounts, competing informant estimates, table entries, received names and unknown child quantities remain separate. No sums, confidence intervals, verified unique-person total, personal allocation or reprisals attributed to an earlier attack commander.

Record A4-B12-ET83-LETTER · exact wording SHA-256 e7d8856ac68588ff585594fa286eabfc2143b43dec1003498bf883b96a3716b6

Report a correction →
context

CAVR places the start of Operation Persatuan in September 1983 and reports that the operation caused large displacements towards towns. It supplies no complete displacement count in that passage.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record or identified copy · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 1983-09 · source-defined month, exact day unknown.

Date basis and original source clocks

Retrospective CAVR subject clock, not first publication. April and September bounds express month precision, not verified first-day events. The undated letter is not dated from its planned operation month or the phrase shortly after10June. Received names have no exact date. Report/publication dates remain unknown in this reviewed source metadata; no date inferred from URL paths or earlier editions. Chronology alone does not establish causation.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Chega! Part3: The History of the Conflict ↗

Publisher: Commission for Reception,Truth and Reconciliation in Timor-Leste(CAVR); copy hosted by EastTimor and IndonesiaActionNetwork

Exact passage: Part3,paragraph428

Source establishes: Part3paragraph428 directly states the month and displacement relationship; preparation, announcement and operational start remain distinct. No personal refugee/death allocation.

Document date: Not established · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Physical/printed103–105, paragraphs414,417–428; selected paragraphs414/417/418/420/421/425/427/428

Access limitations

Commission report in ETAN-hosted English copy, not original institutional custody. Same family across chapters. Original appointments, letter, speech and underlying interviews not separately authenticated. Publication date unknown;2006URLpath is not proof.

Original institutional document URL: Not established. Identified reviewed copy URL ↗. A hosted copy does not establish original institutional custody.

Provenance, custody and reuse

identified_primary_document_copy_independently_read · CAVR-CHEGA

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B37-EDITION-CAVR-3@a56b2151be5cfb61

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: a56b2151be5cfb61741eca4adcc72540725d86564847f7469f96fba1a90f1f23. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_qualified_wording

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Identified English report copies; no original private order, letter, recording or underlying witness authentication. No new geographic connection activated.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Month precision only; no complete displacement count or personal death allocation. Planning/announcement dates remain separate.

These are attributed CAVR accounts in English copies hosted by ETAN, not newly authenticated original orders, letters, recordings or witness files. Chapters belong to one report family. Historical office, planning, announcement and operational dates remain separate. Reported attacks and later reprisals do not transfer personal responsibility between actors.

Legal distinction

Source-attributed commission account, not an Engineering finding of criminal guilt or complete conflict initiation.

Casualty scope: Military deaths, incident accounts, competing informant estimates, table entries, received names and unknown child quantities remain separate. No sums, confidence intervals, verified unique-person total, personal allocation or reprisals attributed to an earlier attack commander.

Record A4-B12-ET83-OPERATION · exact wording SHA-256 612cecfe2bea74d8495d018a9b142e3a2562664d14d2885645c7ee1f96fa5602

Report a correction →
human consequence

CAVR says it received the names of 141 Tahu Bein victims. This is a reported list, not 141 independently verified identities or a separate group to add to the other estimates.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record or identified copy · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Context collection; no single event date assigned.

Date basis and original source clocks

Retrospective CAVR subject clock, not first publication. April and September bounds express month precision, not verified first-day events. The undated letter is not dated from its planned operation month or the phrase shortly after10June. Received names have no exact date. Report/publication dates remain unknown in this reviewed source metadata; no date inferred from URL paths or earlier editions. Chronology alone does not establish causation.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Chega! Chapter7.2: Unlawful Killings and Enforced Disappearances ↗

Publisher: Commission for Reception,Truth and Reconciliation in Timor-Leste(CAVR); copy hosted by EastTimor and IndonesiaActionNetwork

Exact passage: Chapter7.2,paragraph529,finalsentence

Source establishes: Chapter7.2paragraph529 states namesreceived141. Table18includes a bracketed entry; no sex/age inference or reproduction of names is approved.

Document date: Not established · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Physical/printed168–172, paragraphs519–529, Tables16–18; Tables17spans170–171

Access limitations

Competing informant counts, numbered entries and received names overlap and are not a reconciled census. No raw tables, witness/victim names, graphic descriptions or inferred child totals exported.

Original institutional document URL: Not established. Identified reviewed copy URL ↗. A hosted copy does not establish original institutional custody.

Provenance, custody and reuse

identified_primary_document_copy_independently_read · CAVR-CHEGA

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B37-EDITION-CAVR-72@3d08160d288fd146

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 3d08160d288fd146fbb62bde6f50a5e1f36f0581854582d40bdd0a37f381c54c. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_qualified_wording

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Identified English report copies; no original private order, letter, recording or underlying witness authentication. No new geographic connection activated.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Not141judiciallyverifiedidentities, an additional toll, or a complete child count. Table18contains a bracketed entry requiring editorial clarification; sex classification is not repeated here.

Competing incident estimates, table entries and received names are overlapping source representations. Do not add them or turn ranges into confidence intervals, entries into verified unique identities, or named/listed ages into a complete child toll. No victim names, graphic testimony or raw tables are approved for export.

Legal distinction

Source-attributed commission account, not an Engineering finding of criminal guilt or complete conflict initiation.

Casualty scope: Military deaths, incident accounts, competing informant estimates, table entries, received names and unknown child quantities remain separate. No sums, confidence intervals, verified unique-person total, personal allocation or reprisals attributed to an earlier attack commander.

Record A4-B12-ET83-TAHU-NAMES · exact wording SHA-256 b21212e39a77565a45d0b071028de78c9405889f5964ed3a1f3bb718e566fd67

Report a correction →
human consequence

CAVR records conflicting reports of twenty-six to 181 people killed at Tahu Bein on 17 September 1983. The figures are competing reports, not a reconciled total.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record or identified copy · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 1983-09-17 · source-attributed historical subject.

Date basis and original source clocks

Retrospective CAVR subject clock, not first publication. April and September bounds express month precision, not verified first-day events. The undated letter is not dated from its planned operation month or the phrase shortly after10June. Received names have no exact date. Report/publication dates remain unknown in this reviewed source metadata; no date inferred from URL paths or earlier editions. Chronology alone does not establish causation.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Chega! Chapter7.2: Unlawful Killings and Enforced Disappearances ↗

Publisher: Commission for Reception,Truth and Reconciliation in Timor-Leste(CAVR); copy hosted by EastTimor and IndonesiaActionNetwork

Exact passage: Chapter7.2,paragraph529

Source establishes: Chapter7.2paragraphs528–529 place the reported episode/date and26–181range; the continuation footnote and table are not silently harmonised with the separately reported141names.

Document date: Not established · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Physical/printed168–172, paragraphs519–529, Tables16–18; Tables17spans170–171

Access limitations

Competing informant counts, numbered entries and received names overlap and are not a reconciled census. No raw tables, witness/victim names, graphic descriptions or inferred child totals exported.

Original institutional document URL: Not established. Identified reviewed copy URL ↗. A hosted copy does not establish original institutional custody.

Provenance, custody and reuse

identified_primary_document_copy_independently_read · CAVR-CHEGA

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B37-EDITION-CAVR-72@3d08160d288fd146

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 3d08160d288fd146fbb62bde6f50a5e1f36f0581854582d40bdd0a37f381c54c. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_qualified_wording

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Identified English report copies; no original private order, letter, recording or underlying witness authentication. No new geographic connection activated.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Different reports, not a verified interval. Overlaps the Commission’s141reportednames; underlying testimonies not separately reviewed.

Competing incident estimates, table entries and received names are overlapping source representations. Do not add them or turn ranges into confidence intervals, entries into verified unique identities, or named/listed ages into a complete child toll. No victim names, graphic testimony or raw tables are approved for export.

Legal distinction

Source-attributed commission account, not an Engineering finding of criminal guilt or complete conflict initiation.

Casualty scope: Military deaths, incident accounts, competing informant estimates, table entries, received names and unknown child quantities remain separate. No sums, confidence intervals, verified unique-person total, personal allocation or reprisals attributed to an earlier attack commander.

Record A4-B12-ET83-TAHU-RANGE · exact wording SHA-256 a280ea99ab795ea52a4026522a41a1d088611c99f425b398dbcc54b33c73f5d7

Report a correction →
context

A U.S. telegram of 16 March 1978 relays Prime Minister Begin’s message that Israel intended to withdraw once security arrangements prevented the PLO’s return. FRUS editors say the original message was not found; the telegram also records U.S. reservations about those assurances.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact source attributed bounded historical proposition · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 1978-03-16 · U.S. telegram relaying a message; original message unavailable.

Date basis and original source clocks

1978-03-16 · U.S. telegram relaying a message; original message unavailable

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

FRUS1977-1980 volVIII doc230, telegram67617 ↗

Publisher: US State Department

Exact passage: Body second policy bullet; source note4 says underlying message not found

Source establishes: Document230 second policy bullet, subsequent U.S. reply and footnote4; relay via Dinitz and Atherton, not original signed initiation order.

Document date: 1978-03-16 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Whole substantive telegram230/67617 read, second policy bullet, U.S. reservations and footnote4. Telegram16March1978,0334Z.

Access limitations

The U.S. record relays Begin’s message through intermediaries, with original message missing and U.S. reservations recorded. It does not prove a signed initiation order, fulfilment of assurances or personal allocation of casualties. A later FRUS casualty footnote is editorial context, not the original telegram’s observation.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_cached_original_body_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B03-FAMILY-US-LB1978

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B03-SRC-LB-FRUS230@19b7054dc1372174

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 19b7054dc13721748c2d96ebcb59ba2a88c6c137dbb94e0d1dc1dfb168842e01. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_attributed_wording

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

The U.S. record relays Begin’s message through intermediaries, with original message missing and U.S. reservations recorded. It does not prove a signed initiation order, fulfilment of assurances or personal allocation of casualties. A later FRUS casualty footnote is editorial context, not the original telegram’s observation.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Relay of policy, not original signed initiation order. Do not infer his order for every operational action.

The U.S. record relays Begin’s message through intermediaries, with original message missing and U.S. reservations recorded. It does not prove a signed initiation order, fulfilment of assurances or personal allocation of casualties. A later FRUS casualty footnote is editorial context, not the original telegram’s observation.

Legal distinction

Source-attributed planning, launch, cessation instruction and diplomatic assurances are distinct. No authenticated private order, finding of individual criminal guilt, entire-conflict initiation or personal casualty allocation is established.

Casualty scope: Exact source-defined populations remain separate. Children and shelter needs are subsets, not extra totals. IDF source terminology is not an independently verified legal classification; early relief figures are not added to operation totals or assigned to planners.

Record A4-B13-LB-BEGIN-MESSAGE · exact wording SHA-256 45f8d9857e59b8a6cad45b9ae3eedbee82f65b6ba58dca39993638d5b22e2724

Report a correction →
human consequence

The IDF reports that the 11 March 1978 Coastal Road bus attack killed 35 civilians, including 13 children, and wounded 71. These are its reported figures; the children are included in the death total.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact source attributed bounded historical proposition · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 1978-03-11 · Coastal Road attack; separate from the Litani operation.

Date basis and original source clocks

1978-03-11 · Coastal Road attack; separate from the Litani operation

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Operation Litani ↗

Publisher: IDF Editorial Team

Exact passage: Opening paragraph, renderedline7

Source establishes: Opening paragraph; no independent victim register or reconciliation with revised totals acquired.

Document date: Not established · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Opening paragraph and Initiation section, especially opening, shared-plan and final paragraphs; display30.10.17 and byline IDF Editorial Team.

Access limitations

This is an IDF retrospective by a party to the conflict. Its original orders, casualty register and independent revised totals were not acquired. Planning, launch, cessation instruction and withdrawal remain distinct. Source labels do not establish legal combatant status or individual guilt, and operation totals are not assigned personally to planners. The blocked personal leadership allegation is excluded.

Official live selected-body review without a cached-body hash. The producer challenge payload and review receipt are not the source body; displayed2017date is not verified original publication.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

official_live_body_read_no_cached_body_hash · HR-ARCHIVE-B03-FAMILY-IDF-LITANI

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B03-SRC-LB-IDF-WEB@A4-LIVE-20261030

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: Not established. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_attributed_wording

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

This is an IDF retrospective by a party to the conflict. Its original orders, casualty register and independent revised totals were not acquired. Planning, launch, cessation instruction and withdrawal remain distinct. Source labels do not establish legal combatant status or individual guilt, and operation totals are not assigned personally to planners. The blocked personal leadership allegation is excluded.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Source quantities preserved; independent victim list and revised figures not reconciled. Child deaths are a subset.

This is an IDF retrospective by a party to the conflict. Its original orders, casualty register and independent revised totals were not acquired. Planning, launch, cessation instruction and withdrawal remain distinct. Source labels do not establish legal combatant status or individual guilt, and operation totals are not assigned personally to planners. The blocked personal leadership allegation is excluded.

Legal distinction

Source-attributed planning, launch, cessation instruction and diplomatic assurances are distinct. No authenticated private order, finding of individual criminal guilt, entire-conflict initiation or personal casualty allocation is established.

Casualty scope: Exact source-defined populations remain separate. Children and shelter needs are subsets, not extra totals. IDF source terminology is not an independently verified legal classification; early relief figures are not added to operation totals or assigned to planners.

Record A4-B13-LB-COASTAL-CONSEQUENCES · exact wording SHA-256 20686252f1c3e5d205918909b1c347a4e6f6ac0a79b8c1edb40e50db6bf0dd2a

Report a correction →
human consequence

The IDF’s retrospective reports 300 people it labels “terrorists” killed and eighteen Israeli soldiers lost during the fighting. Its terminology is not an independently verified legal classification.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact source attributed bounded historical proposition · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Context collection; no single event date assigned.

Date basis and original source clocks

Undated source-attributed operation total. No exact occurrence, reporting or original publication day established; not assigned an invented replay day.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Operation Litani ↗

Publisher: IDF Editorial Team

Exact passage: Initiation section, renderedline29

Source establishes: Initiation final paragraph; opposing-force labels and operation totals differ from early relief observations and later FRUS editorial totals.

Document date: Not established · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Opening paragraph and Initiation section, especially opening, shared-plan and final paragraphs; display30.10.17 and byline IDF Editorial Team.

Access limitations

This is an IDF retrospective by a party to the conflict. Its original orders, casualty register and independent revised totals were not acquired. Planning, launch, cessation instruction and withdrawal remain distinct. Source labels do not establish legal combatant status or individual guilt, and operation totals are not assigned personally to planners. The blocked personal leadership allegation is excluded.

Official live selected-body review without a cached-body hash. The producer challenge payload and review receipt are not the source body; displayed2017date is not verified original publication.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

official_live_body_read_no_cached_body_hash · HR-ARCHIVE-B03-FAMILY-IDF-LITANI

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B03-SRC-LB-IDF-WEB@A4-LIVE-20261030

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: Not established. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_attributed_wording

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

This is an IDF retrospective by a party to the conflict. Its original orders, casualty register and independent revised totals were not acquired. Planning, launch, cessation instruction and withdrawal remain distinct. Source labels do not establish legal combatant status or individual guilt, and operation totals are not assigned personally to planners. The blocked personal leadership allegation is excluded.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Publisher’s categories, not independently verified legal combatant classifications; incompatible with unspecified early relief tallies.

This is an IDF retrospective by a party to the conflict. Its original orders, casualty register and independent revised totals were not acquired. Planning, launch, cessation instruction and withdrawal remain distinct. Source labels do not establish legal combatant status or individual guilt, and operation totals are not assigned personally to planners. The blocked personal leadership allegation is excluded.

Legal distinction

Source-attributed planning, launch, cessation instruction and diplomatic assurances are distinct. No authenticated private order, finding of individual criminal guilt, entire-conflict initiation or personal casualty allocation is established.

Casualty scope: Exact source-defined populations remain separate. Children and shelter needs are subsets, not extra totals. IDF source terminology is not an independently verified legal classification; early relief figures are not added to operation totals or assigned to planners.

Record A4-B13-LB-MILITARY-TOLLS · exact wording SHA-256 13b9b5adcab42b8e46608ebf57c0184c86153de5a5ab4cf6154cf0ac988a3c75

Report a correction →
context

The IDF’s retrospective dates the launch of Operation Litani in southern Lebanon to the night of 14 March 1978.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact source attributed bounded historical proposition · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 1978-03-14 · operation launch as dated by IDF retrospective.

Date basis and original source clocks

1978-03-14 · operation launch as dated by IDF retrospective

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Operation Litani ↗

Publisher: IDF Editorial Team

Exact passage: Initiation section, renderedline19

Source establishes: Official military retrospective, Initiation opening paragraph; not an original cabinet instruction.

Document date: Not established · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Opening paragraph and Initiation section, especially opening, shared-plan and final paragraphs; display30.10.17 and byline IDF Editorial Team.

Access limitations

This is an IDF retrospective by a party to the conflict. Its original orders, casualty register and independent revised totals were not acquired. Planning, launch, cessation instruction and withdrawal remain distinct. Source labels do not establish legal combatant status or individual guilt, and operation totals are not assigned personally to planners. The blocked personal leadership allegation is excluded.

Official live selected-body review without a cached-body hash. The producer challenge payload and review receipt are not the source body; displayed2017date is not verified original publication.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

official_live_body_read_no_cached_body_hash · HR-ARCHIVE-B03-FAMILY-IDF-LITANI

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B03-SRC-LB-IDF-WEB@A4-LIVE-20261030

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: Not established. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_attributed_wording

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

This is an IDF retrospective by a party to the conflict. Its original orders, casualty register and independent revised totals were not acquired. Planning, launch, cessation instruction and withdrawal remain distinct. Source labels do not establish legal combatant status or individual guilt, and operation totals are not assigned personally to planners. The blocked personal leadership allegation is excluded.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

This is an IDF retrospective by a party to the conflict. Its original orders, casualty register and independent revised totals were not acquired. Planning, launch, cessation instruction and withdrawal remain distinct. Source labels do not establish legal combatant status or individual guilt, and operation totals are not assigned personally to planners. The blocked personal leadership allegation is excluded.

Legal distinction

Source-attributed planning, launch, cessation instruction and diplomatic assurances are distinct. No authenticated private order, finding of individual criminal guilt, entire-conflict initiation or personal casualty allocation is established.

Casualty scope: Exact source-defined populations remain separate. Children and shelter needs are subsets, not extra totals. IDF source terminology is not an independently verified legal classification; early relief figures are not added to operation totals or assigned to planners.

Record A4-B13-LB-OPERATION · exact wording SHA-256 28687704b30af992f9bdc9fb01c15bff5b17aa809463af31eb4540bb47e37f42

Report a correction →
decision

The IDF’s account identifies Chief of Staff Motta Gur and Northern Command commander Avigdor Ben Gal as devising the operation’s plan.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact source attributed bounded historical proposition · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 1978 · planning year; exact planning day unknown, not31December.

Date basis and original source clocks

1978 · planning year; exact planning day unknown, not31December

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Operation Litani ↗

Publisher: IDF Editorial Team

Exact passage: Initiation section, renderedline25

Source establishes: One shared planning statement supports both actors; two native person views are merged into one proposition, without separate orders or personal casualty allocations.

Document date: Not established · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Opening paragraph and Initiation section, especially opening, shared-plan and final paragraphs; display30.10.17 and byline IDF Editorial Team.

Access limitations

This is an IDF retrospective by a party to the conflict. Its original orders, casualty register and independent revised totals were not acquired. Planning, launch, cessation instruction and withdrawal remain distinct. Source labels do not establish legal combatant status or individual guilt, and operation totals are not assigned personally to planners. The blocked personal leadership allegation is excluded.

Official live selected-body review without a cached-body hash. The producer challenge payload and review receipt are not the source body; displayed2017date is not verified original publication.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

official_live_body_read_no_cached_body_hash · HR-ARCHIVE-B03-FAMILY-IDF-LITANI

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B03-SRC-LB-IDF-WEB@A4-LIVE-20261030

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: Not established. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_attributed_wording

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

This is an IDF retrospective by a party to the conflict. Its original orders, casualty register and independent revised totals were not acquired. Planning, launch, cessation instruction and withdrawal remain distinct. Source labels do not establish legal combatant status or individual guilt, and operation totals are not assigned personally to planners. The blocked personal leadership allegation is excluded.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Planning relationship only; no automatic personal allocation of operation deaths.

This is an IDF retrospective by a party to the conflict. Its original orders, casualty register and independent revised totals were not acquired. Planning, launch, cessation instruction and withdrawal remain distinct. Source labels do not establish legal combatant status or individual guilt, and operation totals are not assigned personally to planners. The blocked personal leadership allegation is excluded.

Legal distinction

Source-attributed planning, launch, cessation instruction and diplomatic assurances are distinct. No authenticated private order, finding of individual criminal guilt, entire-conflict initiation or personal casualty allocation is established.

Casualty scope: Exact source-defined populations remain separate. Children and shelter needs are subsets, not extra totals. IDF source terminology is not an independently verified legal classification; early relief figures are not added to operation totals or assigned to planners.

Record A4-B13-LB-PLAN-GUR · exact wording SHA-256 2d48ab09249523cff8c9ea98efa520f9084b47ab57a27e9765b526387c3de930

Report a correction →
human consequence

OFDA Situation Report No. 4, reproduced in the Congressional Record on 6 April 1978, listed 50–60 dead, 120 injured and 245,000 displaced in Lebanon, including 160,000 needing shelter. It explicitly said updated death and injury figures were unavailable.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact source attributed bounded historical proposition · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 1978-04-06 · Congressional reproduction; underlying observation cutoff unknown.

Date basis and original source clocks

1978-04-06 · Congressional reproduction; underlying observation cutoff unknown

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Situation report No4 on Lebanon, reproduced in Congressional Record6April1978 p9159 ↗

Publisher: USAID Office of US Foreign Disaster Assistance / US Congress

Exact passage: PDFp16, CongressionalRecord printed9159, rightcolumn Lebanon—DisplacedPersons

Source establishes: Physical16/printed9159 right column; original situation-report observation cutoff is unknown. Shelter group is a subset, not 160,000 additional displaced people.

Document date: 1978-04-06 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Physical16/printed9159, right-column OFDA SituationReportNo4, table and GeneralSituation; rendered and visually checked.

Access limitations

These are OFDA observations reproduced on 6 April 1978, not a final conflict-wide toll. Updated death/injury figures were expressly unavailable and the underlying cutoff is unknown. Shelter needs are a subset of displaced people. Do not add these figures to IDF or later editorial totals or infer civilian/child breakdowns.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_cached_original_body_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B03-FAMILY-USAID-LB4

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B03-SRC-LB-USAID@4bdfbffa2e159204

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 4bdfbffa2e159204ae1f0678cd992ac7177d02547e586108f36d5d604cd4921d. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_attributed_wording

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

These are OFDA observations reproduced on 6 April 1978, not a final conflict-wide toll. Updated death/injury figures were expressly unavailable and the underlying cutoff is unknown. Shelter needs are a subset of displaced people. Do not add these figures to IDF or later editorial totals or infer civilian/child breakdowns.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Death/injury figures expressly not updated. Underlying report cut-off unknown; no civilian/combatant/age breakdown. Shelter group is a subset of displaced.

These are OFDA observations reproduced on 6 April 1978, not a final conflict-wide toll. Updated death/injury figures were expressly unavailable and the underlying cutoff is unknown. Shelter needs are a subset of displaced people. Do not add these figures to IDF or later editorial totals or infer civilian/child breakdowns.

Legal distinction

Source-attributed planning, launch, cessation instruction and diplomatic assurances are distinct. No authenticated private order, finding of individual criminal guilt, entire-conflict initiation or personal casualty allocation is established.

Casualty scope: Exact source-defined populations remain separate. Children and shelter needs are subsets, not extra totals. IDF source terminology is not an independently verified legal classification; early relief figures are not added to operation totals or assigned to planners.

Record A4-B13-LB-RELIEF-QUANTITIES · exact wording SHA-256 a235a95267814853dad209d531d8ea6d1923a4ebba348e2b186608a51767393b

Report a correction →
context

The Secretary-General’s September 1978 report says UNIFIL’s first-month humanitarian work included recovering dead and wounded, searching for missing people including children, and providing shelter and medical help. The passage gives no child casualty total.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact source attributed bounded historical proposition · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 1978-09-13 · UN report; first-month activities and19March–13September reporting period separate.

Date basis and original source clocks

1978-09-13 · UN report; first-month activities and19March–13September reporting period separate

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

S/12845, Report on UNIFIL,19March-13September1978 ↗

Publisher: UN Secretary-General

Exact passage: para53, PDF/printedp16

Source establishes: S/12845 paragraph53 physical/printed16; cover13September1978 and reporting period19March–13September1978 visually checked, overriding erroneous web metadata.

Document date: 1978-09-13 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Physical1 cover rendered/viewed, physical16 paragraph53 read; original cover13September1978 and period19March–13September1978.

Access limitations

S/12845 is dated 13 September 1978 and covers 19 March–13 September. Original PDF controls erroneous online metadata. Its qualitative humanitarian work description is not a verified number of lives saved, missing children or casualties.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_cached_original_body_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B03-FAMILY-UN-S12845

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B03-SRC-LB-S12845@9e8a506de06f5ab3

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 9e8a506de06f5ab35e7be5817c3d3743fcd09708f23e1a66288ff5b19dabc5d6. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_attributed_wording

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

S/12845 is dated 13 September 1978 and covers 19 March–13 September. Original PDF controls erroneous online metadata. Its qualitative humanitarian work description is not a verified number of lives saved, missing children or casualties.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

No numeric child, missing or injury total in this passage.

S/12845 is dated 13 September 1978 and covers 19 March–13 September. Original PDF controls erroneous online metadata. Its qualitative humanitarian work description is not a verified number of lives saved, missing children or casualties.

Legal distinction

Source-attributed planning, launch, cessation instruction and diplomatic assurances are distinct. No authenticated private order, finding of individual criminal guilt, entire-conflict initiation or personal casualty allocation is established.

Casualty scope: Exact source-defined populations remain separate. Children and shelter needs are subsets, not extra totals. IDF source terminology is not an independently verified legal classification; early relief figures are not added to operation totals or assigned to planners.

Record A4-B13-LB-UN-HUMANITARIAN · exact wording SHA-256 f9ca1be0a96801a4c0ff6ab1addb466c9109068aa5337e6750393db395073f64

Report a correction →
decision

The IDF’s account says Defence Minister Ezer Weizman ordered the operation to end on 21 March 1978. This does not establish that all subsequent violence stopped then.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact source attributed bounded historical proposition · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 1978-03-21 · reported cessation instruction; not proof all violence ended.

Date basis and original source clocks

1978-03-21 · reported cessation instruction; not proof all violence ended

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Operation Litani ↗

Publisher: IDF Editorial Team

Exact passage: Initiation section, renderedline29

Source establishes: Initiation final paragraph; cessation instruction is distinct from launch, withdrawal and later incidents.

Document date: Not established · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Opening paragraph and Initiation section, especially opening, shared-plan and final paragraphs; display30.10.17 and byline IDF Editorial Team.

Access limitations

This is an IDF retrospective by a party to the conflict. Its original orders, casualty register and independent revised totals were not acquired. Planning, launch, cessation instruction and withdrawal remain distinct. Source labels do not establish legal combatant status or individual guilt, and operation totals are not assigned personally to planners. The blocked personal leadership allegation is excluded.

Official live selected-body review without a cached-body hash. The producer challenge payload and review receipt are not the source body; displayed2017date is not verified original publication.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

official_live_body_read_no_cached_body_hash · HR-ARCHIVE-B03-FAMILY-IDF-LITANI

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B03-SRC-LB-IDF-WEB@A4-LIVE-20261030

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: Not established. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_attributed_wording

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

This is an IDF retrospective by a party to the conflict. Its original orders, casualty register and independent revised totals were not acquired. Planning, launch, cessation instruction and withdrawal remain distinct. Source labels do not establish legal combatant status or individual guilt, and operation totals are not assigned personally to planners. The blocked personal leadership allegation is excluded.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Does not establish immediate cessation of all later violence. Cannot cause earlier displacement.

This is an IDF retrospective by a party to the conflict. Its original orders, casualty register and independent revised totals were not acquired. Planning, launch, cessation instruction and withdrawal remain distinct. Source labels do not establish legal combatant status or individual guilt, and operation totals are not assigned personally to planners. The blocked personal leadership allegation is excluded.

Legal distinction

Source-attributed planning, launch, cessation instruction and diplomatic assurances are distinct. No authenticated private order, finding of individual criminal guilt, entire-conflict initiation or personal casualty allocation is established.

Casualty scope: Exact source-defined populations remain separate. Children and shelter needs are subsets, not extra totals. IDF source terminology is not an independently verified legal classification; early relief figures are not added to operation totals or assigned to planners.

Record A4-B13-LB-WEIZMAN-STOP · exact wording SHA-256 daf050605c086a6c40ad32d425d3e0fc766958d6e179b873f71faa151552e075

Report a correction →
human consequence

At the UN Third Committee on 13 October 1976, Mozambique’s delegate repeated her foreign minister’s claim that 675 unarmed refugees had been killed at Nyazonia. This is a government claim recorded at the UN, not an independently verified UN count.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact source attributed bounded historical proposition · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 13 October1976 · delegate repeats5October government statement; not a verified UN count.

Date basis and original source clocks

13 October1976 · delegate repeats5October government statement; not a verified UN count. Historical subject, cited press, government statement/meeting, refugee-centre assessment and later report keep separate clocks. A report date is not an unknown observation day or a newly occurring raid.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

A/C.3/31/SR.15, Third Committee13October1976 ↗

Publisher: UN General Assembly summary record

Exact passage: para8, PDF/printedp4

Source establishes: A/C.3/31/SR.15 paragraph8 physical4; repeats5Octoberstatement, same government source family as later mission account.

Document date: 1976-10-13 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: A/C.3/31/SR.15cover and physical4paragraph8read; MrsSumbane13October1976repeats5Octoberforeignministerstatement.

Access limitations

These are Mozambique government accounts relayed in UN documents. The 675 and more-than-700 accounts are different reports from a related family, not independent counts to add. Missing/untraced people are not assumed dead. No individual order or reconciled child toll is established.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_cached_original_body_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B03-FAMILY-MOZ-GOV-REPORTING

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B03-SRC-RH-UN-SR15@dce11c98bcaff2c9

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: dce11c98bcaff2c97832f2cc92e62e911b3a1e8ff7508ac5339feea4d1e439fc. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_attributed_wording

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

These are Mozambique government accounts relayed in UN documents. The 675 and more-than-700 accounts are different reports from a related family, not independent counts to add. Missing/untraced people are not assumed dead. No individual order or reconciled child toll is established.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Summary record of13October repeats October5 foreign-minister statement. Related government source family, not independent corroboration of the mission figure.

These are Mozambique government accounts relayed in UN documents. The 675 and more-than-700 accounts are different reports from a related family, not independent counts to add. Missing/untraced people are not assumed dead. No individual order or reconciled child toll is established.

Legal distinction

Public pursuit policy, raid, government allegations, experts assessment and relayed UNHCR observations are separate. No individual raid authorisation, criminal judgment or reconciled final toll is established.

Casualty scope: More than700,675 and at least620 are alternative source accounts, not additive victims. More than1000 fled/untraced are not assumed dead. Wounded296/204, reported evacuations176 and hospitalised302 may overlap. No reconciled child toll, new combatant classification or personal allocation.

Record A4-B13-RH-675 · exact wording SHA-256 5cee67d5a9cfd6fb96e64b440a5ccd7ed13e2e319bf4341a0473ec2f5f97592d

Report a correction →
context

UN experts quoted the Rhodesian communiqué’s military-target account of Nyazonia, rejected it, and relayed UNHCR’s assessment that the site was a refugee settlement. Their report is not an individual criminal judgment.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact source attributed bounded historical proposition · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 31 January1977 · experts report;10August1976 communiqué is separately attributed.

Date basis and original source clocks

31 January1977 · experts report;10August1976 communiqué is separately attributed. Historical subject, cited press, government statement/meeting, refugee-centre assessment and later report keep separate clocks. A report date is not an unknown observation day or a newly occurring raid.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

E/CN.4/1222, Ad Hoc Working Group report31January1977 ↗

Publisher: UN Commission on Human Rights experts

Exact passage: paras478-479 and footnotes52-53, PDF/printedp150

Source establishes: E/CN.4/1222 paragraphs478–479 physical150; opposing categories, quoted press, and UNHCR assessment remain identified. Original communiqué and press release not independently acquired.

Document date: 1977-01-31 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Physical/printed149–150,paras474,478–479andfootnotes47,52,53 independentlyread;150rendered/viewed for counts/voice/footnotes. REF/744visible; LeMondeyearnotacceptedascorrected1976.

Access limitations

UN experts distinguish Rhodesian communiqué claims, press reports, their assessment and a relayed UNHCR visit. Underlying communiqué, press editions and REF/744 were not separately acquired. Wounded, hospitalised and evacuated groups may overlap; competing death estimates are not summed. Footnote52’s Le Monde year remains unverified; no silently corrected date or personal criminal judgment is approved. A cited public pursuit-policy statement is distinct from a private operational authorisation. The original newspaper and a personal Nyazonia instruction were not acquired. Southern Rhodesia’s then-disputed/unrecognised state status must be labelled if Engineering uses a symbolic Salisbury reference; this review supplies no coordinates or personal casualty arc.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_cached_original_body_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B03-FAMILY-UN-SOUTHERNAFRICA-INQUIRY

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B03-SRC-RH-UN-INQUIRY1976@7132d796e2b91b5d

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 7132d796e2b91b5d1ab0382e5d347c65edd30cc73082410c54ca6a2195f65adb. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_attributed_wording

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

UN experts distinguish Rhodesian communiqué claims, press reports, their assessment and a relayed UNHCR visit. Underlying communiqué, press editions and REF/744 were not separately acquired. Wounded, hospitalised and evacuated groups may overlap; competing death estimates are not summed. Footnote52’s Le Monde year remains unverified; no silently corrected date or personal criminal judgment is approved. A cited public pursuit-policy statement is distinct from a private operational authorisation. The original newspaper and a personal Nyazonia instruction were not acquired. Southern Rhodesia’s then-disputed/unrecognised state status must be labelled if Engineering uses a symbolic Salisbury reference; this review supplies no coordinates or personal casualty arc.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Underlying10August communiqué and REF/744 press release not separately obtained. Report is not an individual criminal judgment. Civilian/combatant categories remain contested.

UN experts distinguish Rhodesian communiqué claims, press reports, their assessment and a relayed UNHCR visit. Underlying communiqué, press editions and REF/744 were not separately acquired. Wounded, hospitalised and evacuated groups may overlap; competing death estimates are not summed. Footnote52’s Le Monde year remains unverified; no silently corrected date or personal criminal judgment is approved.

Legal distinction

Public pursuit policy, raid, government allegations, experts assessment and relayed UNHCR observations are separate. No individual raid authorisation, criminal judgment or reconciled final toll is established.

Casualty scope: More than700,675 and at least620 are alternative source accounts, not additive victims. More than1000 fled/untraced are not assumed dead. Wounded296/204, reported evacuations176 and hospitalised302 may overlap. No reconciled child toll, new combatant classification or personal allocation.

Record A4-B13-RH-COMMUNIQUE · exact wording SHA-256 931ece5f43d9f9e99ac0f74f72c4ebacc9f6e1ea33d36f8fc1aa25601f0fec8e

Report a correction →
human consequence

The mission report relays Mozambique’s account of more than 700 people killed at Nyazonia and more than 1,000 refugees who fled and had not been traced. Untraced people are not assumed dead or added to the death estimate.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact source attributed bounded historical proposition · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 9 June1977 · mission report about9August1976; not a new raid or death date.

Date basis and original source clocks

9 June1977 · mission report about9August1976; not a new raid or death date. Historical subject, cited press, government statement/meeting, refugee-centre assessment and later report keep separate clocks. A report date is not an unknown observation day or a newly occurring raid.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

A/32/96 Assistance to Mozambique, second review mission ↗

Publisher: UN Secretary-General

Exact passage: paras85-86(a), PDF/printedp27

Source establishes: A/32/96 physical27 paragraphs85–86(a); not an independently enumerated UN casualty register.

Document date: 1977-06-09 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: A/32/96 cover and physical23–25paras67,71–72; physical27paras85–86(a) rendered/viewed. Governmentaccount distinguished from UNagencyteamobservations.

Access limitations

These are Mozambique government accounts relayed in UN documents. The 675 and more-than-700 accounts are different reports from a related family, not independent counts to add. Missing/untraced people are not assumed dead. No individual order or reconciled child toll is established. The assistance mission incorporates a UNHCR–UNICEF–WFP team’s refugee-centre assessments. Relocation and continuing effects are qualitative observations, not individual medical diagnoses or a complete affected-person count.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_cached_original_body_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B03-FAMILY-MOZ-GOV-REPORTING

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B03-SRC-RH-MISSION1977@c32c235e8530ab0e

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: c32c235e8530ab0e0401a4c730056b98f857f625a7e8f0a4e2ebe3c20409bbe6. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_attributed_wording

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

These are Mozambique government accounts relayed in UN documents. The 675 and more-than-700 accounts are different reports from a related family, not independent counts to add. Missing/untraced people are not assumed dead. No individual order or reconciled child toll is established. The assistance mission incorporates a UNHCR–UNICEF–WFP team’s refugee-centre assessments. Relocation and continuing effects are qualitative observations, not individual medical diagnoses or a complete affected-person count.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Not an independently enumerated UN casualty list. Untraced people are not assumed dead; no sum.

These are Mozambique government accounts relayed in UN documents. The 675 and more-than-700 accounts are different reports from a related family, not independent counts to add. Missing/untraced people are not assumed dead. No individual order or reconciled child toll is established.

Legal distinction

Public pursuit policy, raid, government allegations, experts assessment and relayed UNHCR observations are separate. No individual raid authorisation, criminal judgment or reconciled final toll is established.

Casualty scope: More than700,675 and at least620 are alternative source accounts, not additive victims. More than1000 fled/untraced are not assumed dead. Wounded296/204, reported evacuations176 and hospitalised302 may overlap. No reconciled child toll, new combatant classification or personal allocation.

Record A4-B13-RH-DEATHS-MISSING · exact wording SHA-256 7937808a114633f72f86fb7d0d4697604fc2f315c568dc720d66d3e415c87013

Report a correction →
human consequence

The UN experts also relay an earlier press estimate of at least 620 dead and 302 in hospital after Nyazonia. This is a reported estimate, not an additional victim group or a final reconciled toll.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact source attributed bounded historical proposition · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 31 January1977 · report availability only; exact press estimate day/year unresolved.

Date basis and original source clocks

31 January1977 · report availability only; exact press estimate day/year unresolved. Historical subject, cited press, government statement/meeting, refugee-centre assessment and later report keep separate clocks. A report date is not an unknown observation day or a newly occurring raid.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

E/CN.4/1222, Ad Hoc Working Group report31January1977 ↗

Publisher: UN Commission on Human Rights experts

Exact passage: para478, p150, footnote52

Source establishes: Paragraph478 physical150 and footnote52; underlying press editions not reviewed, and the Le Monde year in the scan is ambiguous/inconsistent with the producer’s assertion. No corrected press date is approved.

Document date: 1977-01-31 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Physical/printed149–150,paras474,478–479andfootnotes47,52,53 independentlyread;150rendered/viewed for counts/voice/footnotes. REF/744visible; LeMondeyearnotacceptedascorrected1976.

Access limitations

UN experts distinguish Rhodesian communiqué claims, press reports, their assessment and a relayed UNHCR visit. Underlying communiqué, press editions and REF/744 were not separately acquired. Wounded, hospitalised and evacuated groups may overlap; competing death estimates are not summed. Footnote52’s Le Monde year remains unverified; no silently corrected date or personal criminal judgment is approved. A cited public pursuit-policy statement is distinct from a private operational authorisation. The original newspaper and a personal Nyazonia instruction were not acquired. Southern Rhodesia’s then-disputed/unrecognised state status must be labelled if Engineering uses a symbolic Salisbury reference; this review supplies no coordinates or personal casualty arc.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_cached_original_body_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B03-FAMILY-UN-SOUTHERNAFRICA-INQUIRY

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B03-SRC-RH-UN-INQUIRY1976@7132d796e2b91b5d

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 7132d796e2b91b5d1ab0382e5d347c65edd30cc73082410c54ca6a2195f65adb. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_attributed_wording

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

UN experts distinguish Rhodesian communiqué claims, press reports, their assessment and a relayed UNHCR visit. Underlying communiqué, press editions and REF/744 were not separately acquired. Wounded, hospitalised and evacuated groups may overlap; competing death estimates are not summed. Footnote52’s Le Monde year remains unverified; no silently corrected date or personal criminal judgment is approved. A cited public pursuit-policy statement is distinct from a private operational authorisation. The original newspaper and a personal Nyazonia instruction were not acquired. Southern Rhodesia’s then-disputed/unrecognised state status must be labelled if Engineering uses a symbolic Salisbury reference; this review supplies no coordinates or personal casualty arc.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Underlying press reports not obtained. Related/overlapping event counts, not additional victims.

UN experts distinguish Rhodesian communiqué claims, press reports, their assessment and a relayed UNHCR visit. Underlying communiqué, press editions and REF/744 were not separately acquired. Wounded, hospitalised and evacuated groups may overlap; competing death estimates are not summed. Footnote52’s Le Monde year remains unverified; no silently corrected date or personal criminal judgment is approved.

Legal distinction

Public pursuit policy, raid, government allegations, experts assessment and relayed UNHCR observations are separate. No individual raid authorisation, criminal judgment or reconciled final toll is established.

Casualty scope: More than700,675 and at least620 are alternative source accounts, not additive victims. More than1000 fled/untraced are not assumed dead. Wounded296/204, reported evacuations176 and hospitalised302 may overlap. No reconciled child toll, new combatant classification or personal allocation.

Record A4-B13-RH-EARLY-TOLL · exact wording SHA-256 4856ea7cc1f9766a1929031134b44e4bf06ef4c5cb403051c1aff4dfcf91aeb1

Report a correction →
human consequence

The experts relay a UNHCR representative’s counts of 296 wounded at Chimoio hospital and 204 at a temporary camp, plus information given to him that 176 serious cases had been evacuated to Beira. Possible overlaps and transfers prevent adding these figures.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact source attributed bounded historical proposition · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 31 January1977 · report availability only; exact observation/visit day unknown.

Date basis and original source clocks

31 January1977 · report availability only; exact observation/visit day unknown. Historical subject, cited press, government statement/meeting, refugee-centre assessment and later report keep separate clocks. A report date is not an unknown observation day or a newly occurring raid.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

E/CN.4/1222, Ad Hoc Working Group report31January1977 ↗

Publisher: UN Commission on Human Rights experts

Exact passage: para479, p150; footnote53 REF/744 of25August1976

Source establishes: Paragraph479 physical150 distinguishes observed296/204 from reported176; footnote53 cites REF/744,25August1976.

Document date: 1977-01-31 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Physical/printed149–150,paras474,478–479andfootnotes47,52,53 independentlyread;150rendered/viewed for counts/voice/footnotes. REF/744visible; LeMondeyearnotacceptedascorrected1976.

Access limitations

UN experts distinguish Rhodesian communiqué claims, press reports, their assessment and a relayed UNHCR visit. Underlying communiqué, press editions and REF/744 were not separately acquired. Wounded, hospitalised and evacuated groups may overlap; competing death estimates are not summed. Footnote52’s Le Monde year remains unverified; no silently corrected date or personal criminal judgment is approved. A cited public pursuit-policy statement is distinct from a private operational authorisation. The original newspaper and a personal Nyazonia instruction were not acquired. Southern Rhodesia’s then-disputed/unrecognised state status must be labelled if Engineering uses a symbolic Salisbury reference; this review supplies no coordinates or personal casualty arc.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_cached_original_body_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B03-FAMILY-UN-SOUTHERNAFRICA-INQUIRY

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B03-SRC-RH-UN-INQUIRY1976@7132d796e2b91b5d

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 7132d796e2b91b5d1ab0382e5d347c65edd30cc73082410c54ca6a2195f65adb. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_attributed_wording

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

UN experts distinguish Rhodesian communiqué claims, press reports, their assessment and a relayed UNHCR visit. Underlying communiqué, press editions and REF/744 were not separately acquired. Wounded, hospitalised and evacuated groups may overlap; competing death estimates are not summed. Footnote52’s Le Monde year remains unverified; no silently corrected date or personal criminal judgment is approved. A cited public pursuit-policy statement is distinct from a private operational authorisation. The original newspaper and a personal Nyazonia instruction were not acquired. Southern Rhodesia’s then-disputed/unrecognised state status must be labelled if Engineering uses a symbolic Salisbury reference; this review supplies no coordinates or personal casualty arc.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Visit report not separately reviewed.296 and204 described as seen;176 reported to visitor. Overlap, transfers and survival unknown; never add.

UN experts distinguish Rhodesian communiqué claims, press reports, their assessment and a relayed UNHCR visit. Underlying communiqué, press editions and REF/744 were not separately acquired. Wounded, hospitalised and evacuated groups may overlap; competing death estimates are not summed. Footnote52’s Le Monde year remains unverified; no silently corrected date or personal criminal judgment is approved.

Legal distinction

Public pursuit policy, raid, government allegations, experts assessment and relayed UNHCR observations are separate. No individual raid authorisation, criminal judgment or reconciled final toll is established.

Casualty scope: More than700,675 and at least620 are alternative source accounts, not additive victims. More than1000 fled/untraced are not assumed dead. Wounded296/204, reported evacuations176 and hospitalised302 may overlap. No reconciled child toll, new combatant classification or personal allocation.

Record A4-B13-RH-INJURED · exact wording SHA-256 2e0c877143cdd7cbbc4661ca6993f35a1d315c695018eb2e5c8b950b8cbb08ff

Report a correction →
context

The UN’s 1977 assistance mission report relays Mozambique’s account that Southern Rhodesian forces attacked the Nyazonia refugee centre on 9 August 1976. The reviewed passage does not identify an individual authorisation.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact source attributed bounded historical proposition · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 9 August1976 · reported raid day; individual authorisation unknown.

Date basis and original source clocks

9 August1976 · reported raid day; individual authorisation unknown. Historical subject, cited press, government statement/meeting, refugee-centre assessment and later report keep separate clocks. A report date is not an unknown observation day or a newly occurring raid.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

A/32/96 Assistance to Mozambique, second review mission ↗

Publisher: UN Secretary-General

Exact passage: paras71-72 pp23-25; paras85-86(a) p27

Source establishes: A/32/96 paragraphs85–86(a) are explicitly information from the Government of Mozambique; agency refugee-centre observations are separate.

Document date: 1977-06-09 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: A/32/96 cover and physical23–25paras67,71–72; physical27paras85–86(a) rendered/viewed. Governmentaccount distinguished from UNagencyteamobservations.

Access limitations

These are Mozambique government accounts relayed in UN documents. The 675 and more-than-700 accounts are different reports from a related family, not independent counts to add. Missing/untraced people are not assumed dead. No individual order or reconciled child toll is established. The assistance mission incorporates a UNHCR–UNICEF–WFP team’s refugee-centre assessments. Relocation and continuing effects are qualitative observations, not individual medical diagnoses or a complete affected-person count.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_cached_original_body_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B03-FAMILY-MOZ-GOV-REPORTING

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B03-SRC-RH-MISSION1977@c32c235e8530ab0e

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: c32c235e8530ab0e0401a4c730056b98f857f625a7e8f0a4e2ebe3c20409bbe6. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_attributed_wording

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

These are Mozambique government accounts relayed in UN documents. The 675 and more-than-700 accounts are different reports from a related family, not independent counts to add. Missing/untraced people are not assumed dead. No individual order or reconciled child toll is established. The assistance mission incorporates a UNHCR–UNICEF–WFP team’s refugee-centre assessments. Relocation and continuing effects are qualitative observations, not individual medical diagnoses or a complete affected-person count.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Individual authorisation and complete unit chain remain unresolved.

These are Mozambique government accounts relayed in UN documents. The 675 and more-than-700 accounts are different reports from a related family, not independent counts to add. Missing/untraced people are not assumed dead. No individual order or reconciled child toll is established.

Legal distinction

Public pursuit policy, raid, government allegations, experts assessment and relayed UNHCR observations are separate. No individual raid authorisation, criminal judgment or reconciled final toll is established.

Casualty scope: More than700,675 and at least620 are alternative source accounts, not additive victims. More than1000 fled/untraced are not assumed dead. Wounded296/204, reported evacuations176 and hospitalised302 may overlap. No reconciled child toll, new combatant classification or personal allocation.

Record A4-B13-RH-RAID · exact wording SHA-256 528836ae41c8acb2e10e43fb8fbdd2d2e76288dada3a6036625e8a9db0c2d30a

Report a correction →
human consequence

The UN assistance report describes Doroi opening as an emergency centre after the Nyazonia attack and records continuing physical and psychological effects among relocated refugees. It supplies no complete count or individual diagnosis of those effects.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact source attributed bounded historical proposition · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 30 March–4 April1977 · refugee-centre assessment interval; not an exact relocation day.

Date basis and original source clocks

30 March–4 April1977 · refugee-centre assessment interval; not an exact relocation day. Historical subject, cited press, government statement/meeting, refugee-centre assessment and later report keep separate clocks. A report date is not an unknown observation day or a newly occurring raid.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

A/32/96 Assistance to Mozambique, second review mission ↗

Publisher: UN Secretary-General

Exact passage: paras71-72, PDFpp23,25

Source establishes: A/32/96 paragraphs67,71–72 physical23–25, incorporating assessments by a UNHCR–UNICEF–WFP team.

Document date: 1977-06-09 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: A/32/96 cover and physical23–25paras67,71–72; physical27paras85–86(a) rendered/viewed. Governmentaccount distinguished from UNagencyteamobservations.

Access limitations

These are Mozambique government accounts relayed in UN documents. The 675 and more-than-700 accounts are different reports from a related family, not independent counts to add. Missing/untraced people are not assumed dead. No individual order or reconciled child toll is established. The assistance mission incorporates a UNHCR–UNICEF–WFP team’s refugee-centre assessments. Relocation and continuing effects are qualitative observations, not individual medical diagnoses or a complete affected-person count.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_cached_original_body_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B03-FAMILY-MOZ-GOV-REPORTING

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B03-SRC-RH-MISSION1977@c32c235e8530ab0e

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: c32c235e8530ab0e0401a4c730056b98f857f625a7e8f0a4e2ebe3c20409bbe6. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_attributed_wording

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

These are Mozambique government accounts relayed in UN documents. The 675 and more-than-700 accounts are different reports from a related family, not independent counts to add. Missing/untraced people are not assumed dead. No individual order or reconciled child toll is established. The assistance mission incorporates a UNHCR–UNICEF–WFP team’s refugee-centre assessments. Relocation and continuing effects are qualitative observations, not individual medical diagnoses or a complete affected-person count.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

No numeric long-term trauma diagnosis or individual victim count inferred.

The assistance mission incorporates a UNHCR–UNICEF–WFP team’s refugee-centre assessments. Relocation and continuing effects are qualitative observations, not individual medical diagnoses or a complete affected-person count.

Legal distinction

Public pursuit policy, raid, government allegations, experts assessment and relayed UNHCR observations are separate. No individual raid authorisation, criminal judgment or reconciled final toll is established.

Casualty scope: More than700,675 and at least620 are alternative source accounts, not additive victims. More than1000 fled/untraced are not assumed dead. Wounded296/204, reported evacuations176 and hospitalised302 may overlap. No reconciled child toll, new combatant classification or personal allocation.

Record A4-B13-RH-RELOCATION · exact wording SHA-256 9160c011932b3448be282d181c19243b3e04cc558600ebad385cecc49288b6ed

Report a correction →
decision

The UN experts quote Lt-Gen G. P. Walls expressing a cross-border pursuit policy in May 1976, citing the Rhodesia Herald of 1 May. This statement does not establish that he personally ordered the later Nyazonia raid.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact source attributed bounded historical proposition · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 1 May1976 · cited newspaper edition, not a verified private raid-order day.

Date basis and original source clocks

1 May1976 · cited newspaper edition, not a verified private raid-order day. Historical subject, cited press, government statement/meeting, refugee-centre assessment and later report keep separate clocks. A report date is not an unknown observation day or a newly occurring raid.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

E/CN.4/1222, Ad Hoc Working Group report31January1977 ↗

Publisher: UN Commission on Human Rights experts

Exact passage: para474 p149; footnote47 RhodesiaHerald1May1976

Source establishes: Paragraph474 physical149 and footnote47; original newspaper issue and private operational authorisation were not obtained.

Document date: 1977-01-31 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Physical/printed149–150,paras474,478–479andfootnotes47,52,53 independentlyread;150rendered/viewed for counts/voice/footnotes. REF/744visible; LeMondeyearnotacceptedascorrected1976.

Access limitations

UN experts distinguish Rhodesian communiqué claims, press reports, their assessment and a relayed UNHCR visit. Underlying communiqué, press editions and REF/744 were not separately acquired. Wounded, hospitalised and evacuated groups may overlap; competing death estimates are not summed. Footnote52’s Le Monde year remains unverified; no silently corrected date or personal criminal judgment is approved. A cited public pursuit-policy statement is distinct from a private operational authorisation. The original newspaper and a personal Nyazonia instruction were not acquired. Southern Rhodesia’s then-disputed/unrecognised state status must be labelled if Engineering uses a symbolic Salisbury reference; this review supplies no coordinates or personal casualty arc.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_cached_original_body_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B03-FAMILY-UN-SOUTHERNAFRICA-INQUIRY

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B03-SRC-RH-UN-INQUIRY1976@7132d796e2b91b5d

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 7132d796e2b91b5d1ab0382e5d347c65edd30cc73082410c54ca6a2195f65adb. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_attributed_wording

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

UN experts distinguish Rhodesian communiqué claims, press reports, their assessment and a relayed UNHCR visit. Underlying communiqué, press editions and REF/744 were not separately acquired. Wounded, hospitalised and evacuated groups may overlap; competing death estimates are not summed. Footnote52’s Le Monde year remains unverified; no silently corrected date or personal criminal judgment is approved. A cited public pursuit-policy statement is distinct from a private operational authorisation. The original newspaper and a personal Nyazonia instruction were not acquired. Southern Rhodesia’s then-disputed/unrecognised state status must be labelled if Engineering uses a symbolic Salisbury reference; this review supplies no coordinates or personal casualty arc.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Original press issue not reviewed. This statement does not prove a personal Nyazonia order. Full name/office tenure and operational approval remain gaps.

A cited public pursuit-policy statement is distinct from a private operational authorisation. The original newspaper and a personal Nyazonia instruction were not acquired. Southern Rhodesia’s then-disputed/unrecognised state status must be labelled if Engineering uses a symbolic Salisbury reference; this review supplies no coordinates or personal casualty arc.

Legal distinction

Public pursuit policy, raid, government allegations, experts assessment and relayed UNHCR observations are separate. No individual raid authorisation, criminal judgment or reconciled final toll is established.

Casualty scope: More than700,675 and at least620 are alternative source accounts, not additive victims. More than1000 fled/untraced are not assumed dead. Wounded296/204, reported evacuations176 and hospitalised302 may overlap. No reconciled child toll, new combatant classification or personal allocation.

Record A4-B13-RH-WALLS-POLICY · exact wording SHA-256 ddf38d1bf369e69d31d5f08ba8ae9233475ad36fb50bd08a3219aef89009d270

Report a correction →
context

Amnesty’s report Human Rights Violations in Uganda, dated June 1978, traces the military regime to the coup of 1971. The report’s hosting filename does not establish a 1982 publication date.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact source attributed bounded historical proposition · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: June1978 · retrospective report month about1971; not regime onset in1978 or hosting filename1982.

Date basis and original source clocks

June1978 · retrospective report month about1971; not regime onset in1978 or hosting filename1982

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Human Rights Violations in Uganda, June1978, with errata ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: Introduction, PDFp3

Source establishes: Physical3 introduction and errata physical2; only introductory chronology approved, not the unrevised detailed allegations elsewhere.

Document date: 1978-06 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Physical3 cover/intro rendered/viewed; physical2errata read. Title HumanRightsViolationsinUganda,June1978, AIreportAFR59/05/78;1971intro chronology only.

Access limitations

The reviewed Amnesty document identifies itself as June 1978 and includes errata. Its hosting filename is not publication evidence. Approval is limited to introductory 1971 chronology; unrevised remainder and detailed personal allegations are not adopted.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_cached_original_body_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B03-FAMILY-AI-UG

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B03-SRC-UG-AMNESTYCASE@46eeda5199f77ba4

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 46eeda5199f77ba4bb4fbb9fec1167f58398a41761393a5d4af41db39ab3edf0. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_attributed_wording

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

The reviewed Amnesty document identifies itself as June 1978 and includes errata. Its hosting filename is not publication evidence. Approval is limited to introductory 1971 chronology; unrevised remainder and detailed personal allegations are not adopted.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Hosting path date1982 does not replace original report dateJune1978. No1976 regime-onset inference.

The reviewed Amnesty document identifies itself as June 1978 and includes errata. Its hosting filename is not publication evidence. Approval is limited to introductory 1971 chronology; unrevised remainder and detailed personal allegations are not adopted.

Legal distinction

Reported summons, arrests, death reports and competing official/NGO accounts are distinct. No personal torture or execution order, resolved manner of death or criminal classification is established.

Casualty scope: Tentative below-ten estimate is not a hard cap; more than200 is an exclusive lower bound. Students are not automatically children. Three named deaths and spelling variants do not create extra victims. No additive total or personal casualty allocation.

Record A4-B13-UG-1971-CONTEXT · exact wording SHA-256 b205027c8b3191c262d92cb8014c3627d929a22ebfef82803571b9ce8c4acaef

Report a correction →
context

The U.S. telegram relays Kampala radio’s claim that Luwum and the two ministers died in a car accident while trying to escape custody. Amnesty expressed grave doubts and called for an independent inquiry. This review does not resolve those conflicting accounts.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact source attributed bounded historical proposition · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 17February1977 · telegram relaying conflicting accounts, not an exact death date.

Date basis and original source clocks

17February1977 · telegram relaying conflicting accounts, not an exact death date

Sources (2) · exact passages & limitations

FRUS1977-1980 volXVII part2 doc137, telegram2168 ↗

Publisher: US Embassy Kenya

Exact passage: para1

Source establishes: FRUS137 paragraph1officialaccount versus embassycomment and Amnesty physical57doubts/inquiry.

Document date: 1977-02-17 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Whole short official telegram2168,doc137,paragraphs1–3and source note read; Nairobi17February1977,1400Z.

Access limitations

Keep the summons, arrests, reported deaths, official accident account and Amnesty’s doubts separate. The embassy was not an eyewitness execution inquiry. Name variants across the two sources do not create extra victims. No personal execution order, definitive manner of death or judicial classification is established here.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_cached_original_body_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B03-FAMILY-US-UG1977

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B03-SRC-UG-FRUS137@5860970410b8810d

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 5860970410b8810d4cf9762e810558070011d089a49b8fa267f4f731da6aee76. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_attributed_wording

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Amnesty International Report1977, Uganda section ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: printed111 / PDFp57, paragraph following arrest account

Source establishes: FRUS137 paragraph1officialaccount versus embassycomment and Amnesty physical57doubts/inquiry.

Document date: 1977 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Physical57 spread, printed110–111 rendered/viewed. Makerere2–3August1976;16February1977summons/arrests; radioannouncement and Amnesty doubts/inquiry.

Access limitations

Amnesty reports anonymous eyewitness information; underlying witnesses, original orders and a full casualty register were not obtained. The tentative death estimate is not a hard cap. Students are not automatically children. Amin’s alleged personal torture instruction is individually blocked; humanitarian observations remain separately attributed. Keep the summons, arrests, reported deaths, official accident account and Amnesty’s doubts separate. The embassy was not an eyewitness execution inquiry. Name variants across the two sources do not create extra victims. No personal execution order, definitive manner of death or judicial classification is established here.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_cached_original_body_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B03-FAMILY-AI-UG

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B03-SRC-UG-AMNESTY1977@76f7030fde362aaf

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 76f7030fde362aaf18e3a4ee611f473b92e805c707c5e83b1ad2f478b1466056. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_attributed_wording

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Keep the summons, arrests, reported deaths, official accident account and Amnesty’s doubts separate. The embassy was not an eyewitness execution inquiry. Name variants across the two sources do not create extra victims. No personal execution order, definitive manner of death or judicial classification is established here.

Amnesty reports anonymous eyewitness information; underlying witnesses, original orders and a full casualty register were not obtained. The tentative death estimate is not a hard cap. Students are not automatically children. Amin’s alleged personal torture instruction is individually blocked; humanitarian observations remain separately attributed. Keep the summons, arrests, reported deaths, official accident account and Amnesty’s doubts separate. The embassy was not an eyewitness execution inquiry. Name variants across the two sources do not create extra victims. No personal execution order, definitive manner of death or judicial classification is established here.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Preserve the official account as attributed. This batch does not independently resolve the manner of death.

Keep the summons, arrests, reported deaths, official accident account and Amnesty’s doubts separate. The embassy was not an eyewitness execution inquiry. Name variants across the two sources do not create extra victims. No personal execution order, definitive manner of death or judicial classification is established here.

Legal distinction

Reported summons, arrests, death reports and competing official/NGO accounts are distinct. No personal torture or execution order, resolved manner of death or criminal classification is established.

Casualty scope: Tentative below-ten estimate is not a hard cap; more than200 is an exclusive lower bound. Students are not automatically children. Three named deaths and spelling variants do not create extra victims. No additive total or personal casualty allocation.

Record A4-B13-UG-ACCIDENT-ACCOUNT · exact wording SHA-256 7ece2b2dddc1c670a1a73d3aaca5ed289f3e4518a7874b0369972fe8946f13c6

Report a correction →
human consequence

Amnesty and a contemporaneous U.S. telegram report the deaths of Archbishop Luwum and ministers Oboth-Ofumbi and Oryema following their arrests in February 1977. The reviewed passages do not settle their manner of death or identify a personal killing order.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact source attributed bounded historical proposition · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: February1977 · reported deaths; exact death days unknown, telegram17February separate.

Date basis and original source clocks

February1977 · reported deaths; exact death days unknown, telegram17February separate

Sources (2) · exact passages & limitations

Amnesty International Report1977, Uganda section ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: Uganda, printed111 / PDFp57, arrests and following announcement

Source establishes: Amnesty physical57/printed111 and FRUSdoc137 paragraphs1–3; different given-name spellings are retained as identity variants, not additional victims.

Document date: 1977 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Physical57 spread, printed110–111 rendered/viewed. Makerere2–3August1976;16February1977summons/arrests; radioannouncement and Amnesty doubts/inquiry.

Access limitations

Amnesty reports anonymous eyewitness information; underlying witnesses, original orders and a full casualty register were not obtained. The tentative death estimate is not a hard cap. Students are not automatically children. Amin’s alleged personal torture instruction is individually blocked; humanitarian observations remain separately attributed. Keep the summons, arrests, reported deaths, official accident account and Amnesty’s doubts separate. The embassy was not an eyewitness execution inquiry. Name variants across the two sources do not create extra victims. No personal execution order, definitive manner of death or judicial classification is established here.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_cached_original_body_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B03-FAMILY-AI-UG

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B03-SRC-UG-AMNESTY1977@76f7030fde362aaf

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 76f7030fde362aaf18e3a4ee611f473b92e805c707c5e83b1ad2f478b1466056. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_attributed_wording

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

FRUS1977-1980 volXVII part2 doc137, telegram2168 ↗

Publisher: US Embassy Kenya

Exact passage: paras1-3

Source establishes: Amnesty physical57/printed111 and FRUSdoc137 paragraphs1–3; different given-name spellings are retained as identity variants, not additional victims.

Document date: 1977-02-17 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Whole short official telegram2168,doc137,paragraphs1–3and source note read; Nairobi17February1977,1400Z.

Access limitations

Keep the summons, arrests, reported deaths, official accident account and Amnesty’s doubts separate. The embassy was not an eyewitness execution inquiry. Name variants across the two sources do not create extra victims. No personal execution order, definitive manner of death or judicial classification is established here.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_cached_original_body_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B03-FAMILY-US-UG1977

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B03-SRC-UG-FRUS137@5860970410b8810d

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 5860970410b8810d4cf9762e810558070011d089a49b8fa267f4f731da6aee76. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_attributed_wording

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Amnesty reports anonymous eyewitness information; underlying witnesses, original orders and a full casualty register were not obtained. The tentative death estimate is not a hard cap. Students are not automatically children. Amin’s alleged personal torture instruction is individually blocked; humanitarian observations remain separately attributed. Keep the summons, arrests, reported deaths, official accident account and Amnesty’s doubts separate. The embassy was not an eyewitness execution inquiry. Name variants across the two sources do not create extra victims. No personal execution order, definitive manner of death or judicial classification is established here.

Keep the summons, arrests, reported deaths, official accident account and Amnesty’s doubts separate. The embassy was not an eyewitness execution inquiry. Name variants across the two sources do not create extra victims. No personal execution order, definitive manner of death or judicial classification is established here.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Three named victims; cause, precise times and individual killing orders not settled by these passages. Two ministers not automatically combatants because of office or rank.

Keep the summons, arrests, reported deaths, official accident account and Amnesty’s doubts separate. The embassy was not an eyewitness execution inquiry. Name variants across the two sources do not create extra victims. No personal execution order, definitive manner of death or judicial classification is established here.

Legal distinction

Reported summons, arrests, death reports and competing official/NGO accounts are distinct. No personal torture or execution order, resolved manner of death or criminal classification is established.

Casualty scope: Tentative below-ten estimate is not a hard cap; more than200 is an exclusive lower bound. Students are not automatically children. Three named deaths and spelling variants do not create extra victims. No additive total or personal casualty allocation.

Record A4-B13-UG-CUSTODY-DEATHS · exact wording SHA-256 630f673e8c3e1f776bdd720f2c6612e7341b1b9c0c088f451afcc1921e05023b

Report a correction →
human consequence

Amnesty’s 1977 report says more than 200 Makerere students were detained and mistreated on 2–3 August 1976. It considered the death toll probably below ten, contrasting this with earlier exaggerated reports of hundreds killed.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact source attributed bounded historical proposition · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 2–3 August1976 · source-attributed interval; not an exact casualty count.

Date basis and original source clocks

2–3 August1976 · source-attributed interval; not an exact casualty count

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Amnesty International Report1977, Uganda section ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: Uganda, printed111 / PDFp57, paragraph In August

Source establishes: Printed111/physical57; source’s tentative estimate is not a verified hard cap, and students are not automatically children.

Document date: 1977 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Physical57 spread, printed110–111 rendered/viewed. Makerere2–3August1976;16February1977summons/arrests; radioannouncement and Amnesty doubts/inquiry.

Access limitations

Amnesty reports anonymous eyewitness information; underlying witnesses, original orders and a full casualty register were not obtained. The tentative death estimate is not a hard cap. Students are not automatically children. Amin’s alleged personal torture instruction is individually blocked; humanitarian observations remain separately attributed. Keep the summons, arrests, reported deaths, official accident account and Amnesty’s doubts separate. The embassy was not an eyewitness execution inquiry. Name variants across the two sources do not create extra victims. No personal execution order, definitive manner of death or judicial classification is established here.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_cached_original_body_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B03-FAMILY-AI-UG

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B03-SRC-UG-AMNESTY1977@76f7030fde362aaf

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 76f7030fde362aaf18e3a4ee611f473b92e805c707c5e83b1ad2f478b1466056. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_attributed_wording

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Amnesty reports anonymous eyewitness information; underlying witnesses, original orders and a full casualty register were not obtained. The tentative death estimate is not a hard cap. Students are not automatically children. Amin’s alleged personal torture instruction is individually blocked; humanitarian observations remain separately attributed. Keep the summons, arrests, reported deaths, official accident account and Amnesty’s doubts separate. The embassy was not an eyewitness execution inquiry. Name variants across the two sources do not create extra victims. No personal execution order, definitive manner of death or judicial classification is established here.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Students are not automatically children. Probably below10 is not an exact count or verified hard cap. No casualty sum.

Amnesty reports anonymous eyewitness information; underlying witnesses, original orders and a full casualty register were not obtained. The tentative death estimate is not a hard cap. Students are not automatically children. Amin’s alleged personal torture instruction is individually blocked; humanitarian observations remain separately attributed.

Legal distinction

Reported summons, arrests, death reports and competing official/NGO accounts are distinct. No personal torture or execution order, resolved manner of death or criminal classification is established.

Casualty scope: Tentative below-ten estimate is not a hard cap; more than200 is an exclusive lower bound. Students are not automatically children. Three named deaths and spelling variants do not create extra victims. No additive total or personal casualty allocation.

Record A4-B13-UG-MAKERERE-QUANTITIES · exact wording SHA-256 689e4a2647a253ce6c6b2dc65f8a826e7a273fc7a994e41522db83804e9dccdf

Report a correction →
decision

Amnesty reports that President Idi Amin summoned religious leaders to the Nile Conference Centre on 16 February 1977, before public accusations and arrests. This is a reported summons, not evidence of an execution order.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact source attributed bounded historical proposition · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 16February1977 · reported summons, not an execution order.

Date basis and original source clocks

16February1977 · reported summons, not an execution order

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Amnesty International Report1977, Uganda section ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: Uganda, printed111 / PDFp57, paragraph The worst series

Source establishes: Printed111/physical57 paragraphTheworstseries; keep documented public action separate from disputed later deaths.

Document date: 1977 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Physical57 spread, printed110–111 rendered/viewed. Makerere2–3August1976;16February1977summons/arrests; radioannouncement and Amnesty doubts/inquiry.

Access limitations

Amnesty reports anonymous eyewitness information; underlying witnesses, original orders and a full casualty register were not obtained. The tentative death estimate is not a hard cap. Students are not automatically children. Amin’s alleged personal torture instruction is individually blocked; humanitarian observations remain separately attributed. Keep the summons, arrests, reported deaths, official accident account and Amnesty’s doubts separate. The embassy was not an eyewitness execution inquiry. Name variants across the two sources do not create extra victims. No personal execution order, definitive manner of death or judicial classification is established here.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_cached_original_body_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B03-FAMILY-AI-UG

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B03-SRC-UG-AMNESTY1977@76f7030fde362aaf

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 76f7030fde362aaf18e3a4ee611f473b92e805c707c5e83b1ad2f478b1466056. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_attributed_wording

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Amnesty reports anonymous eyewitness information; underlying witnesses, original orders and a full casualty register were not obtained. The tentative death estimate is not a hard cap. Students are not automatically children. Amin’s alleged personal torture instruction is individually blocked; humanitarian observations remain separately attributed. Keep the summons, arrests, reported deaths, official accident account and Amnesty’s doubts separate. The embassy was not an eyewitness execution inquiry. Name variants across the two sources do not create extra victims. No personal execution order, definitive manner of death or judicial classification is established here.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Summons is distinct from an execution order. No finding that Amin personally fired shots from this passage.

Keep the summons, arrests, reported deaths, official accident account and Amnesty’s doubts separate. The embassy was not an eyewitness execution inquiry. Name variants across the two sources do not create extra victims. No personal execution order, definitive manner of death or judicial classification is established here.

Legal distinction

Reported summons, arrests, death reports and competing official/NGO accounts are distinct. No personal torture or execution order, resolved manner of death or criminal classification is established.

Casualty scope: Tentative below-ten estimate is not a hard cap; more than200 is an exclusive lower bound. Students are not automatically children. Three named deaths and spelling variants do not create extra victims. No additive total or personal casualty allocation.

Record A4-B13-UG-SUMMONS · exact wording SHA-256 f7af3ecb27181f5889004eb5f6b3151c327be81df01f402ce7c0c6e793772aeb

Report a correction →
context

The Secretary-General’s November 1975 report records Morocco and Mauritania defending the Madrid agreement while Algeria challenged its legality and scope. These are attributed government positions, not an adjudication by the report.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact source attributed bounded historical proposition · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 19 November1975 · pre1976 attributed government positions; not an adjudication.

Date basis and original source clocks

19 November1975 · pre1976 attributed government positions; not an adjudication. Pre1976 records are background already preceding the timeline start, never newly dated to1976. Source report, historical subject, planned deadline, actual withdrawal and later legal analysis keep separate dates; later legal sources do not establish contemporaneous1975 knowledge.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

S/11880, third Secretary-General report and annexes ↗

Publisher: UN Secretary-General

Exact passage: paras4-8, PDFpp2-3

Source establishes: S/11880 physical2–3 paragraphs4–8; read defence, self-determination objection and Algeria’s null-and-void position together.

Document date: 1975-11-19 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: S/11880 cover and paragraphs2–8 physical1–3; AnnexIII clauses and typed signature block physical8–9. Original report19November1975.

Access limitations

UNTS is an English translation of a declaration whose authentic language is Spanish; it and the Secretary-General’s annex reproduce one agreement, not independent corroborations. Typed signatory names are not authenticated autographs or proof of later attack orders. The UNTS effective-date footnote says 19 November 1975 while BOE dates the enabling law’s publication/effect to 20 November; neither is silently substituted. Madrid is the declared agreement location, not a verified private signature room. Disputed Western Sahara must not be mapped as a transfer of sovereign title. Contemporary government positions, the 1977 withdrawal account and the 2002 UN legal opinion have different voices and dates. The latter is not a court judgment. Planned 28 February and reported actual 26 February 1976 withdrawal are distinct. No present sovereignty, boundary or territorial-control conclusion is approved.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_cached_original_body_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B03-FAMILY-MADRID1975

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B03-SRC-WS-MADRID@7793b299e8086f9c

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 7793b299e8086f9c152d42a94b39b3f83cd6e0223bce041c3786bc4e95b17147. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_attributed_wording

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

UNTS is an English translation of a declaration whose authentic language is Spanish; it and the Secretary-General’s annex reproduce one agreement, not independent corroborations. Typed signatory names are not authenticated autographs or proof of later attack orders. The UNTS effective-date footnote says 19 November 1975 while BOE dates the enabling law’s publication/effect to 20 November; neither is silently substituted. Madrid is the declared agreement location, not a verified private signature room. Disputed Western Sahara must not be mapped as a transfer of sovereign title. Contemporary government positions, the 1977 withdrawal account and the 2002 UN legal opinion have different voices and dates. The latter is not a court judgment. Planned 28 February and reported actual 26 February 1976 withdrawal are distinct. No present sovereignty, boundary or territorial-control conclusion is approved.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Positions of governments, not an adjudication by the report.

Contemporary government positions, the 1977 withdrawal account and the 2002 UN legal opinion have different voices and dates. The latter is not a court judgment. Planned 28 February and reported actual 26 February 1976 withdrawal are distinct. No present sovereignty, boundary or territorial-control conclusion is approved.

Legal distinction

Agreement terms/signatories, reported withdrawal, opposing government positions and later legal opinion retain distinct roles. No sovereignty transfer, present territorial control, criminal judgment or military initiation established.

Casualty scope: About20000 is an attributed December1975 refugee population stock, not deaths, new1976arrivals, a UNHCR census or personal casualty allocation. No killed/injured total or additive observation inferred.

Record A4-B13-WS-OPPOSING-ACCOUNTS · exact wording SHA-256 e351713d2947e9147aa53a58a062dacf64555b486117931935daaf76cef09186

Report a correction →
human consequence

UNHCR’s 1976 report relays an Algerian-authority estimate of about 20,000 Western Sahara refugees in Algeria in December 1975. It is an attributed population estimate, not a UNHCR census or a count of 1976 arrivals.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact source attributed bounded historical proposition · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 1976 · report year only; estimated refugee stock observed December1975, issue day unknown.

Date basis and original source clocks

1976 · report year only; estimated refugee stock observed December1975, issue day unknown. Pre1976 records are background already preceding the timeline start, never newly dated to1976. Source report, historical subject, planned deadline, actual withdrawal and later legal analysis keep separate dates; later legal sources do not establish contemporaneous1975 knowledge.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Report of UN High Commissioner for Refugees, A/31/12 ↗

Publisher: UNHCR / Refworld

Exact passage: A/31/12 para166, with para165 context

Source establishes: A/31/12 paragraphs165–166 in agency-hosted Refworld transcription; original scan not acquired.

Document date: 1976 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Agency-hosted A/31/12 transcription paragraphs165–166; government estimateDecember1975, not independent census. Displayed1January1976 not adopted as verified issue day.

Access limitations

Agency-hosted A/31/12 transcription relays an Algerian-authority population estimate for December 1975. Original scan and census methodology were not obtained. The displayed 1 January 1976 catalogue date is not adopted as a verified exact issue date. Refugee stock is not deaths, new arrivals or personal causation.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

official_live_body_read_no_cached_body_hash · HR-ARCHIVE-B03-FAMILY-UNHCR1976

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B03-SRC-WS-UNHCR-WEB@A4-LIVE-20261030

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: Not established. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_attributed_wording

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Agency-hosted A/31/12 transcription relays an Algerian-authority population estimate for December 1975. Original scan and census methodology were not obtained. The displayed 1 January 1976 catalogue date is not adopted as a verified exact issue date. Refugee stock is not deaths, new arrivals or personal causation.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Background stock estimate, not1976 arrivals or personally caused deaths. Original scan unavailable; agency-hosted web transcription reviewed.

Agency-hosted A/31/12 transcription relays an Algerian-authority population estimate for December 1975. Original scan and census methodology were not obtained. The displayed 1 January 1976 catalogue date is not adopted as a verified exact issue date. Refugee stock is not deaths, new arrivals or personal causation.

Legal distinction

Agreement terms/signatories, reported withdrawal, opposing government positions and later legal opinion retain distinct roles. No sovereignty transfer, present territorial control, criminal judgment or military initiation established.

Casualty scope: About20000 is an attributed December1975 refugee population stock, not deaths, new1976arrivals, a UNHCR census or personal casualty allocation. No killed/injured total or additive observation inferred.

Record A4-B13-WS-REFUGEES · exact wording SHA-256 0d0dbf6e2266c116ffb0a340bf5b8afae1f482e33135e4130a17dcf3182ff407

Report a correction →
decision

Carlos Arias Navarro is named as a signatory in the published Madrid declaration. La Moncloa’s historical chronology places him in office as Spain’s head of government in November 1975.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact source attributed bounded historical proposition · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 14 November1975 · pre1976 documentary context · Carlos Arias Navarro: published signatory; not a military order.

Date basis and original source clocks

14 November1975 · pre1976 documentary context · Carlos Arias Navarro: published signatory; not a military order. Pre1976 records are background already preceding the timeline start, never newly dated to1976. Source report, historical subject, planned deadline, actual withdrawal and later legal analysis keep separate dates; later legal sources do not establish contemporaneous1975 knowledge.

Sources (3) · exact passages & limitations

UN Treaty Series988, I-14450, Declaration on Western Sahara ↗

Publisher: UN Treaty Series

Exact passage: PDFp2, printed259, signature block

Source establishes: UNTS physical2 signature block names Carlos Arias Navarro; S/11880 AnnexIII physical9 names Carlos Arias; institutional chronology dates tenure29December1973–1July1976. Typed documentary names, not autograph authentication.

Document date: 1975-11-14 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Both pages read; physical2/printed259 visually checked for clauses1–6, names and footnote1. Cover identifies authentic Spanish and registration9December1975.

Access limitations

UNTS is an English translation of a declaration whose authentic language is Spanish; it and the Secretary-General’s annex reproduce one agreement, not independent corroborations. Typed signatory names are not authenticated autographs or proof of later attack orders. The UNTS effective-date footnote says 19 November 1975 while BOE dates the enabling law’s publication/effect to 20 November; neither is silently substituted. Madrid is the declared agreement location, not a verified private signature room. Disputed Western Sahara must not be mapped as a transfer of sovereign title.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_cached_original_body_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B03-FAMILY-MADRID1975

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B03-SRC-WS-UNTS@ffff146c19cb7618

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: ffff146c19cb761877d44f385798459cfa76ec32323a4ac2f95589b1519b9331. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_attributed_wording

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

S/11880, third Secretary-General report and annexes ↗

Publisher: UN Secretary-General

Exact passage: AnnexIII signature block, PDFp9

Source establishes: UNTS physical2 signature block names Carlos Arias Navarro; S/11880 AnnexIII physical9 names Carlos Arias; institutional chronology dates tenure29December1973–1July1976. Typed documentary names, not autograph authentication.

Document date: 1975-11-19 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: S/11880 cover and paragraphs2–8 physical1–3; AnnexIII clauses and typed signature block physical8–9. Original report19November1975.

Access limitations

UNTS is an English translation of a declaration whose authentic language is Spanish; it and the Secretary-General’s annex reproduce one agreement, not independent corroborations. Typed signatory names are not authenticated autographs or proof of later attack orders. The UNTS effective-date footnote says 19 November 1975 while BOE dates the enabling law’s publication/effect to 20 November; neither is silently substituted. Madrid is the declared agreement location, not a verified private signature room. Disputed Western Sahara must not be mapped as a transfer of sovereign title. Contemporary government positions, the 1977 withdrawal account and the 2002 UN legal opinion have different voices and dates. The latter is not a court judgment. Planned 28 February and reported actual 26 February 1976 withdrawal are distinct. No present sovereignty, boundary or territorial-control conclusion is approved.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_cached_original_body_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B03-FAMILY-MADRID1975

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B03-SRC-WS-MADRID@7793b299e8086f9c

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 7793b299e8086f9c152d42a94b39b3f83cd6e0223bce041c3786bc4e95b17147. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_attributed_wording

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Historical chronology of Spanish heads of government ↗

Publisher: Spanish Prime Minister office La Moncloa

Exact passage: Carlos Arias Navarro row, tenure29December1973–1July1976

Source establishes: UNTS physical2 signature block names Carlos Arias Navarro; S/11880 AnnexIII physical9 names Carlos Arias; institutional chronology dates tenure29December1973–1July1976. Typed documentary names, not autograph authentication.

Document date: Not established · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: La Moncloa historical heads-of-government table; Carlos Arias Navarro row29December1973–1July1976 and neighbouring rows.

Access limitations

No original appointment/departure decrees or private decision site acquired.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_cached_original_body_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B03-FAMILY-SPAIN-OFFICE

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B03-SRC-WS-ARIAS-OFFICE@a373dd8868180133

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: a373dd886818013353479e05bb3aef6091a96da97733e5e9327947a66aec07f1. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: dated_office_context

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

UNTS is an English translation of a declaration whose authentic language is Spanish; it and the Secretary-General’s annex reproduce one agreement, not independent corroborations. Typed signatory names are not authenticated autographs or proof of later attack orders. The UNTS effective-date footnote says 19 November 1975 while BOE dates the enabling law’s publication/effect to 20 November; neither is silently substituted. Madrid is the declared agreement location, not a verified private signature room. Disputed Western Sahara must not be mapped as a transfer of sovereign title.

UNTS is an English translation of a declaration whose authentic language is Spanish; it and the Secretary-General’s annex reproduce one agreement, not independent corroborations. Typed signatory names are not authenticated autographs or proof of later attack orders. The UNTS effective-date footnote says 19 November 1975 while BOE dates the enabling law’s publication/effect to 20 November; neither is silently substituted. Madrid is the declared agreement location, not a verified private signature room. Disputed Western Sahara must not be mapped as a transfer of sovereign title. Contemporary government positions, the 1977 withdrawal account and the 2002 UN legal opinion have different voices and dates. The latter is not a court judgment. Planned 28 February and reported actual 26 February 1976 withdrawal are distinct. No present sovereignty, boundary or territorial-control conclusion is approved.

No original appointment/departure decrees or private decision site acquired.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Signature proves participation in this agreement, not all later attacks or refugee movements.

UNTS is an English translation of a declaration whose authentic language is Spanish; it and the Secretary-General’s annex reproduce one agreement, not independent corroborations. Typed signatory names are not authenticated autographs or proof of later attack orders. The UNTS effective-date footnote says 19 November 1975 while BOE dates the enabling law’s publication/effect to 20 November; neither is silently substituted. Madrid is the declared agreement location, not a verified private signature room. Disputed Western Sahara must not be mapped as a transfer of sovereign title.

Legal distinction

Agreement terms/signatories, reported withdrawal, opposing government positions and later legal opinion retain distinct roles. No sovereignty transfer, present territorial control, criminal judgment or military initiation established.

Casualty scope: About20000 is an attributed December1975 refugee population stock, not deaths, new1976arrivals, a UNHCR census or personal casualty allocation. No killed/injured total or additive observation inferred.

Record A4-B13-WS-SIGN-ARIAS · exact wording SHA-256 b6f15fa4be9827dfd64f39b8c88439bdf2592c3a25882d63ae3e9d6b8e7d7cf5

Report a correction →
decision

Hamdi Mouknass is named as a signatory in the published Madrid declaration. The Secretary-General’s report identifies him as Mauritania’s foreign minister during the negotiations.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact source attributed bounded historical proposition · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 14 November1975 · pre1976 documentary context · Hamdi Mouknass: published signatory; not a military order.

Date basis and original source clocks

14 November1975 · pre1976 documentary context · Hamdi Mouknass: published signatory; not a military order. Pre1976 records are background already preceding the timeline start, never newly dated to1976. Source report, historical subject, planned deadline, actual withdrawal and later legal analysis keep separate dates; later legal sources do not establish contemporaneous1975 knowledge.

Sources (3) · exact passages & limitations

UN Treaty Series988, I-14450, Declaration on Western Sahara ↗

Publisher: UN Treaty Series

Exact passage: PDFp2, printed259, signature block

Source establishes: UNTS physical2, S/11880 AnnexIII physical9 and reportparagraph2 physical1; Ahmed Laraki in paragraph4 is a different Moroccan foreign minister, not Osman.

Document date: 1975-11-14 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Both pages read; physical2/printed259 visually checked for clauses1–6, names and footnote1. Cover identifies authentic Spanish and registration9December1975.

Access limitations

UNTS is an English translation of a declaration whose authentic language is Spanish; it and the Secretary-General’s annex reproduce one agreement, not independent corroborations. Typed signatory names are not authenticated autographs or proof of later attack orders. The UNTS effective-date footnote says 19 November 1975 while BOE dates the enabling law’s publication/effect to 20 November; neither is silently substituted. Madrid is the declared agreement location, not a verified private signature room. Disputed Western Sahara must not be mapped as a transfer of sovereign title.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_cached_original_body_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B03-FAMILY-MADRID1975

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B03-SRC-WS-UNTS@ffff146c19cb7618

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: ffff146c19cb761877d44f385798459cfa76ec32323a4ac2f95589b1519b9331. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_attributed_wording

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

S/11880, third Secretary-General report and annexes ↗

Publisher: UN Secretary-General

Exact passage: AnnexIII signature block, PDFp9

Source establishes: UNTS physical2, S/11880 AnnexIII physical9 and reportparagraph2 physical1; Ahmed Laraki in paragraph4 is a different Moroccan foreign minister, not Osman.

Document date: 1975-11-19 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: S/11880 cover and paragraphs2–8 physical1–3; AnnexIII clauses and typed signature block physical8–9. Original report19November1975.

Access limitations

UNTS is an English translation of a declaration whose authentic language is Spanish; it and the Secretary-General’s annex reproduce one agreement, not independent corroborations. Typed signatory names are not authenticated autographs or proof of later attack orders. The UNTS effective-date footnote says 19 November 1975 while BOE dates the enabling law’s publication/effect to 20 November; neither is silently substituted. Madrid is the declared agreement location, not a verified private signature room. Disputed Western Sahara must not be mapped as a transfer of sovereign title. Contemporary government positions, the 1977 withdrawal account and the 2002 UN legal opinion have different voices and dates. The latter is not a court judgment. Planned 28 February and reported actual 26 February 1976 withdrawal are distinct. No present sovereignty, boundary or territorial-control conclusion is approved.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_cached_original_body_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B03-FAMILY-MADRID1975

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B03-SRC-WS-MADRID@7793b299e8086f9c

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 7793b299e8086f9c152d42a94b39b3f83cd6e0223bce041c3786bc4e95b17147. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_attributed_wording

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

S/11880, third Secretary-General report and annexes ↗

Publisher: UN Secretary-General

Exact passage: Physical1–2, paragraphs2and4

Source establishes: UNTS physical2, S/11880 AnnexIII physical9 and reportparagraph2 physical1; Ahmed Laraki in paragraph4 is a different Moroccan foreign minister, not Osman.

Document date: 1975-11-19 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: S/11880 cover and paragraphs2–8 physical1–3; AnnexIII clauses and typed signature block physical8–9. Original report19November1975.

Access limitations

UNTS is an English translation of a declaration whose authentic language is Spanish; it and the Secretary-General’s annex reproduce one agreement, not independent corroborations. Typed signatory names are not authenticated autographs or proof of later attack orders. The UNTS effective-date footnote says 19 November 1975 while BOE dates the enabling law’s publication/effect to 20 November; neither is silently substituted. Madrid is the declared agreement location, not a verified private signature room. Disputed Western Sahara must not be mapped as a transfer of sovereign title. Contemporary government positions, the 1977 withdrawal account and the 2002 UN legal opinion have different voices and dates. The latter is not a court judgment. Planned 28 February and reported actual 26 February 1976 withdrawal are distinct. No present sovereignty, boundary or territorial-control conclusion is approved.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_cached_original_body_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B03-FAMILY-MADRID1975

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B03-SRC-WS-MADRID@7793b299e8086f9c

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 7793b299e8086f9c152d42a94b39b3f83cd6e0223bce041c3786bc4e95b17147. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: dated_office_and_identity_context

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

UNTS is an English translation of a declaration whose authentic language is Spanish; it and the Secretary-General’s annex reproduce one agreement, not independent corroborations. Typed signatory names are not authenticated autographs or proof of later attack orders. The UNTS effective-date footnote says 19 November 1975 while BOE dates the enabling law’s publication/effect to 20 November; neither is silently substituted. Madrid is the declared agreement location, not a verified private signature room. Disputed Western Sahara must not be mapped as a transfer of sovereign title.

UNTS is an English translation of a declaration whose authentic language is Spanish; it and the Secretary-General’s annex reproduce one agreement, not independent corroborations. Typed signatory names are not authenticated autographs or proof of later attack orders. The UNTS effective-date footnote says 19 November 1975 while BOE dates the enabling law’s publication/effect to 20 November; neither is silently substituted. Madrid is the declared agreement location, not a verified private signature room. Disputed Western Sahara must not be mapped as a transfer of sovereign title. Contemporary government positions, the 1977 withdrawal account and the 2002 UN legal opinion have different voices and dates. The latter is not a court judgment. Planned 28 February and reported actual 26 February 1976 withdrawal are distinct. No present sovereignty, boundary or territorial-control conclusion is approved.

UNTS is an English translation of a declaration whose authentic language is Spanish; it and the Secretary-General’s annex reproduce one agreement, not independent corroborations. Typed signatory names are not authenticated autographs or proof of later attack orders. The UNTS effective-date footnote says 19 November 1975 while BOE dates the enabling law’s publication/effect to 20 November; neither is silently substituted. Madrid is the declared agreement location, not a verified private signature room. Disputed Western Sahara must not be mapped as a transfer of sovereign title. Contemporary government positions, the 1977 withdrawal account and the 2002 UN legal opinion have different voices and dates. The latter is not a court judgment. Planned 28 February and reported actual 26 February 1976 withdrawal are distinct. No present sovereignty, boundary or territorial-control conclusion is approved.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Signature proves participation in this agreement, not all later attacks or refugee movements.

UNTS is an English translation of a declaration whose authentic language is Spanish; it and the Secretary-General’s annex reproduce one agreement, not independent corroborations. Typed signatory names are not authenticated autographs or proof of later attack orders. The UNTS effective-date footnote says 19 November 1975 while BOE dates the enabling law’s publication/effect to 20 November; neither is silently substituted. Madrid is the declared agreement location, not a verified private signature room. Disputed Western Sahara must not be mapped as a transfer of sovereign title.

Legal distinction

Agreement terms/signatories, reported withdrawal, opposing government positions and later legal opinion retain distinct roles. No sovereignty transfer, present territorial control, criminal judgment or military initiation established.

Casualty scope: About20000 is an attributed December1975 refugee population stock, not deaths, new1976arrivals, a UNHCR census or personal casualty allocation. No killed/injured total or additive observation inferred.

Record A4-B13-WS-SIGN-MOUKNASS · exact wording SHA-256 a3c0914d370831a4f625d4ae68a3173c6ecaf374e585323c6cdced1870f064bc

Report a correction →
decision

Ahmed Osman is named as a signatory in the published Madrid declaration. The Secretary-General’s report identifies him as Morocco’s prime minister during the negotiations.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact source attributed bounded historical proposition · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 14 November1975 · pre1976 documentary context · Ahmed Osman: published signatory; not a military order.

Date basis and original source clocks

14 November1975 · pre1976 documentary context · Ahmed Osman: published signatory; not a military order. Pre1976 records are background already preceding the timeline start, never newly dated to1976. Source report, historical subject, planned deadline, actual withdrawal and later legal analysis keep separate dates; later legal sources do not establish contemporaneous1975 knowledge.

Sources (3) · exact passages & limitations

UN Treaty Series988, I-14450, Declaration on Western Sahara ↗

Publisher: UN Treaty Series

Exact passage: PDFp2, printed259, signature block

Source establishes: UNTS physical2, S/11880 AnnexIII physical9 and reportparagraph2 physical1; no complete tenure or private signing-site verification.

Document date: 1975-11-14 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Both pages read; physical2/printed259 visually checked for clauses1–6, names and footnote1. Cover identifies authentic Spanish and registration9December1975.

Access limitations

UNTS is an English translation of a declaration whose authentic language is Spanish; it and the Secretary-General’s annex reproduce one agreement, not independent corroborations. Typed signatory names are not authenticated autographs or proof of later attack orders. The UNTS effective-date footnote says 19 November 1975 while BOE dates the enabling law’s publication/effect to 20 November; neither is silently substituted. Madrid is the declared agreement location, not a verified private signature room. Disputed Western Sahara must not be mapped as a transfer of sovereign title.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_cached_original_body_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B03-FAMILY-MADRID1975

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B03-SRC-WS-UNTS@ffff146c19cb7618

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: ffff146c19cb761877d44f385798459cfa76ec32323a4ac2f95589b1519b9331. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_attributed_wording

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

S/11880, third Secretary-General report and annexes ↗

Publisher: UN Secretary-General

Exact passage: AnnexIII signature block, PDFp9

Source establishes: UNTS physical2, S/11880 AnnexIII physical9 and reportparagraph2 physical1; no complete tenure or private signing-site verification.

Document date: 1975-11-19 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: S/11880 cover and paragraphs2–8 physical1–3; AnnexIII clauses and typed signature block physical8–9. Original report19November1975.

Access limitations

UNTS is an English translation of a declaration whose authentic language is Spanish; it and the Secretary-General’s annex reproduce one agreement, not independent corroborations. Typed signatory names are not authenticated autographs or proof of later attack orders. The UNTS effective-date footnote says 19 November 1975 while BOE dates the enabling law’s publication/effect to 20 November; neither is silently substituted. Madrid is the declared agreement location, not a verified private signature room. Disputed Western Sahara must not be mapped as a transfer of sovereign title. Contemporary government positions, the 1977 withdrawal account and the 2002 UN legal opinion have different voices and dates. The latter is not a court judgment. Planned 28 February and reported actual 26 February 1976 withdrawal are distinct. No present sovereignty, boundary or territorial-control conclusion is approved.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_cached_original_body_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B03-FAMILY-MADRID1975

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B03-SRC-WS-MADRID@7793b299e8086f9c

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 7793b299e8086f9c152d42a94b39b3f83cd6e0223bce041c3786bc4e95b17147. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_attributed_wording

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

S/11880, third Secretary-General report and annexes ↗

Publisher: UN Secretary-General

Exact passage: Physical1, paragraph2

Source establishes: UNTS physical2, S/11880 AnnexIII physical9 and reportparagraph2 physical1; no complete tenure or private signing-site verification.

Document date: 1975-11-19 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: S/11880 cover and paragraphs2–8 physical1–3; AnnexIII clauses and typed signature block physical8–9. Original report19November1975.

Access limitations

UNTS is an English translation of a declaration whose authentic language is Spanish; it and the Secretary-General’s annex reproduce one agreement, not independent corroborations. Typed signatory names are not authenticated autographs or proof of later attack orders. The UNTS effective-date footnote says 19 November 1975 while BOE dates the enabling law’s publication/effect to 20 November; neither is silently substituted. Madrid is the declared agreement location, not a verified private signature room. Disputed Western Sahara must not be mapped as a transfer of sovereign title. Contemporary government positions, the 1977 withdrawal account and the 2002 UN legal opinion have different voices and dates. The latter is not a court judgment. Planned 28 February and reported actual 26 February 1976 withdrawal are distinct. No present sovereignty, boundary or territorial-control conclusion is approved.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_cached_original_body_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B03-FAMILY-MADRID1975

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B03-SRC-WS-MADRID@7793b299e8086f9c

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 7793b299e8086f9c152d42a94b39b3f83cd6e0223bce041c3786bc4e95b17147. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: dated_office_context

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

UNTS is an English translation of a declaration whose authentic language is Spanish; it and the Secretary-General’s annex reproduce one agreement, not independent corroborations. Typed signatory names are not authenticated autographs or proof of later attack orders. The UNTS effective-date footnote says 19 November 1975 while BOE dates the enabling law’s publication/effect to 20 November; neither is silently substituted. Madrid is the declared agreement location, not a verified private signature room. Disputed Western Sahara must not be mapped as a transfer of sovereign title.

UNTS is an English translation of a declaration whose authentic language is Spanish; it and the Secretary-General’s annex reproduce one agreement, not independent corroborations. Typed signatory names are not authenticated autographs or proof of later attack orders. The UNTS effective-date footnote says 19 November 1975 while BOE dates the enabling law’s publication/effect to 20 November; neither is silently substituted. Madrid is the declared agreement location, not a verified private signature room. Disputed Western Sahara must not be mapped as a transfer of sovereign title. Contemporary government positions, the 1977 withdrawal account and the 2002 UN legal opinion have different voices and dates. The latter is not a court judgment. Planned 28 February and reported actual 26 February 1976 withdrawal are distinct. No present sovereignty, boundary or territorial-control conclusion is approved.

UNTS is an English translation of a declaration whose authentic language is Spanish; it and the Secretary-General’s annex reproduce one agreement, not independent corroborations. Typed signatory names are not authenticated autographs or proof of later attack orders. The UNTS effective-date footnote says 19 November 1975 while BOE dates the enabling law’s publication/effect to 20 November; neither is silently substituted. Madrid is the declared agreement location, not a verified private signature room. Disputed Western Sahara must not be mapped as a transfer of sovereign title. Contemporary government positions, the 1977 withdrawal account and the 2002 UN legal opinion have different voices and dates. The latter is not a court judgment. Planned 28 February and reported actual 26 February 1976 withdrawal are distinct. No present sovereignty, boundary or territorial-control conclusion is approved.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Signature proves participation in this agreement, not all later attacks or refugee movements.

UNTS is an English translation of a declaration whose authentic language is Spanish; it and the Secretary-General’s annex reproduce one agreement, not independent corroborations. Typed signatory names are not authenticated autographs or proof of later attack orders. The UNTS effective-date footnote says 19 November 1975 while BOE dates the enabling law’s publication/effect to 20 November; neither is silently substituted. Madrid is the declared agreement location, not a verified private signature room. Disputed Western Sahara must not be mapped as a transfer of sovereign title.

Legal distinction

Agreement terms/signatories, reported withdrawal, opposing government positions and later legal opinion retain distinct roles. No sovereignty transfer, present territorial control, criminal judgment or military initiation established.

Casualty scope: About20000 is an attributed December1975 refugee population stock, not deaths, new1976arrivals, a UNHCR census or personal casualty allocation. No killed/injured total or additive observation inferred.

Record A4-B13-WS-SIGN-OSMAN · exact wording SHA-256 7e06ac962065928864175a7dc20516fc9c78794773c566fde27142da24e27298

Report a correction →
context

In his letter dated 29 January 2002, the UN Legal Counsel stated that the Madrid Agreement transferred neither sovereignty over Western Sahara nor administering-power status. This was a legal opinion, not an individual criminal judgment.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact source attributed bounded historical proposition · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 29 January2002 · Legal Counsel letter, not a judgment; distribution12February separate.

Date basis and original source clocks

29 January2002 · Legal Counsel letter, not a judgment; distribution12February separate. Pre1976 records are background already preceding the timeline start, never newly dated to1976. Source report, historical subject, planned deadline, actual withdrawal and later legal analysis keep separate dates; later legal sources do not establish contemporaneous1975 knowledge.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

S/2002/161, Legal Counsel letter29January2002 ↗

Publisher: UN Legal Counsel Hans Corell

Exact passage: para6, PDF/printedp2; letter date/title PDFp1

Source establishes: S/2002/161 paragraph6; cover distinguishes letter29January from distribution12February2002. No present territorial-control assessment approved.

Document date: 2002-01-29 · Publication date: 2002-02-12

Actual review scope: Cover visually checked, physical2 paragraphs6–7 read; letter29January2002, distribution12February2002.

Access limitations

Contemporary government positions, the 1977 withdrawal account and the 2002 UN legal opinion have different voices and dates. The latter is not a court judgment. Planned 28 February and reported actual 26 February 1976 withdrawal are distinct. No present sovereignty, boundary or territorial-control conclusion is approved.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_cached_original_body_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B03-FAMILY-UN-LEGAL2002

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B03-SRC-WS-LEGAL2002@1ca8e32ef48a3968

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 1ca8e32ef48a3968f71902f116809b32dae25d319fb9f835a38cc3c881f14131. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_attributed_wording

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Contemporary government positions, the 1977 withdrawal account and the 2002 UN legal opinion have different voices and dates. The latter is not a court judgment. Planned 28 February and reported actual 26 February 1976 withdrawal are distinct. No present sovereignty, boundary or territorial-control conclusion is approved.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Later legal analysis, not an individual criminal judgment or1975 contemporaneous knowledge.

Contemporary government positions, the 1977 withdrawal account and the 2002 UN legal opinion have different voices and dates. The latter is not a court judgment. Planned 28 February and reported actual 26 February 1976 withdrawal are distinct. No present sovereignty, boundary or territorial-control conclusion is approved.

Legal distinction

Agreement terms/signatories, reported withdrawal, opposing government positions and later legal opinion retain distinct roles. No sovereignty transfer, present territorial control, criminal judgment or military initiation established.

Casualty scope: About20000 is an attributed December1975 refugee population stock, not deaths, new1976arrivals, a UNHCR census or personal casualty allocation. No killed/injured total or additive observation inferred.

Record A4-B13-WS-SOVEREIGNTY · exact wording SHA-256 4d93b99c04c879a497fdf47dad866f9522fe157016c72055e3eae5f34a04ce22

Report a correction →
context

The declaration dated 14 November 1975 provided for a temporary administration involving Spain, Morocco and Mauritania, with the Yemaa’s collaboration, and completion of Spain’s departure by 28 February 1976. These were agreement terms, not a transfer of sovereignty.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact source attributed bounded historical proposition · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 14 November1975 · pre1976 documentary context · Agreement terms; not a military order.

Date basis and original source clocks

14 November1975 · pre1976 documentary context · Agreement terms; not a military order. Pre1976 records are background already preceding the timeline start, never newly dated to1976. Source report, historical subject, planned deadline, actual withdrawal and later legal analysis keep separate dates; later legal sources do not establish contemporaneous1975 knowledge.

Sources (3) · exact passages & limitations

S/11880, third Secretary-General report and annexes ↗

Publisher: UN Secretary-General

Exact passage: AnnexIII clauses1-3, PDFp8

Source establishes: S/11880 AnnexIII and UNTS988 I-14450 English translation clauses1–3; legal opinion paragraph6 limits title claims.

Document date: 1975-11-19 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: S/11880 cover and paragraphs2–8 physical1–3; AnnexIII clauses and typed signature block physical8–9. Original report19November1975.

Access limitations

UNTS is an English translation of a declaration whose authentic language is Spanish; it and the Secretary-General’s annex reproduce one agreement, not independent corroborations. Typed signatory names are not authenticated autographs or proof of later attack orders. The UNTS effective-date footnote says 19 November 1975 while BOE dates the enabling law’s publication/effect to 20 November; neither is silently substituted. Madrid is the declared agreement location, not a verified private signature room. Disputed Western Sahara must not be mapped as a transfer of sovereign title. Contemporary government positions, the 1977 withdrawal account and the 2002 UN legal opinion have different voices and dates. The latter is not a court judgment. Planned 28 February and reported actual 26 February 1976 withdrawal are distinct. No present sovereignty, boundary or territorial-control conclusion is approved.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_cached_original_body_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B03-FAMILY-MADRID1975

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B03-SRC-WS-MADRID@7793b299e8086f9c

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 7793b299e8086f9c152d42a94b39b3f83cd6e0223bce041c3786bc4e95b17147. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_attributed_wording

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

UN Treaty Series988, I-14450, Declaration on Western Sahara ↗

Publisher: UN Treaty Series

Exact passage: PDFp2, printed259, clauses1-3

Source establishes: S/11880 AnnexIII and UNTS988 I-14450 English translation clauses1–3; legal opinion paragraph6 limits title claims.

Document date: 1975-11-14 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Both pages read; physical2/printed259 visually checked for clauses1–6, names and footnote1. Cover identifies authentic Spanish and registration9December1975.

Access limitations

UNTS is an English translation of a declaration whose authentic language is Spanish; it and the Secretary-General’s annex reproduce one agreement, not independent corroborations. Typed signatory names are not authenticated autographs or proof of later attack orders. The UNTS effective-date footnote says 19 November 1975 while BOE dates the enabling law’s publication/effect to 20 November; neither is silently substituted. Madrid is the declared agreement location, not a verified private signature room. Disputed Western Sahara must not be mapped as a transfer of sovereign title.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_cached_original_body_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B03-FAMILY-MADRID1975

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B03-SRC-WS-UNTS@ffff146c19cb7618

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: ffff146c19cb761877d44f385798459cfa76ec32323a4ac2f95589b1519b9331. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_attributed_wording

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

S/2002/161, Legal Counsel letter29January2002 ↗

Publisher: UN Legal Counsel Hans Corell

Exact passage: Physical2, paragraph6

Source establishes: S/11880 AnnexIII and UNTS988 I-14450 English translation clauses1–3; legal opinion paragraph6 limits title claims.

Document date: 2002-01-29 · Publication date: 2002-02-12

Actual review scope: Cover visually checked, physical2 paragraphs6–7 read; letter29January2002, distribution12February2002.

Access limitations

Contemporary government positions, the 1977 withdrawal account and the 2002 UN legal opinion have different voices and dates. The latter is not a court judgment. Planned 28 February and reported actual 26 February 1976 withdrawal are distinct. No present sovereignty, boundary or territorial-control conclusion is approved.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_cached_original_body_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B03-FAMILY-UN-LEGAL2002

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B03-SRC-WS-LEGAL2002@1ca8e32ef48a3968

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 1ca8e32ef48a3968f71902f116809b32dae25d319fb9f835a38cc3c881f14131. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: later_legal_limit

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

UNTS is an English translation of a declaration whose authentic language is Spanish; it and the Secretary-General’s annex reproduce one agreement, not independent corroborations. Typed signatory names are not authenticated autographs or proof of later attack orders. The UNTS effective-date footnote says 19 November 1975 while BOE dates the enabling law’s publication/effect to 20 November; neither is silently substituted. Madrid is the declared agreement location, not a verified private signature room. Disputed Western Sahara must not be mapped as a transfer of sovereign title. Contemporary government positions, the 1977 withdrawal account and the 2002 UN legal opinion have different voices and dates. The latter is not a court judgment. Planned 28 February and reported actual 26 February 1976 withdrawal are distinct. No present sovereignty, boundary or territorial-control conclusion is approved.

UNTS is an English translation of a declaration whose authentic language is Spanish; it and the Secretary-General’s annex reproduce one agreement, not independent corroborations. Typed signatory names are not authenticated autographs or proof of later attack orders. The UNTS effective-date footnote says 19 November 1975 while BOE dates the enabling law’s publication/effect to 20 November; neither is silently substituted. Madrid is the declared agreement location, not a verified private signature room. Disputed Western Sahara must not be mapped as a transfer of sovereign title.

Contemporary government positions, the 1977 withdrawal account and the 2002 UN legal opinion have different voices and dates. The latter is not a court judgment. Planned 28 February and reported actual 26 February 1976 withdrawal are distinct. No present sovereignty, boundary or territorial-control conclusion is approved.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Pre1976 background; agreement terms do not establish a completed sovereignty transfer or a killing order.

UNTS is an English translation of a declaration whose authentic language is Spanish; it and the Secretary-General’s annex reproduce one agreement, not independent corroborations. Typed signatory names are not authenticated autographs or proof of later attack orders. The UNTS effective-date footnote says 19 November 1975 while BOE dates the enabling law’s publication/effect to 20 November; neither is silently substituted. Madrid is the declared agreement location, not a verified private signature room. Disputed Western Sahara must not be mapped as a transfer of sovereign title.

Legal distinction

Agreement terms/signatories, reported withdrawal, opposing government positions and later legal opinion retain distinct roles. No sovereignty transfer, present territorial control, criminal judgment or military initiation established.

Casualty scope: About20000 is an attributed December1975 refugee population stock, not deaths, new1976arrivals, a UNHCR census or personal casualty allocation. No killed/injured total or additive observation inferred.

Record A4-B13-WS-TERMS · exact wording SHA-256 d5bb1876d70d38f2de4e8d5dfb97abd00e5ec2614102d74ec330d3b0ff6982f9

Report a correction →
context

The UN’s 1977 Western Sahara chapter dates Spain’s withdrawal to 26 February 1976 and says self-determination had not been exercised as called for by the General Assembly. The planned deadline in the declaration was 28 February.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact source attributed bounded historical proposition · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 26 February1976 · withdrawal day reported retrospectively by UN1977; not planned28February.

Date basis and original source clocks

26 February1976 · withdrawal day reported retrospectively by UN1977; not planned28February. Pre1976 records are background already preceding the timeline start, never newly dated to1976. Source report, historical subject, planned deadline, actual withdrawal and later legal analysis keep separate dates; later legal sources do not establish contemporaneous1975 knowledge.

Sources (2) · exact passages & limitations

A/32/23/Rev.1 volII, Western Sahara chapter ↗

Publisher: UN Special Committee on Decolonization

Exact passage: WesternSahara paras5-6, printed89 / PDFp95

Source establishes: A/32/23/Rev.1 volII physical95/printed89 paragraphs5–6; actual withdrawal and prospective deadline are different clocks.

Document date: 1977 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: A/32/23/Rev.1 volII physical95/printed89 paragraphs5–6; withdrawal26February1976 and self-determination statement.

Access limitations

Contemporary government positions, the 1977 withdrawal account and the 2002 UN legal opinion have different voices and dates. The latter is not a court judgment. Planned 28 February and reported actual 26 February 1976 withdrawal are distinct. No present sovereignty, boundary or territorial-control conclusion is approved.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_cached_original_body_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B03-FAMILY-UN-DECOL1977

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B03-SRC-WS-UN1977@c1a5e770d031e661

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: c1a5e770d031e6617006b57a9197844b1638d48c0c1960179622e490d5822edb. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_attributed_wording

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

UN Treaty Series988, I-14450, Declaration on Western Sahara ↗

Publisher: UN Treaty Series

Exact passage: Physical2/printed259, clause2

Source establishes: A/32/23/Rev.1 volII physical95/printed89 paragraphs5–6; actual withdrawal and prospective deadline are different clocks.

Document date: 1975-11-14 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Both pages read; physical2/printed259 visually checked for clauses1–6, names and footnote1. Cover identifies authentic Spanish and registration9December1975.

Access limitations

UNTS is an English translation of a declaration whose authentic language is Spanish; it and the Secretary-General’s annex reproduce one agreement, not independent corroborations. Typed signatory names are not authenticated autographs or proof of later attack orders. The UNTS effective-date footnote says 19 November 1975 while BOE dates the enabling law’s publication/effect to 20 November; neither is silently substituted. Madrid is the declared agreement location, not a verified private signature room. Disputed Western Sahara must not be mapped as a transfer of sovereign title.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_cached_original_body_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B03-FAMILY-MADRID1975

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B03-SRC-WS-UNTS@ffff146c19cb7618

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: ffff146c19cb761877d44f385798459cfa76ec32323a4ac2f95589b1519b9331. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: planned_deadline_contrast

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Contemporary government positions, the 1977 withdrawal account and the 2002 UN legal opinion have different voices and dates. The latter is not a court judgment. Planned 28 February and reported actual 26 February 1976 withdrawal are distinct. No present sovereignty, boundary or territorial-control conclusion is approved.

UNTS is an English translation of a declaration whose authentic language is Spanish; it and the Secretary-General’s annex reproduce one agreement, not independent corroborations. Typed signatory names are not authenticated autographs or proof of later attack orders. The UNTS effective-date footnote says 19 November 1975 while BOE dates the enabling law’s publication/effect to 20 November; neither is silently substituted. Madrid is the declared agreement location, not a verified private signature room. Disputed Western Sahara must not be mapped as a transfer of sovereign title.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

No historical boundary polygon or legal title transfer inferred.

Contemporary government positions, the 1977 withdrawal account and the 2002 UN legal opinion have different voices and dates. The latter is not a court judgment. Planned 28 February and reported actual 26 February 1976 withdrawal are distinct. No present sovereignty, boundary or territorial-control conclusion is approved.

Legal distinction

Agreement terms/signatories, reported withdrawal, opposing government positions and later legal opinion retain distinct roles. No sovereignty transfer, present territorial control, criminal judgment or military initiation established.

Casualty scope: About20000 is an attributed December1975 refugee population stock, not deaths, new1976arrivals, a UNHCR census or personal casualty allocation. No killed/injured total or additive observation inferred.

Record A4-B13-WS-WITHDRAWAL · exact wording SHA-256 291ba695a0b980946f3df38203af8e4d6e4e58d25beb876e521d2b48a1f2b161

Report a correction →
human consequence

The report describes nine Turkman Gate-area patients attending AIIMS on 24 April 1976, eight aged two to sixteen and one aged sixty-five, with blunt-weapon injuries. Attendance date is not necessarily injury date, and the passage does not establish that police shooting caused these injuries.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed commission record observation testimony or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 24 April1976 · AIIMS attendance, injury date and police-shooting cause unknown.

Date basis and original source clocks

24 April1976 · AIIMS attendance, injury date and police-shooting cause unknown. Report date1978-04-26 is distinct from incident, attendance, meeting, unknown signature/testimony and first-publication clocks. Background1975 lies before1976replay horizon.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Shah Commission of Inquiry, Interim Report II, 26 April 1978 ↗

Publisher: Shah Commission of Inquiry, India

Exact passage: chapter14 para14.113, printed131/PDF134

Source establishes: Paragraph14.113physical134 visuallychecked; source questions accidentexplanation. No new individual injury responsibility or allocation of the one grievousinjury approved.

Document date: 1978-04-26 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Coverphysical1rendered/viewed;chapter13physical101–104/printed98–101paras13.161–13.174;chapter14physical123,134–135,138–142/printed120,131–132,135–139paras14.1–14.8,14.109–14.129,14.154–14.178;chapter15physical143–144paras15.3–15.5. Physical134and142rendered/viewed for injurycounts/agesandnotices/defences/findings.

Access limitations

BJP library hosts identified scanned Commission report, not original government digital custody. Cached originalscanread; fresh web fetch failed size limit89,565,528bytes, not source-content disproof. Original orders, diaries, medical records, witnesses, property file and handwriting report not independently acquired. Jagmohan/Laldefences,KrishanChand/residentaccounts,Bhinderdenial,Sanjayproceduralobjections/freshnotice/exparteassessment,conflictingofficial/witnessdeathcounts,medical/policelistdifferencesandexplicitfiringindividualnoticebar reviewed.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_primary_document_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B04-FAMILY-SHAH-TURKMAN

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B04-SRC-IN-SHAHII@448e2b8cb6138ea6

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 448e2b8cb6138ea678b102b7862192830a35ed7e5d2d863e16d0e467c0aa8849. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

BJP library hosts identified scanned Commission report, not original government digital custody. Cached originalscanread; fresh web fetch failed size limit89,565,528bytes, not source-content disproof. Original orders, diaries, medical records, witnesses, property file and handwriting report not independently acquired. Jagmohan/Laldefences,KrishanChand/residentaccounts,Bhinderdenial,Sanjayproceduralobjections/freshnotice/exparteassessment,conflictingofficial/witnessdeathcounts,medical/policelistdifferencesandexplicitfiringindividualnoticebar reviewed.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

24April medical attendance is not necessarily injury date. No verified police-shooting cause for these eight children. One grievous injury among nine is not assigned to a child without evidence.

Preserve official reports, inquiry minima, witness allegations and hospital-record observations as separate voices. Deaths, injuries, hospital attendance, source-defined minors, structures and displaced people are different units. Categories, date windows and groups may overlap. Do not repair medical arithmetic, infer missing identities, identify raw victims/addresses, assign one grievous injury to a child or convert structures into a population. Witness20 and official/inquiry6 are competing accounts, not a sum.

Legal distinction

Inquiry findings, witness allegations, institutional causal interpretation, defences and procedural objections retain their own voices. Firing individual-notice limit is separate from demolition/backdating notices. No criminal conviction, original personal shooting order or current legal status established.

Casualty scope: Official six and inquiry minimum six overlap; witness at-least20 is a competing allegation. Injury totals/subsets/hospital attendance may overlap; structures are not people; source-defined minors are not a proven under18total. No personal shooter allocation or police-shooting cause for AIIMS injuries.

Record A4-B14-IN-AIIMS · exact wording SHA-256 1b49f19bc02c96a8ef05e7e142de9e6c9f4d7bf4ea19ef4205d0c89cb29b865c

Report a correction →
context

The Shah Commission describes a meeting on 3 June 1976 followed by obtaining a signed, pre-dated firing order. The later signature’s exact date is not established, and it was not an original order issued on 19 April.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed commission record observation testimony or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 3 June1976 · later meeting; subsequent signature date unknown, not19April order.

Date basis and original source clocks

3 June1976 · later meeting; subsequent signature date unknown, not19April order. Report date1978-04-26 is distinct from incident, attendance, meeting, unknown signature/testimony and first-publication clocks. Background1975 lies before1976replay horizon.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Shah Commission of Inquiry, Interim Report II, 26 April 1978 ↗

Publisher: Shah Commission of Inquiry, India

Exact passage: chapter14 paras14.167-172, printed138-139/PDF141-142

Source establishes: Paragraphs14.167–14.172read testimony and referencedwirelesslog; public text omits streetaddress and originalprivatecaseprose.

Document date: 1978-04-26 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Coverphysical1rendered/viewed;chapter13physical101–104/printed98–101paras13.161–13.174;chapter14physical123,134–135,138–142/printed120,131–132,135–139paras14.1–14.8,14.109–14.129,14.154–14.178;chapter15physical143–144paras15.3–15.5. Physical134and142rendered/viewed for injurycounts/agesandnotices/defences/findings.

Access limitations

BJP library hosts identified scanned Commission report, not original government digital custody. Cached originalscanread; fresh web fetch failed size limit89,565,528bytes, not source-content disproof. Original orders, diaries, medical records, witnesses, property file and handwriting report not independently acquired. Jagmohan/Laldefences,KrishanChand/residentaccounts,Bhinderdenial,Sanjayproceduralobjections/freshnotice/exparteassessment,conflictingofficial/witnessdeathcounts,medical/policelistdifferencesandexplicitfiringindividualnoticebar reviewed.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_primary_document_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B04-FAMILY-SHAH-TURKMAN

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B04-SRC-IN-SHAHII@448e2b8cb6138ea6

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 448e2b8cb6138ea678b102b7862192830a35ed7e5d2d863e16d0e467c0aa8849. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

BJP library hosts identified scanned Commission report, not original government digital custody. Cached originalscanread; fresh web fetch failed size limit89,565,528bytes, not source-content disproof. Original orders, diaries, medical records, witnesses, property file and handwriting report not independently acquired. Jagmohan/Laldefences,KrishanChand/residentaccounts,Bhinderdenial,Sanjayproceduralobjections/freshnotice/exparteassessment,conflictingofficial/witnessdeathcounts,medical/policelistdifferencesandexplicitfiringindividualnoticebar reviewed.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Meeting date is distinct from the later signature date, which remains unknown. Testimony and a wireless-log record are reproduced in the inquiry; originals not separately obtained.

This is the Commission’s later-record finding based on multiple magistrates’ testimony and a cited wireless log, read alongside Bhinder’s denial and Sanjay Gandhi’s procedural objections, fresh notice, refusal and subsequent ex parte assessment. Underlying original testimony/log and later criminal-case outcomes were not reviewed. June3meeting is distinct from a later signature of unknown date and from April19firing. No original shooting instruction or current conviction is established. Street addresses and private audit prose are excluded.

Legal distinction

Inquiry findings, witness allegations, institutional causal interpretation, defences and procedural objections retain their own voices. Firing individual-notice limit is separate from demolition/backdating notices. No criminal conviction, original personal shooting order or current legal status established.

Casualty scope: Official six and inquiry minimum six overlap; witness at-least20 is a competing allegation. Injury totals/subsets/hospital attendance may overlap; structures are not people; source-defined minors are not a proven under18total. No personal shooter allocation or police-shooting cause for AIIMS injuries.

Record A4-B14-IN-BACKDATING · exact wording SHA-256 e3be9b64f28eb138261c60527463975ee73789b2b76b77f8742761d0849cb117

Report a correction →
decision

The Shah Commission found that P. S. Bhinder requisitioned bulldozers before the unrest was fully controlled and misused his authority in resuming demolition. Its finding does not establish an individual order to shoot.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed commission record observation testimony or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 26 April1978 · Commission report date; underlying action/testimony/observation day unknown.

Date basis and original source clocks

26 April1978 · Commission report date; underlying action/testimony/observation day unknown. Report date1978-04-26 is distinct from incident, attendance, meeting, unknown signature/testimony and first-publication clocks. Background1975 lies before1976replay horizon.

Sources (2) · exact passages & limitations

Shah Commission of Inquiry, Interim Report II, 26 April 1978 ↗

Publisher: Shah Commission of Inquiry, India

Exact passage: chapter13 para13.174, printed101/PDF104

Source establishes: Paragraph13.174readwith13.164; corroborating accounts and notice/procedural limits reviewed, pending criminal trial is not a conviction.

Document date: 1978-04-26 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Coverphysical1rendered/viewed;chapter13physical101–104/printed98–101paras13.161–13.174;chapter14physical123,134–135,138–142/printed120,131–132,135–139paras14.1–14.8,14.109–14.129,14.154–14.178;chapter15physical143–144paras15.3–15.5. Physical134and142rendered/viewed for injurycounts/agesandnotices/defences/findings.

Access limitations

BJP library hosts identified scanned Commission report, not original government digital custody. Cached originalscanread; fresh web fetch failed size limit89,565,528bytes, not source-content disproof. Original orders, diaries, medical records, witnesses, property file and handwriting report not independently acquired. Jagmohan/Laldefences,KrishanChand/residentaccounts,Bhinderdenial,Sanjayproceduralobjections/freshnotice/exparteassessment,conflictingofficial/witnessdeathcounts,medical/policelistdifferencesandexplicitfiringindividualnoticebar reviewed.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_primary_document_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B04-FAMILY-SHAH-TURKMAN

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B04-SRC-IN-SHAHII@448e2b8cb6138ea6

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 448e2b8cb6138ea678b102b7862192830a35ed7e5d2d863e16d0e467c0aa8849. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Shah Commission of Inquiry, Interim Report II, 26 April 1978 ↗

Publisher: Shah Commission of Inquiry, India

Exact passage: Printed99/physical102, paragraph13.164

Source establishes: Paragraph13.174readwith13.164; corroborating accounts and notice/procedural limits reviewed, pending criminal trial is not a conviction.

Document date: 1978-04-26 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Coverphysical1rendered/viewed;chapter13physical101–104/printed98–101paras13.161–13.174;chapter14physical123,134–135,138–142/printed120,131–132,135–139paras14.1–14.8,14.109–14.129,14.154–14.178;chapter15physical143–144paras15.3–15.5. Physical134and142rendered/viewed for injurycounts/agesandnotices/defences/findings.

Access limitations

BJP library hosts identified scanned Commission report, not original government digital custody. Cached originalscanread; fresh web fetch failed size limit89,565,528bytes, not source-content disproof. Original orders, diaries, medical records, witnesses, property file and handwriting report not independently acquired. Jagmohan/Laldefences,KrishanChand/residentaccounts,Bhinderdenial,Sanjayproceduralobjections/freshnotice/exparteassessment,conflictingofficial/witnessdeathcounts,medical/policelistdifferencesandexplicitfiringindividualnoticebar reviewed.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_primary_document_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B04-FAMILY-SHAH-TURKMAN

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B04-SRC-IN-SHAHII@448e2b8cb6138ea6

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 448e2b8cb6138ea678b102b7862192830a35ed7e5d2d863e16d0e467c0aa8849. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

BJP library hosts identified scanned Commission report, not original government digital custody. Cached originalscanread; fresh web fetch failed size limit89,565,528bytes, not source-content disproof. Original orders, diaries, medical records, witnesses, property file and handwriting report not independently acquired. Jagmohan/Laldefences,KrishanChand/residentaccounts,Bhinderdenial,Sanjayproceduralobjections/freshnotice/exparteassessment,conflictingofficial/witnessdeathcounts,medical/policelistdifferencesandexplicitfiringindividualnoticebar reviewed.

BJP library hosts identified scanned Commission report, not original government digital custody. Cached originalscanread; fresh web fetch failed size limit89,565,528bytes, not source-content disproof. Original orders, diaries, medical records, witnesses, property file and handwriting report not independently acquired. Jagmohan/Laldefences,KrishanChand/residentaccounts,Bhinderdenial,Sanjayproceduralobjections/freshnotice/exparteassessment,conflictingofficial/witnessdeathcounts,medical/policelistdifferencesandexplicitfiringindividualnoticebar reviewed.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Demolition conduct only. He had notice, declined a later defence citing a pending trial and had earlier given his version. No result of that criminal trial established here.

Shah Commission findings and the defences are distinct. The scan is hosted by a political party library; original underlying records, resident testimony and handwriting report were not independently acquired. Jagmohan and Lal had notices and gave explanations; Bhinder’s later-stage demolition defence was declined/deferred in circumstances described in the report. Inquiry findings are not criminal convictions. No demolition finding becomes an individual firing order.

Legal distinction

Inquiry findings, witness allegations, institutional causal interpretation, defences and procedural objections retain their own voices. Firing individual-notice limit is separate from demolition/backdating notices. No criminal conviction, original personal shooting order or current legal status established.

Casualty scope: Official six and inquiry minimum six overlap; witness at-least20 is a competing allegation. Injury totals/subsets/hospital attendance may overlap; structures are not people; source-defined minors are not a proven under18total. No personal shooter allocation or police-shooting cause for AIIMS injuries.

Record A4-B14-IN-BHINDER-BULLDOZERS · exact wording SHA-256 052c545cb7a4ae2de905c3dd561350e425a86273057870e59646de5454c306af

Report a correction →
human consequence

The Shah report relays the official six deaths from police firing and concludes that at least six people died. Conflicting identity entries did not establish a seventh death. These overlapping accounts do not create two victim groups.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed commission record observation testimony or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 19–24 April1976 · firing and later reported death; not all deaths on19April.

Date basis and original source clocks

19–24 April1976 · firing and later reported death; not all deaths on19April. Report date1978-04-26 is distinct from incident, attendance, meeting, unknown signature/testimony and first-publication clocks. Background1975 lies before1976replay horizon.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Shah Commission of Inquiry, Interim Report II, 26 April 1978 ↗

Publisher: Shah Commission of Inquiry, India

Exact passage: chapter14 paras14.115-117, printed131/PDF134;14.159(vii), printed136/PDF139

Source establishes: Paragraphs14.115–14.117and14.159(vii); some deaths followed19April, including one reported24April. No names/addresses exported or personal shooter allocation.

Document date: 1978-04-26 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Coverphysical1rendered/viewed;chapter13physical101–104/printed98–101paras13.161–13.174;chapter14physical123,134–135,138–142/printed120,131–132,135–139paras14.1–14.8,14.109–14.129,14.154–14.178;chapter15physical143–144paras15.3–15.5. Physical134and142rendered/viewed for injurycounts/agesandnotices/defences/findings.

Access limitations

BJP library hosts identified scanned Commission report, not original government digital custody. Cached originalscanread; fresh web fetch failed size limit89,565,528bytes, not source-content disproof. Original orders, diaries, medical records, witnesses, property file and handwriting report not independently acquired. Jagmohan/Laldefences,KrishanChand/residentaccounts,Bhinderdenial,Sanjayproceduralobjections/freshnotice/exparteassessment,conflictingofficial/witnessdeathcounts,medical/policelistdifferencesandexplicitfiringindividualnoticebar reviewed.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_primary_document_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B04-FAMILY-SHAH-TURKMAN

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B04-SRC-IN-SHAHII@448e2b8cb6138ea6

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 448e2b8cb6138ea678b102b7862192830a35ed7e5d2d863e16d0e467c0aa8849. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

BJP library hosts identified scanned Commission report, not original government digital custody. Cached originalscanread; fresh web fetch failed size limit89,565,528bytes, not source-content disproof. Original orders, diaries, medical records, witnesses, property file and handwriting report not independently acquired. Jagmohan/Laldefences,KrishanChand/residentaccounts,Bhinderdenial,Sanjayproceduralobjections/freshnotice/exparteassessment,conflictingofficial/witnessdeathcounts,medical/policelistdifferencesandexplicitfiringindividualnoticebar reviewed.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Official lists and minimum inquiry conclusion are overlapping accounts of the same deaths. Some deaths occurred after19April, including one reported24April. No individual shooter allocation.

Preserve official reports, inquiry minima, witness allegations and hospital-record observations as separate voices. Deaths, injuries, hospital attendance, source-defined minors, structures and displaced people are different units. Categories, date windows and groups may overlap. Do not repair medical arithmetic, infer missing identities, identify raw victims/addresses, assign one grievous injury to a child or convert structures into a population. Witness20 and official/inquiry6 are competing accounts, not a sum.

Legal distinction

Inquiry findings, witness allegations, institutional causal interpretation, defences and procedural objections retain their own voices. Firing individual-notice limit is separate from demolition/backdating notices. No criminal conviction, original personal shooting order or current legal status established.

Casualty scope: Official six and inquiry minimum six overlap; witness at-least20 is a competing allegation. Injury totals/subsets/hospital attendance may overlap; structures are not people; source-defined minors are not a proven under18total. No personal shooter allocation or police-shooting cause for AIIMS injuries.

Record A4-B14-IN-DEATHS · exact wording SHA-256 b9755c95fa2ea63058e85ad3e3e2da50b5d9519b629dda0620bf601a9a294838

Report a correction →
context

Jagmohan defended the clearances as lawful and voluntary and said the lieutenant-governor was informed. The Shah Commission records contrary evidence from Krishan Chand and residents and rejects voluntariness and the reliability of the purported permission file.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed commission record observation testimony or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 26 April1978 · Commission report date; underlying action/testimony/observation day unknown.

Date basis and original source clocks

26 April1978 · Commission report date; underlying action/testimony/observation day unknown. Report date1978-04-26 is distinct from incident, attendance, meeting, unknown signature/testimony and first-publication clocks. Background1975 lies before1976replay horizon.

Sources (2) · exact passages & limitations

Shah Commission of Inquiry, Interim Report II, 26 April 1978 ↗

Publisher: Shah Commission of Inquiry, India

Exact passage: chapter13 paras13.167-173, printed100-101/PDF103-104

Source establishes: Paragraphs13.167–13.173; H.K.Lal’s statutory/supervisory defence appears13.165–13.166. Original file, handwriting report and resident transcripts not acquired.

Document date: 1978-04-26 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Coverphysical1rendered/viewed;chapter13physical101–104/printed98–101paras13.161–13.174;chapter14physical123,134–135,138–142/printed120,131–132,135–139paras14.1–14.8,14.109–14.129,14.154–14.178;chapter15physical143–144paras15.3–15.5. Physical134and142rendered/viewed for injurycounts/agesandnotices/defences/findings.

Access limitations

BJP library hosts identified scanned Commission report, not original government digital custody. Cached originalscanread; fresh web fetch failed size limit89,565,528bytes, not source-content disproof. Original orders, diaries, medical records, witnesses, property file and handwriting report not independently acquired. Jagmohan/Laldefences,KrishanChand/residentaccounts,Bhinderdenial,Sanjayproceduralobjections/freshnotice/exparteassessment,conflictingofficial/witnessdeathcounts,medical/policelistdifferencesandexplicitfiringindividualnoticebar reviewed.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_primary_document_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B04-FAMILY-SHAH-TURKMAN

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B04-SRC-IN-SHAHII@448e2b8cb6138ea6

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 448e2b8cb6138ea678b102b7862192830a35ed7e5d2d863e16d0e467c0aa8849. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Shah Commission of Inquiry, Interim Report II, 26 April 1978 ↗

Publisher: Shah Commission of Inquiry, India

Exact passage: Printed99–101/physical102–104, paragraphs13.165–13.173

Source establishes: Paragraphs13.167–13.173; H.K.Lal’s statutory/supervisory defence appears13.165–13.166. Original file, handwriting report and resident transcripts not acquired.

Document date: 1978-04-26 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Coverphysical1rendered/viewed;chapter13physical101–104/printed98–101paras13.161–13.174;chapter14physical123,134–135,138–142/printed120,131–132,135–139paras14.1–14.8,14.109–14.129,14.154–14.178;chapter15physical143–144paras15.3–15.5. Physical134and142rendered/viewed for injurycounts/agesandnotices/defences/findings.

Access limitations

BJP library hosts identified scanned Commission report, not original government digital custody. Cached originalscanread; fresh web fetch failed size limit89,565,528bytes, not source-content disproof. Original orders, diaries, medical records, witnesses, property file and handwriting report not independently acquired. Jagmohan/Laldefences,KrishanChand/residentaccounts,Bhinderdenial,Sanjayproceduralobjections/freshnotice/exparteassessment,conflictingofficial/witnessdeathcounts,medical/policelistdifferencesandexplicitfiringindividualnoticebar reviewed.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_primary_document_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B04-FAMILY-SHAH-TURKMAN

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B04-SRC-IN-SHAHII@448e2b8cb6138ea6

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 448e2b8cb6138ea678b102b7862192830a35ed7e5d2d863e16d0e467c0aa8849. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

BJP library hosts identified scanned Commission report, not original government digital custody. Cached originalscanread; fresh web fetch failed size limit89,565,528bytes, not source-content disproof. Original orders, diaries, medical records, witnesses, property file and handwriting report not independently acquired. Jagmohan/Laldefences,KrishanChand/residentaccounts,Bhinderdenial,Sanjayproceduralobjections/freshnotice/exparteassessment,conflictingofficial/witnessdeathcounts,medical/policelistdifferencesandexplicitfiringindividualnoticebar reviewed.

BJP library hosts identified scanned Commission report, not original government digital custody. Cached originalscanread; fresh web fetch failed size limit89,565,528bytes, not source-content disproof. Original orders, diaries, medical records, witnesses, property file and handwriting report not independently acquired. Jagmohan/Laldefences,KrishanChand/residentaccounts,Bhinderdenial,Sanjayproceduralobjections/freshnotice/exparteassessment,conflictingofficial/witnessdeathcounts,medical/policelistdifferencesandexplicitfiringindividualnoticebar reviewed.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Original permission file, handwriting report, resident testimony and underlying notices not independently reviewed.

Shah Commission findings and the defences are distinct. The scan is hosted by a political party library; original underlying records, resident testimony and handwriting report were not independently acquired. Jagmohan and Lal had notices and gave explanations; Bhinder’s later-stage demolition defence was declined/deferred in circumstances described in the report. Inquiry findings are not criminal convictions. No demolition finding becomes an individual firing order.

Legal distinction

Inquiry findings, witness allegations, institutional causal interpretation, defences and procedural objections retain their own voices. Firing individual-notice limit is separate from demolition/backdating notices. No criminal conviction, original personal shooting order or current legal status established.

Casualty scope: Official six and inquiry minimum six overlap; witness at-least20 is a competing allegation. Injury totals/subsets/hospital attendance may overlap; structures are not people; source-defined minors are not a proven under18total. No personal shooter allocation or police-shooting cause for AIIMS injuries.

Record A4-B14-IN-DEM-DEFENCES · exact wording SHA-256 586f5487edbe61b69732d8a6656e01f8c18e71841631367f18cab3e3e911e6c3

Report a correction →
decision

The Shah Commission found that Jagmohan and H. K. Lal misused their authority in coercive Turkman Gate clearances that caused considerable human misery. This is an inquiry finding about demolition, not a criminal conviction or individual firing liability.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed commission record observation testimony or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 26 April1978 · Commission report date; underlying action/testimony/observation day unknown.

Date basis and original source clocks

26 April1978 · Commission report date; underlying action/testimony/observation day unknown. Report date1978-04-26 is distinct from incident, attendance, meeting, unknown signature/testimony and first-publication clocks. Background1975 lies before1976replay horizon.

Sources (2) · exact passages & limitations

Shah Commission of Inquiry, Interim Report II, 26 April 1978 ↗

Publisher: Shah Commission of Inquiry, India

Exact passage: chapter13 paras13.169-173, printed100-101/PDF103-104

Source establishes: One joint finding in13.173 covers two native actor views. Read notices, defences and contradictory property/permission records in13.165–13.173.

Document date: 1978-04-26 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Coverphysical1rendered/viewed;chapter13physical101–104/printed98–101paras13.161–13.174;chapter14physical123,134–135,138–142/printed120,131–132,135–139paras14.1–14.8,14.109–14.129,14.154–14.178;chapter15physical143–144paras15.3–15.5. Physical134and142rendered/viewed for injurycounts/agesandnotices/defences/findings.

Access limitations

BJP library hosts identified scanned Commission report, not original government digital custody. Cached originalscanread; fresh web fetch failed size limit89,565,528bytes, not source-content disproof. Original orders, diaries, medical records, witnesses, property file and handwriting report not independently acquired. Jagmohan/Laldefences,KrishanChand/residentaccounts,Bhinderdenial,Sanjayproceduralobjections/freshnotice/exparteassessment,conflictingofficial/witnessdeathcounts,medical/policelistdifferencesandexplicitfiringindividualnoticebar reviewed.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_primary_document_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B04-FAMILY-SHAH-TURKMAN

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B04-SRC-IN-SHAHII@448e2b8cb6138ea6

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 448e2b8cb6138ea678b102b7862192830a35ed7e5d2d863e16d0e467c0aa8849. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Shah Commission of Inquiry, Interim Report II, 26 April 1978 ↗

Publisher: Shah Commission of Inquiry, India

Exact passage: Printed99–101/physical102–104, paragraphs13.165–13.173

Source establishes: One joint finding in13.173 covers two native actor views. Read notices, defences and contradictory property/permission records in13.165–13.173.

Document date: 1978-04-26 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Coverphysical1rendered/viewed;chapter13physical101–104/printed98–101paras13.161–13.174;chapter14physical123,134–135,138–142/printed120,131–132,135–139paras14.1–14.8,14.109–14.129,14.154–14.178;chapter15physical143–144paras15.3–15.5. Physical134and142rendered/viewed for injurycounts/agesandnotices/defences/findings.

Access limitations

BJP library hosts identified scanned Commission report, not original government digital custody. Cached originalscanread; fresh web fetch failed size limit89,565,528bytes, not source-content disproof. Original orders, diaries, medical records, witnesses, property file and handwriting report not independently acquired. Jagmohan/Laldefences,KrishanChand/residentaccounts,Bhinderdenial,Sanjayproceduralobjections/freshnotice/exparteassessment,conflictingofficial/witnessdeathcounts,medical/policelistdifferencesandexplicitfiringindividualnoticebar reviewed.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_primary_document_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B04-FAMILY-SHAH-TURKMAN

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B04-SRC-IN-SHAHII@448e2b8cb6138ea6

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 448e2b8cb6138ea678b102b7862192830a35ed7e5d2d863e16d0e467c0aa8849. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

BJP library hosts identified scanned Commission report, not original government digital custody. Cached originalscanread; fresh web fetch failed size limit89,565,528bytes, not source-content disproof. Original orders, diaries, medical records, witnesses, property file and handwriting report not independently acquired. Jagmohan/Laldefences,KrishanChand/residentaccounts,Bhinderdenial,Sanjayproceduralobjections/freshnotice/exparteassessment,conflictingofficial/witnessdeathcounts,medical/policelistdifferencesandexplicitfiringindividualnoticebar reviewed.

BJP library hosts identified scanned Commission report, not original government digital custody. Cached originalscanread; fresh web fetch failed size limit89,565,528bytes, not source-content disproof. Original orders, diaries, medical records, witnesses, property file and handwriting report not independently acquired. Jagmohan/Laldefences,KrishanChand/residentaccounts,Bhinderdenial,Sanjayproceduralobjections/freshnotice/exparteassessment,conflictingofficial/witnessdeathcounts,medical/policelistdifferencesandexplicitfiringindividualnoticebar reviewed.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Adverse inquiry finding after notices in demolition case, not criminal conviction. No individual firing liability inferred.

Shah Commission findings and the defences are distinct. The scan is hosted by a political party library; original underlying records, resident testimony and handwriting report were not independently acquired. Jagmohan and Lal had notices and gave explanations; Bhinder’s later-stage demolition defence was declined/deferred in circumstances described in the report. Inquiry findings are not criminal convictions. No demolition finding becomes an individual firing order.

Legal distinction

Inquiry findings, witness allegations, institutional causal interpretation, defences and procedural objections retain their own voices. Firing individual-notice limit is separate from demolition/backdating notices. No criminal conviction, original personal shooting order or current legal status established.

Casualty scope: Official six and inquiry minimum six overlap; witness at-least20 is a competing allegation. Injury totals/subsets/hospital attendance may overlap; structures are not people; source-defined minors are not a proven under18total. No personal shooter allocation or police-shooting cause for AIIMS injuries.

Record A4-B14-IN-DEM-JAGMOHAN · exact wording SHA-256 5f520242ebe691379199848329dbee852b2e95c884ae2f7c2f0b63e21a1b603b

Report a correction →
context

The Shah Commission records demolition resuming on the evening of 19 April 1976 under curfew and continuing until 27 April. It separately dates curfew in the wider Jama Masjid police-station jurisdiction to 19 April–13 May.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed commission record observation testimony or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 19 April1976 · demolition resumption; end27April and wider curfew end13May remain separate.

Date basis and original source clocks

19 April1976 · demolition resumption; end27April and wider curfew end13May remain separate. Report date1978-04-26 is distinct from incident, attendance, meeting, unknown signature/testimony and first-publication clocks. Background1975 lies before1976replay horizon.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Shah Commission of Inquiry, Interim Report II, 26 April 1978 ↗

Publisher: Shah Commission of Inquiry, India

Exact passage: chapter14 paras14.154-155, printed135/PDF138

Source establishes: Paragraphs14.154–14.155physical138; location of demolition and wider curfew jurisdiction are not interchangeable boundaries.

Document date: 1978-04-26 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Coverphysical1rendered/viewed;chapter13physical101–104/printed98–101paras13.161–13.174;chapter14physical123,134–135,138–142/printed120,131–132,135–139paras14.1–14.8,14.109–14.129,14.154–14.178;chapter15physical143–144paras15.3–15.5. Physical134and142rendered/viewed for injurycounts/agesandnotices/defences/findings.

Access limitations

BJP library hosts identified scanned Commission report, not original government digital custody. Cached originalscanread; fresh web fetch failed size limit89,565,528bytes, not source-content disproof. Original orders, diaries, medical records, witnesses, property file and handwriting report not independently acquired. Jagmohan/Laldefences,KrishanChand/residentaccounts,Bhinderdenial,Sanjayproceduralobjections/freshnotice/exparteassessment,conflictingofficial/witnessdeathcounts,medical/policelistdifferencesandexplicitfiringindividualnoticebar reviewed.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_primary_document_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B04-FAMILY-SHAH-TURKMAN

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B04-SRC-IN-SHAHII@448e2b8cb6138ea6

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 448e2b8cb6138ea678b102b7862192830a35ed7e5d2d863e16d0e467c0aa8849. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

BJP library hosts identified scanned Commission report, not original government digital custody. Cached originalscanread; fresh web fetch failed size limit89,565,528bytes, not source-content disproof. Original orders, diaries, medical records, witnesses, property file and handwriting report not independently acquired. Jagmohan/Laldefences,KrishanChand/residentaccounts,Bhinderdenial,Sanjayproceduralobjections/freshnotice/exparteassessment,conflictingofficial/witnessdeathcounts,medical/policelistdifferencesandexplicitfiringindividualnoticebar reviewed.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Turkman Gate event geography and larger police-station curfew jurisdiction are not identical polygons.

Shah Commission findings and the defences are distinct. The scan is hosted by a political party library; original underlying records, resident testimony and handwriting report were not independently acquired. Jagmohan and Lal had notices and gave explanations; Bhinder’s later-stage demolition defence was declined/deferred in circumstances described in the report. Inquiry findings are not criminal convictions. No demolition finding becomes an individual firing order.

Legal distinction

Inquiry findings, witness allegations, institutional causal interpretation, defences and procedural objections retain their own voices. Firing individual-notice limit is separate from demolition/backdating notices. No criminal conviction, original personal shooting order or current legal status established.

Casualty scope: Official six and inquiry minimum six overlap; witness at-least20 is a competing allegation. Injury totals/subsets/hospital attendance may overlap; structures are not people; source-defined minors are not a proven under18total. No personal shooter allocation or police-shooting cause for AIIMS injuries.

Record A4-B14-IN-DEM-TIMING · exact wording SHA-256 c3ff4502ab975579c4985b3d94234e38e5e8a462f86ffa5e100ffb9c9549761f

Report a correction →
context

The Shah Commission’s 1978 report discusses the internal Emergency declared on the night of 25 June 1975 and the cabinet meeting the next morning as background. This does not establish an order for the April 1976 Turkman Gate firing.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed commission record observation testimony or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 25–26 June1975 · background Emergency chronology, before replay horizon; not April1976 firing authorisation.

Date basis and original source clocks

25–26 June1975 · background Emergency chronology, before replay horizon; not April1976 firing authorisation. Report date1978-04-26 is distinct from incident, attendance, meeting, unknown signature/testimony and first-publication clocks. Background1975 lies before1976replay horizon.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Shah Commission of Inquiry, Interim Report II, 26 April 1978 ↗

Publisher: Shah Commission of Inquiry, India

Exact passage: chapter15 paras15.3-5, printed140-141/PDF143-144

Source establishes: Chapter15paragraphs15.3–15.5; original proclamation and original cabinet papers not acquired. Narrow chronology only, not wider motive/illegality findings elsewhere.

Document date: 1978-04-26 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Coverphysical1rendered/viewed;chapter13physical101–104/printed98–101paras13.161–13.174;chapter14physical123,134–135,138–142/printed120,131–132,135–139paras14.1–14.8,14.109–14.129,14.154–14.178;chapter15physical143–144paras15.3–15.5. Physical134and142rendered/viewed for injurycounts/agesandnotices/defences/findings.

Access limitations

BJP library hosts identified scanned Commission report, not original government digital custody. Cached originalscanread; fresh web fetch failed size limit89,565,528bytes, not source-content disproof. Original orders, diaries, medical records, witnesses, property file and handwriting report not independently acquired. Jagmohan/Laldefences,KrishanChand/residentaccounts,Bhinderdenial,Sanjayproceduralobjections/freshnotice/exparteassessment,conflictingofficial/witnessdeathcounts,medical/policelistdifferencesandexplicitfiringindividualnoticebar reviewed.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_primary_document_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B04-FAMILY-SHAH-TURKMAN

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B04-SRC-IN-SHAHII@448e2b8cb6138ea6

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 448e2b8cb6138ea678b102b7862192830a35ed7e5d2d863e16d0e467c0aa8849. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

BJP library hosts identified scanned Commission report, not original government digital custody. Cached originalscanread; fresh web fetch failed size limit89,565,528bytes, not source-content disproof. Original orders, diaries, medical records, witnesses, property file and handwriting report not independently acquired. Jagmohan/Laldefences,KrishanChand/residentaccounts,Bhinderdenial,Sanjayproceduralobjections/freshnotice/exparteassessment,conflictingofficial/witnessdeathcounts,medical/policelistdifferencesandexplicitfiringindividualnoticebar reviewed.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Pre1976 background only. Original proclamation not separately obtained; this does not establish a personal order for the April1976 firing.

This is a selected passage of the Shah Commission’s Interim ReportII,26April1978, in a scan hosted by the BJP library, not original government digital custody. The cover and relevant passages were independently read. Background Emergency chronology does not establish a personal April1976 shooting order. Original proclamation/cabinet records were not obtained.

Legal distinction

Inquiry findings, witness allegations, institutional causal interpretation, defences and procedural objections retain their own voices. Firing individual-notice limit is separate from demolition/backdating notices. No criminal conviction, original personal shooting order or current legal status established.

Casualty scope: Official six and inquiry minimum six overlap; witness at-least20 is a competing allegation. Injury totals/subsets/hospital attendance may overlap; structures are not people; source-defined minors are not a proven under18total. No personal shooter allocation or police-shooting cause for AIIMS injuries.

Record A4-B14-IN-EMERGENCY-BACKGROUND · exact wording SHA-256 9efb9391358e69080dda6da654ce82025d7d8ee897236bd3780ff024bcacfa5b

Report a correction →
context

For the 19 April 1976 firing itself, the Shah Commission expressly refrained from observations on individual officers because it had not issued the required notices and summons. This limit does not erase its separate demolition and later backdating findings.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed commission record observation testimony or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 26 April1978 · Commission report date; underlying action/testimony/observation day unknown.

Date basis and original source clocks

26 April1978 · Commission report date; underlying action/testimony/observation day unknown. Report date1978-04-26 is distinct from incident, attendance, meeting, unknown signature/testimony and first-publication clocks. Background1975 lies before1976replay horizon.

Sources (2) · exact passages & limitations

Shah Commission of Inquiry, Interim Report II, 26 April 1978 ↗

Publisher: Shah Commission of Inquiry, India

Exact passage: chapter14 paras14.158-159, printed135/PDF138

Source establishes: Paragraph14.159physical138;13.166–13.174and14.172–14.178recordseparatenoticeprocedures.

Document date: 1978-04-26 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Coverphysical1rendered/viewed;chapter13physical101–104/printed98–101paras13.161–13.174;chapter14physical123,134–135,138–142/printed120,131–132,135–139paras14.1–14.8,14.109–14.129,14.154–14.178;chapter15physical143–144paras15.3–15.5. Physical134and142rendered/viewed for injurycounts/agesandnotices/defences/findings.

Access limitations

BJP library hosts identified scanned Commission report, not original government digital custody. Cached originalscanread; fresh web fetch failed size limit89,565,528bytes, not source-content disproof. Original orders, diaries, medical records, witnesses, property file and handwriting report not independently acquired. Jagmohan/Laldefences,KrishanChand/residentaccounts,Bhinderdenial,Sanjayproceduralobjections/freshnotice/exparteassessment,conflictingofficial/witnessdeathcounts,medical/policelistdifferencesandexplicitfiringindividualnoticebar reviewed.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_primary_document_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B04-FAMILY-SHAH-TURKMAN

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B04-SRC-IN-SHAHII@448e2b8cb6138ea6

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 448e2b8cb6138ea678b102b7862192830a35ed7e5d2d863e16d0e467c0aa8849. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Shah Commission of Inquiry, Interim Report II, 26 April 1978 ↗

Publisher: Shah Commission of Inquiry, India

Exact passage: Printed99–101and139/physical102–104and142, separate notices and findings

Source establishes: Paragraph14.159physical138;13.166–13.174and14.172–14.178recordseparatenoticeprocedures.

Document date: 1978-04-26 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Coverphysical1rendered/viewed;chapter13physical101–104/printed98–101paras13.161–13.174;chapter14physical123,134–135,138–142/printed120,131–132,135–139paras14.1–14.8,14.109–14.129,14.154–14.178;chapter15physical143–144paras15.3–15.5. Physical134and142rendered/viewed for injurycounts/agesandnotices/defences/findings.

Access limitations

BJP library hosts identified scanned Commission report, not original government digital custody. Cached originalscanread; fresh web fetch failed size limit89,565,528bytes, not source-content disproof. Original orders, diaries, medical records, witnesses, property file and handwriting report not independently acquired. Jagmohan/Laldefences,KrishanChand/residentaccounts,Bhinderdenial,Sanjayproceduralobjections/freshnotice/exparteassessment,conflictingofficial/witnessdeathcounts,medical/policelistdifferencesandexplicitfiringindividualnoticebar reviewed.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_primary_document_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B04-FAMILY-SHAH-TURKMAN

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B04-SRC-IN-SHAHII@448e2b8cb6138ea6

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 448e2b8cb6138ea678b102b7862192830a35ed7e5d2d863e16d0e467c0aa8849. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

BJP library hosts identified scanned Commission report, not original government digital custody. Cached originalscanread; fresh web fetch failed size limit89,565,528bytes, not source-content disproof. Original orders, diaries, medical records, witnesses, property file and handwriting report not independently acquired. Jagmohan/Laldefences,KrishanChand/residentaccounts,Bhinderdenial,Sanjayproceduralobjections/freshnotice/exparteassessment,conflictingofficial/witnessdeathcounts,medical/policelistdifferencesandexplicitfiringindividualnoticebar reviewed.

BJP library hosts identified scanned Commission report, not original government digital custody. Cached originalscanread; fresh web fetch failed size limit89,565,528bytes, not source-content disproof. Original orders, diaries, medical records, witnesses, property file and handwriting report not independently acquired. Jagmohan/Laldefences,KrishanChand/residentaccounts,Bhinderdenial,Sanjayproceduralobjections/freshnotice/exparteassessment,conflictingofficial/witnessdeathcounts,medical/policelistdifferencesandexplicitfiringindividualnoticebar reviewed.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

This procedural limit is specific to the firing inquiry. Separate demolition and later backdating inquiries had notices and adverse individual findings.

For the19Aprilfiring the inquiry expressly withheld individual-officer observations because required notices were absent, and it recorded conflicting police/public accounts. Institutional causal interpretation does not establish a personal order or legal guilt. Separate demolition and backdating inquiries have their own notices and adverse findings; do not transfer the procedural limit between inquiries.

Legal distinction

Inquiry findings, witness allegations, institutional causal interpretation, defences and procedural objections retain their own voices. Firing individual-notice limit is separate from demolition/backdating notices. No criminal conviction, original personal shooting order or current legal status established.

Casualty scope: Official six and inquiry minimum six overlap; witness at-least20 is a competing allegation. Injury totals/subsets/hospital attendance may overlap; structures are not people; source-defined minors are not a proven under18total. No personal shooter allocation or police-shooting cause for AIIMS injuries.

Record A4-B14-IN-FIRING-SCOPE · exact wording SHA-256 8bc7fc45b2f7609a77255c4f07737dcdb06d232c846fb8fb1e85aa1c4f11234e

Report a correction →
human consequence

Police reported 146 injured, including 58 police and two magistrates; the Shah report also prints a medical total of 146 excluding four dead. It records substantial differences between the named lists. These are not independently additive groups.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed commission record observation testimony or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 26 April1978 · Commission report date; underlying action/testimony/observation day unknown.

Date basis and original source clocks

26 April1978 · Commission report date; underlying action/testimony/observation day unknown. Report date1978-04-26 is distinct from incident, attendance, meeting, unknown signature/testimony and first-publication clocks. Background1975 lies before1976replay horizon.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Shah Commission of Inquiry, Interim Report II, 26 April 1978 ↗

Publisher: Shah Commission of Inquiry, India

Exact passage: chapter14 paras14.109-112, printed131/PDF134

Source establishes: Paragraphs14.109–14.112physical134; printed medical total not silently repaired from hospital subtotals, which do not clearly reconcile.

Document date: 1978-04-26 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Coverphysical1rendered/viewed;chapter13physical101–104/printed98–101paras13.161–13.174;chapter14physical123,134–135,138–142/printed120,131–132,135–139paras14.1–14.8,14.109–14.129,14.154–14.178;chapter15physical143–144paras15.3–15.5. Physical134and142rendered/viewed for injurycounts/agesandnotices/defences/findings.

Access limitations

BJP library hosts identified scanned Commission report, not original government digital custody. Cached originalscanread; fresh web fetch failed size limit89,565,528bytes, not source-content disproof. Original orders, diaries, medical records, witnesses, property file and handwriting report not independently acquired. Jagmohan/Laldefences,KrishanChand/residentaccounts,Bhinderdenial,Sanjayproceduralobjections/freshnotice/exparteassessment,conflictingofficial/witnessdeathcounts,medical/policelistdifferencesandexplicitfiringindividualnoticebar reviewed.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_primary_document_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B04-FAMILY-SHAH-TURKMAN

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B04-SRC-IN-SHAHII@448e2b8cb6138ea6

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 448e2b8cb6138ea678b102b7862192830a35ed7e5d2d863e16d0e467c0aa8849. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

BJP library hosts identified scanned Commission report, not original government digital custody. Cached originalscanread; fresh web fetch failed size limit89,565,528bytes, not source-content disproof. Original orders, diaries, medical records, witnesses, property file and handwriting report not independently acquired. Jagmohan/Laldefences,KrishanChand/residentaccounts,Bhinderdenial,Sanjayproceduralobjections/freshnotice/exparteassessment,conflictingofficial/witnessdeathcounts,medical/policelistdifferencesandexplicitfiringindividualnoticebar reviewed.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Not independent additive cohorts. Raw hospital subtotals are not reconciled; no repaired total calculated. Different lists may overlap and omit cases.

Preserve official reports, inquiry minima, witness allegations and hospital-record observations as separate voices. Deaths, injuries, hospital attendance, source-defined minors, structures and displaced people are different units. Categories, date windows and groups may overlap. Do not repair medical arithmetic, infer missing identities, identify raw victims/addresses, assign one grievous injury to a child or convert structures into a population. Witness20 and official/inquiry6 are competing accounts, not a sum.

Legal distinction

Inquiry findings, witness allegations, institutional causal interpretation, defences and procedural objections retain their own voices. Firing individual-notice limit is separate from demolition/backdating notices. No criminal conviction, original personal shooting order or current legal status established.

Casualty scope: Official six and inquiry minimum six overlap; witness at-least20 is a competing allegation. Injury totals/subsets/hospital attendance may overlap; structures are not people; source-defined minors are not a proven under18total. No personal shooter allocation or police-shooting cause for AIIMS injuries.

Record A4-B14-IN-INJURIES · exact wording SHA-256 746d9d1ab612e0376d79eeb61e17aec4148e57cce9ddc3099a490edf3455abd8

Report a correction →
decision

The Shah Commission records Jagmohan informing subordinate officers on 7 April 1976 about the proposed Turkman Gate demolition operations. It found they lacked sufficient preparation time. This is a demolition-planning account, not an order to fire.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed commission record observation testimony or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 7 April1976 · reported demolition planning, not a firing order.

Date basis and original source clocks

7 April1976 · reported demolition planning, not a firing order. Report date1978-04-26 is distinct from incident, attendance, meeting, unknown signature/testimony and first-publication clocks. Background1975 lies before1976replay horizon.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Shah Commission of Inquiry, Interim Report II, 26 April 1978 ↗

Publisher: Shah Commission of Inquiry, India

Exact passage: chapter13 paras13.171-173, printed101/PDF104

Source establishes: Chapter13paragraphs13.171–13.173 and14.1; original7Aprilletter not separately acquired.

Document date: 1978-04-26 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Coverphysical1rendered/viewed;chapter13physical101–104/printed98–101paras13.161–13.174;chapter14physical123,134–135,138–142/printed120,131–132,135–139paras14.1–14.8,14.109–14.129,14.154–14.178;chapter15physical143–144paras15.3–15.5. Physical134and142rendered/viewed for injurycounts/agesandnotices/defences/findings.

Access limitations

BJP library hosts identified scanned Commission report, not original government digital custody. Cached originalscanread; fresh web fetch failed size limit89,565,528bytes, not source-content disproof. Original orders, diaries, medical records, witnesses, property file and handwriting report not independently acquired. Jagmohan/Laldefences,KrishanChand/residentaccounts,Bhinderdenial,Sanjayproceduralobjections/freshnotice/exparteassessment,conflictingofficial/witnessdeathcounts,medical/policelistdifferencesandexplicitfiringindividualnoticebar reviewed.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_primary_document_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B04-FAMILY-SHAH-TURKMAN

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B04-SRC-IN-SHAHII@448e2b8cb6138ea6

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 448e2b8cb6138ea678b102b7862192830a35ed7e5d2d863e16d0e467c0aa8849. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

BJP library hosts identified scanned Commission report, not original government digital custody. Cached originalscanread; fresh web fetch failed size limit89,565,528bytes, not source-content disproof. Original orders, diaries, medical records, witnesses, property file and handwriting report not independently acquired. Jagmohan/Laldefences,KrishanChand/residentaccounts,Bhinderdenial,Sanjayproceduralobjections/freshnotice/exparteassessment,conflictingofficial/witnessdeathcounts,medical/policelistdifferencesandexplicitfiringindividualnoticebar reviewed.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

No original7April letter separately obtained. Planning and implementation of clearance are distinct from an order to fire.

Shah Commission findings and the defences are distinct. The scan is hosted by a political party library; original underlying records, resident testimony and handwriting report were not independently acquired. Jagmohan and Lal had notices and gave explanations; Bhinder’s later-stage demolition defence was declined/deferred in circumstances described in the report. Inquiry findings are not criminal convictions. No demolition finding becomes an individual firing order.

Legal distinction

Inquiry findings, witness allegations, institutional causal interpretation, defences and procedural objections retain their own voices. Firing individual-notice limit is separate from demolition/backdating notices. No criminal conviction, original personal shooting order or current legal status established.

Casualty scope: Official six and inquiry minimum six overlap; witness at-least20 is a competing allegation. Injury totals/subsets/hospital attendance may overlap; structures are not people; source-defined minors are not a proven under18total. No personal shooter allocation or police-shooting cause for AIIMS injuries.

Record A4-B14-IN-JAGMOHAN-PLAN · exact wording SHA-256 fbdd933c0f236a9852de219c6017d7e8ae3ca3d60cfba3e309ae9ded73e36528

Report a correction →
human consequence

The Shah Commission says other hospitals’ medico-legal records listed thirteen injured people described as minors, many with blunt-weapon injuries. The passage does not provide their ages or define “minor”; it does not establish an under-eighteen total.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed commission record observation testimony or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 26 April1978 · Commission report date; underlying action/testimony/observation day unknown.

Date basis and original source clocks

26 April1978 · Commission report date; underlying action/testimony/observation day unknown. Report date1978-04-26 is distinct from incident, attendance, meeting, unknown signature/testimony and first-publication clocks. Background1975 lies before1976replay horizon.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Shah Commission of Inquiry, Interim Report II, 26 April 1978 ↗

Publisher: Shah Commission of Inquiry, India

Exact passage: chapter14 para14.114, printed131/PDF134

Source establishes: Paragraph14.114physical134; possible overlap with broaderinjuryfigures and AIIMSpatients unknown.

Document date: 1978-04-26 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Coverphysical1rendered/viewed;chapter13physical101–104/printed98–101paras13.161–13.174;chapter14physical123,134–135,138–142/printed120,131–132,135–139paras14.1–14.8,14.109–14.129,14.154–14.178;chapter15physical143–144paras15.3–15.5. Physical134and142rendered/viewed for injurycounts/agesandnotices/defences/findings.

Access limitations

BJP library hosts identified scanned Commission report, not original government digital custody. Cached originalscanread; fresh web fetch failed size limit89,565,528bytes, not source-content disproof. Original orders, diaries, medical records, witnesses, property file and handwriting report not independently acquired. Jagmohan/Laldefences,KrishanChand/residentaccounts,Bhinderdenial,Sanjayproceduralobjections/freshnotice/exparteassessment,conflictingofficial/witnessdeathcounts,medical/policelistdifferencesandexplicitfiringindividualnoticebar reviewed.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_primary_document_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B04-FAMILY-SHAH-TURKMAN

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B04-SRC-IN-SHAHII@448e2b8cb6138ea6

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 448e2b8cb6138ea678b102b7862192830a35ed7e5d2d863e16d0e467c0aa8849. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

BJP library hosts identified scanned Commission report, not original government digital custody. Cached originalscanread; fresh web fetch failed size limit89,565,528bytes, not source-content disproof. Original orders, diaries, medical records, witnesses, property file and handwriting report not independently acquired. Jagmohan/Laldefences,KrishanChand/residentaccounts,Bhinderdenial,Sanjayproceduralobjections/freshnotice/exparteassessment,conflictingofficial/witnessdeathcounts,medical/policelistdifferencesandexplicitfiringindividualnoticebar reviewed.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Exact ages and source minor definition absent here; under18 categorisation not established. Potential overlap with other injury totals.

Preserve official reports, inquiry minima, witness allegations and hospital-record observations as separate voices. Deaths, injuries, hospital attendance, source-defined minors, structures and displaced people are different units. Categories, date windows and groups may overlap. Do not repair medical arithmetic, infer missing identities, identify raw victims/addresses, assign one grievous injury to a child or convert structures into a population. Witness20 and official/inquiry6 are competing accounts, not a sum.

Legal distinction

Inquiry findings, witness allegations, institutional causal interpretation, defences and procedural objections retain their own voices. Firing individual-notice limit is separate from demolition/backdating notices. No criminal conviction, original personal shooting order or current legal status established.

Casualty scope: Official six and inquiry minimum six overlap; witness at-least20 is a competing allegation. Injury totals/subsets/hospital attendance may overlap; structures are not people; source-defined minors are not a proven under18total. No personal shooter allocation or police-shooting cause for AIIMS injuries.

Record A4-B14-IN-MINORS · exact wording SHA-256 cf59de743ba21133134612684584b236eaec73de346ff33d01a36dbc67b3baca

Report a correction →
decision

The Shah Commission found that P. S. Bhinder, through Sanjay Gandhi’s intervention, pressured magistrates to sign and backdate a firing order after the event. This is a later-record inquiry finding, not an original firing order or a criminal conviction.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed commission record observation testimony or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 26 April1978 · Commission report date; underlying action/testimony/observation day unknown.

Date basis and original source clocks

26 April1978 · Commission report date; underlying action/testimony/observation day unknown. Report date1978-04-26 is distinct from incident, attendance, meeting, unknown signature/testimony and first-publication clocks. Background1975 lies before1976replay horizon.

Sources (3) · exact passages & limitations

Shah Commission of Inquiry, Interim Report II, 26 April 1978 ↗

Publisher: Shah Commission of Inquiry, India

Exact passage: chapter14 paras14.171-172, printed139/PDF142

Source establishes: 14.171–14.178give two actor views of one intervention: multiplemagistratestestimony and citedwirelesslog, Bhinderdenial and Sanjayproceduralobjections/freshnotice/exparteprogress.

Document date: 1978-04-26 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Coverphysical1rendered/viewed;chapter13physical101–104/printed98–101paras13.161–13.174;chapter14physical123,134–135,138–142/printed120,131–132,135–139paras14.1–14.8,14.109–14.129,14.154–14.178;chapter15physical143–144paras15.3–15.5. Physical134and142rendered/viewed for injurycounts/agesandnotices/defences/findings.

Access limitations

BJP library hosts identified scanned Commission report, not original government digital custody. Cached originalscanread; fresh web fetch failed size limit89,565,528bytes, not source-content disproof. Original orders, diaries, medical records, witnesses, property file and handwriting report not independently acquired. Jagmohan/Laldefences,KrishanChand/residentaccounts,Bhinderdenial,Sanjayproceduralobjections/freshnotice/exparteassessment,conflictingofficial/witnessdeathcounts,medical/policelistdifferencesandexplicitfiringindividualnoticebar reviewed.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_primary_document_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B04-FAMILY-SHAH-TURKMAN

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B04-SRC-IN-SHAHII@448e2b8cb6138ea6

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 448e2b8cb6138ea678b102b7862192830a35ed7e5d2d863e16d0e467c0aa8849. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Shah Commission of Inquiry, Interim Report II, 26 April 1978 ↗

Publisher: Shah Commission of Inquiry, India

Exact passage: chapter14 paras14.173-178, printed139/PDF142

Source establishes: 14.171–14.178give two actor views of one intervention: multiplemagistratestestimony and citedwirelesslog, Bhinderdenial and Sanjayproceduralobjections/freshnotice/exparteprogress.

Document date: 1978-04-26 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Coverphysical1rendered/viewed;chapter13physical101–104/printed98–101paras13.161–13.174;chapter14physical123,134–135,138–142/printed120,131–132,135–139paras14.1–14.8,14.109–14.129,14.154–14.178;chapter15physical143–144paras15.3–15.5. Physical134and142rendered/viewed for injurycounts/agesandnotices/defences/findings.

Access limitations

BJP library hosts identified scanned Commission report, not original government digital custody. Cached originalscanread; fresh web fetch failed size limit89,565,528bytes, not source-content disproof. Original orders, diaries, medical records, witnesses, property file and handwriting report not independently acquired. Jagmohan/Laldefences,KrishanChand/residentaccounts,Bhinderdenial,Sanjayproceduralobjections/freshnotice/exparteassessment,conflictingofficial/witnessdeathcounts,medical/policelistdifferencesandexplicitfiringindividualnoticebar reviewed.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_primary_document_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B04-FAMILY-SHAH-TURKMAN

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B04-SRC-IN-SHAHII@448e2b8cb6138ea6

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 448e2b8cb6138ea678b102b7862192830a35ed7e5d2d863e16d0e467c0aa8849. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Shah Commission of Inquiry, Interim Report II, 26 April 1978 ↗

Publisher: Shah Commission of Inquiry, India

Exact passage: Printed139/physical142, paragraphs14.171–14.178

Source establishes: 14.171–14.178give two actor views of one intervention: multiplemagistratestestimony and citedwirelesslog, Bhinderdenial and Sanjayproceduralobjections/freshnotice/exparteprogress.

Document date: 1978-04-26 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Coverphysical1rendered/viewed;chapter13physical101–104/printed98–101paras13.161–13.174;chapter14physical123,134–135,138–142/printed120,131–132,135–139paras14.1–14.8,14.109–14.129,14.154–14.178;chapter15physical143–144paras15.3–15.5. Physical134and142rendered/viewed for injurycounts/agesandnotices/defences/findings.

Access limitations

BJP library hosts identified scanned Commission report, not original government digital custody. Cached originalscanread; fresh web fetch failed size limit89,565,528bytes, not source-content disproof. Original orders, diaries, medical records, witnesses, property file and handwriting report not independently acquired. Jagmohan/Laldefences,KrishanChand/residentaccounts,Bhinderdenial,Sanjayproceduralobjections/freshnotice/exparteassessment,conflictingofficial/witnessdeathcounts,medical/policelistdifferencesandexplicitfiringindividualnoticebar reviewed.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_primary_document_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B04-FAMILY-SHAH-TURKMAN

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B04-SRC-IN-SHAHII@448e2b8cb6138ea6

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 448e2b8cb6138ea678b102b7862192830a35ed7e5d2d863e16d0e467c0aa8849. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

BJP library hosts identified scanned Commission report, not original government digital custody. Cached originalscanread; fresh web fetch failed size limit89,565,528bytes, not source-content disproof. Original orders, diaries, medical records, witnesses, property file and handwriting report not independently acquired. Jagmohan/Laldefences,KrishanChand/residentaccounts,Bhinderdenial,Sanjayproceduralobjections/freshnotice/exparteassessment,conflictingofficial/witnessdeathcounts,medical/policelistdifferencesandexplicitfiringindividualnoticebar reviewed.

BJP library hosts identified scanned Commission report, not original government digital custody. Cached originalscanread; fresh web fetch failed size limit89,565,528bytes, not source-content disproof. Original orders, diaries, medical records, witnesses, property file and handwriting report not independently acquired. Jagmohan/Laldefences,KrishanChand/residentaccounts,Bhinderdenial,Sanjayproceduralobjections/freshnotice/exparteassessment,conflictingofficial/witnessdeathcounts,medical/policelistdifferencesandexplicitfiringindividualnoticebar reviewed.

BJP library hosts identified scanned Commission report, not original government digital custody. Cached originalscanread; fresh web fetch failed size limit89,565,528bytes, not source-content disproof. Original orders, diaries, medical records, witnesses, property file and handwriting report not independently acquired. Jagmohan/Laldefences,KrishanChand/residentaccounts,Bhinderdenial,Sanjayproceduralobjections/freshnotice/exparteassessment,conflictingofficial/witnessdeathcounts,medical/policelistdifferencesandexplicitfiringindividualnoticebar reviewed.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Later record manipulation, not an original19April order to fire or a criminal conviction. Separate notices and inquiry procedure apply.

This is the Commission’s later-record finding based on multiple magistrates’ testimony and a cited wireless log, read alongside Bhinder’s denial and Sanjay Gandhi’s procedural objections, fresh notice, refusal and subsequent ex parte assessment. Underlying original testimony/log and later criminal-case outcomes were not reviewed. June3meeting is distinct from a later signature of unknown date and from April19firing. No original shooting instruction or current conviction is established. Street addresses and private audit prose are excluded.

Legal distinction

Inquiry findings, witness allegations, institutional causal interpretation, defences and procedural objections retain their own voices. Firing individual-notice limit is separate from demolition/backdating notices. No criminal conviction, original personal shooting order or current legal status established.

Casualty scope: Official six and inquiry minimum six overlap; witness at-least20 is a competing allegation. Injury totals/subsets/hospital attendance may overlap; structures are not people; source-defined minors are not a proven under18total. No personal shooter allocation or police-shooting cause for AIIMS injuries.

Record A4-B14-IN-POST-BHINDER · exact wording SHA-256 5c9e6ae5ebc1c0683c0526887439eb5a402d09c7c6ddd9feb6783d8b107e6349

Report a correction →
context

The report records Bhinder denying the meetings and pressure, and Sanjay Gandhi challenging procedure and declining testimony. The Commission rejected Bhinder’s account using magistrates’ testimony and a wireless log and records a fresh notice to Gandhi.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed commission record observation testimony or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 26 April1978 · Commission report date; underlying action/testimony/observation day unknown.

Date basis and original source clocks

26 April1978 · Commission report date; underlying action/testimony/observation day unknown. Report date1978-04-26 is distinct from incident, attendance, meeting, unknown signature/testimony and first-publication clocks. Background1975 lies before1976replay horizon.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Shah Commission of Inquiry, Interim Report II, 26 April 1978 ↗

Publisher: Shah Commission of Inquiry, India

Exact passage: chapter14 paras14.171-177, printed139/PDF142

Source establishes: 14.171–14.177physical142; pending criminal cases and report complaints are not established convictions, currentstatus notchecked.

Document date: 1978-04-26 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Coverphysical1rendered/viewed;chapter13physical101–104/printed98–101paras13.161–13.174;chapter14physical123,134–135,138–142/printed120,131–132,135–139paras14.1–14.8,14.109–14.129,14.154–14.178;chapter15physical143–144paras15.3–15.5. Physical134and142rendered/viewed for injurycounts/agesandnotices/defences/findings.

Access limitations

BJP library hosts identified scanned Commission report, not original government digital custody. Cached originalscanread; fresh web fetch failed size limit89,565,528bytes, not source-content disproof. Original orders, diaries, medical records, witnesses, property file and handwriting report not independently acquired. Jagmohan/Laldefences,KrishanChand/residentaccounts,Bhinderdenial,Sanjayproceduralobjections/freshnotice/exparteassessment,conflictingofficial/witnessdeathcounts,medical/policelistdifferencesandexplicitfiringindividualnoticebar reviewed.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_primary_document_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B04-FAMILY-SHAH-TURKMAN

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B04-SRC-IN-SHAHII@448e2b8cb6138ea6

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 448e2b8cb6138ea678b102b7862192830a35ed7e5d2d863e16d0e467c0aa8849. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

BJP library hosts identified scanned Commission report, not original government digital custody. Cached originalscanread; fresh web fetch failed size limit89,565,528bytes, not source-content disproof. Original orders, diaries, medical records, witnesses, property file and handwriting report not independently acquired. Jagmohan/Laldefences,KrishanChand/residentaccounts,Bhinderdenial,Sanjayproceduralobjections/freshnotice/exparteassessment,conflictingofficial/witnessdeathcounts,medical/policelistdifferencesandexplicitfiringindividualnoticebar reviewed.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Inquiry rejection of denial is not a later criminal judgment. Pending criminal proceedings mentioned in the report do not establish conviction.

This is the Commission’s later-record finding based on multiple magistrates’ testimony and a cited wireless log, read alongside Bhinder’s denial and Sanjay Gandhi’s procedural objections, fresh notice, refusal and subsequent ex parte assessment. Underlying original testimony/log and later criminal-case outcomes were not reviewed. June3meeting is distinct from a later signature of unknown date and from April19firing. No original shooting instruction or current conviction is established. Street addresses and private audit prose are excluded.

Legal distinction

Inquiry findings, witness allegations, institutional causal interpretation, defences and procedural objections retain their own voices. Firing individual-notice limit is separate from demolition/backdating notices. No criminal conviction, original personal shooting order or current legal status established.

Casualty scope: Official six and inquiry minimum six overlap; witness at-least20 is a competing allegation. Injury totals/subsets/hospital attendance may overlap; structures are not people; source-defined minors are not a proven under18total. No personal shooter allocation or police-shooting cause for AIIMS injuries.

Record A4-B14-IN-POST-DEFENCES · exact wording SHA-256 22f2896a1dee7ccacb0d65240ced5f3c85c219fdbc49ceac8133e9490cb7fa33

Report a correction →
human consequence

The Shah Commission, using a DDA statement, reports 384 residential structures demolished by 18 April 1976 and 457 pucca structures demolished during 19–24 April. These are different structure categories and periods, not numbers of people or families.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed commission record observation testimony or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 18–24 April1976 · different reported structure-count cut-offs; not one demolition interval.

Date basis and original source clocks

18–24 April1976 · different reported structure-count cut-offs; not one demolition interval. Report date1978-04-26 is distinct from incident, attendance, meeting, unknown signature/testimony and first-publication clocks. Background1975 lies before1976replay horizon.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Shah Commission of Inquiry, Interim Report II, 26 April 1978 ↗

Publisher: Shah Commission of Inquiry, India

Exact passage: chapter13 para13.167 table and following paragraph, printed100/PDF103

Source establishes: Paragraph13.167andtablephysical103; units/periods preserved, raw table not recalculated or converted to displaced population.

Document date: 1978-04-26 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Coverphysical1rendered/viewed;chapter13physical101–104/printed98–101paras13.161–13.174;chapter14physical123,134–135,138–142/printed120,131–132,135–139paras14.1–14.8,14.109–14.129,14.154–14.178;chapter15physical143–144paras15.3–15.5. Physical134and142rendered/viewed for injurycounts/agesandnotices/defences/findings.

Access limitations

BJP library hosts identified scanned Commission report, not original government digital custody. Cached originalscanread; fresh web fetch failed size limit89,565,528bytes, not source-content disproof. Original orders, diaries, medical records, witnesses, property file and handwriting report not independently acquired. Jagmohan/Laldefences,KrishanChand/residentaccounts,Bhinderdenial,Sanjayproceduralobjections/freshnotice/exparteassessment,conflictingofficial/witnessdeathcounts,medical/policelistdifferencesandexplicitfiringindividualnoticebar reviewed.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_primary_document_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B04-FAMILY-SHAH-TURKMAN

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B04-SRC-IN-SHAHII@448e2b8cb6138ea6

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 448e2b8cb6138ea678b102b7862192830a35ed7e5d2d863e16d0e467c0aa8849. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

BJP library hosts identified scanned Commission report, not original government digital custody. Cached originalscanread; fresh web fetch failed size limit89,565,528bytes, not source-content disproof. Original orders, diaries, medical records, witnesses, property file and handwriting report not independently acquired. Jagmohan/Laldefences,KrishanChand/residentaccounts,Bhinderdenial,Sanjayproceduralobjections/freshnotice/exparteassessment,conflictingofficial/witnessdeathcounts,medical/policelistdifferencesandexplicitfiringindividualnoticebar reviewed.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Units and time windows differ. These are structures, not persons/families. No conversion to a displacement population or automatic combined total.

Preserve official reports, inquiry minima, witness allegations and hospital-record observations as separate voices. Deaths, injuries, hospital attendance, source-defined minors, structures and displaced people are different units. Categories, date windows and groups may overlap. Do not repair medical arithmetic, infer missing identities, identify raw victims/addresses, assign one grievous injury to a child or convert structures into a population. Witness20 and official/inquiry6 are competing accounts, not a sum.

Legal distinction

Inquiry findings, witness allegations, institutional causal interpretation, defences and procedural objections retain their own voices. Firing individual-notice limit is separate from demolition/backdating notices. No criminal conviction, original personal shooting order or current legal status established.

Casualty scope: Official six and inquiry minimum six overlap; witness at-least20 is a competing allegation. Injury totals/subsets/hospital attendance may overlap; structures are not people; source-defined minors are not a proven under18total. No personal shooter allocation or police-shooting cause for AIIMS injuries.

Record A4-B14-IN-STRUCTURES · exact wording SHA-256 f72e9598760da1890f2a0d6888a32aa4ea02c08655aedd095e01946484e457cc

Report a correction →
human consequence

The Shah Commission records Rajesh Sharma saying that at least twenty people died in the firing and that bodies of elderly women and children were found under debris. This is his account, not a verified Commission total or a counted child death toll.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed commission record observation testimony or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 26 April1978 · Commission report date; underlying action/testimony/observation day unknown.

Date basis and original source clocks

26 April1978 · Commission report date; underlying action/testimony/observation day unknown. Report date1978-04-26 is distinct from incident, attendance, meeting, unknown signature/testimony and first-publication clocks. Background1975 lies before1976replay horizon.

Sources (2) · exact passages & limitations

Shah Commission of Inquiry, Interim Report II, 26 April 1978 ↗

Publisher: Shah Commission of Inquiry, India

Exact passage: chapter14 para14.120, printed132/PDF135

Source establishes: Paragraph14.120physical135; ExecutiveCouncillorRajeshSharma is distinct from policeofficerR.K.Sharma. Contraryofficialsix/minimumsixretained.

Document date: 1978-04-26 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Coverphysical1rendered/viewed;chapter13physical101–104/printed98–101paras13.161–13.174;chapter14physical123,134–135,138–142/printed120,131–132,135–139paras14.1–14.8,14.109–14.129,14.154–14.178;chapter15physical143–144paras15.3–15.5. Physical134and142rendered/viewed for injurycounts/agesandnotices/defences/findings.

Access limitations

BJP library hosts identified scanned Commission report, not original government digital custody. Cached originalscanread; fresh web fetch failed size limit89,565,528bytes, not source-content disproof. Original orders, diaries, medical records, witnesses, property file and handwriting report not independently acquired. Jagmohan/Laldefences,KrishanChand/residentaccounts,Bhinderdenial,Sanjayproceduralobjections/freshnotice/exparteassessment,conflictingofficial/witnessdeathcounts,medical/policelistdifferencesandexplicitfiringindividualnoticebar reviewed.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_primary_document_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B04-FAMILY-SHAH-TURKMAN

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B04-SRC-IN-SHAHII@448e2b8cb6138ea6

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 448e2b8cb6138ea678b102b7862192830a35ed7e5d2d863e16d0e467c0aa8849. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Shah Commission of Inquiry, Interim Report II, 26 April 1978 ↗

Publisher: Shah Commission of Inquiry, India

Exact passage: Printed131and136/physical134and139, paragraphs14.115–14.117and14.159(vii)

Source establishes: Paragraph14.120physical135; ExecutiveCouncillorRajeshSharma is distinct from policeofficerR.K.Sharma. Contraryofficialsix/minimumsixretained.

Document date: 1978-04-26 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Coverphysical1rendered/viewed;chapter13physical101–104/printed98–101paras13.161–13.174;chapter14physical123,134–135,138–142/printed120,131–132,135–139paras14.1–14.8,14.109–14.129,14.154–14.178;chapter15physical143–144paras15.3–15.5. Physical134and142rendered/viewed for injurycounts/agesandnotices/defences/findings.

Access limitations

BJP library hosts identified scanned Commission report, not original government digital custody. Cached originalscanread; fresh web fetch failed size limit89,565,528bytes, not source-content disproof. Original orders, diaries, medical records, witnesses, property file and handwriting report not independently acquired. Jagmohan/Laldefences,KrishanChand/residentaccounts,Bhinderdenial,Sanjayproceduralobjections/freshnotice/exparteassessment,conflictingofficial/witnessdeathcounts,medical/policelistdifferencesandexplicitfiringindividualnoticebar reviewed.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_primary_document_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B04-FAMILY-SHAH-TURKMAN

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B04-SRC-IN-SHAHII@448e2b8cb6138ea6

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 448e2b8cb6138ea678b102b7862192830a35ed7e5d2d863e16d0e467c0aa8849. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

BJP library hosts identified scanned Commission report, not original government digital custody. Cached originalscanread; fresh web fetch failed size limit89,565,528bytes, not source-content disproof. Original orders, diaries, medical records, witnesses, property file and handwriting report not independently acquired. Jagmohan/Laldefences,KrishanChand/residentaccounts,Bhinderdenial,Sanjayproceduralobjections/freshnotice/exparteassessment,conflictingofficial/witnessdeathcounts,medical/policelistdifferencesandexplicitfiringindividualnoticebar reviewed.

BJP library hosts identified scanned Commission report, not original government digital custody. Cached originalscanread; fresh web fetch failed size limit89,565,528bytes, not source-content disproof. Original orders, diaries, medical records, witnesses, property file and handwriting report not independently acquired. Jagmohan/Laldefences,KrishanChand/residentaccounts,Bhinderdenial,Sanjayproceduralobjections/freshnotice/exparteassessment,conflictingofficial/witnessdeathcounts,medical/policelistdifferencesandexplicitfiringindividualnoticebar reviewed.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Witness claim, not independently verified commission casualty total or a numeric child death count. Not the police officer R.K.Sharma.

Preserve official reports, inquiry minima, witness allegations and hospital-record observations as separate voices. Deaths, injuries, hospital attendance, source-defined minors, structures and displaced people are different units. Categories, date windows and groups may overlap. Do not repair medical arithmetic, infer missing identities, identify raw victims/addresses, assign one grievous injury to a child or convert structures into a population. Witness20 and official/inquiry6 are competing accounts, not a sum.

Legal distinction

Inquiry findings, witness allegations, institutional causal interpretation, defences and procedural objections retain their own voices. Firing individual-notice limit is separate from demolition/backdating notices. No criminal conviction, original personal shooting order or current legal status established.

Casualty scope: Official six and inquiry minimum six overlap; witness at-least20 is a competing allegation. Injury totals/subsets/hospital attendance may overlap; structures are not people; source-defined minors are not a proven under18total. No personal shooter allocation or police-shooting cause for AIIMS injuries.

Record A4-B14-IN-WITNESS-DEATHS · exact wording SHA-256 77c116fb6aedf7c632d8d7d1ccce9cd1f55513698531b109ae2b5b8a1e4c776f

Report a correction →
human consequence

The TRC relays the Cillie Commission’s count of 575 dead and 2,389 injured. It separately gives that inquiry’s terms of reference as 16 June 1976–28 February 1977; those terms do not by themselves prove the count’s exact coverage.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed commission record observation testimony or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 29 October1998 · TRC report presentation; historical observation/testimony day unknown.

Date basis and original source clocks

29 October1998 · TRC report presentation; historical observation/testimony day unknown. Action, public statement, report presentation and unknown testimony/observation/first-online clocks remain separate. Inquiry terms of reference are not the casualty interval.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report, Volume Three ↗

Publisher: South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission

Exact passage: chapter6 paras167-168, printed569/PDF572

Source establishes: Paragraphs167–168; original Cillie report not obtained. This is a relayed inquiry count, not an adopted one-day local or child total.

Document date: 1998-10-29 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Chapter6physical558/printed555paras107–110;562–563/559–560paras127–132;571–573/568–570paras163–170andfindingbox. Selectedtextread;findingboxphysical573renderedandvisuallyread;officiallivePDFidentity/introchecked.

Access limitations

Official South African Justice-hosted report; original underlying testimony, victim files, Hansard and Cillie report not separately obtained. Swanepoeldefence,Cillieexoneratingaccount,Morobeallegations,rank/taskforcesizeandcasualtyscopeinconsistencies reviewed; meanings remain distinct.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_primary_document_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B04-FAMILY-TRC-SOWETO

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B04-SRC-ZA-TRCV3@8596a81355dd7d11

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 8596a81355dd7d11e4f1c7bb8794dbb4933a736c5acadd151331091afc6a86a6. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Official South African Justice-hosted report; original underlying testimony, victim files, Hansard and Cillie report not separately obtained. Swanepoeldefence,Cillieexoneratingaccount,Morobeallegations,rank/taskforcesizeandcasualtyscopeinconsistencies reviewed; meanings remain distinct.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Original Cillie report not obtained. Terms of reference are not automatically the exact casualty reporting interval or national scope.

The TRC overview, relayed Cillie count and finding box differ in wording, operator, population and injury total. Exact common coverage is unresolved. The overview and finding-box numeric candidates are withheld. The Cillie figure may appear only as the count relayed by TRC, without a one-day/local/child-total label. Inquiry terms of reference alone are not the casualty interval. Under25 does not mean under18. Never add the competing representations.

Legal distinction

Attributed investigative findings, testimony, public statement, defence and contrary inquiry account retain distinct voices. No criminal conviction, original operational order or personal casualty allocation established.

Casualty scope: Incident pupil/WRAB deaths and wider relayed Cillie counts may overlap; no summation, one-day local total, child subtotal or personal allocation. The two ambiguous TRC numeric candidates remain withheld. Source-defined age is not a new child-count observation.

Record A4-B14-ZA-CILLIE-COUNTS · exact wording SHA-256 64f1911de9094afa90756274a5781dd9dd104535d5250f838b538654e8d7510a

Report a correction →
context

The TRC describes the Cillie Commission exonerating police conduct and rejects that assessment. It also records Morobe’s allegation that coerced testimony was used to justify the shootings. The allegation and the TRC’s findings remain distinct.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed commission record observation testimony or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 29 October1998 · TRC report presentation; historical observation/testimony day unknown.

Date basis and original source clocks

29 October1998 · TRC report presentation; historical observation/testimony day unknown. Action, public statement, report presentation and unknown testimony/observation/first-online clocks remain separate. Inquiry terms of reference are not the casualty interval.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report, Volume Three ↗

Publisher: South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission

Exact passage: chapter6 paras168-170 printed569/PDF572 and finding box printed570/PDF573

Source establishes: Paragraphs168–170 and finding box; original Cillie report/hearing transcripts not independently read.

Document date: 1998-10-29 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Chapter6physical558/printed555paras107–110;562–563/559–560paras127–132;571–573/568–570paras163–170andfindingbox. Selectedtextread;findingboxphysical573renderedandvisuallyread;officiallivePDFidentity/introchecked.

Access limitations

Official South African Justice-hosted report; original underlying testimony, victim files, Hansard and Cillie report not separately obtained. Swanepoeldefence,Cillieexoneratingaccount,Morobeallegations,rank/taskforcesizeandcasualtyscopeinconsistencies reviewed; meanings remain distinct.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_primary_document_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B04-FAMILY-TRC-SOWETO

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B04-SRC-ZA-TRCV3@8596a81355dd7d11

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 8596a81355dd7d11e4f1c7bb8794dbb4933a736c5acadd151331091afc6a86a6. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Official South African Justice-hosted report; original underlying testimony, victim files, Hansard and Cillie report not separately obtained. Swanepoeldefence,Cillieexoneratingaccount,Morobeallegations,rank/taskforcesizeandcasualtyscopeinconsistencies reviewed; meanings remain distinct.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Original Cillie report and underlying testimony not separately reviewed. Do not present either inquiry as an individual criminal conviction.

These are attributed TRC investigative findings, not criminal convictions. Read the contrary Cillie account, Swanepoel’s defence and Morobe’s allegations in their own voices. An unnamed education minister is not a documented named decision-maker. The report’s inconsistent casualty population/period is excluded from personal liability and child totals.

Legal distinction

Attributed investigative findings, testimony, public statement, defence and contrary inquiry account retain distinct voices. No criminal conviction, original operational order or personal casualty allocation established.

Casualty scope: Incident pupil/WRAB deaths and wider relayed Cillie counts may overlap; no summation, one-day local total, child subtotal or personal allocation. The two ambiguous TRC numeric candidates remain withheld. Source-defined age is not a new child-count observation.

Record A4-B14-ZA-CILLIE-DISPUTE · exact wording SHA-256 26960edf94a00d43e174b7ee65c13913ee6761a258b832f48f83913308c56293

Report a correction →
context

The TRC reproduces Swanepoel’s account that police were overwhelmed and that he used appropriate force. This is his defence, not the Commission’s endorsement.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed commission record observation testimony or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 29 October1998 · TRC report presentation; historical observation/testimony day unknown.

Date basis and original source clocks

29 October1998 · TRC report presentation; historical observation/testimony day unknown. Action, public statement, report presentation and unknown testimony/observation/first-online clocks remain separate. Inquiry terms of reference are not the casualty interval.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report, Volume Three ↗

Publisher: South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission

Exact passage: chapter6 paras163-165, printed568/PDF571

Source establishes: Paragraphs163–165 and finding box read together;58-member task force in narrative versus60men in quoted recollection, and Captain/Colonel labels remain unresolved.

Document date: 1998-10-29 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Chapter6physical558/printed555paras107–110;562–563/559–560paras127–132;571–573/568–570paras163–170andfindingbox. Selectedtextread;findingboxphysical573renderedandvisuallyread;officiallivePDFidentity/introchecked.

Access limitations

Official South African Justice-hosted report; original underlying testimony, victim files, Hansard and Cillie report not separately obtained. Swanepoeldefence,Cillieexoneratingaccount,Morobeallegations,rank/taskforcesizeandcasualtyscopeinconsistencies reviewed; meanings remain distinct.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_primary_document_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B04-FAMILY-TRC-SOWETO

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B04-SRC-ZA-TRCV3@8596a81355dd7d11

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 8596a81355dd7d11e4f1c7bb8794dbb4933a736c5acadd151331091afc6a86a6. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Official South African Justice-hosted report; original underlying testimony, victim files, Hansard and Cillie report not separately obtained. Swanepoeldefence,Cillieexoneratingaccount,Morobeallegations,rank/taskforcesizeandcasualtyscopeinconsistencies reviewed; meanings remain distinct.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

TRC labels him Colonel here and Captain in para110/finding box; rank at action unresolved.58-member task force in para163 versus60 men in reproduced account are not reconciled.

TRC Volume3 is an official investigative report presented in 1998, describing 1976 events and later accounts. Original orders, Hansard and interview transcripts were not separately obtained. Swanepoel’s rank and task-force sizes vary within the text. Distinguish public statement, reported self-account, defence and Commission finding. No individual casualty total or earliest-shot instruction is established.

Legal distinction

Attributed investigative findings, testimony, public statement, defence and contrary inquiry account retain distinct voices. No criminal conviction, original operational order or personal casualty allocation established.

Casualty scope: Incident pupil/WRAB deaths and wider relayed Cillie counts may overlap; no summation, one-day local total, child subtotal or personal allocation. The two ambiguous TRC numeric candidates remain withheld. Source-defined age is not a new child-count observation.

Record A4-B14-ZA-DEFENCE · exact wording SHA-256 835696693158d8dd0b8ca64b0648c03d61f8eccd07d77b20d2c856acc23aafb7

Report a correction →
context

The TRC found that the decision to introduce Afrikaans as a medium of instruction caused the conflict leading to the Soweto march, and that the march was peaceful until violent police intervention. The passage does not name the education minister.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed commission record observation testimony or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 29 October1998 · TRC report presentation; historical observation/testimony day unknown.

Date basis and original source clocks

29 October1998 · TRC report presentation; historical observation/testimony day unknown. Action, public statement, report presentation and unknown testimony/observation/first-online clocks remain separate. Inquiry terms of reference are not the casualty interval.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report, Volume Three ↗

Publisher: South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission

Exact passage: chapter6 finding box, printed570/PDF573

Source establishes: Finding box; no person inferred from generic ministerial office or automatically linked to all deaths. Separate WRAB deaths retained in their own statement.

Document date: 1998-10-29 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Chapter6physical558/printed555paras107–110;562–563/559–560paras127–132;571–573/568–570paras163–170andfindingbox. Selectedtextread;findingboxphysical573renderedandvisuallyread;officiallivePDFidentity/introchecked.

Access limitations

Official South African Justice-hosted report; original underlying testimony, victim files, Hansard and Cillie report not separately obtained. Swanepoeldefence,Cillieexoneratingaccount,Morobeallegations,rank/taskforcesizeandcasualtyscopeinconsistencies reviewed; meanings remain distinct.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_primary_document_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B04-FAMILY-TRC-SOWETO

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B04-SRC-ZA-TRCV3@8596a81355dd7d11

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 8596a81355dd7d11e4f1c7bb8794dbb4933a736c5acadd151331091afc6a86a6. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Official South African Justice-hosted report; original underlying testimony, victim files, Hansard and Cillie report not separately obtained. Swanepoeldefence,Cillieexoneratingaccount,Morobeallegations,rank/taskforcesizeandcasualtyscopeinconsistencies reviewed; meanings remain distinct.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Education minister unnamed in the passage: no person inferred from generic office succession. No identified organiser’s murder order for WRAB victims established.

These are attributed TRC investigative findings, not criminal convictions. Read the contrary Cillie account, Swanepoel’s defence and Morobe’s allegations in their own voices. An unnamed education minister is not a documented named decision-maker. The report’s inconsistent casualty population/period is excluded from personal liability and child totals.

Legal distinction

Attributed investigative findings, testimony, public statement, defence and contrary inquiry account retain distinct voices. No criminal conviction, original operational order or personal casualty allocation established.

Casualty scope: Incident pupil/WRAB deaths and wider relayed Cillie counts may overlap; no summation, one-day local total, child subtotal or personal allocation. The two ambiguous TRC numeric candidates remain withheld. Source-defined age is not a new child-count observation.

Record A4-B14-ZA-EDUCATION · exact wording SHA-256 051f40d8ae935214b887bacfa984cbc09aadc7c7dd9b34329b4e03b185d58774

Report a correction →
context

The TRC found that police adopted a shoot-to-kill policy and named Swanepoel and Deputy Commissioner Wandrag in its excessive-force finding. This is an investigative finding, not an individual criminal conviction or a personal casualty allocation.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed commission record observation testimony or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 29 October1998 · TRC report presentation; historical observation/testimony day unknown.

Date basis and original source clocks

29 October1998 · TRC report presentation; historical observation/testimony day unknown. Action, public statement, report presentation and unknown testimony/observation/first-online clocks remain separate. Inquiry terms of reference are not the casualty interval.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report, Volume Three ↗

Publisher: South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission

Exact passage: chapter6 finding box, printed570/PDF573

Source establishes: Finding box physical573/printed570 expressly names both. Its inconsistent casualty scope is not imported into this statement; no separate Wandrag instruction inferred.

Document date: 1998-10-29 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Chapter6physical558/printed555paras107–110;562–563/559–560paras127–132;571–573/568–570paras163–170andfindingbox. Selectedtextread;findingboxphysical573renderedandvisuallyread;officiallivePDFidentity/introchecked.

Access limitations

Official South African Justice-hosted report; original underlying testimony, victim files, Hansard and Cillie report not separately obtained. Swanepoeldefence,Cillieexoneratingaccount,Morobeallegations,rank/taskforcesizeandcasualtyscopeinconsistencies reviewed; meanings remain distinct.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_primary_document_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B04-FAMILY-TRC-SOWETO

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B04-SRC-ZA-TRCV3@8596a81355dd7d11

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 8596a81355dd7d11e4f1c7bb8794dbb4933a736c5acadd151331091afc6a86a6. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Official South African Justice-hosted report; original underlying testimony, victim files, Hansard and Cillie report not separately obtained. Swanepoeldefence,Cillieexoneratingaccount,Morobeallegations,rank/taskforcesizeandcasualtyscopeinconsistencies reviewed; meanings remain distinct.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Institutional/individual investigative finding, not criminal conviction or a personal casualty allocation. No separately documented Wandrag order in this passage. Source casualty population and time wording require reconciliation.

These are attributed TRC investigative findings, not criminal convictions. Read the contrary Cillie account, Swanepoel’s defence and Morobe’s allegations in their own voices. An unnamed education minister is not a documented named decision-maker. The report’s inconsistent casualty population/period is excluded from personal liability and child totals.

Legal distinction

Attributed investigative findings, testimony, public statement, defence and contrary inquiry account retain distinct voices. No criminal conviction, original operational order or personal casualty allocation established.

Casualty scope: Incident pupil/WRAB deaths and wider relayed Cillie counts may overlap; no summation, one-day local total, child subtotal or personal allocation. The two ambiguous TRC numeric candidates remain withheld. Source-defined age is not a new child-count observation.

Record A4-B14-ZA-FORCE-FINDING · exact wording SHA-256 3696f7b51e801098f3c0d4df49973832c95eefc8d07635d1760f4df20c3c2330

Report a correction →
human consequence

The TRC reproduces a mother’s account that police harassment drove the person photographed carrying Hector Peterson into exile. This retrospective account in the 1998 report does not establish anyone’s present missing-person status.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed commission record observation testimony or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 29 October1998 · TRC report presentation; historical observation/testimony day unknown.

Date basis and original source clocks

29 October1998 · TRC report presentation; historical observation/testimony day unknown. Action, public statement, report presentation and unknown testimony/observation/first-online clocks remain separate. Inquiry terms of reference are not the casualty interval.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report, Volume Three ↗

Publisher: South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission

Exact passage: chapter6 para131, printed560/PDF563

Source establishes: Paragraph131 read with130and132; public historical account narrowed to harassment/exile; family correspondence details and current whereabouts not exported.

Document date: 1998-10-29 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Chapter6physical558/printed555paras107–110;562–563/559–560paras127–132;571–573/568–570paras163–170andfindingbox. Selectedtextread;findingboxphysical573renderedandvisuallyread;officiallivePDFidentity/introchecked.

Access limitations

Official South African Justice-hosted report; original underlying testimony, victim files, Hansard and Cillie report not separately obtained. Swanepoeldefence,Cillieexoneratingaccount,Morobeallegations,rank/taskforcesizeandcasualtyscopeinconsistencies reviewed; meanings remain distinct.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_primary_document_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B04-FAMILY-TRC-SOWETO

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B04-SRC-ZA-TRCV3@8596a81355dd7d11

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 8596a81355dd7d11e4f1c7bb8794dbb4933a736c5acadd151331091afc6a86a6. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Official South African Justice-hosted report; original underlying testimony, victim files, Hansard and Cillie report not separately obtained. Swanepoeldefence,Cillieexoneratingaccount,Morobeallegations,rank/taskforcesizeandcasualtyscopeinconsistencies reviewed; meanings remain distinct.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Retrospective report published1998; not a2026 missing-person status finding. No numeric national exile/refugee total established.

These are report passages and attributed testimony, not original victim/witness files independently authenticated here. Peterson is the spelling used in this source; no silent identity correction. Incident deaths overlap wider totals. No individual student leader’s killing order, raw personal identifiers, family correspondence details or present missing-person status is approved.

Legal distinction

Attributed investigative findings, testimony, public statement, defence and contrary inquiry account retain distinct voices. No criminal conviction, original operational order or personal casualty allocation established.

Casualty scope: Incident pupil/WRAB deaths and wider relayed Cillie counts may overlap; no summation, one-day local total, child subtotal or personal allocation. The two ambiguous TRC numeric candidates remain withheld. Source-defined age is not a new child-count observation.

Record A4-B14-ZA-MAKHUBO · exact wording SHA-256 43cfa10c659b58c0df686140d1d66e4b759ca452360a74ef5b37d071dfb04fcc

Report a correction →
context

Murphy Morobe told the TRC that pupils’ resort to violence was spontaneous and had not been part of their plan. His testimony does not establish the intentions of every participant.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed commission record observation testimony or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 29 October1998 · TRC report presentation; historical observation/testimony day unknown.

Date basis and original source clocks

29 October1998 · TRC report presentation; historical observation/testimony day unknown. Action, public statement, report presentation and unknown testimony/observation/first-online clocks remain separate. Inquiry terms of reference are not the casualty interval.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report, Volume Three ↗

Publisher: South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission

Exact passage: chapter6 paras129-130, printed559-560/PDF562-563

Source establishes: Paragraph129 and continuationphysical563; reported witness explanation, not Commission finding about every later event.

Document date: 1998-10-29 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Chapter6physical558/printed555paras107–110;562–563/559–560paras127–132;571–573/568–570paras163–170andfindingbox. Selectedtextread;findingboxphysical573renderedandvisuallyread;officiallivePDFidentity/introchecked.

Access limitations

Official South African Justice-hosted report; original underlying testimony, victim files, Hansard and Cillie report not separately obtained. Swanepoeldefence,Cillieexoneratingaccount,Morobeallegations,rank/taskforcesizeandcasualtyscopeinconsistencies reviewed; meanings remain distinct.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_primary_document_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B04-FAMILY-TRC-SOWETO

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B04-SRC-ZA-TRCV3@8596a81355dd7d11

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 8596a81355dd7d11e4f1c7bb8794dbb4933a736c5acadd151331091afc6a86a6. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Official South African Justice-hosted report; original underlying testimony, victim files, Hansard and Cillie report not separately obtained. Swanepoeldefence,Cillieexoneratingaccount,Morobeallegations,rank/taskforcesizeandcasualtyscopeinconsistencies reviewed; meanings remain distinct.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Witness account, not proof about every participant or later event.

These are report passages and attributed testimony, not original victim/witness files independently authenticated here. Peterson is the spelling used in this source; no silent identity correction. Incident deaths overlap wider totals. No individual student leader’s killing order, raw personal identifiers, family correspondence details or present missing-person status is approved.

Legal distinction

Attributed investigative findings, testimony, public statement, defence and contrary inquiry account retain distinct voices. No criminal conviction, original operational order or personal casualty allocation established.

Casualty scope: Incident pupil/WRAB deaths and wider relayed Cillie counts may overlap; no summation, one-day local total, child subtotal or personal allocation. The two ambiguous TRC numeric candidates remain withheld. Source-defined age is not a new child-count observation.

Record A4-B14-ZA-MOROBE · exact wording SHA-256 c38922aa34c3c26c9a0f3dd8aaae7af7e376d58f72b1a528432e1944cdf82114

Report a correction →
human consequence

The TRC describes two pupils fatally wounded after police opened fire near Orlando West High School on 16 June 1976. It identifies thirteen-year-old Hector Zolile Peterson as one of them. This is an incident account, not a whole-day toll.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed commission record observation testimony or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 16 June1976 · two-pupil incident account, not a whole-day toll.

Date basis and original source clocks

16 June1976 · two-pupil incident account, not a whole-day toll. Action, public statement, report presentation and unknown testimony/observation/first-online clocks remain separate. Inquiry terms of reference are not the casualty interval.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report, Volume Three ↗

Publisher: South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission

Exact passage: chapter6 para127, printed559/PDF562

Source establishes: Paragraph127; source spelling Peterson preserved, underlying individual victim file not acquired.

Document date: 1998-10-29 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Chapter6physical558/printed555paras107–110;562–563/559–560paras127–132;571–573/568–570paras163–170andfindingbox. Selectedtextread;findingboxphysical573renderedandvisuallyread;officiallivePDFidentity/introchecked.

Access limitations

Official South African Justice-hosted report; original underlying testimony, victim files, Hansard and Cillie report not separately obtained. Swanepoeldefence,Cillieexoneratingaccount,Morobeallegations,rank/taskforcesizeandcasualtyscopeinconsistencies reviewed; meanings remain distinct.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_primary_document_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B04-FAMILY-TRC-SOWETO

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B04-SRC-ZA-TRCV3@8596a81355dd7d11

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 8596a81355dd7d11e4f1c7bb8794dbb4933a736c5acadd151331091afc6a86a6. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Official South African Justice-hosted report; original underlying testimony, victim files, Hansard and Cillie report not separately obtained. Swanepoeldefence,Cillieexoneratingaccount,Morobeallegations,rank/taskforcesizeandcasualtyscopeinconsistencies reviewed; meanings remain distinct.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Source spells the name Peterson. Identity/spelling reconciliation and original victim file remain open. Not a whole-day or nationwide total.

These are report passages and attributed testimony, not original victim/witness files independently authenticated here. Peterson is the spelling used in this source; no silent identity correction. Incident deaths overlap wider totals. No individual student leader’s killing order, raw personal identifiers, family correspondence details or present missing-person status is approved.

Legal distinction

Attributed investigative findings, testimony, public statement, defence and contrary inquiry account retain distinct voices. No criminal conviction, original operational order or personal casualty allocation established.

Casualty scope: Incident pupil/WRAB deaths and wider relayed Cillie counts may overlap; no summation, one-day local total, child subtotal or personal allocation. The two ambiguous TRC numeric candidates remain withheld. Source-defined age is not a new child-count observation.

Record A4-B14-ZA-PUPILS · exact wording SHA-256 34f2642ee83a022ddd08beff1ed6399adc34f31c3a2c782aa524864ac55053d3

Report a correction →
decision

The TRC reports that Rooi Rus Swanepoel ordered Soweto pupils to disperse on 16 June 1976 and later said he had adopted a shoot-to-kill policy. This does not identify who directed the earliest shots at individual pupils.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed commission record observation testimony or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 16 June1976 · reported dispersal instruction; later self-account date unknown.

Date basis and original source clocks

16 June1976 · reported dispersal instruction; later self-account date unknown. Action, public statement, report presentation and unknown testimony/observation/first-online clocks remain separate. Inquiry terms of reference are not the casualty interval.

Sources (2) · exact passages & limitations

Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report, Volume Three ↗

Publisher: South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission

Exact passage: chapter6 para110, printed555/PDF558

Source establishes: Volume3chapter6paragraph110 supports reported instruction and later self-account; the separate finding box supports the Commission’s institutional assessment. No original order or separately reviewed interview.

Document date: 1998-10-29 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Chapter6physical558/printed555paras107–110;562–563/559–560paras127–132;571–573/568–570paras163–170andfindingbox. Selectedtextread;findingboxphysical573renderedandvisuallyread;officiallivePDFidentity/introchecked.

Access limitations

Official South African Justice-hosted report; original underlying testimony, victim files, Hansard and Cillie report not separately obtained. Swanepoeldefence,Cillieexoneratingaccount,Morobeallegations,rank/taskforcesizeandcasualtyscopeinconsistencies reviewed; meanings remain distinct.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_primary_document_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B04-FAMILY-TRC-SOWETO

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B04-SRC-ZA-TRCV3@8596a81355dd7d11

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 8596a81355dd7d11e4f1c7bb8794dbb4933a736c5acadd151331091afc6a86a6. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report, Volume Three ↗

Publisher: South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission

Exact passage: Chapter6 finding box, printed570/physical573

Source establishes: Volume3chapter6paragraph110 supports reported instruction and later self-account; the separate finding box supports the Commission’s institutional assessment. No original order or separately reviewed interview.

Document date: 1998-10-29 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Chapter6physical558/printed555paras107–110;562–563/559–560paras127–132;571–573/568–570paras163–170andfindingbox. Selectedtextread;findingboxphysical573renderedandvisuallyread;officiallivePDFidentity/introchecked.

Access limitations

Official South African Justice-hosted report; original underlying testimony, victim files, Hansard and Cillie report not separately obtained. Swanepoeldefence,Cillieexoneratingaccount,Morobeallegations,rank/taskforcesizeandcasualtyscopeinconsistencies reviewed; meanings remain distinct.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_primary_document_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B04-FAMILY-TRC-SOWETO

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B04-SRC-ZA-TRCV3@8596a81355dd7d11

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 8596a81355dd7d11e4f1c7bb8794dbb4933a736c5acadd151331091afc6a86a6. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Official South African Justice-hosted report; original underlying testimony, victim files, Hansard and Cillie report not separately obtained. Swanepoeldefence,Cillieexoneratingaccount,Morobeallegations,rank/taskforcesizeandcasualtyscopeinconsistencies reviewed; meanings remain distinct.

Official South African Justice-hosted report; original underlying testimony, victim files, Hansard and Cillie report not separately obtained. Swanepoeldefence,Cillieexoneratingaccount,Morobeallegations,rank/taskforcesizeandcasualtyscopeinconsistencies reviewed; meanings remain distinct.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

No original signed order or separately reviewed interview transcript. Arrival/order timing does not establish he directed the earliest shots at individual pupils.

TRC Volume3 is an official investigative report presented in 1998, describing 1976 events and later accounts. Original orders, Hansard and interview transcripts were not separately obtained. Swanepoel’s rank and task-force sizes vary within the text. Distinguish public statement, reported self-account, defence and Commission finding. No individual casualty total or earliest-shot instruction is established.

Legal distinction

Attributed investigative findings, testimony, public statement, defence and contrary inquiry account retain distinct voices. No criminal conviction, original operational order or personal casualty allocation established.

Casualty scope: Incident pupil/WRAB deaths and wider relayed Cillie counts may overlap; no summation, one-day local total, child subtotal or personal allocation. The two ambiguous TRC numeric candidates remain withheld. Source-defined age is not a new child-count observation.

Record A4-B14-ZA-SWANEPOEL · exact wording SHA-256 123e8b18c2cdbfc48a181308b856ed94bc53c37549f4729773e2525a912bf099

Report a correction →
decision

The TRC reports that Prime Minister John Vorster told parliament on 18 June 1976 that orders had been given to maintain order at all costs. This public statement is distinct from an original operational order.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed commission record observation testimony or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 18 June1976 · public parliamentary statement, not an original operational order.

Date basis and original source clocks

18 June1976 · public parliamentary statement, not an original operational order. Action, public statement, report presentation and unknown testimony/observation/first-online clocks remain separate. Inquiry terms of reference are not the casualty interval.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report, Volume Three ↗

Publisher: South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission

Exact passage: chapter6 para109, printed555/PDF558

Source establishes: Paragraph109 dates statement18June; original Hansard not obtained, and later statement cannot establish causation of16Junedeaths.

Document date: 1998-10-29 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Chapter6physical558/printed555paras107–110;562–563/559–560paras127–132;571–573/568–570paras163–170andfindingbox. Selectedtextread;findingboxphysical573renderedandvisuallyread;officiallivePDFidentity/introchecked.

Access limitations

Official South African Justice-hosted report; original underlying testimony, victim files, Hansard and Cillie report not separately obtained. Swanepoeldefence,Cillieexoneratingaccount,Morobeallegations,rank/taskforcesizeandcasualtyscopeinconsistencies reviewed; meanings remain distinct.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_primary_document_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B04-FAMILY-TRC-SOWETO

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B04-SRC-ZA-TRCV3@8596a81355dd7d11

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 8596a81355dd7d11e4f1c7bb8794dbb4933a736c5acadd151331091afc6a86a6. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Official South African Justice-hosted report; original underlying testimony, victim files, Hansard and Cillie report not separately obtained. Swanepoeldefence,Cillieexoneratingaccount,Morobeallegations,rank/taskforcesizeandcasualtyscopeinconsistencies reviewed; meanings remain distinct.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Original Hansard not obtained. Public assertion is not an original operational murder order. A June18 statement cannot cause June16 deaths.

TRC Volume3 is an official investigative report presented in 1998, describing 1976 events and later accounts. Original orders, Hansard and interview transcripts were not separately obtained. Swanepoel’s rank and task-force sizes vary within the text. Distinguish public statement, reported self-account, defence and Commission finding. No individual casualty total or earliest-shot instruction is established.

Legal distinction

Attributed investigative findings, testimony, public statement, defence and contrary inquiry account retain distinct voices. No criminal conviction, original operational order or personal casualty allocation established.

Casualty scope: Incident pupil/WRAB deaths and wider relayed Cillie counts may overlap; no summation, one-day local total, child subtotal or personal allocation. The two ambiguous TRC numeric candidates remain withheld. Source-defined age is not a new child-count observation.

Record A4-B14-ZA-VORSTER · exact wording SHA-256 c53c452b76f19be8545bce3b49cae48dc940c8da4a0b44128cac2fc8d7db3b0b

Report a correction →
human consequence

The TRC reports that pupils killed two West Rand Administration Board officials during the unrest. Its account does not identify an individual attacker or a student leader’s order.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed commission record observation testimony or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 29 October1998 · TRC report presentation; historical observation/testimony day unknown.

Date basis and original source clocks

29 October1998 · TRC report presentation; historical observation/testimony day unknown. Action, public statement, report presentation and unknown testimony/observation/first-online clocks remain separate. Inquiry terms of reference are not the casualty interval.

Sources (2) · exact passages & limitations

Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report, Volume Three ↗

Publisher: South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission

Exact passage: chapter6 para128, printed559/PDF562

Source establishes: Paragraph128 names two officials; finding box attributes deaths to students and also finds police/formerstate responsible for the climate. No personal leader liability inferred.

Document date: 1998-10-29 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Chapter6physical558/printed555paras107–110;562–563/559–560paras127–132;571–573/568–570paras163–170andfindingbox. Selectedtextread;findingboxphysical573renderedandvisuallyread;officiallivePDFidentity/introchecked.

Access limitations

Official South African Justice-hosted report; original underlying testimony, victim files, Hansard and Cillie report not separately obtained. Swanepoeldefence,Cillieexoneratingaccount,Morobeallegations,rank/taskforcesizeandcasualtyscopeinconsistencies reviewed; meanings remain distinct.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_primary_document_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B04-FAMILY-TRC-SOWETO

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B04-SRC-ZA-TRCV3@8596a81355dd7d11

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 8596a81355dd7d11e4f1c7bb8794dbb4933a736c5acadd151331091afc6a86a6. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report, Volume Three ↗

Publisher: South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission

Exact passage: Finding box, printed570/physical573

Source establishes: Paragraph128 names two officials; finding box attributes deaths to students and also finds police/formerstate responsible for the climate. No personal leader liability inferred.

Document date: 1998-10-29 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Chapter6physical558/printed555paras107–110;562–563/559–560paras127–132;571–573/568–570paras163–170andfindingbox. Selectedtextread;findingboxphysical573renderedandvisuallyread;officiallivePDFidentity/introchecked.

Access limitations

Official South African Justice-hosted report; original underlying testimony, victim files, Hansard and Cillie report not separately obtained. Swanepoeldefence,Cillieexoneratingaccount,Morobeallegations,rank/taskforcesizeandcasualtyscopeinconsistencies reviewed; meanings remain distinct.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

selected_primary_document_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B04-FAMILY-TRC-SOWETO

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B04-SRC-ZA-TRCV3@8596a81355dd7d11

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 8596a81355dd7d11e4f1c7bb8794dbb4933a736c5acadd151331091afc6a86a6. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: Exact source-attributed supporting passage; retain the stated limitations.

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Official South African Justice-hosted report; original underlying testimony, victim files, Hansard and Cillie report not separately obtained. Swanepoeldefence,Cillieexoneratingaccount,Morobeallegations,rank/taskforcesizeandcasualtyscopeinconsistencies reviewed; meanings remain distinct.

Official South African Justice-hosted report; original underlying testimony, victim files, Hansard and Cillie report not separately obtained. Swanepoeldefence,Cillieexoneratingaccount,Morobeallegations,rank/taskforcesizeandcasualtyscopeinconsistencies reviewed; meanings remain distinct.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

No individual attacker or organiser order identified; cannot attribute these deaths to a named student leader.

These are report passages and attributed testimony, not original victim/witness files independently authenticated here. Peterson is the spelling used in this source; no silent identity correction. Incident deaths overlap wider totals. No individual student leader’s killing order, raw personal identifiers, family correspondence details or present missing-person status is approved.

Legal distinction

Attributed investigative findings, testimony, public statement, defence and contrary inquiry account retain distinct voices. No criminal conviction, original operational order or personal casualty allocation established.

Casualty scope: Incident pupil/WRAB deaths and wider relayed Cillie counts may overlap; no summation, one-day local total, child subtotal or personal allocation. The two ambiguous TRC numeric candidates remain withheld. Source-defined age is not a new child-count observation.

Record A4-B14-ZA-WRAB · exact wording SHA-256 2813294de71c6d6ae7980263351b5c1be9d107068d8a2065963b32249c6dca37

Report a correction →
context

In its 5 November 1980 opinion, the court held civil default relief proper against Chile and six named individuals. It said Ignacio Novo’s default would be vacated and his case dismissed because the evidence placed his involvement after the killings. Pinochet was not a defendant.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record testimony judicial account or public measure · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 5November1980 civil opinion directing relief; not a criminal conviction or verified enforcement.

Date basis and original source clocks

5November1980 civil opinion directing relief; not a criminal conviction or verified enforcement

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

De Letelier v Republic of Chile,502F.Supp.259, No78-1477,5November1980 ↗

Publisher: US District Court for DC, Judge Joyce Hens Green

Exact passage: 502F.Supp.p266 legal conclusions2-3 and footnote4

Source establishes: 502F.Supp.266legalconclusions2–3and268footnote4; opinion directs relief, separate judgment/docket execution not independently acquired. Civil and criminal proceedings remain distinct.

Document date: 1980-11-05 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Identifiedcivilopinionheadingand502F.Supp.260–266relevantprocedure/evidencenarrative/legalconclusions;263–264preparation/departuredates;268footnotes3–5includingcriminalreversals,evidenceexclusionsandIgnaciodismissalreviewed.

Access limitations

These are judicial texts in identified third-party transcriptions, not court-hosted original bytes or independently reread trial exhibits. The1980civilopinion followed defaults and an evidence hearing and relied heavily on Townley’s earlier sworn testimony. The September1980criminal reversals/remand are retained; the civil court said it did not rely on the informant evidence underlying those reversals. Default liability and evidence narrative are not personal criminal convictions or proof of later payment/enforcement/retrial outcomes. Pinochet was not a defendant in this civil case. The opinion directs relief; a separate entry-of-judgment docket was not obtained.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

identified_primary_document_copy_or_transcription_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B05-FAMILY-US-CIVIL1980

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B05-SRC-CL-CIVIL-LAS@11edb41b4cf57c92

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 11edb41b4cf57c9256a02f26aac25e4d5ef3687c340191035596979ce9f30398. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_wording_or_limit

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

These are judicial texts in identified third-party transcriptions, not court-hosted original bytes or independently reread trial exhibits. The1980civilopinion followed defaults and an evidence hearing and relied heavily on Townley’s earlier sworn testimony. The September1980criminal reversals/remand are retained; the civil court said it did not rely on the informant evidence underlying those reversals. Default liability and evidence narrative are not personal criminal convictions or proof of later payment/enforcement/retrial outcomes. Pinochet was not a defendant in this civil case. The opinion directs relief; a separate entry-of-judgment docket was not obtained.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Civil liability and default procedure, not a criminal conviction. Pinochet is not among these defendants. No claim of latest2026 litigation status.

These are judicial texts in identified third-party transcriptions, not court-hosted original bytes or independently reread trial exhibits. The1980civilopinion followed defaults and an evidence hearing and relied heavily on Townley’s earlier sworn testimony. The September1980criminal reversals/remand are retained; the civil court said it did not rely on the informant evidence underlying those reversals. Default liability and evidence narrative are not personal criminal convictions or proof of later payment/enforcement/retrial outcomes. Pinochet was not a defendant in this civil case. The opinion directs relief; a separate entry-of-judgment docket was not obtained.

Legal distinction

Civil default opinion and testimony narrative are not personal criminal convictions. Criminal reversals/remand do not establish factual innocence or later retrial outcomes. No verified payment/enforcement or private order location is inferred.

Casualty scope: Two deaths and one injured survivor remain distinct nonadditive observations of one21September1976event. No inferred child category, injury severity, personal toll or source-additive total.

Record A4-B15-CL-CIVIL-FINDING · exact wording SHA-256 a94a70216624d84cf3e103cfa89a776010cc6f61d2f61a4d5c17ed5d0f2c26cb

Report a correction →
human consequence

A State Department summary and the civil opinion record Orlando Letelier and Ronni Moffitt dying from the 21 September 1976 car bombing in Washington, D.C. These are two deaths in one event, not additional totals to add across sources.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record testimony judicial account or public measure · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 21September1976 deaths; later government summary and civil opinion are separate source clocks.

Date basis and original source clocks

21September1976 deaths; later government summary and civil opinion are separate source clocks

Sources (2) · exact passages & limitations

The Letelier Dispute: Background and Factual Summary,January1989 ↗

Publisher: US Department of State

Exact passage: PDFp1 Introduction opening paragraph

Source establishes: Statesummaryphysical1openingandcivilopinion260,265; explosion and medical-examiner times are distinct, no graphic details exported.

Document date: Not established · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Physical1renderedandvisuallyread:documenttitle,intro21September1976deathsandinjuredsurvivor,source-governmentaccountscope. ProducerlabelJanuary1989notindependentlyestablishedasexactissuedateinthispassage.

Access limitations

The StateDepartment retrospective summary is an identified document copy hosted by NationalSecurityArchive; its original exact public availability and underlying medical records were not obtained. Deaths and the surviving injured passenger are overlapping accounts of one21September1976event, not source-additive personal totals. No child category, graphic testimony or private family data is exported.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

identified_primary_document_copy_or_transcription_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B05-FAMILY-US-PROSECUTION-LETELIER

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B05-SRC-CL-STATE1989@f67ac3c8f46ce2c3

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: f67ac3c8f46ce2c38e3d54b96357a0f249393ccee9a446f773ad5d4cd73ea690. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_wording_or_limit

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

De Letelier v Republic of Chile,502F.Supp.259, No78-1477,5November1980 ↗

Publisher: US District Court for DC, Judge Joyce Hens Green

Exact passage: 502F.Supp.pp260,265, deaths at Sheridan Circle and medical-examiner account

Source establishes: Statesummaryphysical1openingandcivilopinion260,265; explosion and medical-examiner times are distinct, no graphic details exported.

Document date: 1980-11-05 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Identifiedcivilopinionheadingand502F.Supp.260–266relevantprocedure/evidencenarrative/legalconclusions;263–264preparation/departuredates;268footnotes3–5includingcriminalreversals,evidenceexclusionsandIgnaciodismissalreviewed.

Access limitations

These are judicial texts in identified third-party transcriptions, not court-hosted original bytes or independently reread trial exhibits. The1980civilopinion followed defaults and an evidence hearing and relied heavily on Townley’s earlier sworn testimony. The September1980criminal reversals/remand are retained; the civil court said it did not rely on the informant evidence underlying those reversals. Default liability and evidence narrative are not personal criminal convictions or proof of later payment/enforcement/retrial outcomes. Pinochet was not a defendant in this civil case. The opinion directs relief; a separate entry-of-judgment docket was not obtained.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

identified_primary_document_copy_or_transcription_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B05-FAMILY-US-CIVIL1980

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B05-SRC-CL-CIVIL-LAS@11edb41b4cf57c92

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 11edb41b4cf57c9256a02f26aac25e4d5ef3687c340191035596979ce9f30398. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_wording_or_limit

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

The StateDepartment retrospective summary is an identified document copy hosted by NationalSecurityArchive; its original exact public availability and underlying medical records were not obtained. Deaths and the surviving injured passenger are overlapping accounts of one21September1976event, not source-additive personal totals. No child category, graphic testimony or private family data is exported.

These are judicial texts in identified third-party transcriptions, not court-hosted original bytes or independently reread trial exhibits. The1980civilopinion followed defaults and an evidence hearing and relied heavily on Townley’s earlier sworn testimony. The September1980criminal reversals/remand are retained; the civil court said it did not rely on the informant evidence underlying those reversals. Default liability and evidence narrative are not personal criminal convictions or proof of later payment/enforcement/retrial outcomes. Pinochet was not a defendant in this civil case. The opinion directs relief; a separate entry-of-judgment docket was not obtained.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Same event, potentially shared prosecution/witness ancestry. Counts not additive or a personal death toll. No child breakdown derived from victim kinship.

The StateDepartment retrospective summary is an identified document copy hosted by NationalSecurityArchive; its original exact public availability and underlying medical records were not obtained. Deaths and the surviving injured passenger are overlapping accounts of one21September1976event, not source-additive personal totals. No child category, graphic testimony or private family data is exported.

Legal distinction

Civil default opinion and testimony narrative are not personal criminal convictions. Criminal reversals/remand do not establish factual innocence or later retrial outcomes. No verified payment/enforcement or private order location is inferred.

Casualty scope: Two deaths and one injured survivor remain distinct nonadditive observations of one21September1976event. No inferred child category, injury severity, personal toll or source-additive total.

Record A4-B15-CL-CONSEQUENCES · exact wording SHA-256 998e5ae6ddb9c71ef8a5d53d8a8200fdaf6ab820dd33907eb97ef57154f8ea3d

Report a correction →
decision

The 1980 civil opinion in Letelier v. Republic of Chile recounts Townley’s sworn testimony that DINA operations director Pedro Espinoza instructed him about the assassination mission. This is the civil court’s evidence narrative, not a new criminal conviction.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record testimony judicial account or public measure · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 1976 reported instruction; exact day unknown; civil opinion5November1980 separate.

Date basis and original source clocks

1976 reported instruction; exact day unknown; civil opinion5November1980 separate

Sources (2) · exact passages & limitations

Anexo A: Relato de sucesos en la muerte de Orlando Letelier,14March1978 ↗

Publisher: Michael Vernon Townley, as attributed in document

Exact passage: PDFp1 opening and explicit-instructions paragraphs; p3 numberedpoint2

Source establishes: Civilopinion261–262expressly identifies role, successive meetings and instruction. Typed1978account is related participant material, not an independent second witness.

Document date: 1978-03-14 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: All3typedSpanishpagesread;physical3rendered/viewed for direct-order/implementation points, typednameandabsenceofhandwrittenoriginal. Printed14March1978labelnotindependentlyauthenticatedwritingdate.

Access limitations

Typed participant-account copies and an alias-signed undated translation are not authenticated handwritten originals. The Marcy document is explicitly a draft with blank exhibits and oath fields and differing English/Spanish chronology, not an executed affidavit or the FBI laboratory report. No private identifiers, operational details, alias expansion into a new personal order or source-date guess is approved. Blocked direct-order/letter candidates remain excluded.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

identified_primary_document_copy_or_transcription_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B05-FAMILY-TOWNLEY-ACCOUNTS

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B05-SRC-CL-TOWNLEY1978@47d2967dcc17cb29

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 47d2967dcc17cb2959c19af0e85fb4f4120f8af1065b64e00023c0fa9269b787. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: related_participant_material_not_independent_corroboration

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

De Letelier v Republic of Chile,502F.Supp.259, No78-1477,5November1980 ↗

Publisher: US District Court for DC, Judge Joyce Hens Green

Exact passage: 502F.Supp.pp261-262, Townley testimony narrative

Source establishes: Civilopinion261–262expressly identifies role, successive meetings and instruction. Typed1978account is related participant material, not an independent second witness.

Document date: 1980-11-05 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Identifiedcivilopinionheadingand502F.Supp.260–266relevantprocedure/evidencenarrative/legalconclusions;263–264preparation/departuredates;268footnotes3–5includingcriminalreversals,evidenceexclusionsandIgnaciodismissalreviewed.

Access limitations

These are judicial texts in identified third-party transcriptions, not court-hosted original bytes or independently reread trial exhibits. The1980civilopinion followed defaults and an evidence hearing and relied heavily on Townley’s earlier sworn testimony. The September1980criminal reversals/remand are retained; the civil court said it did not rely on the informant evidence underlying those reversals. Default liability and evidence narrative are not personal criminal convictions or proof of later payment/enforcement/retrial outcomes. Pinochet was not a defendant in this civil case. The opinion directs relief; a separate entry-of-judgment docket was not obtained.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

identified_primary_document_copy_or_transcription_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B05-FAMILY-US-CIVIL1980

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B05-SRC-CL-CIVIL-LAS@11edb41b4cf57c92

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 11edb41b4cf57c9256a02f26aac25e4d5ef3687c340191035596979ce9f30398. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_wording_or_limit

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Typed participant-account copies and an alias-signed undated translation are not authenticated handwritten originals. The Marcy document is explicitly a draft with blank exhibits and oath fields and differing English/Spanish chronology, not an executed affidavit or the FBI laboratory report. No private identifiers, operational details, alias expansion into a new personal order or source-date guess is approved. Blocked direct-order/letter candidates remain excluded.

These are judicial texts in identified third-party transcriptions, not court-hosted original bytes or independently reread trial exhibits. The1980civilopinion followed defaults and an evidence hearing and relied heavily on Townley’s earlier sworn testimony. The September1980criminal reversals/remand are retained; the civil court said it did not rely on the informant evidence underlying those reversals. Default liability and evidence narrative are not personal criminal convictions or proof of later payment/enforcement/retrial outcomes. Pinochet was not a defendant in this civil case. The opinion directs relief; a separate entry-of-judgment docket was not obtained.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Court narrative substantially inherits Townley testimony; these are not wholly independent accounts. No original instruction separately reviewed. Rank recollection differs in specificity; retain reported roles.

These are judicial texts in identified third-party transcriptions, not court-hosted original bytes or independently reread trial exhibits. The1980civilopinion followed defaults and an evidence hearing and relied heavily on Townley’s earlier sworn testimony. The September1980criminal reversals/remand are retained; the civil court said it did not rely on the informant evidence underlying those reversals. Default liability and evidence narrative are not personal criminal convictions or proof of later payment/enforcement/retrial outcomes. Pinochet was not a defendant in this civil case. The opinion directs relief; a separate entry-of-judgment docket was not obtained.

Legal distinction

Civil default opinion and testimony narrative are not personal criminal convictions. Criminal reversals/remand do not establish factual innocence or later retrial outcomes. No verified payment/enforcement or private order location is inferred.

Casualty scope: Two deaths and one injured survivor remain distinct nonadditive observations of one21September1976event. No inferred child category, injury severity, personal toll or source-additive total.

Record A4-B15-CL-ESPINOZA · exact wording SHA-256 8427c34d70b188168f767acb9243725e5aa7793bfd04e8c3f4ee89e72924c364

Report a correction →
context

The civil opinion describes Armando Fernandez Larios giving Townley surveillance information at New York’s Kennedy Airport. This identifies a reported surveillance handover, not who constructed or detonated the bomb.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record testimony judicial account or public measure · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 9September1976 reported surveillance handover; civil evidence narrative5November1980 separate.

Date basis and original source clocks

9September1976 reported surveillance handover; civil evidence narrative5November1980 separate

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

De Letelier v Republic of Chile,502F.Supp.259, No78-1477,5November1980 ↗

Publisher: US District Court for DC, Judge Joyce Hens Green

Exact passage: 502F.Supp.p262, arrival/meeting at Kennedy Airport paragraphs

Source establishes: 502F.Supp.262,9Septemberarrivalandmeetingnarrative; bounded role derived from testimony considered by the civil court.

Document date: 1980-11-05 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Identifiedcivilopinionheadingand502F.Supp.260–266relevantprocedure/evidencenarrative/legalconclusions;263–264preparation/departuredates;268footnotes3–5includingcriminalreversals,evidenceexclusionsandIgnaciodismissalreviewed.

Access limitations

These are judicial texts in identified third-party transcriptions, not court-hosted original bytes or independently reread trial exhibits. The1980civilopinion followed defaults and an evidence hearing and relied heavily on Townley’s earlier sworn testimony. The September1980criminal reversals/remand are retained; the civil court said it did not rely on the informant evidence underlying those reversals. Default liability and evidence narrative are not personal criminal convictions or proof of later payment/enforcement/retrial outcomes. Pinochet was not a defendant in this civil case. The opinion directs relief; a separate entry-of-judgment docket was not obtained.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

identified_primary_document_copy_or_transcription_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B05-FAMILY-US-CIVIL1980

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B05-SRC-CL-CIVIL-LAS@11edb41b4cf57c92

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 11edb41b4cf57c9256a02f26aac25e4d5ef3687c340191035596979ce9f30398. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_wording_or_limit

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

These are judicial texts in identified third-party transcriptions, not court-hosted original bytes or independently reread trial exhibits. The1980civilopinion followed defaults and an evidence hearing and relied heavily on Townley’s earlier sworn testimony. The September1980criminal reversals/remand are retained; the civil court said it did not rely on the informant evidence underlying those reversals. Default liability and evidence narrative are not personal criminal convictions or proof of later payment/enforcement/retrial outcomes. Pinochet was not a defendant in this civil case. The opinion directs relief; a separate entry-of-judgment docket was not obtained.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Surveillance/handover role; no automatic assumption that he built or detonated the bomb.

These are judicial texts in identified third-party transcriptions, not court-hosted original bytes or independently reread trial exhibits. The1980civilopinion followed defaults and an evidence hearing and relied heavily on Townley’s earlier sworn testimony. The September1980criminal reversals/remand are retained; the civil court said it did not rely on the informant evidence underlying those reversals. Default liability and evidence narrative are not personal criminal convictions or proof of later payment/enforcement/retrial outcomes. Pinochet was not a defendant in this civil case. The opinion directs relief; a separate entry-of-judgment docket was not obtained.

Legal distinction

Civil default opinion and testimony narrative are not personal criminal convictions. Criminal reversals/remand do not establish factual innocence or later retrial outcomes. No verified payment/enforcement or private order location is inferred.

Casualty scope: Two deaths and one injured survivor remain distinct nonadditive observations of one21September1976event. No inferred child category, injury severity, personal toll or source-additive total.

Record A4-B15-CL-FERNANDEZ · exact wording SHA-256 da0da4285775acbca2071d7fa8bf79ce1f8a50d3d0054b8ddf107ee02f9881ee

Report a correction →
decision

The civil opinion recounts Guillermo Novo and Suarez informing Townley that the Cuban Nationalist Movement would assist the assassination. Guillermo and Ignacio Novo are different people; the opinion notes the earlier criminal judgments had been reversed.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record testimony judicial account or public measure · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: September1976 reported assistance decision; exact day unknown; reversed judgments retained.

Date basis and original source clocks

September1976 reported assistance decision; exact day unknown; reversed judgments retained

Sources (2) · exact passages & limitations

De Letelier v Republic of Chile,502F.Supp.259, No78-1477,5November1980 ↗

Publisher: US District Court for DC, Judge Joyce Hens Green

Exact passage: 502F.Supp.pp262-263, NewJersey meetings and CNM assistance decision

Source establishes: 502F.Supp.262–263and268footnote3; assistance decision in civil evidence narrative, with appellate reversal retained.

Document date: 1980-11-05 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Identifiedcivilopinionheadingand502F.Supp.260–266relevantprocedure/evidencenarrative/legalconclusions;263–264preparation/departuredates;268footnotes3–5includingcriminalreversals,evidenceexclusionsandIgnaciodismissalreviewed.

Access limitations

These are judicial texts in identified third-party transcriptions, not court-hosted original bytes or independently reread trial exhibits. The1980civilopinion followed defaults and an evidence hearing and relied heavily on Townley’s earlier sworn testimony. The September1980criminal reversals/remand are retained; the civil court said it did not rely on the informant evidence underlying those reversals. Default liability and evidence narrative are not personal criminal convictions or proof of later payment/enforcement/retrial outcomes. Pinochet was not a defendant in this civil case. The opinion directs relief; a separate entry-of-judgment docket was not obtained.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

identified_primary_document_copy_or_transcription_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B05-FAMILY-US-CIVIL1980

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B05-SRC-CL-CIVIL-LAS@11edb41b4cf57c92

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 11edb41b4cf57c9256a02f26aac25e4d5ef3687c340191035596979ce9f30398. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_wording_or_limit

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

United States v Sampol,636F.2d621 /204USAppDC349 ↗

Publisher: US Court of Appeals, DC Circuit

Exact passage: CaseheadingandPartXIVConclusion;15September1980

Source establishes: 502F.Supp.262–263and268footnote3; assistance decision in civil evidence narrative, with appellate reversal retained.

Document date: 1980-09-15 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Identifiedappellateheading,decision15September1980versusrehearingdenial9December1980,openingcasehistoryandPartXIVConclusionread;notalllengthyappealissuesreviewed.

Access limitations

These are judicial texts in identified third-party transcriptions, not court-hosted original bytes or independently reread trial exhibits. The1980civilopinion followed defaults and an evidence hearing and relied heavily on Townley’s earlier sworn testimony. The September1980criminal reversals/remand are retained; the civil court said it did not rely on the informant evidence underlying those reversals. Default liability and evidence narrative are not personal criminal convictions or proof of later payment/enforcement/retrial outcomes. Pinochet was not a defendant in this civil case. The opinion directs relief; a separate entry-of-judgment docket was not obtained.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

identified_primary_document_copy_or_transcription_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B05-FAMILY-US-CRIMINAL1980

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B05-SRC-CL-SAMPOL@a979e89a2b304f9f

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: a979e89a2b304f9fe620b804d69e20096a6a228b8c97419d51c62d738f3964e6. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: criminal_reversal_context

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

These are judicial texts in identified third-party transcriptions, not court-hosted original bytes or independently reread trial exhibits. The1980civilopinion followed defaults and an evidence hearing and relied heavily on Townley’s earlier sworn testimony. The September1980criminal reversals/remand are retained; the civil court said it did not rely on the informant evidence underlying those reversals. Default liability and evidence narrative are not personal criminal convictions or proof of later payment/enforcement/retrial outcomes. Pinochet was not a defendant in this civil case. The opinion directs relief; a separate entry-of-judgment docket was not obtained.

These are judicial texts in identified third-party transcriptions, not court-hosted original bytes or independently reread trial exhibits. The1980civilopinion followed defaults and an evidence hearing and relied heavily on Townley’s earlier sworn testimony. The September1980criminal reversals/remand are retained; the civil court said it did not rely on the informant evidence underlying those reversals. Default liability and evidence narrative are not personal criminal convictions or proof of later payment/enforcement/retrial outcomes. Pinochet was not a defendant in this civil case. The opinion directs relief; a separate entry-of-judgment docket was not obtained.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Guillermo and Ignacio Novo are distinct people.1979 criminal convictions were reversed in1980; civil findings do not reinstate them.

These are judicial texts in identified third-party transcriptions, not court-hosted original bytes or independently reread trial exhibits. The1980civilopinion followed defaults and an evidence hearing and relied heavily on Townley’s earlier sworn testimony. The September1980criminal reversals/remand are retained; the civil court said it did not rely on the informant evidence underlying those reversals. Default liability and evidence narrative are not personal criminal convictions or proof of later payment/enforcement/retrial outcomes. Pinochet was not a defendant in this civil case. The opinion directs relief; a separate entry-of-judgment docket was not obtained.

Legal distinction

Civil default opinion and testimony narrative are not personal criminal convictions. Criminal reversals/remand do not establish factual innocence or later retrial outcomes. No verified payment/enforcement or private order location is inferred.

Casualty scope: Two deaths and one injured survivor remain distinct nonadditive observations of one21September1976event. No inferred child category, injury severity, personal toll or source-additive total.

Record A4-B15-CL-GUILLERMO · exact wording SHA-256 30bf4e22e70d439965a77117dccf80814f98cc4d9f183d2e569af7183127b1d9

Report a correction →
human consequence

The State Department summary records Michael Moffitt injured in the same explosion. It supplies no quantified injury severity or basis for classifying him as a child.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record testimony judicial account or public measure · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 21September1976 injured survivor; report issue day and severity unknown.

Date basis and original source clocks

21September1976 injured survivor; report issue day and severity unknown

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

The Letelier Dispute: Background and Factual Summary,January1989 ↗

Publisher: US Department of State

Exact passage: PDFp1 Introduction opening paragraph

Source establishes: Statesummaryphysical1opening; survivor is not a third fatality and no medical records were independently read.

Document date: Not established · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Physical1renderedandvisuallyread:documenttitle,intro21September1976deathsandinjuredsurvivor,source-governmentaccountscope. ProducerlabelJanuary1989notindependentlyestablishedasexactissuedateinthispassage.

Access limitations

The StateDepartment retrospective summary is an identified document copy hosted by NationalSecurityArchive; its original exact public availability and underlying medical records were not obtained. Deaths and the surviving injured passenger are overlapping accounts of one21September1976event, not source-additive personal totals. No child category, graphic testimony or private family data is exported.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

identified_primary_document_copy_or_transcription_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B05-FAMILY-US-PROSECUTION-LETELIER

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B05-SRC-CL-STATE1989@f67ac3c8f46ce2c3

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: f67ac3c8f46ce2c38e3d54b96357a0f249393ccee9a446f773ad5d4cd73ea690. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_wording_or_limit

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

The StateDepartment retrospective summary is an identified document copy hosted by NationalSecurityArchive; its original exact public availability and underlying medical records were not obtained. Deaths and the surviving injured passenger are overlapping accounts of one21September1976event, not source-additive personal totals. No child category, graphic testimony or private family data is exported.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Named surviving passenger; no quantified medical severity or child classification.

The StateDepartment retrospective summary is an identified document copy hosted by NationalSecurityArchive; its original exact public availability and underlying medical records were not obtained. Deaths and the surviving injured passenger are overlapping accounts of one21September1976event, not source-additive personal totals. No child category, graphic testimony or private family data is exported.

Legal distinction

Civil default opinion and testimony narrative are not personal criminal convictions. Criminal reversals/remand do not establish factual innocence or later retrial outcomes. No verified payment/enforcement or private order location is inferred.

Casualty scope: Two deaths and one injured survivor remain distinct nonadditive observations of one21September1976event. No inferred child category, injury severity, personal toll or source-additive total.

Record A4-B15-CL-INJURY · exact wording SHA-256 748e628e6fa5cf9668658eadee873d84fdd90d99591d39b0bc2aaab4e2cb7df7

Report a correction →
context

On 15 September 1980, the appeals court reversed the criminal judgments concerning Guillermo Novo, Alvin Ross and Ignacio Novo and remanded the case. The later civil opinion expressly addressed those reversals. This does not establish factual innocence or the outcome of later retrials.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record testimony judicial account or public measure · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 15September1980 criminal reversal and remand;9December rehearing denial separate, later retrial outcome unknown.

Date basis and original source clocks

15September1980 criminal reversal and remand;9December rehearing denial separate, later retrial outcome unknown

Sources (2) · exact passages & limitations

United States v Sampol,636F.2d621 /204USAppDC349 ↗

Publisher: US Court of Appeals, DC Circuit

Exact passage: Opening summary and partXIV Conclusion, decision15September1980

Source establishes: SampolheadingandPartXIVConclusion, read with civilopinion268footnote3; decision15September differs from rehearingdenial9December1980.

Document date: 1980-09-15 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Identifiedappellateheading,decision15September1980versusrehearingdenial9December1980,openingcasehistoryandPartXIVConclusionread;notalllengthyappealissuesreviewed.

Access limitations

These are judicial texts in identified third-party transcriptions, not court-hosted original bytes or independently reread trial exhibits. The1980civilopinion followed defaults and an evidence hearing and relied heavily on Townley’s earlier sworn testimony. The September1980criminal reversals/remand are retained; the civil court said it did not rely on the informant evidence underlying those reversals. Default liability and evidence narrative are not personal criminal convictions or proof of later payment/enforcement/retrial outcomes. Pinochet was not a defendant in this civil case. The opinion directs relief; a separate entry-of-judgment docket was not obtained.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

identified_primary_document_copy_or_transcription_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B05-FAMILY-US-CRIMINAL1980

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B05-SRC-CL-SAMPOL@a979e89a2b304f9f

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: a979e89a2b304f9fe620b804d69e20096a6a228b8c97419d51c62d738f3964e6. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_wording_or_limit

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

De Letelier v Republic of Chile,502F.Supp.259, No78-1477,5November1980 ↗

Publisher: US District Court for DC, Judge Joyce Hens Green

Exact passage: 502F.Supp.p268 footnote3

Source establishes: SampolheadingandPartXIVConclusion, read with civilopinion268footnote3; decision15September differs from rehearingdenial9December1980.

Document date: 1980-11-05 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Identifiedcivilopinionheadingand502F.Supp.260–266relevantprocedure/evidencenarrative/legalconclusions;263–264preparation/departuredates;268footnotes3–5includingcriminalreversals,evidenceexclusionsandIgnaciodismissalreviewed.

Access limitations

These are judicial texts in identified third-party transcriptions, not court-hosted original bytes or independently reread trial exhibits. The1980civilopinion followed defaults and an evidence hearing and relied heavily on Townley’s earlier sworn testimony. The September1980criminal reversals/remand are retained; the civil court said it did not rely on the informant evidence underlying those reversals. Default liability and evidence narrative are not personal criminal convictions or proof of later payment/enforcement/retrial outcomes. Pinochet was not a defendant in this civil case. The opinion directs relief; a separate entry-of-judgment docket was not obtained.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

identified_primary_document_copy_or_transcription_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B05-FAMILY-US-CIVIL1980

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B05-SRC-CL-CIVIL-LAS@11edb41b4cf57c92

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 11edb41b4cf57c9256a02f26aac25e4d5ef3687c340191035596979ce9f30398. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_wording_or_limit

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

These are judicial texts in identified third-party transcriptions, not court-hosted original bytes or independently reread trial exhibits. The1980civilopinion followed defaults and an evidence hearing and relied heavily on Townley’s earlier sworn testimony. The September1980criminal reversals/remand are retained; the civil court said it did not rely on the informant evidence underlying those reversals. Default liability and evidence narrative are not personal criminal convictions or proof of later payment/enforcement/retrial outcomes. Pinochet was not a defendant in this civil case. The opinion directs relief; a separate entry-of-judgment docket was not obtained.

These are judicial texts in identified third-party transcriptions, not court-hosted original bytes or independently reread trial exhibits. The1980civilopinion followed defaults and an evidence hearing and relied heavily on Townley’s earlier sworn testimony. The September1980criminal reversals/remand are retained; the civil court said it did not rely on the informant evidence underlying those reversals. Default liability and evidence narrative are not personal criminal convictions or proof of later payment/enforcement/retrial outcomes. Pinochet was not a defendant in this civil case. The opinion directs relief; a separate entry-of-judgment docket was not obtained.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Reversal/remand is not a judicial finding of factual innocence or a final status of all later retrials. Decision date differs from9December rehearing denial.

These are judicial texts in identified third-party transcriptions, not court-hosted original bytes or independently reread trial exhibits. The1980civilopinion followed defaults and an evidence hearing and relied heavily on Townley’s earlier sworn testimony. The September1980criminal reversals/remand are retained; the civil court said it did not rely on the informant evidence underlying those reversals. Default liability and evidence narrative are not personal criminal convictions or proof of later payment/enforcement/retrial outcomes. Pinochet was not a defendant in this civil case. The opinion directs relief; a separate entry-of-judgment docket was not obtained.

Legal distinction

Civil default opinion and testimony narrative are not personal criminal convictions. Criminal reversals/remand do not establish factual innocence or later retrial outcomes. No verified payment/enforcement or private order location is inferred.

Casualty scope: Two deaths and one injured survivor remain distinct nonadditive observations of one21September1976event. No inferred child category, injury severity, personal toll or source-additive total.

Record A4-B15-CL-REVERSALS · exact wording SHA-256 f60e49a5697767399f56e95f8b2198d0f71ba720c658628809fd8f2082c160bd

Report a correction →
context

The same civil opinion describes Townley constructing and attaching the bomb on 18 September 1976 and leaving Washington the next day, before the 21 September explosion. It does not place him at the detonation.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record testimony judicial account or public measure · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 18September1976 preparation and19September departure; two distinct actions, not presence at21September detonation.

Date basis and original source clocks

18September1976 preparation and19September departure; two distinct actions, not presence at21September detonation

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

De Letelier v Republic of Chile,502F.Supp.259, No78-1477,5November1980 ↗

Publisher: US District Court for DC, Judge Joyce Hens Green

Exact passage: 502F.Supp.pp263-264, bomb construction/attachment and19September travel paragraphs

Source establishes: 502F.Supp.263–264; preparation, departure and actual explosion clocks differ. No technical construction details are approved for export.

Document date: 1980-11-05 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Identifiedcivilopinionheadingand502F.Supp.260–266relevantprocedure/evidencenarrative/legalconclusions;263–264preparation/departuredates;268footnotes3–5includingcriminalreversals,evidenceexclusionsandIgnaciodismissalreviewed.

Access limitations

These are judicial texts in identified third-party transcriptions, not court-hosted original bytes or independently reread trial exhibits. The1980civilopinion followed defaults and an evidence hearing and relied heavily on Townley’s earlier sworn testimony. The September1980criminal reversals/remand are retained; the civil court said it did not rely on the informant evidence underlying those reversals. Default liability and evidence narrative are not personal criminal convictions or proof of later payment/enforcement/retrial outcomes. Pinochet was not a defendant in this civil case. The opinion directs relief; a separate entry-of-judgment docket was not obtained.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

identified_primary_document_copy_or_transcription_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B05-FAMILY-US-CIVIL1980

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B05-SRC-CL-CIVIL-LAS@11edb41b4cf57c92

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 11edb41b4cf57c9256a02f26aac25e4d5ef3687c340191035596979ce9f30398. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_wording_or_limit

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

These are judicial texts in identified third-party transcriptions, not court-hosted original bytes or independently reread trial exhibits. The1980civilopinion followed defaults and an evidence hearing and relied heavily on Townley’s earlier sworn testimony. The September1980criminal reversals/remand are retained; the civil court said it did not rely on the informant evidence underlying those reversals. Default liability and evidence narrative are not personal criminal convictions or proof of later payment/enforcement/retrial outcomes. Pinochet was not a defendant in this civil case. The opinion directs relief; a separate entry-of-judgment docket was not obtained.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Underlying trial testimony not independently reviewed. No attribution of remote detonation to Townley’s physical presence on21September.

These are judicial texts in identified third-party transcriptions, not court-hosted original bytes or independently reread trial exhibits. The1980civilopinion followed defaults and an evidence hearing and relied heavily on Townley’s earlier sworn testimony. The September1980criminal reversals/remand are retained; the civil court said it did not rely on the informant evidence underlying those reversals. Default liability and evidence narrative are not personal criminal convictions or proof of later payment/enforcement/retrial outcomes. Pinochet was not a defendant in this civil case. The opinion directs relief; a separate entry-of-judgment docket was not obtained.

Legal distinction

Civil default opinion and testimony narrative are not personal criminal convictions. Criminal reversals/remand do not establish factual innocence or later retrial outcomes. No verified payment/enforcement or private order location is inferred.

Casualty scope: Two deaths and one injured survivor remain distinct nonadditive observations of one21September1976event. No inferred child category, injury severity, personal toll or source-additive total.

Record A4-B15-CL-TOWNLEY · exact wording SHA-256 eedff632ec9f3146f3926f2ee5ce80b5e6a22c5a84708655fda4c565fc959dca

Report a correction →
decision

The coroner found that the IRA carried out Kingsmill under the authority of its Army Council, which had issued broad authorisation in April 1975. This organisational finding does not prove a specific attack order by a named Council member.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record testimony judicial account or public measure · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: April1975 broad organisational policy; exact day and individual attack instruction not established; finding12April2024.

Date basis and original source clocks

April1975 broad organisational policy; exact day and individual attack instruction not established; finding12April2024

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Kingsmill inquest, [2024] NICoroner 21 ↗

Publisher: Coroner Judge Sherrard, Northern Ireland

Exact passage: para286 p76; conclusion318 p85

Source establishes: Paragraph286physical76andconclusion318physical85; institutional final finding distinct from named-person hearsay and expert uncertainty.

Document date: 2024-04-12 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Officialcover/citation,date12April2024;physical5paras4–5;66paras236–237;76–78paras286,288–296;84–85paras315–318read. Physical85rendered/viewed for individual-proof limit and organisational finding.

Access limitations

This is the Coroners Court’s 12 April 2024 finding about events on 5 January 1976. Its finding of IRA responsibility and broad Army Council authority is distinct from proof of a named person’s instruction for this attack. Preserve the inquest’s express limit on establishing individual criminal responsibility, its caution about suspect ciphers, expert and witness uncertainty, and the absence of an account from the perpetrators. Only the selected passages listed in the review scope were independently read; no complete-document review or separate authentication of the underlying witness evidence is claimed. No cipher deanonymisation, victim list, private information or new personal map arc is approved.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

official_or_original_publisher_selected_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B05-FAMILY-NI-INQUEST

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B05-SRC-NI-KINGSMILL@0c2dd9d398ddd1a9

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 0c2dd9d398ddd1a98d205a1d000e984ab78a1191c914b2afb5f4434cbdc47d5d. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_wording_or_limit

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

This is the Coroners Court’s 12 April 2024 finding about events on 5 January 1976. Its finding of IRA responsibility and broad Army Council authority is distinct from proof of a named person’s instruction for this attack. Preserve the inquest’s express limit on establishing individual criminal responsibility, its caution about suspect ciphers, expert and witness uncertainty, and the absence of an account from the perpetrators. Only the selected passages listed in the review scope were independently read; no complete-document review or separate authentication of the underlying witness evidence is claimed. No cipher deanonymisation, victim list, private information or new personal map arc is approved.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Broad policy and institutional authority are distinct from a proved specific order by a named Council member. Underlying order not separately obtained.

This is the CoronersCourt’s12April2024finding about5January1976events. Organisational IRA responsibility and broad ArmyCouncil authority are distinct from a named personal attack instruction. The express individual criminal-proof limit, suspect-cipher caution, expert uncertainty and absence of perpetrator disclosure remain. No cipher deanonymisation, victim list, private data or new personal map arc is approved.

Legal distinction

Coronial organisational finding is distinct from individual criminal proof, a specific personal attack instruction or conviction. Suspect ciphers are not deanonymised; exculpatory findings create no positive actor link.

Casualty scope: Ten killed and one injured survivor remain separate source-defined observations. The passenger released before shooting is not an eleventh death. No inferred child/military classification or allocation to an individual.

Record A4-B15-NI-AUTHORITY · exact wording SHA-256 95f16c882630f1a5a787e5522db28c502bd5c7886af42569d62712d859b6ce99

Report a correction →
human consequence

The 2024 Kingsmill inquest records ten workers killed in the 5 January 1976 minibus attack and Alan Black surviving with life-changing injuries. Another passenger was released before the shooting and is not an eleventh fatality.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record testimony judicial account or public measure · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 5January1976 attack and source-defined consequences; inquest finding12April2024 separate.

Date basis and original source clocks

5January1976 attack and source-defined consequences; inquest finding12April2024 separate

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Kingsmill inquest, [2024] NICoroner 21 ↗

Publisher: Coroner Judge Sherrard, Northern Ireland

Exact passage: paras315-316, pp84-85

Source establishes: Paragraphs315–316physical84andintro; aggregate only, no victim list or graphic wound details exported.

Document date: 2024-04-12 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Officialcover/citation,date12April2024;physical5paras4–5;66paras236–237;76–78paras286,288–296;84–85paras315–318read. Physical85rendered/viewed for individual-proof limit and organisational finding.

Access limitations

This is the Coroners Court’s 12 April 2024 finding about events on 5 January 1976. Its finding of IRA responsibility and broad Army Council authority is distinct from proof of a named person’s instruction for this attack. Preserve the inquest’s express limit on establishing individual criminal responsibility, its caution about suspect ciphers, expert and witness uncertainty, and the absence of an account from the perpetrators. Only the selected passages listed in the review scope were independently read; no complete-document review or separate authentication of the underlying witness evidence is claimed. No cipher deanonymisation, victim list, private information or new personal map arc is approved.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

official_or_original_publisher_selected_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B05-FAMILY-NI-INQUEST

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B05-SRC-NI-KINGSMILL@0c2dd9d398ddd1a9

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 0c2dd9d398ddd1a98d205a1d000e984ab78a1191c914b2afb5f4434cbdc47d5d. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_wording_or_limit

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

This is the Coroners Court’s 12 April 2024 finding about events on 5 January 1976. Its finding of IRA responsibility and broad Army Council authority is distinct from proof of a named person’s instruction for this attack. Preserve the inquest’s express limit on establishing individual criminal responsibility, its caution about suspect ciphers, expert and witness uncertainty, and the absence of an account from the perpetrators. Only the selected passages listed in the review scope were independently read; no complete-document review or separate authentication of the underlying witness evidence is claimed. No cipher deanonymisation, victim list, private information or new personal map arc is approved.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Richard Hughes was separated and released before shooting; he is not an eleventh fatality. No personal shooter or child tally established.

This is the CoronersCourt’s12April2024finding about5January1976events. Organisational IRA responsibility and broad ArmyCouncil authority are distinct from a named personal attack instruction. The express individual criminal-proof limit, suspect-cipher caution, expert uncertainty and absence of perpetrator disclosure remain. No cipher deanonymisation, victim list, private data or new personal map arc is approved.

Legal distinction

Coronial organisational finding is distinct from individual criminal proof, a specific personal attack instruction or conviction. Suspect ciphers are not deanonymised; exculpatory findings create no positive actor link.

Casualty scope: Ten killed and one injured survivor remain separate source-defined observations. The passenger released before shooting is not an eleventh death. No inferred child/military classification or allocation to an individual.

Record A4-B15-NI-CONSEQUENCES · exact wording SHA-256 50265b3dd791946ff51a93a139fa259e9a9f5a32872a51ef600ce4d48bd82472

Report a correction →
context

The coroner found that Captain Robert Nairac had no role in Kingsmill and rejected allegations of his involvement. This supports no positive action record or geographic connection to the attack.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record testimony judicial account or public measure · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 12April2024 exculpatory finding; no positive action or map connection.

Date basis and original source clocks

12April2024 exculpatory finding; no positive action or map connection

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Kingsmill inquest, [2024] NICoroner 21 ↗

Publisher: Coroner Judge Sherrard, Northern Ireland

Exact passage: paras236-237 p66

Source establishes: Paragraphs236–237physical66; exculpatory inquest finding, not a positive attribution.

Document date: 2024-04-12 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Officialcover/citation,date12April2024;physical5paras4–5;66paras236–237;76–78paras286,288–296;84–85paras315–318read. Physical85rendered/viewed for individual-proof limit and organisational finding.

Access limitations

This is the Coroners Court’s 12 April 2024 finding about events on 5 January 1976. Its finding of IRA responsibility and broad Army Council authority is distinct from proof of a named person’s instruction for this attack. Preserve the inquest’s express limit on establishing individual criminal responsibility, its caution about suspect ciphers, expert and witness uncertainty, and the absence of an account from the perpetrators. Only the selected passages listed in the review scope were independently read; no complete-document review or separate authentication of the underlying witness evidence is claimed. No cipher deanonymisation, victim list, private information or new personal map arc is approved.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

official_or_original_publisher_selected_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B05-FAMILY-NI-INQUEST

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B05-SRC-NI-KINGSMILL@0c2dd9d398ddd1a9

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 0c2dd9d398ddd1a98d205a1d000e984ab78a1191c914b2afb5f4434cbdc47d5d. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_wording_or_limit

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

This is the Coroners Court’s 12 April 2024 finding about events on 5 January 1976. Its finding of IRA responsibility and broad Army Council authority is distinct from proof of a named person’s instruction for this attack. Preserve the inquest’s express limit on establishing individual criminal responsibility, its caution about suspect ciphers, expert and witness uncertainty, and the absence of an account from the perpetrators. Only the selected passages listed in the review scope were independently read; no complete-document review or separate authentication of the underlying witness evidence is claimed. No cipher deanonymisation, victim list, private information or new personal map arc is approved.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

No positive decision/action record or geographic arc for this rejected allegation.

This is the CoronersCourt’s12April2024finding about5January1976events. Organisational IRA responsibility and broad ArmyCouncil authority are distinct from a named personal attack instruction. The express individual criminal-proof limit, suspect-cipher caution, expert uncertainty and absence of perpetrator disclosure remain. No cipher deanonymisation, victim list, private data or new personal map arc is approved.

Legal distinction

Coronial organisational finding is distinct from individual criminal proof, a specific personal attack instruction or conviction. Suspect ciphers are not deanonymised; exculpatory findings create no positive actor link.

Casualty scope: Ten killed and one injured survivor remain separate source-defined observations. The passenger released before shooting is not an eleventh death. No inferred child/military classification or allocation to an individual.

Record A4-B15-NI-NAIRAC-EXCLUDED · exact wording SHA-256 f6b234e387a3cf671a04a191fbc190ad258b34d2134ed270f86222a03da089bf

Report a correction →
context

The coroner found that Kingsmill had been planned before the Reavey and O’Dowd family murders of 4 January 1976, despite the claimed retaliation. The exact earlier planning date was not established.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record testimony judicial account or public measure · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 12April2024 finding of earlier planning; exact planning date unknown.

Date basis and original source clocks

12April2024 finding of earlier planning; exact planning date unknown

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Kingsmill inquest, [2024] NICoroner 21 ↗

Publisher: Coroner Judge Sherrard, Northern Ireland

Exact passage: conclusion318 p85

Source establishes: Conclusion318physical85; claimed motive/retaliation is not proof those murders initiated the planning.

Document date: 2024-04-12 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Officialcover/citation,date12April2024;physical5paras4–5;66paras236–237;76–78paras286,288–296;84–85paras315–318read. Physical85rendered/viewed for individual-proof limit and organisational finding.

Access limitations

This is the Coroners Court’s 12 April 2024 finding about events on 5 January 1976. Its finding of IRA responsibility and broad Army Council authority is distinct from proof of a named person’s instruction for this attack. Preserve the inquest’s express limit on establishing individual criminal responsibility, its caution about suspect ciphers, expert and witness uncertainty, and the absence of an account from the perpetrators. Only the selected passages listed in the review scope were independently read; no complete-document review or separate authentication of the underlying witness evidence is claimed. No cipher deanonymisation, victim list, private information or new personal map arc is approved.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

official_or_original_publisher_selected_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B05-FAMILY-NI-INQUEST

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B05-SRC-NI-KINGSMILL@0c2dd9d398ddd1a9

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 0c2dd9d398ddd1a98d205a1d000e984ab78a1191c914b2afb5f4434cbdc47d5d. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_wording_or_limit

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

This is the Coroners Court’s 12 April 2024 finding about events on 5 January 1976. Its finding of IRA responsibility and broad Army Council authority is distinct from proof of a named person’s instruction for this attack. Preserve the inquest’s express limit on establishing individual criminal responsibility, its caution about suspect ciphers, expert and witness uncertainty, and the absence of an account from the perpetrators. Only the selected passages listed in the review scope were independently read; no complete-document review or separate authentication of the underlying witness evidence is claimed. No cipher deanonymisation, victim list, private information or new personal map arc is approved.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Earlier planning date unknown. Claimed retaliation chronology is not proof those murders initiated the planning.

This is the CoronersCourt’s12April2024finding about5January1976events. Organisational IRA responsibility and broad ArmyCouncil authority are distinct from a named personal attack instruction. The express individual criminal-proof limit, suspect-cipher caution, expert uncertainty and absence of perpetrator disclosure remain. No cipher deanonymisation, victim list, private data or new personal map arc is approved.

Legal distinction

Coronial organisational finding is distinct from individual criminal proof, a specific personal attack instruction or conviction. Suspect ciphers are not deanonymised; exculpatory findings create no positive actor link.

Casualty scope: Ten killed and one injured survivor remain separate source-defined observations. The passenger released before shooting is not an eleventh death. No inferred child/military classification or allocation to an individual.

Record A4-B15-NI-PRIOR-PLANNING · exact wording SHA-256 fd9df8309af895a572ba3f62629718125493f155868cad914bc574f8a6895317

Report a correction →
context

The inquest says no evidence was gathered capable of establishing individual criminal responsibility for Kingsmill. Its suspect ciphers covered many kinds of association, and the perpetrators supplied no account. Intelligence or association is not a finding of individual guilt.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record testimony judicial account or public measure · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 12April2024 inquest finding; individual proof limit, not a new attack.

Date basis and original source clocks

12April2024 inquest finding; individual proof limit, not a new attack

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Kingsmill inquest, [2024] NICoroner 21 ↗

Publisher: Coroner Judge Sherrard, Northern Ireland

Exact passage: paras4-5 p5 and317 p85

Source establishes: Paragraphs4–5physical5and317physical85; no cipher deanonymisation or suspect identities approved.

Document date: 2024-04-12 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Officialcover/citation,date12April2024;physical5paras4–5;66paras236–237;76–78paras286,288–296;84–85paras315–318read. Physical85rendered/viewed for individual-proof limit and organisational finding.

Access limitations

This is the Coroners Court’s 12 April 2024 finding about events on 5 January 1976. Its finding of IRA responsibility and broad Army Council authority is distinct from proof of a named person’s instruction for this attack. Preserve the inquest’s express limit on establishing individual criminal responsibility, its caution about suspect ciphers, expert and witness uncertainty, and the absence of an account from the perpetrators. Only the selected passages listed in the review scope were independently read; no complete-document review or separate authentication of the underlying witness evidence is claimed. No cipher deanonymisation, victim list, private information or new personal map arc is approved.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

official_or_original_publisher_selected_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B05-FAMILY-NI-INQUEST

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B05-SRC-NI-KINGSMILL@0c2dd9d398ddd1a9

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 0c2dd9d398ddd1a98d205a1d000e984ab78a1191c914b2afb5f4434cbdc47d5d. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_wording_or_limit

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

This is the Coroners Court’s 12 April 2024 finding about events on 5 January 1976. Its finding of IRA responsibility and broad Army Council authority is distinct from proof of a named person’s instruction for this attack. Preserve the inquest’s express limit on establishing individual criminal responsibility, its caution about suspect ciphers, expert and witness uncertainty, and the absence of an account from the perpetrators. Only the selected passages listed in the review scope were independently read; no complete-document review or separate authentication of the underlying witness evidence is claimed. No cipher deanonymisation, victim list, private information or new personal map arc is approved.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Intelligence/suspicion/vehicle association not individual guilt. No cipher deanonymisation attempted.

This is the CoronersCourt’s12April2024finding about5January1976events. Organisational IRA responsibility and broad ArmyCouncil authority are distinct from a named personal attack instruction. The express individual criminal-proof limit, suspect-cipher caution, expert uncertainty and absence of perpetrator disclosure remain. No cipher deanonymisation, victim list, private data or new personal map arc is approved.

Legal distinction

Coronial organisational finding is distinct from individual criminal proof, a specific personal attack instruction or conviction. Suspect ciphers are not deanonymised; exculpatory findings create no positive actor link.

Casualty scope: Ten killed and one injured survivor remain separate source-defined observations. The passenger released before shooting is not an eleventh death. No inferred child/military classification or allocation to an individual.

Record A4-B15-NI-PROOF-LIMIT · exact wording SHA-256 59236a6dcec9a116247cfb128e07c941d6662b450957a3f9c33c382904e60fca

Report a correction →
context

The inquest records expert uncertainty about whether IRA leadership sanctioned Kingsmill and testimony distinguishing general policy from a specific Army Council order. These accounts qualify the evidence; they do not erase the coroner’s final organisational finding.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record testimony judicial account or public measure · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 12April2024 finding and retained expert/witness uncertainty; testimony days unknown.

Date basis and original source clocks

12April2024 finding and retained expert/witness uncertainty; testimony days unknown

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Kingsmill inquest, [2024] NICoroner 21 ↗

Publisher: Coroner Judge Sherrard, Northern Ireland

Exact passage: paras288-290 pp76-77;294-295 p78

Source establishes: Paragraphs288–290and294–295physical76–78, read with318; attributed expert/witness accounts, not named-person convictions.

Document date: 2024-04-12 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Officialcover/citation,date12April2024;physical5paras4–5;66paras236–237;76–78paras286,288–296;84–85paras315–318read. Physical85rendered/viewed for individual-proof limit and organisational finding.

Access limitations

This is the Coroners Court’s 12 April 2024 finding about events on 5 January 1976. Its finding of IRA responsibility and broad Army Council authority is distinct from proof of a named person’s instruction for this attack. Preserve the inquest’s express limit on establishing individual criminal responsibility, its caution about suspect ciphers, expert and witness uncertainty, and the absence of an account from the perpetrators. Only the selected passages listed in the review scope were independently read; no complete-document review or separate authentication of the underlying witness evidence is claimed. No cipher deanonymisation, victim list, private information or new personal map arc is approved.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

official_or_original_publisher_selected_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B05-FAMILY-NI-INQUEST

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B05-SRC-NI-KINGSMILL@0c2dd9d398ddd1a9

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 0c2dd9d398ddd1a98d205a1d000e984ab78a1191c914b2afb5f4434cbdc47d5d. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_wording_or_limit

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

This is the Coroners Court’s 12 April 2024 finding about events on 5 January 1976. Its finding of IRA responsibility and broad Army Council authority is distinct from proof of a named person’s instruction for this attack. Preserve the inquest’s express limit on establishing individual criminal responsibility, its caution about suspect ciphers, expert and witness uncertainty, and the absence of an account from the perpetrators. Only the selected passages listed in the review scope were independently read; no complete-document review or separate authentication of the underlying witness evidence is claimed. No cipher deanonymisation, victim list, private information or new personal map arc is approved.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Keep these accounts alongside the coroner’s final organisational finding, not as a named-person conviction.

This is the CoronersCourt’s12April2024finding about5January1976events. Organisational IRA responsibility and broad ArmyCouncil authority are distinct from a named personal attack instruction. The express individual criminal-proof limit, suspect-cipher caution, expert uncertainty and absence of perpetrator disclosure remain. No cipher deanonymisation, victim list, private data or new personal map arc is approved.

Legal distinction

Coronial organisational finding is distinct from individual criminal proof, a specific personal attack instruction or conviction. Suspect ciphers are not deanonymised; exculpatory findings create no positive actor link.

Casualty scope: Ten killed and one injured survivor remain separate source-defined observations. The passenger released before shooting is not an eleventh death. No inferred child/military classification or allocation to an individual.

Record A4-B15-NI-QUALIFIERS · exact wording SHA-256 8c261838cafbdb079718dc5a8a8acc5cfcfb850295d3acb13b6b57037dc5d565

Report a correction →
human consequence

Amnesty’s 1977 report relays official reports of more than forty killed at Thammasat, other reports of a higher toll, and more than 3,000 students and others arrested. It gives no numeric value for the higher alternative death toll.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record testimony judicial account or public measure · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 6October1976 historical subject · Amnesty1977 report year, issue day unknown.

Date basis and original source clocks

6October1976 historical subject · Amnesty1977 report year, issue day unknown

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Amnesty International Report1977, Thailand section ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: Thailand section, printed224/PDF114 left column

Source establishes: Printed224/physical114leftpage; sameeventoverlapwithhearingaccounts, not another death cohort.

Document date: 1977 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Physical114–115/printed224–227Thailandsectionsread;115rendered/viewed for publicexecutive-measureaccountandtwoexecutiondates. NeighbouringVietnamcontentnotadopted.

Access limitations

Preserve40versusmorethan40,approximately3000versusmorethan3000andtheunquantifiedhigheralternative. These are overlapping source accounts, not a sum. Severalhundred has no invented bounds; students are not automatically children. The143chargedcohort and approximately40under18intendedcharge-drop cases are not all arrested people, completed releases or child deaths. The April1977Article21execution accounts concern a later public executive-measure phase, not the October1976campus violence. Amnesty identifies Thanin and two cases; separate Puey testimony supports broader use of the power, not the precise original instruments. Original orders, legal-name reconciliation and subsequent judicial treatment were not acquired. The review does not determine individual criminal guilt or infer civilian/combatant status.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

official_or_original_publisher_selected_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B03-FAMILY-AI-UG

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B05-SRC-TH-AMNESTY1977@76f7030fde362aaf

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 76f7030fde362aaf18e3a4ee611f473b92e805c707c5e83b1ad2f478b1466056. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_wording_or_limit

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Preserve40versusmorethan40,approximately3000versusmorethan3000andtheunquantifiedhigheralternative. These are overlapping source accounts, not a sum. Severalhundred has no invented bounds; students are not automatically children. The143chargedcohort and approximately40under18intendedcharge-drop cases are not all arrested people, completed releases or child deaths. The April1977Article21execution accounts concern a later public executive-measure phase, not the October1976campus violence. Amnesty identifies Thanin and two cases; separate Puey testimony supports broader use of the power, not the precise original instruments. Original orders, legal-name reconciliation and subsequent judicial treatment were not acquired. The review does not determine individual criminal guilt or infer civilian/combatant status.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

No numeric value for the higher alternative toll. These accounts overlap the same event and are not summed.

Preserve40versusmorethan40,approximately3000versusmorethan3000andtheunquantifiedhigheralternative. These are overlapping source accounts, not a sum. Severalhundred has no invented bounds; students are not automatically children. The143chargedcohort and approximately40under18intendedcharge-drop cases are not all arrested people, completed releases or child deaths.

Legal distinction

Arrest instructions are not instructions to kill. Later takeover, attributed political assessments and public executive measures do not establish private killing orders, criminal convictions or individual casualty allocations.

Casualty scope: Alternative accounts overlap and are not added. More-than and approximate values differ; several hundred has no invented bounds. Students are not automatically children;143charged/about40under18 intended charge drops are not child casualties or completed releases. April1977 executions remain separate from October1976 campus deaths.

Record A4-B15-TH-AI-COUNTS · exact wording SHA-256 88f2d531fb6005b53efdcc759cc66daecbe9cae0d7d11346469aa59227c0621e

Report a correction →
context

The hearing places the military takeover later on 6 October 1976, after the campus violence. The Embassy telegram identifies Admiral Sa-ngat as NARC chairman. Chairmanship alone does not prove an order for the earlier attack.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record testimony judicial account or public measure · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 6October1976 · later takeover separate from campus violence; telegram14October distinct.

Date basis and original source clocks

6October1976 · later takeover separate from campus violence; telegram14October distinct

Sources (2) · exact passages & limitations

Human Rights in Thailand, House hearings23 and30June1977 ↗

Publisher: US House International Relations Subcommittee on International Organizations; speakers individually attributed

Exact passage: Oakley printed40-41/PDF46-47

Source establishes: Oakleyprinted40–41/physical46–47andFRUS425paragraphs1,8–9; separate political takeover and campus-event phases.

Document date: 1977-06 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Officialhearingcoverandphysical7/printed1Fraser23Juneopening;46–47/40–41Oakley30Junetestimony;56–59/50–53PueytestimonyincludingArticle21,arrests/tortureandcontraryresponsibilityaccounts. Underlyingcommittee-fileappendicesnotread.

Access limitations

U.S.diplomatic/official testimony, Puey’s testimony and Amnesty reporting have different voices and interests. Original Thai orders, full underlying witness files and Puey’s committee-file appendix were not obtained. Arrest instruction, campus violence and later takeover remain separate. Neither aid/training ties nor office proves a named killing order; political assessments are not independently established causal or legal findings. Preserve40versusmorethan40,approximately3000versusmorethan3000andtheunquantifiedhigheralternative. These are overlapping source accounts, not a sum. Severalhundred has no invented bounds; students are not automatically children. The143chargedcohort and approximately40under18intendedcharge-drop cases are not all arrested people, completed releases or child deaths. The April1977Article21execution accounts concern a later public executive-measure phase, not the October1976campus violence. Amnesty identifies Thanin and two cases; separate Puey testimony supports broader use of the power, not the precise original instruments. Original orders, legal-name reconciliation and subsequent judicial treatment were not acquired. The review does not determine individual criminal guilt or infer civilian/combatant status.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

official_or_original_publisher_selected_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B05-FAMILY-TH-CONGRESS1977

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B05-SRC-TH-HEARING1977@44021329fdb5092a

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 44021329fdb5092ac91c84c2e2acb48a9d5e9b5542b1b271722fdfbe2cd9017e. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_wording_or_limit

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

FRUS1969-76 volE12 doc425, Embassy telegram28513,14October1976 ↗

Publisher: US Embassy Bangkok

Exact passage: paras1,8-9

Source establishes: Oakleyprinted40–41/physical46–47andFRUS425paragraphs1,8–9; separate political takeover and campus-event phases.

Document date: 1976-10-14 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Officialtelegram28513dated14October1976,1117Z,paragraphs1–9readwithselectedlaterbodycontext;paragraph5arrestdecision5October,8–9appointments/chairman.

Access limitations

U.S.diplomatic/official testimony, Puey’s testimony and Amnesty reporting have different voices and interests. Original Thai orders, full underlying witness files and Puey’s committee-file appendix were not obtained. Arrest instruction, campus violence and later takeover remain separate. Neither aid/training ties nor office proves a named killing order; political assessments are not independently established causal or legal findings.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

official_or_original_publisher_selected_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B05-FAMILY-US-TH-DIPLOMACY

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B05-SRC-TH-FRUS425@b8cab741cce5dc0f

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: b8cab741cce5dc0f7575e441fe5ec7c10a63379943058fb39e2386803d2fb34c. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_wording_or_limit

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

U.S.diplomatic/official testimony, Puey’s testimony and Amnesty reporting have different voices and interests. Original Thai orders, full underlying witness files and Puey’s committee-file appendix were not obtained. Arrest instruction, campus violence and later takeover remain separate. Neither aid/training ties nor office proves a named killing order; political assessments are not independently established causal or legal findings. Preserve40versusmorethan40,approximately3000versusmorethan3000andtheunquantifiedhigheralternative. These are overlapping source accounts, not a sum. Severalhundred has no invented bounds; students are not automatically children. The143chargedcohort and approximately40under18intendedcharge-drop cases are not all arrested people, completed releases or child deaths. The April1977Article21execution accounts concern a later public executive-measure phase, not the October1976campus violence. Amnesty identifies Thanin and two cases; separate Puey testimony supports broader use of the power, not the precise original instruments. Original orders, legal-name reconciliation and subsequent judicial treatment were not acquired. The review does not determine individual criminal guilt or infer civilian/combatant status.

U.S.diplomatic/official testimony, Puey’s testimony and Amnesty reporting have different voices and interests. Original Thai orders, full underlying witness files and Puey’s committee-file appendix were not obtained. Arrest instruction, campus violence and later takeover remain separate. Neither aid/training ties nor office proves a named killing order; political assessments are not independently established causal or legal findings.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Chairmanship does not itself prove an individual order for the earlier campus attack. No complete coup-command chain established.

U.S.diplomatic/official testimony, Puey’s testimony and Amnesty reporting have different voices and interests. Original Thai orders, full underlying witness files and Puey’s committee-file appendix were not obtained. Arrest instruction, campus violence and later takeover remain separate. Neither aid/training ties nor office proves a named killing order; political assessments are not independently established causal or legal findings.

Legal distinction

Arrest instructions are not instructions to kill. Later takeover, attributed political assessments and public executive measures do not establish private killing orders, criminal convictions or individual casualty allocations.

Casualty scope: Alternative accounts overlap and are not added. More-than and approximate values differ; several hundred has no invented bounds. Students are not automatically children;143charged/about40under18 intended charge drops are not child casualties or completed releases. April1977 executions remain separate from October1976 campus deaths.

Record A4-B15-TH-COUP-CHRONOLOGY · exact wording SHA-256 1b3c8ad2c5869bd0bb767d62b09c6facc1e99f52a8f7bbec387077783d1d787e

Report a correction →
human consequence

Amnesty records Thavorn Udomnueduj executed on 15 April and General Chalard Hiranyasiri on 21 April 1977. These two reported cases are separate from the October 1976 campus casualties; the reviewed source supplies no civilian or combatant classification.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record testimony judicial account or public measure · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 15and21April1977 · two discrete reported execution days, not a continuous interval or campus toll.

Date basis and original source clocks

15and21April1977 · two discrete reported execution days, not a continuous interval or campus toll

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Amnesty International Report1977, Thailand section ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: printed226-227/PDF115, Thailand final paragraph

Source establishes: Printed226–227/physical115visuallyread; source spellings retained, original orders/court treatment not acquired.

Document date: 1977 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Physical114–115/printed224–227Thailandsectionsread;115rendered/viewed for publicexecutive-measureaccountandtwoexecutiondates. NeighbouringVietnamcontentnotadopted.

Access limitations

Preserve40versusmorethan40,approximately3000versusmorethan3000andtheunquantifiedhigheralternative. These are overlapping source accounts, not a sum. Severalhundred has no invented bounds; students are not automatically children. The143chargedcohort and approximately40under18intendedcharge-drop cases are not all arrested people, completed releases or child deaths. The April1977Article21execution accounts concern a later public executive-measure phase, not the October1976campus violence. Amnesty identifies Thanin and two cases; separate Puey testimony supports broader use of the power, not the precise original instruments. Original orders, legal-name reconciliation and subsequent judicial treatment were not acquired. The review does not determine individual criminal guilt or infer civilian/combatant status.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

official_or_original_publisher_selected_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B03-FAMILY-AI-UG

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B05-SRC-TH-AMNESTY1977@76f7030fde362aaf

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 76f7030fde362aaf18e3a4ee611f473b92e805c707c5e83b1ad2f478b1466056. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_wording_or_limit

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Preserve40versusmorethan40,approximately3000versusmorethan3000andtheunquantifiedhigheralternative. These are overlapping source accounts, not a sum. Severalhundred has no invented bounds; students are not automatically children. The143chargedcohort and approximately40under18intendedcharge-drop cases are not all arrested people, completed releases or child deaths. The April1977Article21execution accounts concern a later public executive-measure phase, not the October1976campus violence. Amnesty identifies Thanin and two cases; separate Puey testimony supports broader use of the power, not the precise original instruments. Original orders, legal-name reconciliation and subsequent judicial treatment were not acquired. The review does not determine individual criminal guilt or infer civilian/combatant status.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Source spellings retained; legal names and original orders need checking. One narcotics agent and one general are not automatically a civilian/combatant allocation.

The April1977Article21execution accounts concern a later public executive-measure phase, not the October1976campus violence. Amnesty identifies Thanin and two cases; separate Puey testimony supports broader use of the power, not the precise original instruments. Original orders, legal-name reconciliation and subsequent judicial treatment were not acquired. The review does not determine individual criminal guilt or infer civilian/combatant status.

Legal distinction

Arrest instructions are not instructions to kill. Later takeover, attributed political assessments and public executive measures do not establish private killing orders, criminal convictions or individual casualty allocations.

Casualty scope: Alternative accounts overlap and are not added. More-than and approximate values differ; several hundred has no invented bounds. Students are not automatically children;143charged/about40under18 intended charge drops are not child casualties or completed releases. April1977 executions remain separate from October1976 campus deaths.

Record A4-B15-TH-EXECUTIONS · exact wording SHA-256 372b1d79d2bd2dcf7bc4cbd6dd88b5209e9e5a57f3999050efcb1e18832f87c6

Report a correction →
human consequence

Opening the hearing on 23 June 1977, Donald Fraser relayed reports of more than forty dead, several hundred wounded and about 3,000 arrested. His opening statement is not a congressional investigative casualty finding.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record testimony judicial account or public measure · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 6October1976 historical subject · Fraser opening23June1977; not a congressional casualty finding.

Date basis and original source clocks

6October1976 historical subject · Fraser opening23June1977; not a congressional casualty finding

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Human Rights in Thailand, House hearings23 and30June1977 ↗

Publisher: US House International Relations Subcommittee on International Organizations; speakers individually attributed

Exact passage: Fraser opening23June1977, printed1/PDF7

Source establishes: Printed1/physical7; no invented numeric bounds for severalhundred.

Document date: 1977-06 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Officialhearingcoverandphysical7/printed1Fraser23Juneopening;46–47/40–41Oakley30Junetestimony;56–59/50–53PueytestimonyincludingArticle21,arrests/tortureandcontraryresponsibilityaccounts. Underlyingcommittee-fileappendicesnotread.

Access limitations

U.S.diplomatic/official testimony, Puey’s testimony and Amnesty reporting have different voices and interests. Original Thai orders, full underlying witness files and Puey’s committee-file appendix were not obtained. Arrest instruction, campus violence and later takeover remain separate. Neither aid/training ties nor office proves a named killing order; political assessments are not independently established causal or legal findings. Preserve40versusmorethan40,approximately3000versusmorethan3000andtheunquantifiedhigheralternative. These are overlapping source accounts, not a sum. Severalhundred has no invented bounds; students are not automatically children. The143chargedcohort and approximately40under18intendedcharge-drop cases are not all arrested people, completed releases or child deaths. The April1977Article21execution accounts concern a later public executive-measure phase, not the October1976campus violence. Amnesty identifies Thanin and two cases; separate Puey testimony supports broader use of the power, not the precise original instruments. Original orders, legal-name reconciliation and subsequent judicial treatment were not acquired. The review does not determine individual criminal guilt or infer civilian/combatant status.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

official_or_original_publisher_selected_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B05-FAMILY-TH-CONGRESS1977

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B05-SRC-TH-HEARING1977@44021329fdb5092a

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 44021329fdb5092ac91c84c2e2acb48a9d5e9b5542b1b271722fdfbe2cd9017e. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_wording_or_limit

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

U.S.diplomatic/official testimony, Puey’s testimony and Amnesty reporting have different voices and interests. Original Thai orders, full underlying witness files and Puey’s committee-file appendix were not obtained. Arrest instruction, campus violence and later takeover remain separate. Neither aid/training ties nor office proves a named killing order; political assessments are not independently established causal or legal findings. Preserve40versusmorethan40,approximately3000versusmorethan3000andtheunquantifiedhigheralternative. These are overlapping source accounts, not a sum. Severalhundred has no invented bounds; students are not automatically children. The143chargedcohort and approximately40under18intendedcharge-drop cases are not all arrested people, completed releases or child deaths. The April1977Article21execution accounts concern a later public executive-measure phase, not the October1976campus violence. Amnesty identifies Thanin and two cases; separate Puey testimony supports broader use of the power, not the precise original instruments. Original orders, legal-name reconciliation and subsequent judicial treatment were not acquired. The review does not determine individual criminal guilt or infer civilian/combatant status.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Several hundred has no fabricated numeric bounds. Speech in a hearing is not a congressional investigative casualty finding.

Preserve40versusmorethan40,approximately3000versusmorethan3000andtheunquantifiedhigheralternative. These are overlapping source accounts, not a sum. Severalhundred has no invented bounds; students are not automatically children. The143chargedcohort and approximately40under18intendedcharge-drop cases are not all arrested people, completed releases or child deaths.

Legal distinction

Arrest instructions are not instructions to kill. Later takeover, attributed political assessments and public executive measures do not establish private killing orders, criminal convictions or individual casualty allocations.

Casualty scope: Alternative accounts overlap and are not added. More-than and approximate values differ; several hundred has no invented bounds. Students are not automatically children;143charged/about40under18 intended charge drops are not child casualties or completed releases. April1977 executions remain separate from October1976 campus deaths.

Record A4-B15-TH-FRASER-COUNTS · exact wording SHA-256 fa2e58ed91574cf5378addc10d82d059b36c20888d5f426d1737bc46b8335185

Report a correction →
human consequence

In his June 1977 testimony, Oakley reported forty dead and approximately 3,000 arrested in the Thammasat violence. These are his reported figures, not an independently enumerated victim count.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record testimony judicial account or public measure · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 6October1976 historical subject · Oakley testimony30June1977; not an independent victim register.

Date basis and original source clocks

6October1976 historical subject · Oakley testimony30June1977; not an independent victim register

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Human Rights in Thailand, House hearings23 and30June1977 ↗

Publisher: US House International Relations Subcommittee on International Organizations; speakers individually attributed

Exact passage: Oakley testimony, printed40/PDF46

Source establishes: Printed40/physical46; students not automatically children; preserve40versusothergreaterthan40accounts.

Document date: 1977-06 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Officialhearingcoverandphysical7/printed1Fraser23Juneopening;46–47/40–41Oakley30Junetestimony;56–59/50–53PueytestimonyincludingArticle21,arrests/tortureandcontraryresponsibilityaccounts. Underlyingcommittee-fileappendicesnotread.

Access limitations

U.S.diplomatic/official testimony, Puey’s testimony and Amnesty reporting have different voices and interests. Original Thai orders, full underlying witness files and Puey’s committee-file appendix were not obtained. Arrest instruction, campus violence and later takeover remain separate. Neither aid/training ties nor office proves a named killing order; political assessments are not independently established causal or legal findings. Preserve40versusmorethan40,approximately3000versusmorethan3000andtheunquantifiedhigheralternative. These are overlapping source accounts, not a sum. Severalhundred has no invented bounds; students are not automatically children. The143chargedcohort and approximately40under18intendedcharge-drop cases are not all arrested people, completed releases or child deaths. The April1977Article21execution accounts concern a later public executive-measure phase, not the October1976campus violence. Amnesty identifies Thanin and two cases; separate Puey testimony supports broader use of the power, not the precise original instruments. Original orders, legal-name reconciliation and subsequent judicial treatment were not acquired. The review does not determine individual criminal guilt or infer civilian/combatant status.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

official_or_original_publisher_selected_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B05-FAMILY-TH-CONGRESS1977

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B05-SRC-TH-HEARING1977@44021329fdb5092a

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 44021329fdb5092ac91c84c2e2acb48a9d5e9b5542b1b271722fdfbe2cd9017e. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_wording_or_limit

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

U.S.diplomatic/official testimony, Puey’s testimony and Amnesty reporting have different voices and interests. Original Thai orders, full underlying witness files and Puey’s committee-file appendix were not obtained. Arrest instruction, campus violence and later takeover remain separate. Neither aid/training ties nor office proves a named killing order; political assessments are not independently established causal or legal findings. Preserve40versusmorethan40,approximately3000versusmorethan3000andtheunquantifiedhigheralternative. These are overlapping source accounts, not a sum. Severalhundred has no invented bounds; students are not automatically children. The143chargedcohort and approximately40under18intendedcharge-drop cases are not all arrested people, completed releases or child deaths. The April1977Article21execution accounts concern a later public executive-measure phase, not the October1976campus violence. Amnesty identifies Thanin and two cases; separate Puey testimony supports broader use of the power, not the precise original instruments. Original orders, legal-name reconciliation and subsequent judicial treatment were not acquired. The review does not determine individual criminal guilt or infer civilian/combatant status.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Not an independent victim count. Preserve differences from Fraser/Amnesty inequalities; students are not automatically children.

Preserve40versusmorethan40,approximately3000versusmorethan3000andtheunquantifiedhigheralternative. These are overlapping source accounts, not a sum. Severalhundred has no invented bounds; students are not automatically children. The143chargedcohort and approximately40under18intendedcharge-drop cases are not all arrested people, completed releases or child deaths.

Legal distinction

Arrest instructions are not instructions to kill. Later takeover, attributed political assessments and public executive measures do not establish private killing orders, criminal convictions or individual casualty allocations.

Casualty scope: Alternative accounts overlap and are not added. More-than and approximate values differ; several hundred has no invented bounds. Students are not automatically children;143charged/about40under18 intended charge drops are not child casualties or completed releases. April1977 executions remain separate from October1976 campus deaths.

Record A4-B15-TH-OAKLEY-COUNTS · exact wording SHA-256 b7c1c259722c2ed796ebc769fe5f79a095c1048c097173f63ccd15543ebd01bf

Report a correction →
human consequence

Puey Ungphakorn told the June 1977 hearing that more than 3,000 people were arrested at Thammasat after the killings and described torture and assault during detention. The reviewed testimony gives no quantified torture total.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record testimony judicial account or public measure · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 6October1976 historical subject · Puey testimony30June1977; torture total unknown.

Date basis and original source clocks

6October1976 historical subject · Puey testimony30June1977; torture total unknown

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Human Rights in Thailand, House hearings23 and30June1977 ↗

Publisher: US House International Relations Subcommittee on International Organizations; speakers individually attributed

Exact passage: Puey testimony30June1977, printed50-51/PDF56-57

Source establishes: Printed50–51/physical56–57; detailedappendixIIretainedinsubcommitteefiles,notacquired.

Document date: 1977-06 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Officialhearingcoverandphysical7/printed1Fraser23Juneopening;46–47/40–41Oakley30Junetestimony;56–59/50–53PueytestimonyincludingArticle21,arrests/tortureandcontraryresponsibilityaccounts. Underlyingcommittee-fileappendicesnotread.

Access limitations

U.S.diplomatic/official testimony, Puey’s testimony and Amnesty reporting have different voices and interests. Original Thai orders, full underlying witness files and Puey’s committee-file appendix were not obtained. Arrest instruction, campus violence and later takeover remain separate. Neither aid/training ties nor office proves a named killing order; political assessments are not independently established causal or legal findings. Preserve40versusmorethan40,approximately3000versusmorethan3000andtheunquantifiedhigheralternative. These are overlapping source accounts, not a sum. Severalhundred has no invented bounds; students are not automatically children. The143chargedcohort and approximately40under18intendedcharge-drop cases are not all arrested people, completed releases or child deaths. The April1977Article21execution accounts concern a later public executive-measure phase, not the October1976campus violence. Amnesty identifies Thanin and two cases; separate Puey testimony supports broader use of the power, not the precise original instruments. Original orders, legal-name reconciliation and subsequent judicial treatment were not acquired. The review does not determine individual criminal guilt or infer civilian/combatant status.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

official_or_original_publisher_selected_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B05-FAMILY-TH-CONGRESS1977

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B05-SRC-TH-HEARING1977@44021329fdb5092a

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 44021329fdb5092ac91c84c2e2acb48a9d5e9b5542b1b271722fdfbe2cd9017e. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_wording_or_limit

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

U.S.diplomatic/official testimony, Puey’s testimony and Amnesty reporting have different voices and interests. Original Thai orders, full underlying witness files and Puey’s committee-file appendix were not obtained. Arrest instruction, campus violence and later takeover remain separate. Neither aid/training ties nor office proves a named killing order; political assessments are not independently established causal or legal findings. Preserve40versusmorethan40,approximately3000versusmorethan3000andtheunquantifiedhigheralternative. These are overlapping source accounts, not a sum. Severalhundred has no invented bounds; students are not automatically children. The143chargedcohort and approximately40under18intendedcharge-drop cases are not all arrested people, completed releases or child deaths. The April1977Article21execution accounts concern a later public executive-measure phase, not the October1976campus violence. Amnesty identifies Thanin and two cases; separate Puey testimony supports broader use of the power, not the precise original instruments. Original orders, legal-name reconciliation and subsequent judicial treatment were not acquired. The review does not determine individual criminal guilt or infer civilian/combatant status.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Detailed October appendixII is retained in committee files, not reviewed here. No quantified torture total in these passages.

U.S.diplomatic/official testimony, Puey’s testimony and Amnesty reporting have different voices and interests. Original Thai orders, full underlying witness files and Puey’s committee-file appendix were not obtained. Arrest instruction, campus violence and later takeover remain separate. Neither aid/training ties nor office proves a named killing order; political assessments are not independently established causal or legal findings.

Legal distinction

Arrest instructions are not instructions to kill. Later takeover, attributed political assessments and public executive measures do not establish private killing orders, criminal convictions or individual casualty allocations.

Casualty scope: Alternative accounts overlap and are not added. More-than and approximate values differ; several hundred has no invented bounds. Students are not automatically children;143charged/about40under18 intended charge drops are not child casualties or completed releases. April1977 executions remain separate from October1976 campus deaths.

Record A4-B15-TH-PUEY-ARRESTS · exact wording SHA-256 62ded97af3b20d0d6b1ef97a1b67c1072d45559574adf1d8aa44d0fe771a445c

Report a correction →
context

Oakley described the later military coup as bloodless and separate from the campus violence. Puey described armed rightist groups and said he saw no evidence of an immediate American mastermind, while criticising longer U.S. ties. These are attributed assessments.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record testimony judicial account or public measure · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 30June1977 · attributed political assessments, not independently established causation.

Date basis and original source clocks

30June1977 · attributed political assessments, not independently established causation

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Human Rights in Thailand, House hearings23 and30June1977 ↗

Publisher: US House International Relations Subcommittee on International Organizations; speakers individually attributed

Exact passage: Oakley printed41/PDF47; Puey printed52-53/PDF58-59

Source establishes: Oakleyprinted41andPuey52–53/physical47,58–59; disagreements do not establish named U.S. orders or independent exoneration of every actor.

Document date: 1977-06 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Officialhearingcoverandphysical7/printed1Fraser23Juneopening;46–47/40–41Oakley30Junetestimony;56–59/50–53PueytestimonyincludingArticle21,arrests/tortureandcontraryresponsibilityaccounts. Underlyingcommittee-fileappendicesnotread.

Access limitations

U.S.diplomatic/official testimony, Puey’s testimony and Amnesty reporting have different voices and interests. Original Thai orders, full underlying witness files and Puey’s committee-file appendix were not obtained. Arrest instruction, campus violence and later takeover remain separate. Neither aid/training ties nor office proves a named killing order; political assessments are not independently established causal or legal findings. Preserve40versusmorethan40,approximately3000versusmorethan3000andtheunquantifiedhigheralternative. These are overlapping source accounts, not a sum. Severalhundred has no invented bounds; students are not automatically children. The143chargedcohort and approximately40under18intendedcharge-drop cases are not all arrested people, completed releases or child deaths. The April1977Article21execution accounts concern a later public executive-measure phase, not the October1976campus violence. Amnesty identifies Thanin and two cases; separate Puey testimony supports broader use of the power, not the precise original instruments. Original orders, legal-name reconciliation and subsequent judicial treatment were not acquired. The review does not determine individual criminal guilt or infer civilian/combatant status.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

official_or_original_publisher_selected_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B05-FAMILY-TH-CONGRESS1977

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B05-SRC-TH-HEARING1977@44021329fdb5092a

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 44021329fdb5092ac91c84c2e2acb48a9d5e9b5542b1b271722fdfbe2cd9017e. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_wording_or_limit

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

U.S.diplomatic/official testimony, Puey’s testimony and Amnesty reporting have different voices and interests. Original Thai orders, full underlying witness files and Puey’s committee-file appendix were not obtained. Arrest instruction, campus violence and later takeover remain separate. Neither aid/training ties nor office proves a named killing order; political assessments are not independently established causal or legal findings. Preserve40versusmorethan40,approximately3000versusmorethan3000andtheunquantifiedhigheralternative. These are overlapping source accounts, not a sum. Severalhundred has no invented bounds; students are not automatically children. The143chargedcohort and approximately40under18intendedcharge-drop cases are not all arrested people, completed releases or child deaths. The April1977Article21execution accounts concern a later public executive-measure phase, not the October1976campus violence. Amnesty identifies Thanin and two cases; separate Puey testimony supports broader use of the power, not the precise original instruments. Original orders, legal-name reconciliation and subsequent judicial treatment were not acquired. The review does not determine individual criminal guilt or infer civilian/combatant status.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Political assessments remain attributed. Shared training, aid, office or institutional ties do not prove individual orders. No US decision-maker linked to the campus killings by these passages.

U.S.diplomatic/official testimony, Puey’s testimony and Amnesty reporting have different voices and interests. Original Thai orders, full underlying witness files and Puey’s committee-file appendix were not obtained. Arrest instruction, campus violence and later takeover remain separate. Neither aid/training ties nor office proves a named killing order; political assessments are not independently established causal or legal findings.

Legal distinction

Arrest instructions are not instructions to kill. Later takeover, attributed political assessments and public executive measures do not establish private killing orders, criminal convictions or individual casualty allocations.

Casualty scope: Alternative accounts overlap and are not added. More-than and approximate values differ; several hundred has no invented bounds. Students are not automatically children;143charged/about40under18 intended charge drops are not child casualties or completed releases. April1977 executions remain separate from October1976 campus deaths.

Record A4-B15-TH-RESPONSIBILITY-ACCOUNTS · exact wording SHA-256 4e252c849bc5538f9dffe7426f02c519ef71d61771a1076da43b86649f45fff9

Report a correction →
decision

A U.S. Embassy telegram attributes Seni Pramot’s decision to send police to arrest students at Thammasat to 5 October 1976. In June 1977, Robert Oakley said police acted on Seni’s order on 6 October. Neither passage establishes an instruction to kill.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record testimony judicial account or public measure · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 5October1976 · reported arrest decision; implementation6October, telegram14October and testimony30June1977 separate.

Date basis and original source clocks

5October1976 · reported arrest decision; implementation6October, telegram14October and testimony30June1977 separate

Sources (2) · exact passages & limitations

FRUS1969-76 volE12 doc425, Embassy telegram28513,14October1976 ↗

Publisher: US Embassy Bangkok

Exact passage: para5, telegram14October1976

Source establishes: FRUS425paragraph5andOakleyprinted40/physical46; decision and implementation dates kept distinct, two U.S. official accounts not independent Thai order originals.

Document date: 1976-10-14 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Officialtelegram28513dated14October1976,1117Z,paragraphs1–9readwithselectedlaterbodycontext;paragraph5arrestdecision5October,8–9appointments/chairman.

Access limitations

U.S.diplomatic/official testimony, Puey’s testimony and Amnesty reporting have different voices and interests. Original Thai orders, full underlying witness files and Puey’s committee-file appendix were not obtained. Arrest instruction, campus violence and later takeover remain separate. Neither aid/training ties nor office proves a named killing order; political assessments are not independently established causal or legal findings.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

official_or_original_publisher_selected_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B05-FAMILY-US-TH-DIPLOMACY

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B05-SRC-TH-FRUS425@b8cab741cce5dc0f

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: b8cab741cce5dc0f7575e441fe5ec7c10a63379943058fb39e2386803d2fb34c. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_wording_or_limit

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Human Rights in Thailand, House hearings23 and30June1977 ↗

Publisher: US House International Relations Subcommittee on International Organizations; speakers individually attributed

Exact passage: Oakley testimony30June1977, printed40/PDF46

Source establishes: FRUS425paragraph5andOakleyprinted40/physical46; decision and implementation dates kept distinct, two U.S. official accounts not independent Thai order originals.

Document date: 1977-06 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Officialhearingcoverandphysical7/printed1Fraser23Juneopening;46–47/40–41Oakley30Junetestimony;56–59/50–53PueytestimonyincludingArticle21,arrests/tortureandcontraryresponsibilityaccounts. Underlyingcommittee-fileappendicesnotread.

Access limitations

U.S.diplomatic/official testimony, Puey’s testimony and Amnesty reporting have different voices and interests. Original Thai orders, full underlying witness files and Puey’s committee-file appendix were not obtained. Arrest instruction, campus violence and later takeover remain separate. Neither aid/training ties nor office proves a named killing order; political assessments are not independently established causal or legal findings. Preserve40versusmorethan40,approximately3000versusmorethan3000andtheunquantifiedhigheralternative. These are overlapping source accounts, not a sum. Severalhundred has no invented bounds; students are not automatically children. The143chargedcohort and approximately40under18intendedcharge-drop cases are not all arrested people, completed releases or child deaths. The April1977Article21execution accounts concern a later public executive-measure phase, not the October1976campus violence. Amnesty identifies Thanin and two cases; separate Puey testimony supports broader use of the power, not the precise original instruments. Original orders, legal-name reconciliation and subsequent judicial treatment were not acquired. The review does not determine individual criminal guilt or infer civilian/combatant status.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

official_or_original_publisher_selected_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B05-FAMILY-TH-CONGRESS1977

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B05-SRC-TH-HEARING1977@44021329fdb5092a

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 44021329fdb5092ac91c84c2e2acb48a9d5e9b5542b1b271722fdfbe2cd9017e. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_wording_or_limit

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

U.S.diplomatic/official testimony, Puey’s testimony and Amnesty reporting have different voices and interests. Original Thai orders, full underlying witness files and Puey’s committee-file appendix were not obtained. Arrest instruction, campus violence and later takeover remain separate. Neither aid/training ties nor office proves a named killing order; political assessments are not independently established causal or legal findings.

U.S.diplomatic/official testimony, Puey’s testimony and Amnesty reporting have different voices and interests. Original Thai orders, full underlying witness files and Puey’s committee-file appendix were not obtained. Arrest instruction, campus violence and later takeover remain separate. Neither aid/training ties nor office proves a named killing order; political assessments are not independently established causal or legal findings. Preserve40versusmorethan40,approximately3000versusmorethan3000andtheunquantifiedhigheralternative. These are overlapping source accounts, not a sum. Severalhundred has no invented bounds; students are not automatically children. The143chargedcohort and approximately40under18intendedcharge-drop cases are not all arrested people, completed releases or child deaths. The April1977Article21execution accounts concern a later public executive-measure phase, not the October1976campus violence. Amnesty identifies Thanin and two cases; separate Puey testimony supports broader use of the power, not the precise original instruments. Original orders, legal-name reconciliation and subsequent judicial treatment were not acquired. The review does not determine individual criminal guilt or infer civilian/combatant status.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

No original Thai order obtained. Arrest instruction does not establish an instruction to kill or authorise every police/paramilitary act. Decision and implementation dates are distinct.

U.S.diplomatic/official testimony, Puey’s testimony and Amnesty reporting have different voices and interests. Original Thai orders, full underlying witness files and Puey’s committee-file appendix were not obtained. Arrest instruction, campus violence and later takeover remain separate. Neither aid/training ties nor office proves a named killing order; political assessments are not independently established causal or legal findings.

Legal distinction

Arrest instructions are not instructions to kill. Later takeover, attributed political assessments and public executive measures do not establish private killing orders, criminal convictions or individual casualty allocations.

Casualty scope: Alternative accounts overlap and are not added. More-than and approximate values differ; several hundred has no invented bounds. Students are not automatically children;143charged/about40under18 intended charge drops are not child casualties or completed releases. April1977 executions remain separate from October1976 campus deaths.

Record A4-B15-TH-SENI · exact wording SHA-256 2edd2f5a098226c491bb67d57b3a32e2d5c118e290163a29f075cb390c3a456c

Report a correction →
decision

Amnesty’s 1977 report says Prime Minister Thanin Kraivichien used special powers to order the execution of two untried men in April 1977. Puey’s separate testimony describes the use of Article 21 for executions that April; the two original orders were not reviewed.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record testimony judicial account or public measure · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: April1977 · attributed public executive measure, exact order days unknown.

Date basis and original source clocks

April1977 · attributed public executive measure, exact order days unknown

Sources (2) · exact passages & limitations

Amnesty International Report1977, Thailand section ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: printed226 final paragraph and227 opening/PDF115

Source establishes: Printed226–227/physical115; independent hearingprinted51/physical57supportsbroaderpublicexecutivemechanism,notauthenticatespecifictwoinstruments. This is an attributed public executive measure, not a finding of a private murder order or individual criminal guilt.

Document date: 1977 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Physical114–115/printed224–227Thailandsectionsread;115rendered/viewed for publicexecutive-measureaccountandtwoexecutiondates. NeighbouringVietnamcontentnotadopted.

Access limitations

Preserve40versusmorethan40,approximately3000versusmorethan3000andtheunquantifiedhigheralternative. These are overlapping source accounts, not a sum. Severalhundred has no invented bounds; students are not automatically children. The143chargedcohort and approximately40under18intendedcharge-drop cases are not all arrested people, completed releases or child deaths. The April1977Article21execution accounts concern a later public executive-measure phase, not the October1976campus violence. Amnesty identifies Thanin and two cases; separate Puey testimony supports broader use of the power, not the precise original instruments. Original orders, legal-name reconciliation and subsequent judicial treatment were not acquired. The review does not determine individual criminal guilt or infer civilian/combatant status.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

official_or_original_publisher_selected_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B03-FAMILY-AI-UG

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B05-SRC-TH-AMNESTY1977@76f7030fde362aaf

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 76f7030fde362aaf18e3a4ee611f473b92e805c707c5e83b1ad2f478b1466056. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_wording_or_limit

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Human Rights in Thailand, House hearings23 and30June1977 ↗

Publisher: US House International Relations Subcommittee on International Organizations; speakers individually attributed

Exact passage: Pueytestimony30June1977,printed51/physical57,Article21paragraph

Source establishes: Printed226–227/physical115; independent hearingprinted51/physical57supportsbroaderpublicexecutivemechanism,notauthenticatespecifictwoinstruments. This is an attributed public executive measure, not a finding of a private murder order or individual criminal guilt.

Document date: 1977-06 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Officialhearingcoverandphysical7/printed1Fraser23Juneopening;46–47/40–41Oakley30Junetestimony;56–59/50–53PueytestimonyincludingArticle21,arrests/tortureandcontraryresponsibilityaccounts. Underlyingcommittee-fileappendicesnotread.

Access limitations

U.S.diplomatic/official testimony, Puey’s testimony and Amnesty reporting have different voices and interests. Original Thai orders, full underlying witness files and Puey’s committee-file appendix were not obtained. Arrest instruction, campus violence and later takeover remain separate. Neither aid/training ties nor office proves a named killing order; political assessments are not independently established causal or legal findings. Preserve40versusmorethan40,approximately3000versusmorethan3000andtheunquantifiedhigheralternative. These are overlapping source accounts, not a sum. Severalhundred has no invented bounds; students are not automatically children. The143chargedcohort and approximately40under18intendedcharge-drop cases are not all arrested people, completed releases or child deaths. The April1977Article21execution accounts concern a later public executive-measure phase, not the October1976campus violence. Amnesty identifies Thanin and two cases; separate Puey testimony supports broader use of the power, not the precise original instruments. Original orders, legal-name reconciliation and subsequent judicial treatment were not acquired. The review does not determine individual criminal guilt or infer civilian/combatant status.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

official_or_original_publisher_selected_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B05-FAMILY-TH-CONGRESS1977

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B05-SRC-TH-HEARING1977@44021329fdb5092a

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 44021329fdb5092ac91c84c2e2acb48a9d5e9b5542b1b271722fdfbe2cd9017e. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: independent_broader_executive_mechanism_context

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Preserve40versusmorethan40,approximately3000versusmorethan3000andtheunquantifiedhigheralternative. These are overlapping source accounts, not a sum. Severalhundred has no invented bounds; students are not automatically children. The143chargedcohort and approximately40under18intendedcharge-drop cases are not all arrested people, completed releases or child deaths. The April1977Article21execution accounts concern a later public executive-measure phase, not the October1976campus violence. Amnesty identifies Thanin and two cases; separate Puey testimony supports broader use of the power, not the precise original instruments. Original orders, legal-name reconciliation and subsequent judicial treatment were not acquired. The review does not determine individual criminal guilt or infer civilian/combatant status.

U.S.diplomatic/official testimony, Puey’s testimony and Amnesty reporting have different voices and interests. Original Thai orders, full underlying witness files and Puey’s committee-file appendix were not obtained. Arrest instruction, campus violence and later takeover remain separate. Neither aid/training ties nor office proves a named killing order; political assessments are not independently established causal or legal findings. Preserve40versusmorethan40,approximately3000versusmorethan3000andtheunquantifiedhigheralternative. These are overlapping source accounts, not a sum. Severalhundred has no invented bounds; students are not automatically children. The143chargedcohort and approximately40under18intendedcharge-drop cases are not all arrested people, completed releases or child deaths. The April1977Article21execution accounts concern a later public executive-measure phase, not the October1976campus violence. Amnesty identifies Thanin and two cases; separate Puey testimony supports broader use of the power, not the precise original instruments. Original orders, legal-name reconciliation and subsequent judicial treatment were not acquired. The review does not determine individual criminal guilt or infer civilian/combatant status.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Original Article21 orders and subsequent court treatment not obtained. Two named cases, not all Thai executions or civilians killed in the campus violence.

The April1977Article21execution accounts concern a later public executive-measure phase, not the October1976campus violence. Amnesty identifies Thanin and two cases; separate Puey testimony supports broader use of the power, not the precise original instruments. Original orders, legal-name reconciliation and subsequent judicial treatment were not acquired. The review does not determine individual criminal guilt or infer civilian/combatant status.

Legal distinction

Arrest instructions are not instructions to kill. Later takeover, attributed political assessments and public executive measures do not establish private killing orders, criminal convictions or individual casualty allocations.

Casualty scope: Alternative accounts overlap and are not added. More-than and approximate values differ; several hundred has no invented bounds. Students are not automatically children;143charged/about40under18 intended charge drops are not child casualties or completed releases. April1977 executions remain separate from October1976 campus deaths.

Record A4-B15-TH-THANIN · exact wording SHA-256 5a0378e4b1f90ee2f23caef1d6da14136a442ef04be02f50c7350d44e1389f1a

Report a correction →
human consequence

Amnesty reports that in March 1977 charges were to be dropped against about forty of a cohort of 143 students because they were under eighteen. This describes an intended procedural step, not verified completed release or a child casualty count.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record testimony judicial account or public measure · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: March1977 · intended charge-drop procedure, exact day and completed release unknown.

Date basis and original source clocks

March1977 · intended charge-drop procedure, exact day and completed release unknown

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Amnesty International Report1977, Thailand section ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: printed225/PDF114 right column, paragraphs beginning By early1977 and Later inMarch

Source establishes: Printed225/physical114rightpage;143chargedcohortdistinctfromall3000plusarrested; later prosecution/police dispute retained.

Document date: 1977 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Physical114–115/printed224–227Thailandsectionsread;115rendered/viewed for publicexecutive-measureaccountandtwoexecutiondates. NeighbouringVietnamcontentnotadopted.

Access limitations

Preserve40versusmorethan40,approximately3000versusmorethan3000andtheunquantifiedhigheralternative. These are overlapping source accounts, not a sum. Severalhundred has no invented bounds; students are not automatically children. The143chargedcohort and approximately40under18intendedcharge-drop cases are not all arrested people, completed releases or child deaths. The April1977Article21execution accounts concern a later public executive-measure phase, not the October1976campus violence. Amnesty identifies Thanin and two cases; separate Puey testimony supports broader use of the power, not the precise original instruments. Original orders, legal-name reconciliation and subsequent judicial treatment were not acquired. The review does not determine individual criminal guilt or infer civilian/combatant status.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

official_or_original_publisher_selected_passages_independently_read · HR-ARCHIVE-B03-FAMILY-AI-UG

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B05-SRC-TH-AMNESTY1977@76f7030fde362aaf

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 76f7030fde362aaf18e3a4ee611f473b92e805c707c5e83b1ad2f478b1466056. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_wording_or_limit

Citation and link metadata only. Publisher rights retained; no source document, image or cached payload is redistributed and no underlying reuse licence is asserted.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Preserve40versusmorethan40,approximately3000versusmorethan3000andtheunquantifiedhigheralternative. These are overlapping source accounts, not a sum. Severalhundred has no invented bounds; students are not automatically children. The143chargedcohort and approximately40under18intendedcharge-drop cases are not all arrested people, completed releases or child deaths. The April1977Article21execution accounts concern a later public executive-measure phase, not the October1976campus violence. Amnesty identifies Thanin and two cases; separate Puey testimony supports broader use of the power, not the precise original instruments. Original orders, legal-name reconciliation and subsequent judicial treatment were not acquired. The review does not determine individual criminal guilt or infer civilian/combatant status.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Reported intended procedural action in March1977, not verified completed release or a child injury/death count.143 is a charged cohort, not all arrested.

Preserve40versusmorethan40,approximately3000versusmorethan3000andtheunquantifiedhigheralternative. These are overlapping source accounts, not a sum. Severalhundred has no invented bounds; students are not automatically children. The143chargedcohort and approximately40under18intendedcharge-drop cases are not all arrested people, completed releases or child deaths.

Legal distinction

Arrest instructions are not instructions to kill. Later takeover, attributed political assessments and public executive measures do not establish private killing orders, criminal convictions or individual casualty allocations.

Casualty scope: Alternative accounts overlap and are not added. More-than and approximate values differ; several hundred has no invented bounds. Students are not automatically children;143charged/about40under18 intended charge drops are not child casualties or completed releases. April1977 executions remain separate from October1976 campus deaths.

Record A4-B15-TH-UNDER18-CASES · exact wording SHA-256 4dc82425d8ceb8bcfa80f0b76b8ae4f0548d59a10ed0dcfec1251d50d340dda2

Report a correction →
human consequence

Amnesty said it could not precisely estimate executions after the May 1977 attempted coup. It had received names of some ninety people said to have been killed, while opposition claims of thousands remained unconfirmed. Received names are not ninety independently verified deaths.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Source’s post-May-1977 episode through March 1978; not individual death dates or an execution census..

Date basis and original source clocks

Source’s post-May-1977 episode through March 1978; not individual death dates or an execution census.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Angola: Amnesty International report, AFR12/01/84 ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: printed25/PDF27

Source establishes: Amnesty explicitly could not estimate executions precisely, distinguishes some ninety alleged-victim names received from unconfirmed opposition claims of thousands, and supplies the episode context.

Document date: 1984-03 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Previously independently reviewed passages at the exact locator, with their surrounding source qualifications.

Access limitations

Original speeches, tribunal and case files, orders and underlying witness records were not obtained. Received names are not an independently verified death census.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Retrospective Amnesty International report. · HR-ARCHIVE-B06-FAMILY-AI-ANGOLA

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B06-SRC-AO-AMNESTY1984@205b43e5ec0ee031

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 205b43e5ec0ee03118c70db9464161d0dbf4ee6f4dcff9a9eff299de97c877d8. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 27 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Approximately ninety names were received as allegations, not independently verified unique deaths. No precise execution total was established.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Opposition accounts of thousands remained unconfirmed in Amnesty’s report.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B16-AO-COUNT · exact wording SHA-256 7cbec95a17fd7713458661f52b012ad73db27d7db0d37843b520c26bda0f926d

Report a correction →
context

Amnesty’s 1984 report describes Nito Alves’s supporters attempting to seize power on 27 May 1977 and capturing and killing seven senior MPLA officials. It does not establish a personal killing order by Alves.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Amnesty’s date for the attempted seizure of power and reported senior-official killings..

Date basis and original source clocks

Amnesty’s date for the attempted seizure of power and reported senior-official killings.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Angola: Amnesty International report, AFR12/01/84 ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: printed5/PDF7

Source establishes: Amnesty’s account dates the attempted seizure of power and reports capture and killing of seven senior MPLA officials by Alves’s supporters. It does not identify a personal killing order by Alves.

Document date: 1984-03 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Previously independently reviewed passages at the exact locator, with their surrounding source qualifications.

Access limitations

Original speeches, tribunal and case files, orders and underlying witness records were not obtained. Received names are not an independently verified death census.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Retrospective Amnesty International report. · HR-ARCHIVE-B06-FAMILY-AI-ANGOLA

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B06-SRC-AO-AMNESTY1984@205b43e5ec0ee031

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 205b43e5ec0ee03118c70db9464161d0dbf4ee6f4dcff9a9eff299de97c877d8. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 7 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

One retrospective report; no independently verified personal killing order by Nito Alves.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B16-AO-CRISIS · exact wording SHA-256 dd75ba252e40af2fa2b7acdaf65fe4a9a1ea3887f3c280bb5b8413a93a352295

Report a correction →
human consequence

Amnesty reports ANC member Tom Madimba shot dead by a DISA officer in Luanda in late 1977. The passage identifies no individual officer or instruction from a national director.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Reported as late 1977; only year-level conservative bounds, not a verified day or quarter..

Date basis and original source clocks

Reported as late 1977; only year-level conservative bounds, not a verified day or quarter.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Angola: Amnesty International report, AFR12/01/84 ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: printed25/PDF27 opening

Source establishes: Amnesty reports ANC member Tom Madimba shot dead by a DISA officer in Luanda in late 1977, without identifying the officer or a director’s order.

Document date: 1984-03 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Previously independently reviewed passages at the exact locator, with their surrounding source qualifications.

Access limitations

Original speeches, tribunal and case files, orders and underlying witness records were not obtained. Received names are not an independently verified death census.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Retrospective Amnesty International report. · HR-ARCHIVE-B06-FAMILY-AI-ANGOLA

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B06-SRC-AO-AMNESTY1984@205b43e5ec0ee031

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 205b43e5ec0ee03118c70db9464161d0dbf4ee6f4dcff9a9eff299de97c877d8. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 27 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Reported organizational attribution only; no named officer or national director’s instruction is established. The exact occurrence date remains unknown.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B16-AO-MADIMBA · exact wording SHA-256 ca4c1830cb41a998f52ef048db361d62beb903815cbaecbb6673ff59d7edabf5

Report a correction →
decision

Amnesty reports Neto moving from a promise of clemency to calls for swift retribution and announcing in August 1977 that leaders of the attempted coup had been shot. The passage gives neither their number nor identities.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Reported announcement month; this is not a verified execution date..

Date basis and original source clocks

Reported announcement month; this is not a verified execution date.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Angola: Amnesty International report, AFR12/01/84 ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: printed5/PDF7; printed25/PDF27

Source establishes: Amnesty describes Neto’s change from clemency to retribution and his August announcement that coup leaders had been shot; it supplies no names or total.

Document date: 1984-03 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Previously independently reviewed passages at the exact locator, with their surrounding source qualifications.

Access limitations

Original speeches, tribunal and case files, orders and underlying witness records were not obtained. Received names are not an independently verified death census.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Retrospective Amnesty International report. · HR-ARCHIVE-B06-FAMILY-AI-ANGOLA

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B06-SRC-AO-AMNESTY1984@205b43e5ec0ee031

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 205b43e5ec0ee03118c70db9464161d0dbf4ee6f4dcff9a9eff299de97c877d8. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 7, 27 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

The source reports an announcement, not dated individual execution orders. Identities, number and execution dates are not established.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B16-AO-NETO-SPEECH · exact wording SHA-256 8c05a91323f43db6b64322cce79f8c3b97bda6c29ed26bca3b5803fd8cb5321e

Report a correction →
decision

Amnesty attributes the July 1977 announcement of a Special Military Tribunal to President Agostinho Neto. It says proceedings were secret and does not establish how many cases the tribunal examined.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Reported tribunal announcement month; day and number of cases unknown..

Date basis and original source clocks

Reported tribunal announcement month; day and number of cases unknown.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Angola: Amnesty International report, AFR12/01/84 ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: printed5/PDF7

Source establishes: Amnesty attributes the July 1977 tribunal announcement to President Neto and describes secret proceedings without an established number of cases.

Document date: 1984-03 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Previously independently reviewed passages at the exact locator, with their surrounding source qualifications.

Access limitations

Original speeches, tribunal and case files, orders and underlying witness records were not obtained. Received names are not an independently verified death census.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Retrospective Amnesty International report. · HR-ARCHIVE-B06-FAMILY-AI-ANGOLA

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B06-SRC-AO-AMNESTY1984@205b43e5ec0ee031

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 205b43e5ec0ee03118c70db9464161d0dbf4ee6f4dcff9a9eff299de97c877d8. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 7 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

The original announcement and tribunal case files were not obtained; the day and case count remain unknown.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B16-AO-NETO-TRIBUNAL · exact wording SHA-256 3725e9156e7ed9b2496eaab59f048183dc62abd8d8fc4ba9d594f6bf74d51817

Report a correction →
context

Amnesty records alleged UNITA prisoner killings in 1975–early 1976 and reported government-troop executions at Chissamba in June 1976 and Cassemba the following month. These are distinct attributed acts, with no combined toll or individual leader’s order established.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Context collection; no single event date assigned.

Date basis and original source clocks

Separate earlier episodes: 1975–early 1976; June 1976; July 1976. No continuous combined event or common toll.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Angola: Amnesty International report, AFR12/01/84 ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: printed24/PDF26

Source establishes: Amnesty separately discusses alleged UNITA prisoner killings in 1975–early 1976, reported government-troop executions at Chissamba in June 1976 and at Cassemba in July 1976.

Document date: 1984-03 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Previously independently reviewed passages at the exact locator, with their surrounding source qualifications.

Access limitations

Original speeches, tribunal and case files, orders and underlying witness records were not obtained. Received names are not an independently verified death census.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Retrospective Amnesty International report. · HR-ARCHIVE-B06-FAMILY-AI-ANGOLA

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B06-SRC-AO-AMNESTY1984@205b43e5ec0ee031

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 205b43e5ec0ee03118c70db9464161d0dbf4ee6f4dcff9a9eff299de97c877d8. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 26 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Earlier UNITA allegations and reported government-troop executions are distinct accounts. No combined toll or individual leader’s order is established.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B16-AO-OTHER-SIDES · exact wording SHA-256 4f91de9ff26f9b0353b3c32e89927abc45823829aee9d5e26fca27458a86114c

Report a correction →
context

Whitaker’s 1985 UN report relays Artucio’s criticism of the genocide charge alongside Randall Fegley’s view that targeting Bubis and Fernandinos met the UN definition. These are competing analyses; the review makes no independent finding of protected-group intent or domestic-law validity.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Date of the UN expert report relaying competing analyses, not a new judicial ruling or violence event..

Date basis and original source clocks

Date of the UN expert report relaying competing analyses, not a new judicial ruling or violence event.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Revised and updated report on the question of the prevention and punishment of the crime of genocide, E/CN.4/Sub.2/1985/6 ↗

Publisher: B.Whitaker, UN Sub-Commission expert

Exact passage: printed40/PDF43 para76 and footnote64, visually checked

Source establishes: Whitaker’s 1985 UN report, paragraph 76 and footnote 64, relays Artucio’s criticism and Fegley’s competing analysis. It does not establish a new judicial determination.

Document date: 1985-07-02 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Previously independently reviewed passages at the exact locator, with their surrounding source qualifications.

Access limitations

The underlying Fegley article and original court judgment were not obtained. The reported analyses do not establish this project’s finding of protected-group intent or domestic legal validity.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

UN expert report relaying competing legal analyses. · HR-ARCHIVE-B06-FAMILY-UN-WHITAKER

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B06-SRC-EG-UN1985@0752dec0dbb27bf1

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 0752dec0dbb27bf1e11fb9c598117132c13200d3b5bc2a4f889cb7a937dd1a84. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 43 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Whitaker relays two analyses. The original Fegley article and domestic judgment were not reviewed. The 1985 source date is not a new court decision or an extension of the 1979 event.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Whitaker relays Artucio’s criticism alongside Fegley’s view that targeting Bubis and Fernandinos met the UN definition.

Legal distinction

Competing attributed analyses; no independent finding of protected-group intent or domestic-law validity.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B16-EG-ALTERNATIVE · exact wording SHA-256 fa70d584ed4eff1bde434ce29b5bff5ea0770b81a16a528b170ad62e333ab9aa

Report a correction →
context

Artucio says he reconstructed the indictment from notes and describes an indicative list of 474 alleged regime killings. He criticised the genocide charge’s legal basis and considered protected-group intent unproved. These are his observations, not this project’s legal ruling or a verified 1976–1980 toll.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Context collection; no single event date assigned.

Date basis and original source clocks

Reported trial account; exact date of the described indictment or defence passage is not established.

Sources (2) · exact passages & limitations

The Trial of Macias in Equatorial Guinea ↗

Publisher: Alejandro Artucio / International Commission of Jurists

Exact passage: printed27/PDF34 reconstruction note; printed30-32/PDF35-37

Source establishes: Artucio states the indictment was reconstructed from notes, gives an indicative list of 474 alleged regime killings, and criticises the legal basis and protected-group intent of the genocide charge.

Document date: 1979 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Previously independently reviewed passages at the exact locator, with their surrounding source qualifications.

Access limitations

This is an observer’s account, not the original decree, indictment or certified judgment. The English copy omits printed pages 28–29; indictment details were reconstructed from notes. The hosting path does not authenticate a publication month.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Alejandro Artucio’s trial-observation report for the International Commission of Jurists. · HR-ARCHIVE-B06-FAMILY-ICJ-MACIAS

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B06-SRC-EG-ICJ1979@9f49c03538f463c5

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 9f49c03538f463c599e84f7fa31ab659e1ce5eb00f7205300d376ac6890c0d44. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 34, 35, 36, 37 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

El proceso contra Macias en Guinea Ecuatorial ↗

Publisher: Alejandro Artucio / Comision Internacional de Juristas

Exact passage: printed35-37/PDF40-42 legal discussion

Source establishes: The Spanish edition supplies Artucio’s legal discussion of the genocide charge. It is the same observer report family, not independent corroboration of the alleged killings or the original judgment.

Document date: 1979 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Previously independently reviewed passages at the exact locator, with their surrounding source qualifications.

Access limitations

This is the same author and report family, not independent corroboration. Original judgment and indictment were not obtained; legal views are not adopted as current law.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Spanish edition of the same International Commission of Jurists observer report. · HR-ARCHIVE-B06-FAMILY-ICJ-MACIAS

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B06-SRC-EG-ICJ1979ES@fdf0fe80d9b2443f

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: fdf0fe80d9b2443f80af983c6d31c695c534bcef0efb82c356449ab57a2b4eb6. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 40, 41, 42 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

The indictment was reconstructed from notes and the original was not reviewed. The English and Spanish editions belong to the same report family. The 474 entries do not establish unique verified deaths or a 1976–1980 toll.

Legal distinction

Artucio’s criticism of the genocide charge and protected-group intent is an attributed observer analysis, not this review’s legal judgment.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B16-EG-CHARGE-LIMIT · exact wording SHA-256 53f69a105514f8a2778c55baefa4ecf37dde61d4af7908bf5ff33c593d5f2427

Report a correction →
decision

Alejandro Artucio’s report attributes compulsory manual labour for citizens over fifteen to a presidential decree of March 1976 under Macias, following a January party-congress request. The original decree was not reviewed; the age threshold is not an observed child-worker count.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Reported decree month; exact day unknown and original decree not reviewed..

Date basis and original source clocks

Reported decree month; exact day unknown and original decree not reviewed.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

The Trial of Macias in Equatorial Guinea ↗

Publisher: Alejandro Artucio / International Commission of Jurists

Exact passage: printed8/PDF15; printed41/PDF46

Source establishes: Artucio attributes compulsory manual labour for citizens over fifteen to a March 1976 presidential decree under Macias following a January party-congress request. This is a reported public policy, not proof of personally ordered killings.

Document date: 1979 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Previously independently reviewed passages at the exact locator, with their surrounding source qualifications.

Access limitations

This is an observer’s account, not the original decree, indictment or certified judgment. The English copy omits printed pages 28–29; indictment details were reconstructed from notes. The hosting path does not authenticate a publication month.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Alejandro Artucio’s trial-observation report for the International Commission of Jurists. · HR-ARCHIVE-B06-FAMILY-ICJ-MACIAS

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B06-SRC-EG-ICJ1979@9f49c03538f463c5

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 9f49c03538f463c599e84f7fa31ab659e1ce5eb00f7205300d376ac6890c0d44. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 15, 46 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

The original decree was not reviewed. Month-only dates do not supply an exact day, and an age threshold is not an observed child-worker count.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B16-EG-DECREE · exact wording SHA-256 addeb9b40a93574fc159877b9f96918c4f2a7bf398880f16e8ca2b5bb06b27c6

Report a correction →
context

Artucio records Macias denying the charges and seeking acquittal or pardon. Other defendants argued that they had obeyed superior orders. These are reported defences, not an acceptance or rejection of every allegation by this review.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Context collection; no single event date assigned.

Date basis and original source clocks

Reported trial account; exact date of the described indictment or defence passage is not established.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

The Trial of Macias in Equatorial Guinea ↗

Publisher: Alejandro Artucio / International Commission of Jurists

Exact passage: printed53-54/PDF58-59

Source establishes: Artucio reports Macias denying the charges and seeking acquittal or pardon and other defendants relying on superior orders. These positions are recorded without adopting or rejecting every allegation.

Document date: 1979 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Previously independently reviewed passages at the exact locator, with their surrounding source qualifications.

Access limitations

This is an observer’s account, not the original decree, indictment or certified judgment. The English copy omits printed pages 28–29; indictment details were reconstructed from notes. The hosting path does not authenticate a publication month.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Alejandro Artucio’s trial-observation report for the International Commission of Jurists. · HR-ARCHIVE-B06-FAMILY-ICJ-MACIAS

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B06-SRC-EG-ICJ1979@9f49c03538f463c5

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 9f49c03538f463c599e84f7fa31ab659e1ce5eb00f7205300d376ac6890c0d44. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 58, 59 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

The passage reports defence positions. It does not resolve every allegation or establish the exact defence date.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Macias denied the charges and sought acquittal or pardon; other defendants invoked superior orders.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B16-EG-DEFENCE · exact wording SHA-256 e059bcad67ea7085d7ede76b508126f6c83e5ded8bb7db4fb0176559a75a8dbd

Report a correction →
human consequence

Artucio reports Macias and six co-defendants executed at Blackbeach prison at 18:00 on 29 September 1979, without appeal or an opportunity to seek clemency. This is a separate post-coup authority phase, not seven additional victims of Macias’s regime.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Reported execution date; 18:00 is the original clock, timezone unverified..

Date basis and original source clocks

Reported execution date; 18:00 is the original clock, timezone unverified.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

The Trial of Macias in Equatorial Guinea ↗

Publisher: Alejandro Artucio / International Commission of Jurists

Exact passage: printed55/PDF60

Source establishes: Artucio reports Macias and six co-defendants executed at Blackbeach prison at 18:00 on 29 September 1979 without appeal or an opportunity to seek clemency. This is the execution cohort corresponding to the proceedings, not a new former-regime death total.

Document date: 1979 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Previously independently reviewed passages at the exact locator, with their surrounding source qualifications.

Access limitations

This is an observer’s account, not the original decree, indictment or certified judgment. The English copy omits printed pages 28–29; indictment details were reconstructed from notes. The hosting path does not authenticate a publication month.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Alejandro Artucio’s trial-observation report for the International Commission of Jurists. · HR-ARCHIVE-B06-FAMILY-ICJ-MACIAS

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B06-SRC-EG-ICJ1979@9f49c03538f463c5

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 9f49c03538f463c599e84f7fa31ab659e1ce5eb00f7205300d376ac6890c0d44. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 60 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

The original local clock is 18:00 with unverified timezone. The executing commander is not established. These seven belong to the post-coup proceedings and are not seven additional former-regime victims.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B16-EG-EXECUTION · exact wording SHA-256 1b6d40d01091b446c555b3a9493516fcf30a772b1825aa80ecacf623592d77c7

Report a correction →
human consequence

Artucio reports 25,000 workers recruited in 1977 and 15,000 dependants, describing ration-only remuneration, long workdays, restricted movement and beatings. Dependants are not extra workers or an established child count.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Recruitment year as reported by Artucio; individual recruitment days and observation cutoff unknown..

Date basis and original source clocks

Recruitment year as reported by Artucio; individual recruitment days and observation cutoff unknown.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

The Trial of Macias in Equatorial Guinea ↗

Publisher: Alejandro Artucio / International Commission of Jurists

Exact passage: printed8/PDF15

Source establishes: Artucio reports 25,000 recruited workers in 1977 and 15,000 dependants, separately describing ration-only remuneration, long workdays, restrictions on movement and beatings.

Document date: 1979 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Previously independently reviewed passages at the exact locator, with their surrounding source qualifications.

Access limitations

This is an observer’s account, not the original decree, indictment or certified judgment. The English copy omits printed pages 28–29; indictment details were reconstructed from notes. The hosting path does not authenticate a publication month.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Alejandro Artucio’s trial-observation report for the International Commission of Jurists. · HR-ARCHIVE-B06-FAMILY-ICJ-MACIAS

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B06-SRC-EG-ICJ1979@9f49c03538f463c5

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 9f49c03538f463c599e84f7fa31ab659e1ce5eb00f7205300d376ac6890c0d44. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 15 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

The figures and treatment descriptions are Artucio’s reported account. Dependants are not additional workers, and no observed child-worker number or death count is established.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B16-EG-LABOUR · exact wording SHA-256 d9c632d5d5a9bf0244bde962f5c534534fa54daab0e0d68db02585984f60f9f6

Report a correction →
decision

Artucio reports the Special Military Tribunal imposing seven death sentences on 29 September 1979, although the prosecutor had requested one. The presiding officer and the person reading the collegiate verdict are not thereby proved to have issued a separate firing-squad order.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Observer’s reported date of the tribunal’s seven death sentences..

Date basis and original source clocks

Observer’s reported date of the tribunal’s seven death sentences.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

The Trial of Macias in Equatorial Guinea ↗

Publisher: Alejandro Artucio / International Commission of Jurists

Exact passage: printed54-55/PDF59-60

Source establishes: Artucio reports seven death sentences imposed by the Special Military Tribunal on 29 September 1979 although the prosecutor requested one. It supports a reported institutional sentence, not an individual execution order.

Document date: 1979 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Previously independently reviewed passages at the exact locator, with their surrounding source qualifications.

Access limitations

This is an observer’s account, not the original decree, indictment or certified judgment. The English copy omits printed pages 28–29; indictment details were reconstructed from notes. The hosting path does not authenticate a publication month.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Alejandro Artucio’s trial-observation report for the International Commission of Jurists. · HR-ARCHIVE-B06-FAMILY-ICJ-MACIAS

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B06-SRC-EG-ICJ1979@9f49c03538f463c5

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 9f49c03538f463c599e84f7fa31ab659e1ce5eb00f7205300d376ac6890c0d44. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 59, 60 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

This is an observer account, not a certified judgment. Neither the presiding officer’s role nor reading a collegiate verdict proves a separate personal firing-squad order.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B16-EG-SENTENCE · exact wording SHA-256 58a29aac24c01efb6aac6c1652050b576165e7466d5a1b37dedf5f4ce445df5c

Report a correction →
human consequence

The IAEA’s 1998 report says a tenfold rise in Bikini residents’ caesium-137 body content was determined in 1978, associated with maturing coconuts and drought-related consumption. Body content is not a count of illness, injury or death.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 1978 safety and policy records; individual measurement days remain unknown..

Date basis and original source clocks

1978 safety and policy records; individual measurement days remain unknown.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Radiological Conditions at Bikini Atoll: Prospects for Resettlement, STI/PUB/1054 ↗

Publisher: International Atomic Energy Agency

Exact passage: section3.5 printed7-8/PDF17-18

Source establishes: The report describes a tenfold rise in body caesium-137 determined in 1978, with the stated dietary context.

Document date: 1998-03 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Sections 3.4–3.6, physical pages 17–18, printed pages 7–8: approval, reported body-content rise and relocation.

Access limitations

Underlying individual measurements and the original 1968 announcement were not reviewed. Body content is not dose or a clinical outcome; relocation counts and periods overlap other accounts.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Published institutional report with a retrospective historical account. · HR-ARCHIVE-B06-FAMILY-US-BIKINI-TECH

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B06-SRC-MH-IAEA1998@2262279f1ae3c605

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 2262279f1ae3c60508c3df003d8b73552fc1115bcc0f3d45e323199fc2dbbce8. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 17, 18 · Printed page(s): 7, 8. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_attributed_claim

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

The original individual measurements were not reviewed. A body-content increase is a technical observation, not a count of illness, injury or death.

Legal distinction

Proposed legislation is not enacted law. Reported approval or protective administration does not establish malicious intent or individual criminal responsibility.

Casualty scope: Source-defined, non-additive populations and technical measures only. No illness, injury, death, personal casualty total or arithmetic combination is derived.

Record A4-B16-MH-BURDEN · exact wording SHA-256 40d4216f61012090ae874155bdae4fa6e96ecfa10f269ea8a0af723e5c9b735b

Report a correction →
context

A Joe Murphy editorial dated 5 June 1978, reproduced in Congress on 16 June, referred to 139 islanders and a 75 per cent yearly rise in body caesium. This is an editorial’s account, not a congressional or independently verified medical finding.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Date of the editorial, not an established clinical measurement day; reproduced in Congress on 16 June..

Date basis and original source clocks

Date of the editorial, not an established clinical measurement day; reproduced in Congress on 16 June.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Congressional Record,16June1978, House p17961: Burton remarks and reproduced editorial ↗

Publisher: Phillip Burton; embedded editorial by Joe Murphy separately attributed

Exact passage: printed17961/PDF48, editorial after From the Pacific Daily News June5,1978

Source establishes: The reproduced editorial refers to 139 islanders and a 75 per cent yearly body-caesium rise, as the editorial’s account.

Document date: 1978-06-05 · Publication date: 1978-06-16

Actual review scope: Physical page 48, printed page 17961: the separately attributed editorial dated 5 June and reproduced on 16 June 1978.

Access limitations

The original newspaper and test data were not reviewed. The editorial is not a congressional medical finding; its percentage baseline and denominator remain unknown. No personal removal order is inferred.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Newspaper editorial reproduced in the Congressional Record. · HR-ARCHIVE-B06-FAMILY-US-BIKINI-PRESS

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B06-SRC-MH-CRJUN1978@81c45d6e927c1be5

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 81c45d6e927c1be552236d3590ee09963a1cd3383cecee7b7b1bd806d7156f53. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 48 · Printed page(s): 17961. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_attributed_claim

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

The original newspaper and test data were not inspected. The reported percentage has an unresolved baseline and denominator; congressional reproduction does not make it a medical finding.

Legal distinction

Proposed legislation is not enacted law. Reported approval or protective administration does not establish malicious intent or individual criminal responsibility.

Casualty scope: Source-defined, non-additive populations and technical measures only. No illness, injury, death, personal casualty total or arithmetic combination is derived.

Record A4-B16-MH-EDITORIAL · exact wording SHA-256 9eb5f8c71e414c6217c6a0c1f80773fc0052ec4e273fd56bbf2645eea262cb44

Report a correction →
decision

Joseph’s 1978 letter reports President Johnson’s 12 August 1968 announcement that Bikini would be returned after cleanup. The IAEA’s later history also describes August 1968 approval. This is pre-1976 background, not a new 1976 decision or proof of intent to harm.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Reported 12 August 1968 return announcement; historical background..

Date basis and original source clocks

Reported 12 August 1968 return announcement; historical background.

Sources (2) · exact passages & limitations

Congressional Record,4April1978, Senate p8587: Joseph Bikini letter and proposed S2822 ↗

Publisher: James A.Joseph, US Under Secretary Interior, letter6February1978

Exact passage: printed8587/PDF49, Bikini letter middle column

Source establishes: The reproduced 1978 letter reports Johnson’s 12 August 1968 return announcement.

Document date: 1978-02-06 · Publication date: 1978-04-04

Actual review scope: Physical page 49, printed page 8587: Joseph’s dated Bikini letter and proposed legislation.

Access limitations

The original signed letter and 1968 presidential announcement were not inspected. The proposal is not enacted law; a prospective return population is not an actual evacuation cohort.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Official congressional reproduction of an executive letter and proposed legislation. · HR-ARCHIVE-B06-FAMILY-US-BIKINI-TECH

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B06-SRC-MH-CRAPR1978ALT@48690f740053f9d8

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 48690f740053f9d88f44cdf37c60519a22ce401890080a4275085a50a295f565. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 49 · Printed page(s): 8587. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_attributed_claim

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Radiological Conditions at Bikini Atoll: Prospects for Resettlement, STI/PUB/1054 ↗

Publisher: International Atomic Energy Agency

Exact passage: section3.4 printed7/PDF17

Source establishes: The retrospective history describes August 1968 approval; it does not independently establish the precise announcement day.

Document date: 1998-03 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Sections 3.4–3.6, physical pages 17–18, printed pages 7–8: approval, reported body-content rise and relocation.

Access limitations

Underlying individual measurements and the original 1968 announcement were not reviewed. Body content is not dose or a clinical outcome; relocation counts and periods overlap other accounts.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Published institutional report with a retrospective historical account. · HR-ARCHIVE-B06-FAMILY-US-BIKINI-TECH

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B06-SRC-MH-IAEA1998@2262279f1ae3c605

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 2262279f1ae3c60508c3df003d8b73552fc1115bcc0f3d45e323199fc2dbbce8. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 17 · Printed page(s): 7. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_attributed_claim

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

The original presidential announcement was not inspected. This is an attributed retrospective account of a 1968 approval, not evidence of intent to harm.

Legal distinction

Proposed legislation is not enacted law. Reported approval or protective administration does not establish malicious intent or individual criminal responsibility.

Casualty scope: Source-defined, non-additive populations and technical measures only. No illness, injury, death, personal casualty total or arithmetic combination is derived.

Record A4-B16-MH-JOHNSON · exact wording SHA-256 c4cc0390c605c8ef0dbf1789360abc2b31486cc264b79b8502ffd32b814c2f90

Report a correction →
decision

Under Secretary James A. Joseph’s letter of 6 February 1978 recommended proposed Bikini rehabilitation and resettlement legislation and acknowledged earlier food-chain miscalculation and late-1976 coconut concerns. The reproduced proposal is not proof of enactment or a removal order.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Date of Joseph’s letter; reproduced in Congress on 4 April 1978..

Date basis and original source clocks

Date of Joseph’s letter; reproduced in Congress on 4 April 1978.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Congressional Record,4April1978, Senate p8587: Joseph Bikini letter and proposed S2822 ↗

Publisher: James A.Joseph, US Under Secretary Interior, letter6February1978

Exact passage: printed8587/PDF49, Bikini letter middle/right columns

Source establishes: The dated letter recommends proposed rehabilitation and resettlement legislation and acknowledges earlier food-chain and coconut concerns.

Document date: 1978-02-06 · Publication date: 1978-04-04

Actual review scope: Physical page 49, printed page 8587: Joseph’s dated Bikini letter and proposed legislation.

Access limitations

The original signed letter and 1968 presidential announcement were not inspected. The proposal is not enacted law; a prospective return population is not an actual evacuation cohort.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Official congressional reproduction of an executive letter and proposed legislation. · HR-ARCHIVE-B06-FAMILY-US-BIKINI-TECH

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B06-SRC-MH-CRAPR1978ALT@48690f740053f9d8

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 48690f740053f9d88f44cdf37c60519a22ce401890080a4275085a50a295f565. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 49 · Printed page(s): 8587. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_attributed_claim

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

The original signed letter was not inspected. Recommending a bill does not establish enactment, completed resettlement or a removal order.

Legal distinction

Proposed legislation is not enacted law. Reported approval or protective administration does not establish malicious intent or individual criminal responsibility.

Casualty scope: Source-defined, non-additive populations and technical measures only. No illness, injury, death, personal casualty total or arithmetic combination is derived.

Record A4-B16-MH-JOSEPH · exact wording SHA-256 51781ee5933acbf64cef7d2133e58c8b5b35208cc1a10bc668326d58c3b411c0

Report a correction →
human consequence

DOE’s 1982 report describes approximately 140 people moved from Bikini to Kili or Ejit in August 1978. This is an approximate account of the same relocation, not another group to add to the IAEA figure.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: August 1978 relocation, according to DOE; exact days unknown..

Date basis and original source clocks

August 1978 relocation, according to DOE; exact days unknown.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Enewetak Radiological Support Project Final Report, NVO-213 ↗

Publisher: US Department of Energy, Nevada Operations Office

Exact passage: printed71/PDF91 first paragraph

Source establishes: The report describes approximately 140 people moved in August 1978.

Document date: 1982-09 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Cover identity and physical page 91, printed page 71: the Interior decision and the August relocation account.

Access limitations

This is an identified hosted copy, not verified original government digital custody. The removal instrument and named authoriser are unknown; the approximate population overlaps other accounts.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Identified DOE report scan hosted by ICAAD. · HR-ARCHIVE-B06-FAMILY-US-BIKINI-TECH

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B06-SRC-MH-DOE1982COPY@1647c5b64c1524c2

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 1647c5b64c1524c2c60856fb13e5841373c007b36c876ac1432826f3c874f815. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 91 · Printed page(s): 71. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_attributed_claim

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Approximately 140 is an estimate in an identified copy of the DOE report, not an exact independently verified count.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

The account concerns the same relocation described with different numbers and month windows by other sources.

Legal distinction

Proposed legislation is not enacted law. Reported approval or protective administration does not establish malicious intent or individual criminal responsibility.

Casualty scope: Source-defined, non-additive populations and technical measures only. No illness, injury, death, personal casualty total or arithmetic combination is derived.

Record A4-B16-MH-MOVE-DOE · exact wording SHA-256 92d8b68c2f7a97835c404060258191ebdef2b0e373fa608982671e4364c4caf5

Report a correction →
human consequence

The IAEA describes 139 returning Bikinians relocated to Kili and Ejit in August and September 1978. This overlaps other sources’ approximate 140 and 145 accounts; the figures must not be added.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: IAEA August–September 1978 relocation window; DOE describes August and the background paper late August. Bounds represent month precision, not exact moving days..

Date basis and original source clocks

IAEA August–September 1978 relocation window; DOE describes August and the background paper late August. Bounds represent month precision, not exact moving days.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Radiological Conditions at Bikini Atoll: Prospects for Resettlement, STI/PUB/1054 ↗

Publisher: International Atomic Energy Agency

Exact passage: section3.6 printed8/PDF18

Source establishes: The account describes 139 returning Bikinians relocated to Kili and Ejit in August and September 1978.

Document date: 1998-03 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Sections 3.4–3.6, physical pages 17–18, printed pages 7–8: approval, reported body-content rise and relocation.

Access limitations

Underlying individual measurements and the original 1968 announcement were not reviewed. Body content is not dose or a clinical outcome; relocation counts and periods overlap other accounts.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Published institutional report with a retrospective historical account. · HR-ARCHIVE-B06-FAMILY-US-BIKINI-TECH

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B06-SRC-MH-IAEA1998@2262279f1ae3c605

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 2262279f1ae3c60508c3df003d8b73552fc1115bcc0f3d45e323199fc2dbbce8. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 18 · Printed page(s): 8. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_attributed_claim

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

This is a retrospective source account, not an independently verified individual roster.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

The 139-person account potentially overlaps the approximate 140-person and 145-person accounts. They must not be added.

Legal distinction

Proposed legislation is not enacted law. Reported approval or protective administration does not establish malicious intent or individual criminal responsibility.

Casualty scope: Source-defined, non-additive populations and technical measures only. No illness, injury, death, personal casualty total or arithmetic combination is derived.

Record A4-B16-MH-MOVE-IAEA · exact wording SHA-256 7c5e57b5c0ed0f21e4a13a94d235b067c3037fcdfb3069f79fc93cc766b49462

Report a correction →
decision

DOE’s 1982 report attributes the decision to remove Bikini residents to Interior after rising body burdens in April 1978. The IAEA’s later account describes Trust Territory officials relocating them in August–September. No named individual authoriser is established here.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Context collection; no single event date assigned.

Date basis and original source clocks

The institutional decision date is unknown. The reported 1978 relocation is represented separately; later report dates do not supply a decision date.

Sources (2) · exact passages & limitations

Enewetak Radiological Support Project Final Report, NVO-213 ↗

Publisher: US Department of Energy, Nevada Operations Office

Exact passage: printed71/PDF91 first paragraph

Source establishes: The report attributes the protective removal decision to Interior after rising body burdens in April 1978.

Document date: 1982-09 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Cover identity and physical page 91, printed page 71: the Interior decision and the August relocation account.

Access limitations

This is an identified hosted copy, not verified original government digital custody. The removal instrument and named authoriser are unknown; the approximate population overlaps other accounts.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Identified DOE report scan hosted by ICAAD. · HR-ARCHIVE-B06-FAMILY-US-BIKINI-TECH

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B06-SRC-MH-DOE1982COPY@1647c5b64c1524c2

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 1647c5b64c1524c2c60856fb13e5841373c007b36c876ac1432826f3c874f815. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 91 · Printed page(s): 71. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_attributed_claim

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Radiological Conditions at Bikini Atoll: Prospects for Resettlement, STI/PUB/1054 ↗

Publisher: International Atomic Energy Agency

Exact passage: section3.6 printed8/PDF18

Source establishes: The historical account describes Trust Territory officials implementing relocation in August–September 1978.

Document date: 1998-03 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Sections 3.4–3.6, physical pages 17–18, printed pages 7–8: approval, reported body-content rise and relocation.

Access limitations

Underlying individual measurements and the original 1968 announcement were not reviewed. Body content is not dose or a clinical outcome; relocation counts and periods overlap other accounts.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Published institutional report with a retrospective historical account. · HR-ARCHIVE-B06-FAMILY-US-BIKINI-TECH

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B06-SRC-MH-IAEA1998@2262279f1ae3c605

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 2262279f1ae3c60508c3df003d8b73552fc1115bcc0f3d45e323199fc2dbbce8. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 18 · Printed page(s): 8. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_attributed_claim

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

The decision date, original removal instrument and named individual authoriser are not established. The sources describe a protective response to exposure.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

The accounts use different relocation counts and month windows; these have not been reconciled.

Legal distinction

Proposed legislation is not enacted law. Reported approval or protective administration does not establish malicious intent or individual criminal responsibility.

Casualty scope: Source-defined, non-additive populations and technical measures only. No illness, injury, death, personal casualty total or arithmetic combination is derived.

Record A4-B16-MH-REMOVE · exact wording SHA-256 9873cc806be56e7d3fe4ce716d6184b3a11925715ca4f6b4ed763d3acda40c5a

Report a correction →
human consequence

An Interior health-plan background paper circulated in 1980 says 145 Bikini residents were evacuated in late August 1978 and that some 99 of them had whole-body and medical examinations in April. Being examined does not establish injury.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Reported April examinations and late-August evacuation; distinct month windows are preserved in separate observations..

Date basis and original source clocks

Reported April examinations and late-August evacuation; distinct month windows are preserved in separate observations.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Marshall Islands memorandum and Interior health-plan RFP attachments, record402869 ↗

Publisher: Bruce W.Wachholz / US DOE; attached US Interior material

Exact passage: PDF9 first and third Bikini paragraphs; attachment provenance PDF1-2,5

Source establishes: The attached background account gives 145 evacuated residents in late August 1978 and some 99 examined in April; the memorandum circulated in August 1980.

Document date: 1980-08-19 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Physical pages 1–2 and 5 for attachment identity; page 9 for the Bikini population, examinations and relocation account.

Access limitations

The 19 August 1980 circulation date does not date the 1978 examinations or establish an original clinical roster. Examined people are not necessarily injured; the population denominator is unresolved.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Identified circulation memorandum and attached Interior background-paper scan. · HR-ARCHIVE-B06-FAMILY-US-BIKINI-TECH

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B06-SRC-MH-DOEHEALTH@151074a147383cf0

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 151074a147383cf0846cad844f42a9c8062dc863a8be1b9bac61913ad44fef80. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 1, 2, 5, 9 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_exact_attributed_claim

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

The background paper was circulated in 1980 and is not an original 1978 clinical roster. Examination does not establish injury.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

The 145-person account potentially overlaps the IAEA and DOE relocation accounts. Differences in count dates and populations remain unresolved.

Legal distinction

Proposed legislation is not enacted law. Reported approval or protective administration does not establish malicious intent or individual criminal responsibility.

Casualty scope: Source-defined, non-additive populations and technical measures only. No illness, injury, death, personal casualty total or arithmetic combination is derived.

Record A4-B16-MH-RFP · exact wording SHA-256 43b9751f316cbc8d64bf92f862c0a40cccad99a4de106bd6ab588799c6d27501

Report a correction →
context

The TRC dates the air and paratroop attack on Kassinga to 08:00 on 4 May 1978 and describes the site as both a military base and a refugee camp. Neither description classifies every person present.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: TRC date of the Kassinga attack; source local time 08:00, timezone unverified..

Date basis and original source clocks

TRC date of the Kassinga attack; source local time 08:00, timezone unverified.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report, volume2 ↗

Publisher: South African TRC

Exact passage: paras32-38 printed50-51/PDF53-54

Source establishes: The TRC dates the air and paratroop attack to 08:00 on 4 May 1978 and describes Kassinga as both military base and refugee camp.

Document date: 1998-10-29 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Previously independently reviewed passages at the exact locator, with their surrounding source qualifications.

Access limitations

Underlying military documents, White Paper, Cuban archives, UNICEF and Red Cross records were not separately obtained. Commission findings are distinct from criminal convictions.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Official TRC investigative report with attributed military, government and witness accounts. · HR-ARCHIVE-B06-FAMILY-TRC-SA

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B06-SRC-SA-TRCV2@33ecff50426662e9

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 33ecff50426662e97d7de5fb19cdc3c558db74398767663472b657804c0ff008. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 53, 54 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

The source clock is 08:00 with unverified timezone. Describing a military base and refugee camp does not classify every person present.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B16-SA-ATTACK · exact wording SHA-256 c2f56040231aadfc6014facaf77312c5572bab9ab0a380fd74d5163242b7cdcd

Report a correction →
decision

The TRC reproduces Defence Minister P. W. Botha’s public justification of the cross-border operation on 4 May 1978. A defence issued on the attack day does not itself establish his private initiating order.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Date of Botha’s public justification; not proof of a private initiating order..

Date basis and original source clocks

Date of Botha’s public justification; not proof of a private initiating order.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report, volume2 ↗

Publisher: South African TRC

Exact passage: para33 printed50/PDF53

Source establishes: The TRC reproduces Defence Minister P. W. Botha’s 4 May 1978 public justification of the cross-border operation, supporting endorsement on that date, not a private authorization.

Document date: 1998-10-29 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Previously independently reviewed passages at the exact locator, with their surrounding source qualifications.

Access limitations

Underlying military documents, White Paper, Cuban archives, UNICEF and Red Cross records were not separately obtained. Commission findings are distinct from criminal convictions.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Official TRC investigative report with attributed military, government and witness accounts. · HR-ARCHIVE-B06-FAMILY-TRC-SA

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B06-SRC-SA-TRCV2@33ecff50426662e9

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 33ecff50426662e97d7de5fb19cdc3c558db74398767663472b657804c0ff008. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 53 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

A public justification on the attack day does not establish the private initiating order.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B16-SA-BOTHA · exact wording SHA-256 48415eb597c3be6cb725e65b4903f8aeecaa03c07e71f6d5e089f30881b98707

Report a correction →
human consequence

For the separate Chetequera attacks, the TRC reports more than 300 killed, between 200 and 300 captured and torture of many prisoners. It relays a Red Cross report that 118 remained detained in January 1980; that later stock is not an additional captured group.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Context collection; no single event date assigned.

Date basis and original source clocks

The separate attacks’ exact dates remain unresolved in this reviewed unit; January 1980 is the later detention observation only.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report, volume2 ↗

Publisher: South African TRC

Exact passage: para40 printed52/PDF55

Source establishes: The TRC reports more than 300 killed, 200–300 captured and torture of many prisoners at Chetequera, then relays a Red Cross report of 118 still detained in January 1980. The underlying Red Cross record was not obtained.

Document date: 1998-10-29 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Previously independently reviewed passages at the exact locator, with their surrounding source qualifications.

Access limitations

Underlying military documents, White Paper, Cuban archives, UNICEF and Red Cross records were not separately obtained. Commission findings are distinct from criminal convictions.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Official TRC investigative report with attributed military, government and witness accounts. · HR-ARCHIVE-B06-FAMILY-TRC-SA

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B06-SRC-SA-TRCV2@33ecff50426662e9

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 33ecff50426662e97d7de5fb19cdc3c558db74398767663472b657804c0ff008. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 55 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Chetequera is separate from Kassinga. Killed, captured, reported torture and later detained populations cannot be summed; 118 in January 1980 is a later stock, not additional captures.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B16-SA-CHETEQUERA · exact wording SHA-256 66deca2bb999d18f2902896aa30e16a1cebd5581c701299074792d5dc555cae7

Report a correction →
context

The TRC identifies Ian Gleeson, Blackie de Swardt and Giep Booysen in overall planning and command, and Jan Breytenbach and Deon Ferreira leading ground forces at Kassinga. These roles do not establish individual orders to kill civilians.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Context collection; no single event date assigned.

Date basis and original source clocks

Source describes planning/command roles but does not establish separate role-start or role-end dates.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report, volume2 ↗

Publisher: South African TRC

Exact passage: para35 printed51/PDF54

Source establishes: The TRC identifies Gleeson, de Swardt and Booysen in overall planning and command and Breytenbach and Ferreira leading the ground forces at Kassinga.

Document date: 1998-10-29 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Previously independently reviewed passages at the exact locator, with their surrounding source qualifications.

Access limitations

Underlying military documents, White Paper, Cuban archives, UNICEF and Red Cross records were not separately obtained. Commission findings are distinct from criminal convictions.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Official TRC investigative report with attributed military, government and witness accounts. · HR-ARCHIVE-B06-FAMILY-TRC-SA

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B06-SRC-SA-TRCV2@33ecff50426662e9

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 33ecff50426662e97d7de5fb19cdc3c558db74398767663472b657804c0ff008. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 54 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Planning, overall command and ground-force leadership are reported roles; no individual order to kill civilians is established.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B16-SA-COMMAND · exact wording SHA-256 d9401d8ee87b1e2f3051e4a5ee13e054725663f1d0db6bb5eada4851d0e570f9

Report a correction →
human consequence

The TRC relays Cuban archival information that approximately 150 Cuban troops died in attacks on convoys approaching Kassinga. This concerns separate convoy attacks, not an additional civilian camp count.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Context collection; no single event date assigned.

Date basis and original source clocks

Exact dates of the separate convoy attacks are not resolved in this reviewed unit.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report, volume2 ↗

Publisher: South African TRC

Exact passage: para36 printed51/PDF54

Source establishes: The TRC relays Cuban archival information that approximately 150 Cuban troops died in attacks on convoys approaching Kassinga; it does not make them an additional civilian camp count.

Document date: 1998-10-29 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Previously independently reviewed passages at the exact locator, with their surrounding source qualifications.

Access limitations

Underlying military documents, White Paper, Cuban archives, UNICEF and Red Cross records were not separately obtained. Commission findings are distinct from criminal convictions.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Official TRC investigative report with attributed military, government and witness accounts. · HR-ARCHIVE-B06-FAMILY-TRC-SA

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B06-SRC-SA-TRCV2@33ecff50426662e9

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 33ecff50426662e97d7de5fb19cdc3c558db74398767663472b657804c0ff008. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 54 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

The TRC relays Cuban archival information not separately obtained. These are troop deaths in separate convoy attacks, not civilian camp deaths.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B16-SA-CONVOY · exact wording SHA-256 3af07ac37b53c878ee148e764fa2051e2cdf59604f02f8d809fdb71b267b1bce

Report a correction →
context

The TRC found gross human-rights violations against civilian occupants of Kassinga and held B. J. Vorster, P. W. Botha, Magnus Malan, Constand Viljoen and R. H. Rogers accountable for deliberate planning. This is an investigative finding, not individual criminal convictions. Vorster was prime minister at the time.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: TRC report date; documentary investigative account, not occurrence date or a criminal conviction..

Date basis and original source clocks

TRC report date; documentary investigative account, not occurrence date or a criminal conviction.

Sources (2) · exact passages & limitations

Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report, volume2 ↗

Publisher: South African TRC

Exact passage: finding box following para48 printed55/PDF58

Source establishes: The original TRC finding box records gross human-rights violations against civilian occupants and the named officials’ accountability for deliberate planning. The publication is explicitly a neutral documentary account of that institutional finding, not an independent accusation or conviction.

Document date: 1998-10-29 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Previously independently reviewed passages at the exact locator, with their surrounding source qualifications.

Access limitations

Underlying military documents, White Paper, Cuban archives, UNICEF and Red Cross records were not separately obtained. Commission findings are distinct from criminal convictions.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Official TRC investigative report with attributed military, government and witness accounts. · HR-ARCHIVE-B06-FAMILY-TRC-SA

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B06-SRC-SA-TRCV2@33ecff50426662e9

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 33ecff50426662e97d7de5fb19cdc3c558db74398767663472b657804c0ff008. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 58 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

History: former heads of state and government ↗

Publisher: Presidency of South Africa

Exact passage: PrimeMinisters:B.J.Vorster13September1966–29September1978;StatePresidents:Diederichs19April1975–21August1978andVorster10October1978–4June1979

Source establishes: The official historical office roster establishes that Vorster was prime minister at the attack date, not then state president. It supplies only the office correction, no independent corroboration of responsibility and no transfer to Diederichs.

Document date: Not established · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Previously independently reviewed passages at the exact locator, with their surrounding source qualifications.

Access limitations

This supports a dated office correction only. Holding an office does not transfer responsibility for an action.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Official historical office roster. · HR-ARCHIVE-B06-FAMILY-SA-ROSTER

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B06-SRC-SA-OFFICES@5287035c3ce595e5

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 5287035c3ce595e5887f59c44ccd573b5b70a1a52197c8237af076d9c02e567f. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

This records the commission’s formal institutional finding, not adoption of personal criminal guilt or a criminal conviction. Its description of Vorster as head of state requires the dated prime-minister correction.

Legal distinction

Neutral record of a formal TRC investigative finding; not a criminal conviction, new determination of personal guilt, corroborated targeting order or personal casualty allocation.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B16-SA-FINDING · exact wording SHA-256 454ce59aa22c2fd883f07bbcdcb56a21a49d2d490bbe46a7d5ad530518e52725

Report a correction →
human consequence

The TRC reproduces an early military headquarters estimate of 500 enemy dead at Kassinga and separately discusses reports of women and children killed. “Enemy” is the military’s label, not a verified combatant classification.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Context collection; no single event date assigned.

Date basis and original source clocks

Early military estimate as relayed by the TRC; exact estimate date and cutoff unknown.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report, volume2 ↗

Publisher: South African TRC

Exact passage: paras37-38 printed51/PDF54

Source establishes: The TRC reproduces military headquarters’ early estimate of 500 enemy dead and discusses women and children killed. This establishes a reported estimate and label, not 500 verified combatants.

Document date: 1998-10-29 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Previously independently reviewed passages at the exact locator, with their surrounding source qualifications.

Access limitations

Underlying military documents, White Paper, Cuban archives, UNICEF and Red Cross records were not separately obtained. Commission findings are distinct from criminal convictions.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Official TRC investigative report with attributed military, government and witness accounts. · HR-ARCHIVE-B06-FAMILY-TRC-SA

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B06-SRC-SA-TRCV2@33ecff50426662e9

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 33ecff50426662e97d7de5fb19cdc3c558db74398767663472b657804c0ff008. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 54 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

“Enemy” is the military’s label, not a verified legal combatant classification. No addition to the White Paper’s 624 is approved.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

The TRC also relays women and children killed and an Angolan White Paper’s differently classified toll.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B16-SA-MILITARY-COUNT · exact wording SHA-256 5a1a85385626e3f29304366a2dfbb74c87be3927827a3cd12c2724658d93bc5d

Report a correction →
human consequence

The TRC describes five SADF troops missing when withdrawal from Kassinga was otherwise complete that evening. This is a reported operational status, not five confirmed deaths or a present missing-person finding.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Reported operational status that evening; not current missing status or confirmed deaths..

Date basis and original source clocks

Reported operational status that evening; not current missing status or confirmed deaths.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report, volume2 ↗

Publisher: South African TRC

Exact passage: para37 printed51/PDF54

Source establishes: The TRC describes five SADF troops missing when withdrawal was otherwise complete that evening. It supports a reported contemporaneous status, not confirmed deaths or a present missing-person finding.

Document date: 1998-10-29 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Previously independently reviewed passages at the exact locator, with their surrounding source qualifications.

Access limitations

Underlying military documents, White Paper, Cuban archives, UNICEF and Red Cross records were not separately obtained. Commission findings are distinct from criminal convictions.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Official TRC investigative report with attributed military, government and witness accounts. · HR-ARCHIVE-B06-FAMILY-TRC-SA

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B06-SRC-SA-TRCV2@33ecff50426662e9

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 33ecff50426662e97d7de5fb19cdc3c558db74398767663472b657804c0ff008. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 54 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Five then missing is not five confirmed deaths, and later or present status is not established.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B16-SA-MISSING · exact wording SHA-256 929a3d2bed72f477d1f27178e66526966e2055bd9baa8001295a70cef3a54e85

Report a correction →
decision

The TRC places approval for the Kassinga operation around March 1978, without identifying the approving individual in that passage. It quotes orders against killing prisoners after the attack and against shooting women and children where possible.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: TRC places approval around March 1978; approximate month, exact date and approving individual unknown..

Date basis and original source clocks

TRC places approval around March 1978; approximate month, exact date and approving individual unknown.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report, volume2 ↗

Publisher: South African TRC

Exact passage: paras26-27 printed48/PDF51

Source establishes: The TRC places approval around March 1978 and quotes restrictions against killing prisoners after the attack and against shooting women and children where possible; the approving person is not identified.

Document date: 1998-10-29 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Previously independently reviewed passages at the exact locator, with their surrounding source qualifications.

Access limitations

Underlying military documents, White Paper, Cuban archives, UNICEF and Red Cross records were not separately obtained. Commission findings are distinct from criminal convictions.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Official TRC investigative report with attributed military, government and witness accounts. · HR-ARCHIVE-B06-FAMILY-TRC-SA

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B06-SRC-SA-TRCV2@33ecff50426662e9

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 33ecff50426662e97d7de5fb19cdc3c558db74398767663472b657804c0ff008. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 51 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Approval is placed around March 1978 but the passage does not name the approving individual. Quoted restrictions on killing do not prove compliance.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B16-SA-ORDERS · exact wording SHA-256 8cc0946bda1772a418055ecbb4a30b6b0e06f175fdec6bc27a60dccf5dd560dc

Report a correction →
human consequence

The TRC relays an Angolan White Paper’s 624 killed: 159 men, 167 women and 298 teenagers and children. It also reports 611 wounded. These are source categories, not a verified civilian–combatant division or an under-eighteen child count.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Context collection; no single event date assigned.

Date basis and original source clocks

Source categories concern Kassinga; the occurrence dates and casualty observation cutoff are not independently resolved.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report, volume2 ↗

Publisher: South African TRC

Exact passage: para39 printed52/PDF55

Source establishes: The TRC relays 624 killed, subdivided into 159 men, 167 women and 298 teenagers and children, and 611 wounded, attributed to an Angolan White Paper. It does not verify an under-eighteen count or a civilian–combatant division.

Document date: 1998-10-29 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Previously independently reviewed passages at the exact locator, with their surrounding source qualifications.

Access limitations

Underlying military documents, White Paper, Cuban archives, UNICEF and Red Cross records were not separately obtained. Commission findings are distinct from criminal convictions.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Official TRC investigative report with attributed military, government and witness accounts. · HR-ARCHIVE-B06-FAMILY-TRC-SA

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B06-SRC-SA-TRCV2@33ecff50426662e9

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 33ecff50426662e97d7de5fb19cdc3c558db74398767663472b657804c0ff008. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 55 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

The TRC relays an Angolan White Paper, not an independently checked death register. “Teenagers and children” is not an under-eighteen category; men and women are not verified combatant or civilian classes.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

The TRC also reproduces an early military estimate of 500 “enemy” dead. The two counts are competing accounts and must not be added.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B16-SA-TOLL · exact wording SHA-256 99e89c0abbeea7ea2c3acdd1a60c656fab1ff280f6642ce37809debeca46a887

Report a correction →
decision

The TRC quotes an 8 March 1978 communiqué in which army chief Constand Viljoen described Kassinga as a PLAN planning, medical and recruit-transit centre. This records a military assessment, not the status of every camp occupant.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Date of the military communiqué quoted by the TRC..

Date basis and original source clocks

Date of the military communiqué quoted by the TRC.

Sources (2) · exact passages & limitations

Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report, volume2 ↗

Publisher: South African TRC

Exact passage: chapter2 paras21-25, printed47/PDF50, especially paras24-25

Source establishes: The TRC quotes army chief Constand Viljoen’s 8 March 1978 assessment of Kassinga as a PLAN planning, medical and recruit-transit centre.

Document date: 1998-10-29 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Previously independently reviewed passages at the exact locator, with their surrounding source qualifications.

Access limitations

Underlying military documents, White Paper, Cuban archives, UNICEF and Red Cross records were not separately obtained. Commission findings are distinct from criminal convictions.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Official TRC investigative report with attributed military, government and witness accounts. · HR-ARCHIVE-B06-FAMILY-TRC-SA

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B06-SRC-SA-TRCV2@33ecff50426662e9

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 33ecff50426662e97d7de5fb19cdc3c558db74398767663472b657804c0ff008. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 50 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report, volume2 ↗

Publisher: South African TRC

Exact passage: Printed50/physical53,paragraphs32–33

Source establishes: The surrounding TRC account supplies refugee-camp and public-justification context, not independent corroboration of the military assessment.

Document date: 1998-10-29 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Previously independently reviewed passages at the exact locator, with their surrounding source qualifications.

Access limitations

Underlying military documents, White Paper, Cuban archives, UNICEF and Red Cross records were not separately obtained. Commission findings are distinct from criminal convictions.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Official TRC investigative report with attributed military, government and witness accounts. · HR-ARCHIVE-B06-FAMILY-TRC-SA

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B06-SRC-SA-TRCV2@33ecff50426662e9

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 33ecff50426662e97d7de5fb19cdc3c558db74398767663472b657804c0ff008. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 53 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

The TRC quotes a military assessment. This does not classify every occupant, establish an initiating order or independently corroborate the original communiqué.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B16-SA-VILJOEN · exact wording SHA-256 ac052b14f720aabc67ebd4197d501ea2c419c14d05c53f1c2d38f363a0f3aec9

Report a correction →
context

The TRC accepted that no orders were given to kill wounded people but made no finding on their treatment. It could not corroborate a contrary anonymous account and did not conclude that no wounded people were killed.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: TRC report date; documentary investigative account, not occurrence date or a criminal conviction..

Date basis and original source clocks

TRC report date; documentary investigative account, not occurrence date or a criminal conviction.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report, volume2 ↗

Publisher: South African TRC

Exact passage: paras46-48 printed54-55/PDF57-58

Source establishes: The TRC accepted that no orders were given to kill wounded people but made no finding on their treatment and could not corroborate the contrary anonymous account. It did not conclude that no wounded people were killed.

Document date: 1998-10-29 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Previously independently reviewed passages at the exact locator, with their surrounding source qualifications.

Access limitations

Underlying military documents, White Paper, Cuban archives, UNICEF and Red Cross records were not separately obtained. Commission findings are distinct from criminal convictions.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Official TRC investigative report with attributed military, government and witness accounts. · HR-ARCHIVE-B06-FAMILY-TRC-SA

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B06-SRC-SA-TRCV2@33ecff50426662e9

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 33ecff50426662e97d7de5fb19cdc3c558db74398767663472b657804c0ff008. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 57, 58 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

No finding on treatment of wounded people is not a finding that none were killed. The contrary anonymous account could not be corroborated.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

The TRC considered an anonymous contrary account but could not corroborate it.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B16-SA-WOUNDED · exact wording SHA-256 db9f8f388c468362103d17b349c437715e74edbbb57ad014d0c883b7e798e8a3

Report a correction →
context

Amnesty’s 1987 report says Bokassa’s 1980 in-absentia death sentence was annulled after his return in October 1986. A new trial began on 26 November 1986 and remained underway at year end. Annulment of the earlier sentence was a procedural development.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Context collection; no single event date assigned.

Date basis and original source clocks

Return inOctober1986preceded annulment; exact annulment day unknown. Newtrial began26November1986.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Amnesty International Report1987 ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: printed37-38/PDF51-52,final Bokassa paragraphs

Source establishes: Amnesty1987reports the return,annulment,newtrial date and ongoing year-end status.

Document date: 1987 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Printed pages 37–38 on physical PDF pages 51–52, final Bokassa paragraphs and continuation.

Access limitations

Original annulment and trial judgment were not obtained. This is a dated procedural account, not complete current legal history.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Amnesty report of later procedural history. · HR-ARCHIVE-B07-FAMILY-AI-CAR

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B07-SRC-CAR-AI1987@6846af5da02fbb7c

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 6846af5da02fbb7c272e9b5437e34313982befd7025c50bc7852565da1b2d977. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 51, 52 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Annulment is procedural,not blanket exoneration. The1986trial remained underway at year end; original annulment absent.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B17-CAR-ANNUL · exact wording SHA-256 e9e118d6af6beeeba9c352d7d6943ff5565ea0c2e65e8c5e6c38a3a46226b4e2

Report a correction →
human consequence

An Amnesty anthology reprinting its Children report gives 50–100 children killed at Ngaragba prison in April 1979. It separately relays 12–28 suffocation deaths in one cell and a witness’s count of 62 bodies. Those observations overlap; more than 100 children taken to the prison on 18 April is an arrest count.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Reported prison-death month; 18 April admissions are a separate dated arrest observation..

Date basis and original source clocks

Reported prison-death month; 18 April admissions are a separate dated arrest observation.

Sources (2) · exact passages & limitations

Voices for Freedom anthology: Killings,the youngest victims, reprinting Children ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: p110/PDF110 right column

Source establishes: Visually reviewed anthology page supplies the50–100prison estimate,12–28cell deaths,62bodies and more-than100admissions,with reported ages8–16.

Document date: Not established · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Physical/printed page 110, visually reviewed columns and final paragraphs.

Access limitations

Original Children report, underlying release and witness records were not separately obtained. Catalogue identifier does not establish an original publication day. Overlapping prison/cell/body/admission observations are not additive.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Amnesty anthology reprinting its earlier Children report. · HR-ARCHIVE-B07-FAMILY-AI-CAR

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B07-SRC-CAR-AICHILDREN1986@84005719f6cfa6b4

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 84005719f6cfa6b48866aa4e49e14e423f608d368cd98337509fc7920d44c9fe. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 110 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Amnesty International Report1980 ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: Printed35–36/physical23–24,April prison and survivor accounts

Source establishes: The annual-report version supplies related prison/survivor accounts and differing cell formulations; qualification context, not corroboration of identical counts.

Document date: 1980 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Central African Republic account, printed pages 35–37 on physical PDF pages 23–24.

Access limitations

Original decree, inquiry, witness records and judgments were not obtained. Cell-death accounts differ across Amnesty versions and remain unreconciled.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Amnesty report relaying inquiry, witness and trial accounts. · HR-ARCHIVE-B07-FAMILY-AI-CAR

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B07-SRC-CAR-AI1980@85447741dd879b4d

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 85447741dd879b4dd29c4dd55d53fd74f2761521b64afb94d11df7c2c6faf0e3. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 23, 24 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Reprinted source accounts, not independently checked witness records or a death register. Prison/cell/body observations overlap; more-than100admissions on18April are arrests.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Other Amnesty versions describe different cell counts; no harmonization is established.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B17-CAR-APR-COUNTS · exact wording SHA-256 262acecdd7bbc733975eed4e78e2f5e3530dfcf9cf3a07d708b772218d45c9de

Report a correction →
decision

Amnesty’s 1989 report records that President André Kolingba commuted Bokassa’s June 1987 death sentence to life imprisonment in February 1988. It lists convictions including conspiracy to murder and illegal arrest and detention of children; this wording does not convert every earlier allegation into a conviction.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Reported commutation month; original instrument and exact day not obtained..

Date basis and original source clocks

Reported commutation month; original instrument and exact day not obtained.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Amnesty International Report1989 ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: printed42/PDF44 left column,last paragraph

Source establishes: Amnesty1989reports Kolingba’sFebruary1988commutation of theJune1987death sentence and lists particular conviction categories.

Document date: 1989 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Printed page 42 on physical PDF page 44, final left-column paragraph.

Access limitations

Original 1987 judgment and 1988 commutation decree were not obtained. The listed categories do not establish every previous allegation or direct participation.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Amnesty report of conviction categories and executive clemency. · HR-ARCHIVE-B07-FAMILY-AI-CAR

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B07-SRC-CAR-AI1989@fe5cc54594ca9d87

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: fe5cc54594ca9d87e5fde4b247927f5e013c3778dc6ef6e7af20aab567222a61. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 44 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Original1987judgment and1988commutation instrument absent. Listed categories do not turn every earlier allegation into a conviction or supply complete current legal history.

Legal distinction

Neutral source-attributed legal history with specified conviction categories and executive clemency; no independent personal-guilt determination.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B17-CAR-COMMUTE · exact wording SHA-256 58e7d940b8170e7047c4a848f2e1af080da282e1d133a35d699a628e836e969f

Report a correction →
decision

The Amnesty Children excerpt reports that Bokassa initially denied deaths in custody, later acknowledged some older youths had been killed, and announced that children remaining in prison would be released. An announced release does not establish that everyone was freed.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Context collection; no single event date assigned.

Date basis and original source clocks

Exact dates of the reported denial,acknowledgement and release announcement remain unknown.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Voices for Freedom anthology: Killings,the youngest victims, reprinting Children ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: p110/PDF110 final paragraphs

Source establishes: The reprinted account reports successive denial,acknowledgement of some older youths killed and an announcement of release.

Document date: Not established · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Physical/printed page 110, visually reviewed columns and final paragraphs.

Access limitations

Original Children report, underlying release and witness records were not separately obtained. Catalogue identifier does not establish an original publication day. Overlapping prison/cell/body/admission observations are not additive.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Amnesty anthology reprinting its earlier Children report. · HR-ARCHIVE-B07-FAMILY-AI-CAR

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B07-SRC-CAR-AICHILDREN1986@84005719f6cfa6b4

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 84005719f6cfa6b48866aa4e49e14e423f608d368cd98337509fc7920d44c9fe. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 110 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Original statements and completed release registers absent. An announced release is not proof everyone was freed.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B17-CAR-DENIAL · exact wording SHA-256 6f4cdf523775ac4230157c937f8d6eb9620a7aa5660944aaa76e83c3ad349583

Report a correction →
human consequence

Amnesty’s October 1979 newsletter relays an African inquiry’s estimate of about 150 people killed by security forces in January 1979. This differs from Amnesty’s earlier allegation of at least 400; neither figure is added to the other.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: January unrest; the earlier 18–21 January account and later inquiry estimate retain separate coverage..

Date basis and original source clocks

January unrest; the earlier 18–21 January account and later inquiry estimate retain separate coverage.

Sources (2) · exact passages & limitations

Amnesty International Newsletter,October1979, Inquiry confirms children slain ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: p6/PDF6 opening article

Source establishes: Newsletter relays the inquiry estimate for January security-force deaths.

Document date: 1979-10 · Publication date: 1979-10

Actual review scope: October 1979 newsletter, physical/printed page 6, “Inquiry confirms children slain”.

Access limitations

Original inquiry and witness records were not obtained. Direct personal order/participation allegations remain excluded. Same Amnesty reporting family.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Contemporary Amnesty newsletter relaying an African inquiry. · HR-ARCHIVE-B07-FAMILY-AI-CAR

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B07-SRC-CAR-AINEWS1979@5aea5bf05490200c

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 5aea5bf05490200c7c80f1d510cb7d94504b8078d3ab7c12ffcb45bdcc340bbd. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 6 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Amnesty International Report1979 ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: Printed12–13/physical12,Central African Empire opening

Source establishes: Earlier annual report supplies the conflicting at-least400allegation; do not add the estimates.

Document date: 1979 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Title and Central African Empire account, printed pages 12–13 on physical PDF page 12.

Access limitations

Original decree, troop instruction and counting method were not obtained. The reporting period is 1 May 1978–30 April 1979; later same-publisher figures differ.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Contemporary Amnesty annual report. · HR-ARCHIVE-B07-FAMILY-AI-CAR

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B07-SRC-CAR-AI1979@524dff9fe507dabe

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 524dff9fe507dabe0f2a3a1658a1afe441641f17e57011f896afb6c1b90d0ba8. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 12 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Same Amnesty reporting family; underlying inquiry method and scope unresolved.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

About150in the relayed inquiry differs from Amnesty’s earlier at-least400 allegation.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B17-CAR-JAN-ALTERNATIVE · exact wording SHA-256 aabb27753347fa4d43f0e239d7e4333f517e5b7b14f773604130bb020e93d772

Report a correction →
context

Amnesty’s 1981 report records Bokassa’s conviction and death sentence in absentia in December 1980. It separately reports that former ministers Louis Lakouama and Jean-Robert Zana were acquitted of charges connected with the April 1979 prison killings. The in-absentia sentence was later annulled.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Reported in-absentia conviction/sentence month; later annulment is mandatory context..

Date basis and original source clocks

Reported in-absentia conviction/sentence month; later annulment is mandatory context.

Sources (2) · exact passages & limitations

Amnesty International Report1981 ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: printed34-35/PDF23 spread,final CAR paragraphs

Source establishes: Amnesty1981reports theDecember1980in-absentia sentence and the ministers’ acquittals.

Document date: 1981 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Printed pages 34–35 on physical PDF page 23, both columns.

Access limitations

Original judgments, appeals and execution order were not obtained. Acquittals, annulments, retrials and the separate January 1981 execution cohort remain distinct.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Amnesty report of national proceedings and later executions. · HR-ARCHIVE-B07-FAMILY-AI-CAR

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B07-SRC-CAR-AI1981@b90c32f71f4a3012

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: b90c32f71f4a3012dee688f57a81f623c7ee8889aa62af9cd1280e5fbb99d36e. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 23 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Amnesty International Report1987 ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: Printed37–38/physical51–52,final Bokassa paragraphs

Source establishes: The later report supplies the mandatory annulment context; it does not corroborate every original charge.

Document date: 1987 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Printed pages 37–38 on physical PDF pages 51–52, final Bokassa paragraphs and continuation.

Access limitations

Original annulment and trial judgment were not obtained. This is a dated procedural account, not complete current legal history.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Amnesty report of later procedural history. · HR-ARCHIVE-B07-FAMILY-AI-CAR

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B07-SRC-CAR-AI1987@6846af5da02fbb7c

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 6846af5da02fbb7c272e9b5437e34313982befd7025c50bc7852565da1b2d977. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 51, 52 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Original judgment absent. A neutral procedural history,not project adoption of personal guilt or an unchanged final sentence. Two ministers’ acquittals remain explicit.

Legal distinction

Reported conviction,acquittals and later annulment are separate legal stages; the report is not an original judgment.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B17-CAR-LEGAL1980 · exact wording SHA-256 12734f1a9b72eda577dd43063bbfac5be96212bcd97a8201c1b6f467065f5d55

Report a correction →
context

Amnesty reports that six people received death sentences at Bangui’s Central Criminal Court in February 1980, that the Supreme Court annulled those sentences in August, and that September retrials produced fresh death sentences. The six included former prison guards found guilty of killing children in April 1979.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Distinct February sentences,Augustannulment andSeptemberretrials; not a continuous sentence event..

Date basis and original source clocks

Distinct February sentences,Augustannulment andSeptemberretrials; not a continuous sentence event.

Sources (2) · exact passages & limitations

Amnesty International Report1981 ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: printed35/PDF23 right column opening

Source establishes: Amnesty1981describes the six-person cohort and distinct court stages.

Document date: 1981 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Printed pages 34–35 on physical PDF page 23, both columns.

Access limitations

Original judgments, appeals and execution order were not obtained. Acquittals, annulments, retrials and the separate January 1981 execution cohort remain distinct.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Amnesty report of national proceedings and later executions. · HR-ARCHIVE-B07-FAMILY-AI-CAR

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B07-SRC-CAR-AI1981@b90c32f71f4a3012

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: b90c32f71f4a3012dee688f57a81f623c7ee8889aa62af9cd1280e5fbb99d36e. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 23 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Amnesty International Report1980 ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: Central African Republic printed37/PDF24 right column,February trial paragraph

Source establishes: The earlier report provides the February trial account; it does not establish that the first verdicts remained unchanged.

Document date: 1980 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Central African Republic account, printed pages 35–37 on physical PDF pages 23–24.

Access limitations

Original decree, inquiry, witness records and judgments were not obtained. Cell-death accounts differ across Amnesty versions and remain unreconciled.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Amnesty report relaying inquiry, witness and trial accounts. · HR-ARCHIVE-B07-FAMILY-AI-CAR

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B07-SRC-CAR-AI1980@85447741dd879b4d

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 85447741dd879b4dd29c4dd55d53fd74f2761521b64afb94d11df7c2c6faf0e3. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 24 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Original judgments and appeals absent. Same six-person cohort across stages; not all six are described as child-killing defendants.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B17-CAR-SIX · exact wording SHA-256 4b140f24dc51daa011974f844d90573385b9143acf6985f231f2413eb2407f5c

Report a correction →
human consequence

Amnesty’s 1981 report states that the six prisoners were executed by firing squad at the end of January 1981 despite commutation appeals. They are a later execution cohort, separate from the children killed in 1979; this does not mean Bokassa was executed.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Source says end ofJanuary1981; exact day and official authorization unknown..

Date basis and original source clocks

Source says end ofJanuary1981; exact day and official authorization unknown.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Amnesty International Report1981 ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: printed35/PDF23 right column opening

Source establishes: Amnesty1981reports all six executed by firing squad at the end ofJanuary despite commutation appeals.

Document date: 1981 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Printed pages 34–35 on physical PDF page 23, both columns.

Access limitations

Original judgments, appeals and execution order were not obtained. Acquittals, annulments, retrials and the separate January 1981 execution cohort remain distinct.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Amnesty report of national proceedings and later executions. · HR-ARCHIVE-B07-FAMILY-AI-CAR

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B07-SRC-CAR-AI1981@b90c32f71f4a3012

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: b90c32f71f4a3012dee688f57a81f623c7ee8889aa62af9cd1280e5fbb99d36e. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 23 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Different later cohort from1979children; no official execution order or authorizer established and no execution of Bokassa implied.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B17-CAR-SIX-EXEC · exact wording SHA-256 738c522e1f370e8ab34cc675ddf5a39d4b5d756724428beba3c6acc4b7555af0

Report a correction →
decision

Amnesty’s 1980 report identifies a school-uniform decree by Emperor Jean-Bedel Bokassa as the subject of January 1979 protests in Bangui. Its earlier 1979 report alleged at least 400 deaths during 18–21 January unrest; a later inquiry estimate, relayed by Amnesty, was about 150. These estimates remain unreconciled.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: January unrest; the earlier 18–21 January account and later inquiry estimate retain separate coverage..

Date basis and original source clocks

January unrest; the earlier 18–21 January account and later inquiry estimate retain separate coverage.

Sources (3) · exact passages & limitations

Amnesty International Report1979 ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: Central African Empire,printed12-13/PDF12 spread, opening

Source establishes: Earlier annual report alleges at least400deaths in18–21January unrest. It does not establish a child-only count or personal killing order.

Document date: 1979 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Title and Central African Empire account, printed pages 12–13 on physical PDF page 12.

Access limitations

Original decree, troop instruction and counting method were not obtained. The reporting period is 1 May 1978–30 April 1979; later same-publisher figures differ.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Contemporary Amnesty annual report. · HR-ARCHIVE-B07-FAMILY-AI-CAR

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B07-SRC-CAR-AI1979@524dff9fe507dabe

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 524dff9fe507dabe0f2a3a1658a1afe441641f17e57011f896afb6c1b90d0ba8. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 12 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Amnesty International Report1980 ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: printed36/PDF24 first paragraphs

Source establishes: Later annual report identifies Bokassa’s school-uniform decree and relays the differing inquiry estimate. Original decree and inquiry absent.

Document date: 1980 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Central African Republic account, printed pages 35–37 on physical PDF pages 23–24.

Access limitations

Original decree, inquiry, witness records and judgments were not obtained. Cell-death accounts differ across Amnesty versions and remain unreconciled.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Amnesty report relaying inquiry, witness and trial accounts. · HR-ARCHIVE-B07-FAMILY-AI-CAR

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B07-SRC-CAR-AI1980@85447741dd879b4d

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 85447741dd879b4dd29c4dd55d53fd74f2761521b64afb94d11df7c2c6faf0e3. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 24 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Amnesty International Newsletter,October1979, Inquiry confirms children slain ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: Physical/printed6,Central African Empire,Inquiry confirms children slain

Source establishes: October newsletter relays the inquiry’s roughly150January estimate, not independent corroboration of400.

Document date: 1979-10 · Publication date: 1979-10

Actual review scope: October 1979 newsletter, physical/printed page 6, “Inquiry confirms children slain”.

Access limitations

Original inquiry and witness records were not obtained. Direct personal order/participation allegations remain excluded. Same Amnesty reporting family.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Contemporary Amnesty newsletter relaying an African inquiry. · HR-ARCHIVE-B07-FAMILY-AI-CAR

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B07-SRC-CAR-AINEWS1979@5aea5bf05490200c

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 5aea5bf05490200c7c80f1d510cb7d94504b8078d3ab7c12ffcb45bdcc340bbd. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Original decree and counting methods were not obtained. January150andat-least400are unreconciled estimates, not child-only counts or a personal order to kill.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Earlier Amnesty allegation of at least400differs from the later inquiry estimate of about150.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B17-CAR-UNIFORMS · exact wording SHA-256 b85bc4de12cec899e56b98ce7a53e1cf776abef1928601b7ec511fc219e666d7

Report a correction →
context

A US State Department telegram dated 14 May 1979 quotes an Associated Press account of Amnesty’s allegations. Its separate press guidance describes rumours of roughly seven to forty deaths but expressly says the Department lacked independent confirmation, including whether deaths had occurred.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Telegram date; source clock23:06UTC,not the date of alleged prison deaths..

Date basis and original source clocks

Telegram date; source clock23:06UTC,not the date of alleged prison deaths.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

FRUS1977-1980 volXVII part2 doc119, Student Deaths, telegram122925 ↗

Publisher: US Department of State

Exact passage: paras2,4 and source note

Source establishes: FRUS telegram paragraphs2and4and the source note distinguish the quoted AP account from the Department’s own limited press guidance.

Document date: 1979-05-14 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Telegram 122925, paragraphs 1–5 and archival source notes.

Access limitations

AP’s quotation of Amnesty and State Department repetition are not independent investigations. The stated absence of confirmation is not a finding that no deaths occurred.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Official archival transcription of a US diplomatic telegram. · HR-ARCHIVE-B07-FAMILY-US-CAR-DIPLOMACY

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B07-SRC-CAR-FRUS119@5ccbf927942f08f5

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 5ccbf927942f08f554e7a53b14292ddb14a9caf0c4fb9dd1a13a18e89c0b97d4. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

AP/Amnesty quotation and State repetition are not independent investigations. The press guidance’s lack of confirmation is not a negative finding of no killings.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

The separate guidance describes rough rumours while expressly lacking independent confirmation,including whether deaths had occurred.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B17-CAR-US-KNOWLEDGE · exact wording SHA-256 999a72b37b1c81484ce24340bf8986bccf14448d40ff1fa0d62f52415eba642f

Report a correction →
context

After visits to affected cities, the IACHR found that the National Guard used aerial bombardment and heavy artillery indiscriminately and ordered residents to remain indoors. Its report describes coordinated FSLN attacks on National Guard positions on 9 September 1978 before the government counterattack. This chronology concerns that phase of fighting.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Reported September phase, not the start or entirety of the Nicaraguan conflict..

Date basis and original source clocks

Reported September phase, not the start or entirety of the Nicaraguan conflict.

Sources (2) · exact passages & limitations

IACHR Nicaragua1978, chapterII, Right to Life ↗

Publisher: Inter-American Commission on Human Rights

Exact passage: sectionsA,B,commission findings before Chinandega testimony

Source establishes: Chapter II supplies the Commission’s findings of indiscriminate bombardment, heavy artillery and stay-indoors orders.

Document date: 1978-11-17 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Official Chapter II.A–D: findings, Chinandega testimony, full convoy narrative/transcript, competing accounts and Masaya testimony.

Access limitations

Original audio, photographs, witness records and autopsies were not separately authenticated. Institutional investigative findings are not individual criminal convictions. The serious personal Major allegation remains excluded.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Regional commission investigation, with separately identified testimony and transcript. · HR-ARCHIVE-B07-FAMILY-IACHR-NIC1978

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B07-SRC-NI-IACHRCH2@0deda90dc3d6d84e

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 0deda90dc3d6d84e42e24836f508429c1afc768ccd9db55cd06c31b3e5d9e97a. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

IACHR Nicaragua1978 report, Introduction ↗

Publisher: Inter-American Commission on Human Rights

Exact passage: The assaults of September

Source establishes: The introduction dates coordinated FSLN attacks on National Guard positions to 9 September 1978 before the government counterattack; this supports phase chronology only.

Document date: 1978-11-17 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Official introduction: complaints cohort, September chronology/early two-city estimate and competence limits.

Access limitations

Underlying complaints and Red Cross counting method were not obtained. Presumed dead is not independently confirmed dead; a competence limit does not exonerate an armed group.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Commission report with nested complaints and Red Cross estimate. · HR-ARCHIVE-B07-FAMILY-IACHR-NIC1978

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B07-SRC-NI-IACHRINTRO@15c5b9906c5c0ffa

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 15c5b9906c5c0ffaf683b2becedb28328bc7652b4070b2855e81d18a442f1693. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Investigative institutional findings are distinct from individual convictions. The 9 September attacks begin this reported phase, not necessarily the whole conflict.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B17-NI-BOMBING · exact wording SHA-256 109b35148272dfaa0e742c8f71900e617174b675cd01f00a8089514f6489d692

Report a correction →
human consequence

The IACHR reproduces a mother’s testimony that her husband and five-year-old daughter were killed in an aircraft attack in Barrio La Libertad, Chinandega, on 14 September 1978. This is a witness account recorded by the Commission; it identifies neither the pilot nor a personal presidential instruction.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Reported attack date in a mother’s testimony..

Date basis and original source clocks

Reported attack date in a mother’s testimony.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

IACHR Nicaragua1978, chapterII, Right to Life ↗

Publisher: Inter-American Commission on Human Rights

Exact passage: sectionB,first quoted Chinandega testimony

Source establishes: Chapter II.B reproduces a mother’s testimony that her husband and five-year-old daughter were killed in the Chinandega aircraft attack on 14 September.

Document date: 1978-11-17 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Official Chapter II.A–D: findings, Chinandega testimony, full convoy narrative/transcript, competing accounts and Masaya testimony.

Access limitations

Original audio, photographs, witness records and autopsies were not separately authenticated. Institutional investigative findings are not individual criminal convictions. The serious personal Major allegation remains excluded.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Regional commission investigation, with separately identified testimony and transcript. · HR-ARCHIVE-B07-FAMILY-IACHR-NIC1978

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B07-SRC-NI-IACHRCH2@0deda90dc3d6d84e

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 0deda90dc3d6d84e42e24836f508429c1afc768ccd9db55cd06c31b3e5d9e97a. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

A recorded witness account; pilot and personal presidential instruction remain unknown. Names and private witness records are not exported.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B17-NI-CHILD · exact wording SHA-256 64e7c37ce9f74eed005e79c1eba3d88472dc0d45ce191012b02e20b14f2f9227

Report a correction →
human consequence

The IACHR records two Red Cross volunteers killed during a medicine-and-food convoy mission on 14 September 1978. It reproduces the Red Cross account and describes photographs of the pickup and bodies. Its own assessment condemned the attack, while the source also preserves conflicting helicopter and patrol explanations.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Reported convoy mission date..

Date basis and original source clocks

Reported convoy mission date.

Sources (3) · exact passages & limitations

IACHR Nicaragua1978, chapterII, Right to Life ↗

Publisher: Inter-American Commission on Human Rights

Exact passage: sectionC,convoy account and commission photograph paragraph

Source establishes: Chapter II.C records two volunteer deaths, reproduces the Red Cross account and describes photographs and competing explanations.

Document date: 1978-11-17 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Official Chapter II.A–D: findings, Chinandega testimony, full convoy narrative/transcript, competing accounts and Masaya testimony.

Access limitations

Original audio, photographs, witness records and autopsies were not separately authenticated. Institutional investigative findings are not individual criminal convictions. The serious personal Major allegation remains excluded.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Regional commission investigation, with separately identified testimony and transcript. · HR-ARCHIVE-B07-FAMILY-IACHR-NIC1978

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B07-SRC-NI-IACHRCH2@0deda90dc3d6d84e

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 0deda90dc3d6d84e42e24836f508429c1afc768ccd9db55cd06c31b3e5d9e97a. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

IACHR Nicaragua1978 report, English Conclusions ↗

Publisher: Inter-American Commission on Human Rights

Exact passage: English conclusionc

Source establishes: English conclusion (c) assigns government responsibility; this is one side of the unresolved official-edition discrepancy.

Document date: 1978-11-17 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Conclusion (c), conclusion (f) and closing age/sector paragraph.

Access limitations

English and Spanish web conclusion (c) disagree. Original printed editions were not obtained; no silent correction or judicial exoneration is inferred. Same report family.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Official English web edition of commission conclusions. · HR-ARCHIVE-B07-FAMILY-IACHR-NIC1978

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B07-SRC-NI-IACHRCONCL@147c8c538656ba82

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 147c8c538656ba824b198c81e9047ef8102362efd8de8bb9ea568de9b01c50a0. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

CIDH Nicaragua1978, Spanish Conclusiones ↗

Publisher: Inter-American Commission on Human Rights

Exact passage: Spanish conclusionc,no es responsable clause

Source establishes: Spanish conclusion (c) contains a negation; the discrepancy is not silently repaired or treated as judicial exoneration.

Document date: 1978-11-17 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Conclusion (c), including the negation, read against English and Chapter II.C.

Access limitations

Unresolved official-edition discrepancy. This is not a second independent investigation or proof of judicial exoneration.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Official Spanish web edition of the same commission report. · HR-ARCHIVE-B07-FAMILY-IACHR-NIC1978

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B07-SRC-NI-IACHRCONCLSP@78dc628524d3ee3a

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 78dc628524d3ee3a72dcc7e18ee5e421f37ce76f4008e9e0eecec3b1b8284130. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Original images, recording and witness materials were not independently authenticated. Institutional condemnation is not an individual criminal conviction.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

The report retains conflicting helicopter and patrol explanations; the official English and Spanish conclusion (c) also disagree.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B17-NI-CONVOY · exact wording SHA-256 fc9446398989fd72d349738afb46094a23605ae1bdcd8ffc5ca7edb6cd582871

Report a correction →
decision

In a transcript published by the IACHR, Chief of Staff Colonel Humberto Corrales asks Major Anastasio Somoza for an explanation of the Red Cross incident and agrees to relay an account. The transcript is not an authenticated personal firing authorisation; the Major is identified as the president’s son.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Context collection; no single event date assigned.

Date basis and original source clocks

The Commission-published transcript’s exact recording date and custody are unverified.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

IACHR Nicaragua1978, chapterII, Right to Life ↗

Publisher: Inter-American Commission on Human Rights

Exact passage: sectionC,transcript introduction/opening andclosing

Source establishes: The published transcript identifies Chief of Staff Colonel Corrales asking Major Anastasio Somoza for an explanation and agreeing to relay an account. It supports the narrow communication, not a firing order or deliberate personal cover-up finding.

Document date: 1978-11-17 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Official Chapter II.A–D: findings, Chinandega testimony, full convoy narrative/transcript, competing accounts and Masaya testimony.

Access limitations

Original audio, photographs, witness records and autopsies were not separately authenticated. Institutional investigative findings are not individual criminal convictions. The serious personal Major allegation remains excluded.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Regional commission investigation, with separately identified testimony and transcript. · HR-ARCHIVE-B07-FAMILY-IACHR-NIC1978

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B07-SRC-NI-IACHRCH2@0deda90dc3d6d84e

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 0deda90dc3d6d84e42e24836f508429c1afc768ccd9db55cd06c31b3e5d9e97a. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Commission-published transcript, not authenticated original audio. Exact date and speaker custody unverified. The president and his son are distinct people.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B17-NI-CORRALES · exact wording SHA-256 39c390a9abe2151ee9db0216abbd8aedb9be1b368664a98a610c0104081c78c1

Report a correction →
human consequence

The IACHR’s introduction relays an early Red Cross estimate of at least 500 people killed in León and Estelí during the September 1978 fighting. It is neither a nationwide total nor a verified all-civilian or child-only count.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Reported September phase, not the start or entirety of the Nicaraguan conflict..

Date basis and original source clocks

Reported September phase, not the start or entirety of the Nicaraguan conflict.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

IACHR Nicaragua1978 report, Introduction ↗

Publisher: Inter-American Commission on Human Rights

Exact passage: The assaults of September,last paragraph

Source establishes: The introduction relays the early estimate of at least 500 killed in León and Estelí during September fighting.

Document date: 1978-11-17 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Official introduction: complaints cohort, September chronology/early two-city estimate and competence limits.

Access limitations

Underlying complaints and Red Cross counting method were not obtained. Presumed dead is not independently confirmed dead; a competence limit does not exonerate an armed group.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Commission report with nested complaints and Red Cross estimate. · HR-ARCHIVE-B07-FAMILY-IACHR-NIC1978

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B07-SRC-NI-IACHRINTRO@15c5b9906c5c0ffa

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 15c5b9906c5c0ffaf683b2becedb28328bc7652b4070b2855e81d18a442f1693. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Early Red Cross estimate relayed by the Commission; underlying counting method absent. Two cities are not the entire country or an all-child/all-civilian category.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B17-NI-ESTIMATE · exact wording SHA-256 a6ea35885232ff050e90a971f8596f1d338a2526ada108cd924267beb8ba6692

Report a correction →
context

The IACHR’s official web versions disagree in conclusion (c): the English assigns government responsibility for the Red Cross deaths; the Spanish includes a negation. Chapter II.C condemns the attack. This unresolved edition discrepancy is preserved rather than silently corrected.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: IACHR report date, not a new combat event or current legal judgment..

Date basis and original source clocks

IACHR report date, not a new combat event or current legal judgment.

Sources (3) · exact passages & limitations

IACHR Nicaragua1978 report, English Conclusions ↗

Publisher: Inter-American Commission on Human Rights

Exact passage: conclusionc

Source establishes: The cited edition supplies its own wording in the unresolved conclusion (c) comparison.

Document date: 1978-11-17 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Conclusion (c), conclusion (f) and closing age/sector paragraph.

Access limitations

English and Spanish web conclusion (c) disagree. Original printed editions were not obtained; no silent correction or judicial exoneration is inferred. Same report family.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Official English web edition of commission conclusions. · HR-ARCHIVE-B07-FAMILY-IACHR-NIC1978

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B07-SRC-NI-IACHRCONCL@147c8c538656ba82

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 147c8c538656ba824b198c81e9047ef8102362efd8de8bb9ea568de9b01c50a0. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

CIDH Nicaragua1978, Spanish Conclusiones ↗

Publisher: Inter-American Commission on Human Rights

Exact passage: conclusionc

Source establishes: The cited edition supplies its own wording in the unresolved conclusion (c) comparison.

Document date: 1978-11-17 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Conclusion (c), including the negation, read against English and Chapter II.C.

Access limitations

Unresolved official-edition discrepancy. This is not a second independent investigation or proof of judicial exoneration.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Official Spanish web edition of the same commission report. · HR-ARCHIVE-B07-FAMILY-IACHR-NIC1978

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B07-SRC-NI-IACHRCONCLSP@78dc628524d3ee3a

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 78dc628524d3ee3a72dcc7e18ee5e421f37ce76f4008e9e0eecec3b1b8284130. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

IACHR Nicaragua1978, chapterII, Right to Life ↗

Publisher: Inter-American Commission on Human Rights

Exact passage: sectionC,commission final assessment of dialogue

Source establishes: Chapter II.C supplies the Commission’s detailed narrative and condemnation, without resolving the English–Spanish web discrepancy.

Document date: 1978-11-17 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Official Chapter II.A–D: findings, Chinandega testimony, full convoy narrative/transcript, competing accounts and Masaya testimony.

Access limitations

Original audio, photographs, witness records and autopsies were not separately authenticated. Institutional investigative findings are not individual criminal convictions. The serious personal Major allegation remains excluded.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Regional commission investigation, with separately identified testimony and transcript. · HR-ARCHIVE-B07-FAMILY-IACHR-NIC1978

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B07-SRC-NI-IACHRCH2@0deda90dc3d6d84e

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 0deda90dc3d6d84e42e24836f508429c1afc768ccd9db55cd06c31b3e5d9e97a. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Original printed editions were not obtained, so the official web discrepancy remains unresolved. The report date does not date a later web transcription.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

English conclusion (c) assigns government responsibility; the Spanish includes a negation. Chapter II.C condemns the attack.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B17-NI-LANGUAGE · exact wording SHA-256 e33e525284c67b7ecb7734dab3fa467bfe696dba56ea8afc1771f140e0355de5

Report a correction →
context

The IACHR says it received complaints against FSLN members but could not process them under its competence. Its conclusions also describe repression of males aged 14–21. The mandate limit is not a finding that FSLN committed no abuses; the age range includes adults.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: IACHR report date, not a new combat event or current legal judgment..

Date basis and original source clocks

IACHR report date, not a new combat event or current legal judgment.

Sources (3) · exact passages & limitations

IACHR Nicaragua1978 report, Introduction ↗

Publisher: Inter-American Commission on Human Rights

Exact passage: B,Reception of complaints

Source establishes: The introduction explains the FSLN-complaint competence limit.

Document date: 1978-11-17 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Official introduction: complaints cohort, September chronology/early two-city estimate and competence limits.

Access limitations

Underlying complaints and Red Cross counting method were not obtained. Presumed dead is not independently confirmed dead; a competence limit does not exonerate an armed group.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Commission report with nested complaints and Red Cross estimate. · HR-ARCHIVE-B07-FAMILY-IACHR-NIC1978

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B07-SRC-NI-IACHRINTRO@15c5b9906c5c0ffa

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 15c5b9906c5c0ffaf683b2becedb28328bc7652b4070b2855e81d18a442f1693. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

IACHR Nicaragua1978 report, English Conclusions ↗

Publisher: Inter-American Commission on Human Rights

Exact passage: conclusionf and closing paragraph

Source establishes: Conclusion (f) and the closing paragraph supply the reported 14–21 male age category, not an all-child count.

Document date: 1978-11-17 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Conclusion (c), conclusion (f) and closing age/sector paragraph.

Access limitations

English and Spanish web conclusion (c) disagree. Original printed editions were not obtained; no silent correction or judicial exoneration is inferred. Same report family.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Official English web edition of commission conclusions. · HR-ARCHIVE-B07-FAMILY-IACHR-NIC1978

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B07-SRC-NI-IACHRCONCL@147c8c538656ba82

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 147c8c538656ba824b198c81e9047ef8102362efd8de8bb9ea568de9b01c50a0. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

IACHR Nicaragua1978, chapterII, Right to Life ↗

Publisher: Inter-American Commission on Human Rights

Exact passage: sectionsB andD,quoted Leon professional-association statements

Source establishes: The cited witness passages preserve their own legal language; witness terms are not adopted as a court or Commission genocide ruling.

Document date: 1978-11-17 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Official Chapter II.A–D: findings, Chinandega testimony, full convoy narrative/transcript, competing accounts and Masaya testimony.

Access limitations

Original audio, photographs, witness records and autopsies were not separately authenticated. Institutional investigative findings are not individual criminal convictions. The serious personal Major allegation remains excluded.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Regional commission investigation, with separately identified testimony and transcript. · HR-ARCHIVE-B07-FAMILY-IACHR-NIC1978

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B07-SRC-NI-IACHRCH2@0deda90dc3d6d84e

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 0deda90dc3d6d84e42e24836f508429c1afc768ccd9db55cd06c31b3e5d9e97a. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

A competence limit is not a finding of no FSLN abuses. The 14–21 range includes adults; no under-eighteen count is established.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B17-NI-MANDATE · exact wording SHA-256 145fe18a785df71dc98248db59ae5d10e43bdc3a346059cbe6a4fcfb9cff9434

Report a correction →
human consequence

The IACHR found National Guard killings of noncombatants, including children, during mop-up operations. It separately reproduces a Masaya family’s account of 12 September 1978: a father and two sons, aged 24 and 14, were killed; another son, aged 13, was wounded.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Date of the specific Masaya family account; broader mop-up finding is separate..

Date basis and original source clocks

Date of the specific Masaya family account; broader mop-up finding is separate.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

IACHR Nicaragua1978, chapterII, Right to Life ↗

Publisher: Inter-American Commission on Human Rights

Exact passage: sectionD,commission finding and paragraph beginning On September the12th

Source establishes: Chapter II.D contains the institutional finding and the separate 12 September family testimony: father and two sons killed, another thirteen-year-old wounded.

Document date: 1978-11-17 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Official Chapter II.A–D: findings, Chinandega testimony, full convoy narrative/transcript, competing accounts and Masaya testimony.

Access limitations

Original audio, photographs, witness records and autopsies were not separately authenticated. Institutional investigative findings are not individual criminal convictions. The serious personal Major allegation remains excluded.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Regional commission investigation, with separately identified testimony and transcript. · HR-ARCHIVE-B07-FAMILY-IACHR-NIC1978

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B07-SRC-NI-IACHRCH2@0deda90dc3d6d84e

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 0deda90dc3d6d84e42e24836f508429c1afc768ccd9db55cd06c31b3e5d9e97a. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Commission investigative finding and family testimony retain different evidentiary voices. No individual order is inferred from a unit or office.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B17-NI-MOPUP · exact wording SHA-256 928d1a14711b3a865aed134a97abca7654d174e7f0c26488460732e2bbe5d427

Report a correction →
decision

The IACHR reports that Nicaragua’s president in Council of Ministers decreed on 12 October 1978 that specified constitutional rights would remain suspended until 30 April 1979. The president also delegated application of martial law to departmental National Guard commanders. This is a reported public legal measure, not an individual bombing order.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Reported public decree and delegation date; announced future expiry is not proof of actual end..

Date basis and original source clocks

Reported public decree and delegation date; announced future expiry is not proof of actual end.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

IACHR Nicaragua1978, chapterI, State of Emergency ↗

Publisher: Inter-American Commission on Human Rights

Exact passage: sectionB,paragraphs beginning On October12,1978 and As a complement

Source establishes: Chapter I.B records the president in Council of Ministers decreeing the 12 October suspension of specified rights and delegating martial-law application; no personal bombing order is established.

Document date: 1978-11-17 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Official Chapter I.B, including the 12 October measure, delegation, repeal and government justification.

Access limitations

Original gazette decrees were not obtained. An announced expiry is prospective and does not prove when emergency rule actually ended. Government justifications are attributed claims.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Regional human-rights commission account of public executive decrees. · HR-ARCHIVE-B07-FAMILY-IACHR-NIC1978

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B07-SRC-NI-IACHRCH1@039a8ad5e34c4ad3

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 039a8ad5e34c4ad3132ce7dbc22baeefdef60c1a85711f4e22d6a9a7694fc7c9. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

The IACHR relays the public measure; original gazette decrees were not obtained. Announced 30 April 1979 expiry is not proof of actual termination.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B17-NI-OCTOBER · exact wording SHA-256 a9353247148b6dd93153ee2d8a4458d7f9d300f15c5cd421604b738dab0d4844

Report a correction →
human consequence

The IACHR relays complaints concerning 338 peasants captured between 1975 and 1977: seventeen reportedly released and 321 not seen again and presumed dead. The latter is a disappearance/presumed-death category, not 321 independently confirmed killings.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Source complaint cohort covers 1975–1977; do not shift its beginning to 1976..

Date basis and original source clocks

Source complaint cohort covers 1975–1977; do not shift its beginning to 1976.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

IACHR Nicaragua1978 report, Introduction ↗

Publisher: Inter-American Commission on Human Rights

Exact passage: Complaints received by the IACHR in recent years

Source establishes: The introduction relays complaints about 338 peasants captured in 1975–1977, seventeen reportedly released and 321 not seen again and presumed dead.

Document date: 1978-11-17 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Official introduction: complaints cohort, September chronology/early two-city estimate and competence limits.

Access limitations

Underlying complaints and Red Cross counting method were not obtained. Presumed dead is not independently confirmed dead; a competence limit does not exonerate an armed group.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Commission report with nested complaints and Red Cross estimate. · HR-ARCHIVE-B07-FAMILY-IACHR-NIC1978

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B07-SRC-NI-IACHRINTRO@15c5b9906c5c0ffa

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 15c5b9906c5c0ffaf683b2becedb28328bc7652b4070b2855e81d18a442f1693. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Complaints report captures and outcomes; 321 presumed dead are not independently confirmed killings. The cohort begins in 1975 and crosses the initial archive horizon.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B17-NI-PEASANTS · exact wording SHA-256 1ddea5e5ad87e5e72371a433da6c47e7eb2ee4d118d0894edbad0423c8e86581

Report a correction →
human consequence

UNHCR reports that 55,202 boat people remained in countries of first asylum at the end of 1980, separately from 113,086 land cases, mostly Lao. These are different refugee stocks; neither figure is a death count or an all-Vietnamese global population.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Year-end first-asylum stocks, not an occurrence or death date..

Date basis and original source clocks

Year-end first-asylum stocks, not an occurrence or death date.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

UNHCR Report,A/36/12,1981 ↗

Publisher: UNHCR

Exact passage: para346,printed55/PDF63

Source establishes: Paragraph 346 records the separate year-end stocks of 55,202 boat people and 113,086 land cases, mostly Lao.

Document date: 1981 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Report A/36/12, paragraphs 346–348, printed page 55 on physical PDF page 63, visually reviewed.

Access limitations

Original rescue and passenger registers were not obtained. Same-agency rescue-note and annual-report figures differ for an unresolved reason. Merchant ships are not US Navy ships; Indochinese is not necessarily all Vietnamese.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Contemporary UNHCR annual operational report. · HR-ARCHIVE-B07-FAMILY-UNHCR-INDOCHINA

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B07-SRC-VN-UNHCR1981@8dde5205bcd59ebc

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 8dde5205bcd59ebca644530d8454498fab6ae9d4c47d1688c5d4c14d22ec622f. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 63 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Boat people and mostly Lao land cases are distinct stocks, not an all-Vietnamese global total or a mortality denominator.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B17-VN-BOATSTOCK · exact wording SHA-256 1b14a2686f1a00444b81c2dbf57bd36852016f88024347ee8e8f4976f4e3bab7

Report a correction →
human consequence

UNHCR’s 1980 report records 72,020 Vietnamese boat-refugee arrivals in Hong Kong during 1979, 24,540 departures during that year and 55,705 people receiving care at year end. Arrivals and departures are flows; the year-end figure is a stock.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 1979 calendar-year movements; year-end care is a separate stock..

Date basis and original source clocks

1979 calendar-year movements; year-end care is a separate stock.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

UNHCR Report,A/35/12,covering1April1979-31March1980 ↗

Publisher: UNHCR

Exact passage: para229,printed39/PDF46

Source establishes: Paragraph 229 supplies the three Hong Kong figures: 72,020 arrivals, 24,540 departures during 1979, and 55,705 receiving care at year end.

Document date: 1980 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Report A/35/12, paragraphs 229 and 309, printed pages 39 and 49 on physical PDF pages 46 and 56; the 1,174 figure was visually checked.

Access limitations

Original operational registers were not obtained. Arrivals/departures are flows, year-end care is a stock, and no forced arithmetic reconciliation or unique global total is approved.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Contemporary UNHCR operational report in the UN Digital Library. · HR-ARCHIVE-B07-FAMILY-UNHCR-INDOCHINA

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B07-SRC-VN-UN1980COPY@423cba623f23102c

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 423cba623f23102c3ca45f906fecf8d6063fe8c55a4ddbc9fd2509f1dd50803c. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 46 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Arrivals/departures are flows, while care at 31 December is a stock; no forced reconciliation or global unique-person count.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B17-VN-HK · exact wording SHA-256 f9f974368b1fd3053d2d65f9380ae6dd218458ecabe28f861579e9ada8c435bb

Report a correction →
human consequence

UNHCR reports that eleven charter flights carried 1,174 Vietnamese to resettlement countries between 30 May and 31 December 1979, while over 800 left on scheduled commercial flights in the same period. These are reported orderly-departure movements, not deaths or an estimate of everyone rescued at sea.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Reported orderly-departure movements, not the date range of an inferred continuous military operation..

Date basis and original source clocks

Reported orderly-departure movements, not the date range of an inferred continuous military operation.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

UNHCR Report,A/35/12,covering1April1979-31March1980 ↗

Publisher: UNHCR

Exact passage: para309,printed49/PDF56,figure visually checked

Source establishes: Paragraph 309 reports eleven charter flights carrying 1,174 Vietnamese and over 800 scheduled-flight departures between 30 May and 31 December 1979.

Document date: 1980 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Report A/35/12, paragraphs 229 and 309, printed pages 39 and 49 on physical PDF pages 46 and 56; the 1,174 figure was visually checked.

Access limitations

Original operational registers were not obtained. Arrivals/departures are flows, year-end care is a stock, and no forced arithmetic reconciliation or unique global total is approved.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Contemporary UNHCR operational report in the UN Digital Library. · HR-ARCHIVE-B07-FAMILY-UNHCR-INDOCHINA

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B07-SRC-VN-UN1980COPY@423cba623f23102c

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 423cba623f23102c3ca45f906fecf8d6063fe8c55a4ddbc9fd2509f1dd50803c. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 56 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

The visually checked 1,174 passenger figure resolves extraction errors. Passengers, flights and rescues are different units; no additive total across other series.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B17-VN-ODP1979 · exact wording SHA-256 bf8cffea96fb58785be99d80cd8ee1f20f60ced1cc4e07f345b6606a67229bcc

Report a correction →
human consequence

UNHCR’s 1981 report says approximately 15,400 people were rescued at sea by more than 200 merchant ships in 1980. It separately records over 4,700 orderly departures from Vietnam. The rescue figure is not a US Navy total or a number individually attributable to President Carter.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 1980 calendar-year observations; populations, measures and source scopes remain distinct..

Date basis and original source clocks

1980 calendar-year observations; populations, measures and source scopes remain distinct.

Sources (2) · exact passages & limitations

UNHCR Report,A/36/12,1981 ↗

Publisher: UNHCR

Exact passage: paras347-348,printed55/PDF63

Source establishes: The annual report separately records about 15,400 rescues by over 200 merchant ships and over 4,700 orderly departures.

Document date: 1981 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Report A/36/12, paragraphs 346–348, printed page 55 on physical PDF page 63, visually reviewed.

Access limitations

Original rescue and passenger registers were not obtained. Same-agency rescue-note and annual-report figures differ for an unresolved reason. Merchant ships are not US Navy ships; Indochinese is not necessarily all Vietnamese.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Contemporary UNHCR annual operational report. · HR-ARCHIVE-B07-FAMILY-UNHCR-INDOCHINA

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B07-SRC-VN-UNHCR1981@8dde5205bcd59ebc

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 8dde5205bcd59ebca644530d8454498fab6ae9d4c47d1688c5d4c14d22ec622f. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 63 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Problems Related to the Rescue of Asylum-Seekers in Distress at Sea ↗

Publisher: UNHCR

Exact passage: EC/SCP/18,26August1981,paragraph3 and footnote2; official Refworld transcription

Source establishes: The same-agency note supplies the contrasting five-office scope and about 14,560 figure, not independent corroboration of 15,400.

Document date: 1981-08-26 · Publication date: 1981-08-26

Actual review scope: Previously independently reviewed full official Refworld text of EC/SCP/18, dated 26 August 1981, paragraph 3 and footnote 2.

Access limitations

The original UNHCR endpoint was inaccessible in the pinned review; official Refworld full text was read. Original PDF and source-body hash were not obtained. An access-receipt hash is not a source-body hash. Five-office scope and unresolved difference from the annual figure remain explicit.

Original source URL ↗ · The reviewed copy and original URL differ.

Provenance, custody and reuse

Primary-agency UNHCR note, official Refworld republication. · HR-ARCHIVE-B07-FAMILY-UNHCR-INDOCHINA

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B07-SRC-VN-RESCUE-WEB1981@live-access-4f28ed2f72d0d23b

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: Not established. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Merchant ships are not the US Navy, and the rescue population is not established as entirely Vietnamese. No individual causal allocation to Carter.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

The same-agency five-office rescue note gives about 14,560; the numerical difference remains unexplained.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B17-VN-OUTCOMES · exact wording SHA-256 a5a3aadae5cb16c871de1c8bd808b0cbbc082eee556b10d3bf5fe46e175bbb35

Report a correction →
context

A November 1979 CIA assessment reports Vietnamese measures restricting boat departures, including harsh penalties and exit-fee practices. It also assessed earlier state facilitation of the exodus. These are intelligence assessments and reported policies, not original Vietnamese orders, personal criminal findings or a death toll.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: CIA assessment month; not original Vietnamese decision dates..

Date basis and original source clocks

CIA assessment month; not original Vietnamese decision dates.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

FRUS1977-1980 volXXII doc142,CIA intelligence assessment NI79-10009 ↗

Publisher: CIA

Exact passage: Overview;Present Vietnamese Policies:Boat Refugee,paras1-4

Source establishes: The declassified CIA assessment reports departure restrictions, penalties and exit-fee practices and assesses earlier state facilitation. It establishes an attributed assessment, not an original order or death count.

Document date: 1979-11 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: November 1979 assessment NI 79-10009: Overview and Present Vietnamese Policies, paragraphs 1–4, surrounding source notes, refugee accounts, redactions and weather alternative.

Access limitations

Original Vietnamese directives and a named personal authorizer were not obtained. Intelligence assessments and reported policies are not judicial findings or a death count.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Declassified CIA intelligence assessment in official FRUS transcription. · HR-ARCHIVE-B07-FAMILY-US-INDOCHINA-INTELLIGENCE

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B07-SRC-VN-FRUS142@79174b81e026ca79

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 79174b81e026ca7990eab25b6e9ffd494ba7f6cbc7481696bcc33cfe62b62e6e. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Original Vietnamese orders and a personal authorizer are unknown. Intelligence inference, refugee accounts, redactions and adverse weather remain relevant limits.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

The assessment considers adverse weather as an alternative influence on departures.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B17-VN-POLICY · exact wording SHA-256 8572010bdab86dc188e11e280c5a9e251862eb57014e0ce6c97fa7740845bd7e

Report a correction →
human consequence

UNHCR’s 26 August 1981 rescue note reports about 14,560 people picked up by 219 ships in 1980, based on reports from five named UNHCR offices, and says world totals may be higher. Its annual report gives about 15,400 rescues. The available texts do not establish why these quantities differ.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: 1980 calendar-year observations; populations, measures and source scopes remain distinct..

Date basis and original source clocks

1980 calendar-year observations; populations, measures and source scopes remain distinct.

Sources (2) · exact passages & limitations

Problems Related to the Rescue of Asylum-Seekers in Distress at Sea ↗

Publisher: UNHCR

Exact passage: EC/SCP/18, 26 August 1981, paragraph 3 and footnote 2, official Refworld full-text republication; prior snippet-only locator label superseded by the pinned B17 source-passage review

Source establishes: The UNHCR note paragraph 3 and footnote 2 supply about 14,560 picked up by 219 ships, the five-office limitation and possible higher world total.

Document date: 1981-08-26 · Publication date: 1981-08-26

Actual review scope: Previously independently reviewed full official Refworld text of EC/SCP/18, dated 26 August 1981, paragraph 3 and footnote 2.

Access limitations

The original UNHCR endpoint was inaccessible in the pinned review; official Refworld full text was read. Original PDF and source-body hash were not obtained. An access-receipt hash is not a source-body hash. Five-office scope and unresolved difference from the annual figure remain explicit.

Original source URL ↗ · The reviewed copy and original URL differ.

Provenance, custody and reuse

Primary-agency UNHCR note, official Refworld republication. · HR-ARCHIVE-B07-FAMILY-UNHCR-INDOCHINA

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B07-SRC-VN-RESCUE-WEB1981@live-access-4f28ed2f72d0d23b

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: Not established. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

UNHCR Report,A/36/12,1981 ↗

Publisher: UNHCR

Exact passage: para347,printed55/PDF63

Source establishes: Paragraph 347 supplies the annual account’s approximately 15,400 rescues, establishing the unresolved comparison rather than a revision explanation.

Document date: 1981 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Report A/36/12, paragraphs 346–348, printed page 55 on physical PDF page 63, visually reviewed.

Access limitations

Original rescue and passenger registers were not obtained. Same-agency rescue-note and annual-report figures differ for an unresolved reason. Merchant ships are not US Navy ships; Indochinese is not necessarily all Vietnamese.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Contemporary UNHCR annual operational report. · HR-ARCHIVE-B07-FAMILY-UNHCR-INDOCHINA

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B07-SRC-VN-UNHCR1981@8dde5205bcd59ebc

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 8dde5205bcd59ebca644530d8454498fab6ae9d4c47d1688c5d4c14d22ec622f. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 63 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

The note is dated 26 August 1981 but reports 1980 rescues. Full official Refworld text was reviewed in the pinned B17 source review; a stale snippet-only locator label is corrected transparently in the public binding. The reason for the difference remains unknown.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

The annual account gives about 15,400; the note reports about 14,560 from five offices and says world totals may be higher.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B17-VN-RESCUE-DIFFERENCE · exact wording SHA-256 5f6fd7c77a74bdbb738895a2c7e7269740a913b54af3afa9223b674c93772b93

Report a correction →
context

Amnesty’s November 1979 newsletter reproduces an AFP report dated 23 September in which President Hafizullah Amin rejected its twelve-thousand-prisoner claim as hostile propaganda. This is a reported denial, not a verified alternative prisoner census or an exoneration.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: AFP reaction date as reproduced by Amnesty, not a new prison census..

Date basis and original source clocks

AFP reaction date as reproduced by Amnesty, not a new prison census.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Amnesty International Newsletter,November1979,Afghanistan article ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: p1,AFP23Septemberreaction

Source establishes: The newsletter reproduces Amin’s rejection of the twelve-thousand claim as hostile propaganda.

Document date: 1979-11 · Publication date: 1979-11

Actual review scope: November 1979 newsletter, physical page 1, full Afghanistan article.

Access limitations

Same Amnesty family, not independent corroboration. Original AFP dispatch, recordings, release orders and completed registers were not obtained.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Amnesty newsletter with an AFP denial and executive announcements. · HR-ARCHIVE-B08-FAMILY-AI-AFGHAN

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B08-SRC-AF-AINEWS1979@8d64219d48150424

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 8d64219d48150424913f813b985dafdf7d58bdc1345a14f2c9b7cbc15922964c. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Original AFP dispatch or recording not reviewed. Denial does not establish an alternative census or exoneration.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Amin’s attributed denial disputes Amnesty’s reported prisoner figure.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B18-AF-AMIN-DENIAL · exact wording SHA-256 0a399b1086b5a1e4e0237e279ba3c955ef61fb2a62704db837681e738fb18fbc

Report a correction →
decision

Amnesty records that Amin announced in October 1978 the release of three former ministers and 72 or 74 royal women and children, and says those releases were confirmed. It separately reports Amin’s 22 September 1979 announcement of sixty political-prisoner releases, without names or confirmation that Amnesty’s listed prisoners had been freed.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Context collection; no single event date assigned.

Date basis and original source clocks

October 1978 release and 22 September 1979 announcement are separate dated events.

Sources (2) · exact passages & limitations

Violations of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms in the Democratic Republic of Afghanistan,ASA11/04/79 ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: printed6/PDF7 andprinted10/PDF11,Releases

Source establishes: The report supplies October 1978 releases of three former ministers and 72 or 74 royal women and children, described as confirmed.

Document date: 1979-09 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Methodology and physical pages 7 and 11, printed pages 6 and 10, visually reviewed.

Access limitations

Restricted access and fear of reprisals constrained the report. Original lists and release orders were not obtained; a full assessment of atrocities by both combat sides was outside scope. October 1978 mission, December memorandum and September 1979 publication are different dates.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Contemporary Amnesty investigation with qualified estimates and official accounts. · HR-ARCHIVE-B08-FAMILY-AI-AFGHAN

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B08-SRC-AF-AI1979@5c5288f19be6863a

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 5c5288f19be6863a165602822e81f4a02780097dfd138ab9d2e5dc861a0cb603. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 7, 11 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Amnesty International Newsletter,November1979,Afghanistan article ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: p1,paragraphsOn16September/On22September andHowever

Source establishes: The newsletter supplies Amin’s 22 September 1979 announcement of sixty releases without named confirmation that the listed prisoners were freed.

Document date: 1979-11 · Publication date: 1979-11

Actual review scope: November 1979 newsletter, physical page 1, full Afghanistan article.

Access limitations

Same Amnesty family, not independent corroboration. Original AFP dispatch, recordings, release orders and completed registers were not obtained.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Amnesty newsletter with an AFP denial and executive announcements. · HR-ARCHIVE-B08-FAMILY-AI-AFGHAN

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B08-SRC-AF-AINEWS1979@8d64219d48150424

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 8d64219d48150424913f813b985dafdf7d58bdc1345a14f2c9b7cbc15922964c. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Alternative 72 or 74 values are not an interval or two cohorts. Announced sixty is not a verified complete release.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B18-AF-AMIN-RELEASE · exact wording SHA-256 69b3c5ffbd81c9e57e8e6dbb877bd97570245e264928b825604574dd2c3f1d83

Report a correction →
decision

An undated translated memorandum attributed to Yuri Andropov discusses assisting Karmal and Sarwari’s plans against Amin, using two battalions already in Kabul and preparing forces near the border. The archive labels it early December 1979 editorially; that is not a verified signing day or proof every proposal was implemented.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Context collection; no single event date assigned.

Date basis and original source clocks

Undated attributed memorandum; early December 1979 is an editorial archive label, not a verified signing day.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Personal memorandum,Andropov to Brezhnev,n.d.,editorially earlyDecember1979 ↗

Publisher: Attributed Yuri Andropov

Exact passage: p1,point2 andsource note

Source establishes: The undated attributed memorandum discusses assisting plans against Amin, two battalions already in Kabul and border preparations.

Document date: Not established · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Entire one-page memorandum and archival/translation source note, especially point 2.

Access limitations

Undated original; early December 1979 is an editorial label. Original Russian signature was not authenticated. Source allegations about Amin’s foreign links or execution numbers are not adopted.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Archived English translation of an attributed personal memorandum. · HR-ARCHIVE-B08-FAMILY-SOVIET-AFGHAN-DOCS

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B08-SRC-AF-ANDROPOV1979@7756721aebe3b524

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 7756721aebe3b52456d7aca7e7ab2dba38907bd8fe210f19dfb8b8b29c381583. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Editorial early-December label is not a verified date or proof all proposals were implemented. Foreign-link and execution-number allegations are not adopted.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B18-AF-ANDROPOV-MEMO · exact wording SHA-256 220b7a0c73312f29cd940bff5eb0ac61b0ad59ce5ef6f5b5951b02fe136859f4

Report a correction →
human consequence

Lyakhovskiy’s study describes Amin dead after the December 1979 palace assault but leaves uncertain whether a bullet, grenade fragment or Afghan actors caused his death. A Soviet report dated 31 December credits forces opposing Amin with overthrowing his regime and describes Soviet military assistance. Neither source establishes a named killer or personal execution instruction.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Reported December palace-assault/death context; exact individual death time and killer unresolved..

Date basis and original source clocks

Reported December palace-assault/death context; exact individual death time and killer unresolved.

Sources (2) · exact passages & limitations

Inside the Soviet Invasion of Afghanistan and the Seizure of Kabul,December1979,CWIHP WorkingPaper51 ↗

Publisher: Aleksandr A.Lyakhovskiy; translations Gary Goldberg/Artemy Kalinovsky

Exact passage: printed62/PDF67,paragraphThegunpowdersmoke andfollowing accounts

Source establishes: The study describes Amin’s death and uncertainty among bullet, grenade fragment and Afghan-actor accounts.

Document date: 2007-01 · Publication date: 2007-01

Actual review scope: Cover/publisher note and physical pages 24, 45 and 67, printed pages 19, 40 and 62.

Access limitations

Original directive, participant recordings and forensic records were not obtained. Directive number appears in both 10 and 24 December contexts; version history unresolved. The publisher does not adopt the author’s interpretations. No named killer or personal execution instruction established.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Participant’s historical synthesis published by the Wilson Center. · HR-ARCHIVE-B08-FAMILY-SOVIET-AFGHAN-DOCS

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B08-SRC-AF-WILSON2007@3570a0c100b0184a

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 3570a0c100b0184a9f6e7c0a0e53bca814a6b6d37b6ebd1704e5f966236a3efd. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 67 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Andropov-Gromyko-Ustinov-Ponomarev report on27-28December events,No2519-A ↗

Publisher: Four named Soviet report authors

Exact passage: Englishpp2-3,overthrow/assistanceparagraphs

Source establishes: The dated Soviet account credits forces opposing Amin with overthrow and describes Soviet assistance; it does not establish a named killer or execution instruction.

Document date: 1979-12-31 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: English physical pages 2–3, dated heading, overthrow/assistance paragraphs, signatures and source note.

Access limitations

Original Russian text was not independently translated or authenticated. Claims of consent, legitimacy, execution numbers or Amin’s foreign links are not independently adopted.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Interested Soviet post-operation official report, archived translation. · HR-ARCHIVE-B08-FAMILY-SOVIET-AFGHAN-DOCS

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B08-SRC-AF-AFTERREPORT1979@f1097fb176b8051e

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: f1097fb176b8051e557ad897c80a9c45346d8de380a363c0715ba82827a65795. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

No named killer, verified personal instruction or whole-operation civilian toll. Interested Soviet justification is not independent proof of legitimacy.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B18-AF-DEATH · exact wording SHA-256 252b15891dde8177f94f3e92407f4940f5335e8e33b48285cfca7962cc87a482

Report a correction →
decision

Lyakhovskiy’s January 2007 study quotes Directive 312/12/001 as signed by Ustinov and Ogarkov and sent on 24 December 1979, and describes specific combat tasks added on 27 December. It also places that directive number in an earlier, 10 December context. The original directive and its version history remain unverified.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Context collection; no single event date assigned.

Date basis and original source clocks

Study reports 24 December dispatch and 27 December tasks but also uses the same directive number in a 10 December context; original version/date unverified.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Inside the Soviet Invasion of Afghanistan and the Seizure of Kabul,December1979,CWIHP WorkingPaper51 ↗

Publisher: Aleksandr A.Lyakhovskiy; translations Gary Goldberg/Artemy Kalinovsky

Exact passage: printed40/PDF45,directivepassage andtranslatornote;PDF24for reusednumber/datecontext

Source establishes: Lyakhovskiy quotes the directive as signed by Ustinov and Ogarkov, describes the dispatch and additional tasks, and uses the number in an earlier context.

Document date: 2007-01 · Publication date: 2007-01

Actual review scope: Cover/publisher note and physical pages 24, 45 and 67, printed pages 19, 40 and 62.

Access limitations

Original directive, participant recordings and forensic records were not obtained. Directive number appears in both 10 and 24 December contexts; version history unresolved. The publisher does not adopt the author’s interpretations. No named killer or personal execution instruction established.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Participant’s historical synthesis published by the Wilson Center. · HR-ARCHIVE-B08-FAMILY-SOVIET-AFGHAN-DOCS

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B08-SRC-AF-WILSON2007@3570a0c100b0184a

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 3570a0c100b0184a9f6e7c0a0e53bca814a6b6d37b6ebd1704e5f966236a3efd. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 45, 24 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Participant’s synthesis, not the original directive. Signature authenticity and version history remain unresolved.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

The same directive number appears in both 10 and 24 December contexts.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B18-AF-DIRECTIVE · exact wording SHA-256 42be511348377a6f8f2487997c8fd90f1bef0508f4f8b4a134cd827f84c002e3

Report a correction →
human consequence

UNHCR’s 1981 report estimates about 1.4 million Afghan refugees in Pakistan at the end of 1980 and says a more exact joint assessment with Pakistan was underway. This is an estimated population stock, not exactly 1,400,000 unique new arrivals in 1980 or a death toll.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Approximate year-end stock, not a unique annual flow..

Date basis and original source clocks

Approximate year-end stock, not a unique annual flow.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

UNHCR Report,A/36/12,1981 ↗

Publisher: UNHCR

Exact passage: para226,printed38/PDF46;para275,printed44/PDF52

Source establishes: UNHCR estimates about 1.4 million and notes an ongoing more exact joint assessment.

Document date: 1981 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: A/36/12, physical pages 46 and 52, paragraphs 226 and 275.

Access limitations

Same annual report family as B17. Original registers were not reviewed; more exact joint assessment was still underway. No unique annual flow, mortality or personal causal allocation follows.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Contemporary UNHCR report with estimated refugee stocks. · HR-ARCHIVE-B08-FAMILY-UN-ANNUAL1981

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B08-SRC-UN1981@8dde5205bcd59ebc

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 8dde5205bcd59ebca644530d8454498fab6ae9d4c47d1688c5d4c14d22ec622f. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 46, 52 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Approximate population stock, not exactly 1,400,000 unique new arrivals or deaths.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B18-AF-END1980 · exact wording SHA-256 09c55ee37e1df6b3b44f9fbb52a739f9d444c31b62d3d266d0ce176927f66eb4

Report a correction →
human consequence

Amnesty’s 1979 report says it held a list of 42 women and children detained at Pule Charchi because of family association with political prisoners, with some reportedly ill. This mixed group is not a count of 42 children or 42 injuries.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Context collection; no single event date assigned.

Date basis and original source clocks

Separate October 1978 and later estimates, undated family list and dated release announcements; no continuous observed custody interval.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Violations of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms in the Democratic Republic of Afghanistan,ASA11/04/79 ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: printed6/PDF7,family-detention paragraphs

Source establishes: The family-detention passage describes a list of 42 women and children and reports illness among some.

Document date: 1979-09 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Methodology and physical pages 7 and 11, printed pages 6 and 10, visually reviewed.

Access limitations

Restricted access and fear of reprisals constrained the report. Original lists and release orders were not obtained; a full assessment of atrocities by both combat sides was outside scope. October 1978 mission, December memorandum and September 1979 publication are different dates.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Contemporary Amnesty investigation with qualified estimates and official accounts. · HR-ARCHIVE-B08-FAMILY-AI-AFGHAN

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B08-SRC-AF-AI1979@5c5288f19be6863a

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 5c5288f19be6863a165602822e81f4a02780097dfd138ab9d2e5dc861a0cb603. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 7 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Mixed population; no quantified child-only, infant or injury subset. Private list is not exported.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B18-AF-FAMILIES · exact wording SHA-256 d61322706136b36e7fcec9b4a146f1d9a294043d3ae5a62c2d5caf5b0cf812a2

Report a correction →
decision

In the same translated conversation, Soviet Premier Alexei Kosygin warns that concealed Soviet involvement would quickly become known, discusses equipment support and says further consultations are needed. The exchange does not constitute an intervention authorisation or a permanent refusal for the rest of 1979.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Archived translation heading: 17 or 18 March 1979; unresolved discrete alternatives..

Date basis and original source clocks

Archived translation heading: 17 or 18 March 1979; unresolved discrete alternatives.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Kosygin-Taraki telephone conversation,17or18March1979 ↗

Publisher: Soviet conversation record in published English translation

Exact passage: p1,centre/rightcolumns

Source establishes: The same translated exchange records Kosygin’s concealment warning, equipment-support discussion and need for further consultation.

Document date: Not established · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: One-page translation, all three columns and source note visually reviewed.

Access limitations

Heading says 17 or 18 March 1979; catalogue dating does not resolve the alternative. Original audio and Russian transcript were not authenticated. A request or consultation is not deployment or a permanent refusal.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Archived English translation of a telephone conversation. · HR-ARCHIVE-B08-FAMILY-SOVIET-AFGHAN-DOCS

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B08-SRC-AF-KOSYGIN1979@f453106da45f3dee

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: f453106da45f3dee083011f685252dac90fd3a53b197d9db31753d019257618c. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Not an intervention authorization or a permanent refusal for the rest of 1979.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B18-AF-KOSYGIN · exact wording SHA-256 a2c9634367aad5dc73209fd4ae5338cf68cca368952eb9298d4dde84e4ea851d

Report a correction →
context

Dutch prosecutors describe almost five thousand names on records of people executed in 1978–1979. The published English translation ends at ordinal 4,785, but its last ten numbered entries are expressly described as taken from an Amnesty list after the Dari list ends. The ordinal is not a deduplicated total of independently verified deaths.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Context collection; no single event date assigned.

Date basis and original source clocks

Later documentary provenance and investigation are separate from the alleged 1978–1979 deaths; publication date unknown.

Sources (2) · exact passages & limitations

Afghanistan death lists,Morotai investigation ↗

Publisher: Netherlands Public Prosecution Service

Exact passage: DeathLists section andopening

Source establishes: The official summary describes the records and their provenance; not a judicial finding of every listed death.

Document date: Not established · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Official Morotai account: Investigation, Transfer Orders, Death Lists, Quest for Definite Answers and Death of the Suspect sections.

Access limitations

Original interview, orders and signatures were not reviewed. Individual serious allegation remains excluded; initials are not expanded. Refugee exclusion is not a conviction. Current page and publication clocks do not date 1978–1979 events.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Official prosecution investigation summary, not a court judgment. · HR-ARCHIVE-B08-FAMILY-DUTCH-AFGHAN-LISTS

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B08-SRC-AF-DUTCHPROSECUTOR@dc91122372c03ba9

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: dc91122372c03ba9ddbefbf1bd51613656358b957e175cb9bb0ad9d168e79301. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

English translation of Afghan death list published by Dutch prosecutors ↗

Publisher: Dutch Public Prosecution Service publication of translated Afghan records

Exact passage: PDF1provenance/translationcaveat andPDF167lastrows

Source establishes: Reviewed first/final pages show terminal ordinal 4,785 and ten appended Amnesty entries after the Dari section; numbering is not a deduplicated death total.

Document date: Not established · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Physical pages 1 and 167, provenance/caveat and final rows, visually reviewed; not a whole-list review.

Access limitations

Original Dari and all 167 English pages were not reviewed. English and Dari custody accounts are not proven equivalent. Ordinals are not deduplicated verified deaths; translation errors and appended Amnesty entries remain explicit. No names, private victim list, or inferred under-eighteen count is exported.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Prosecutor-published English translation with mixed list ancestry and caveats. · HR-ARCHIVE-B08-FAMILY-DUTCH-AFGHAN-LISTS

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B08-SRC-AF-DEATHLISTEN@b77ba4b729bfa7a6

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: b77ba4b729bfa7a666e73919cd0ee248d64adcf6b1dc30371de37510d6cad63b. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 1, 167 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

No complete list review, verified unique death census, proven equivalent Dari/English custody chain or exported roster.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B18-AF-LISTS · exact wording SHA-256 c2e2c99a03a09e68f63479d4fe24a45613fc423183e07fcfef86ee863b624875

Report a correction →
context

The Dutch prosecutor states that the Morotai war-crimes investigation ended in 2012 when the suspect died. The account reports an investigation, not a criminal conviction of Amanullah O.; refugee-status exclusion is a separate process.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Year of investigation closure after the suspect’s death, not date of the alleged 1978–1979 acts..

Date basis and original source clocks

Year of investigation closure after the suspect’s death, not date of the alleged 1978–1979 acts.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Afghanistan death lists,Morotai investigation ↗

Publisher: Netherlands Public Prosecution Service

Exact passage: DeathoftheSuspect section

Source establishes: The official prosecutor’s Death of the Suspect section says the Morotai investigation ended in 2012.

Document date: Not established · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Official Morotai account: Investigation, Transfer Orders, Death Lists, Quest for Definite Answers and Death of the Suspect sections.

Access limitations

Original interview, orders and signatures were not reviewed. Individual serious allegation remains excluded; initials are not expanded. Refugee exclusion is not a conviction. Current page and publication clocks do not date 1978–1979 events.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Official prosecution investigation summary, not a court judgment. · HR-ARCHIVE-B08-FAMILY-DUTCH-AFGHAN-LISTS

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B08-SRC-AF-DUTCHPROSECUTOR@dc91122372c03ba9

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: dc91122372c03ba9ddbefbf1bd51613656358b957e175cb9bb0ad9d168e79301. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Investigation and refugee-status exclusion are not a criminal conviction. Preserve initials; no unreviewed full identity or guilt claim.

Legal distinction

No criminal conviction established by this account; separate administrative refugee exclusion is not a criminal judgment.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B18-AF-NOCONVICTION · exact wording SHA-256 0f0cd8c3e39b196c44990c1304b157367a89f6f4d9efd5af81d4e62875092112

Report a correction →
human consequence

Amnesty’s 1979 Afghanistan report distinguishes its October 1978 estimate of at least 4,000 political prisoners nationwide, the foreign minister’s figure of about 100, and a later observer estimate of at least 12,000 in Pule Charchi prison alone. Dates, geographic scope and definitions differ; these are detention figures, not deaths.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Context collection; no single event date assigned.

Date basis and original source clocks

Separate October 1978 and later estimates, undated family list and dated release announcements; no continuous observed custody interval.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Violations of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms in the Democratic Republic of Afghanistan,ASA11/04/79 ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: printed10/PDF11,first3paragraphs,visually checked

Source establishes: The visually reviewed passage distinguishes Amnesty’s October estimate, the minister’s account and a later single-prison observer estimate.

Document date: 1979-09 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Methodology and physical pages 7 and 11, printed pages 6 and 10, visually reviewed.

Access limitations

Restricted access and fear of reprisals constrained the report. Original lists and release orders were not obtained; a full assessment of atrocities by both combat sides was outside scope. October 1978 mission, December memorandum and September 1979 publication are different dates.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Contemporary Amnesty investigation with qualified estimates and official accounts. · HR-ARCHIVE-B08-FAMILY-AI-AFGHAN

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B08-SRC-AF-AI1979@5c5288f19be6863a

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 5c5288f19be6863a165602822e81f4a02780097dfd138ab9d2e5dc861a0cb603. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 11 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Dates, geographic scope and definitions differ; none is a death count. No subtraction to manufacture missing or killed persons.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Official and observer accounts differ in definitions and scope; Amin later publicly rejected the twelve-thousand claim.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B18-AF-PRISONERS · exact wording SHA-256 9dcfe686ed5cbf7bff9b774ba0b701019e2b12b7488efb80a03e18e09380fc48

Report a correction →
human consequence

UNHCR reports that Afghan flight into Pakistan began in spring 1979, with more than 400,000 registered by the end of 1979 and over 700,000 by early April 1980. Flight therefore predates the Soviet December intervention; the overlapping stocks cannot all be allocated to that intervention or one leader.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Context collection; no single event date assigned.

Date basis and original source clocks

Flight from spring 1979 and separate year-end/early-April stocks; no continuous count or one-cause total.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

UNHCR Report,A/35/12,1980 ↗

Publisher: UNHCR

Exact passage: para202,printed36/PDF43;paras275-277,printed45/PDF52

Source establishes: UNHCR records pre-intervention flight, over 400,000 registered by year end and over 700,000 by early April.

Document date: 1980 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: A/35/12, physical pages 37, 43 and 52; paragraphs 165, 202 and 275–280 as specified by each binding.

Access limitations

Same A/35/12 edition as B17, not a new independent dataset. Original registration files were not obtained. Stocks, assistance-planning caseloads and flows are different; no exact Chad arrival day is established.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Contemporary UNHCR operational report. · HR-ARCHIVE-B08-FAMILY-UN-ANNUAL1980

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B08-SRC-UN1980@423cba623f23102c

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 423cba623f23102c3ca45f906fecf8d6063fe8c55a4ddbc9fd2509f1dd50803c. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 43, 52 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Overlapping stocks predate or follow intervention; no Soviet-only or personal causal allocation.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B18-AF-REFUGEES · exact wording SHA-256 6b3915b720c677d2c179e15c8f255369164706bea4216013ee9dd4d03a53dab4

Report a correction →
decision

An archived English translation of a Kosygin–Taraki telephone conversation records Taraki requesting Soviet personnel and equipment disguised with Afghan markings or civilian clothing. Its heading dates the conversation to 17 or 18 March 1979; the request does not establish that troops were deployed then.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Archived translation heading: 17 or 18 March 1979; unresolved discrete alternatives..

Date basis and original source clocks

Archived translation heading: 17 or 18 March 1979; unresolved discrete alternatives.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Kosygin-Taraki telephone conversation,17or18March1979 ↗

Publisher: Soviet conversation record in published English translation

Exact passage: p1,centre/rightcolumns

Source establishes: The translated conversation records a request for personnel/equipment with Afghan markings or civilian dress.

Document date: Not established · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: One-page translation, all three columns and source note visually reviewed.

Access limitations

Heading says 17 or 18 March 1979; catalogue dating does not resolve the alternative. Original audio and Russian transcript were not authenticated. A request or consultation is not deployment or a permanent refusal.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Archived English translation of a telephone conversation. · HR-ARCHIVE-B08-FAMILY-SOVIET-AFGHAN-DOCS

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B08-SRC-AF-KOSYGIN1979@f453106da45f3dee

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: f453106da45f3dee083011f685252dac90fd3a53b197d9db31753d019257618c. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Discrete 17/18 March alternatives. Original transcript and audio not authenticated; request does not establish deployment.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B18-AF-TARAKI · exact wording SHA-256 661b2265cdd576043cae53d650f331041678fff227eadb418d1750fdcb9f5e4c

Report a correction →
decision

Amnesty reports that the Kano agreement of 16 March 1979 provided for President Félix Malloum and Prime Minister Hissène Habré to resign on 23 March, an interim council chaired by Goukouni Oueddei, prisoner releases and a demilitarised zone around N’Djamena. It remained unclear whether all prisoners had been freed.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Reported agreement date; planned 23 March resignations are not proof of completion..

Date basis and original source clocks

Reported agreement date; planned 23 March resignations are not proof of completion.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Amnesty International Report1979,Chad ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: printed14-15/PDF13,Kanoparagraphs

Source establishes: Amnesty describes the 16 March Kano terms, planned23Marchresignations, interim council, prisoner-release and demilitarized-zone provisions, while release completion remained unclear.

Document date: 1979 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Chad account, printed pages 14–15 on physical PDF page 13, Kano paragraphs.

Access limitations

Original accord and signatures were not obtained. Same annual edition as B17; political agreement terms are not private killing orders and commitments need not have been completed.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Contemporary Amnesty report of a political agreement. · HR-ARCHIVE-B08-FAMILY-AI-CHAD

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B08-SRC-TD-AI1979@524dff9fe507dabe

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 524dff9fe507dabe0f2a3a1658a1afe441641f17e57011f896afb6c1b90d0ba8. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 13 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Original agreement/signatures not obtained. Planned resignations, releases and demilitarization are terms, not proof all occurred.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B18-TD-ACCORD · exact wording SHA-256 a69eea5aa55aaab985741143c01d615dea5aac74e60daac2cdaabf04926532fb

Report a correction →
human consequence

Amnesty’s 1980 report says more than a thousand people were believed killed by the end of April after fighting resumed in March 1980. It separately says it could not verify or document individual execution and disappearance cases. The estimate is not a confirmed civilian or child-only total.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Fighting resumed in March; believed toll reported by end of April, not a confirmed civilian or child-only total..

Date basis and original source clocks

Fighting resumed in March; believed toll reported by end of April, not a confirmed civilian or child-only total.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Amnesty International Report1980,Chad ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: printed38-39/PDF25,Chadsectionopening andparagraphFurther serious fighting

Source establishes: Amnesty1980reports March resumption and the believed toll by the end of April, with explicit inability to verify or document individual cases.

Document date: 1980 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Chad account, printed pages 38–39 on physical PDF page 25.

Access limitations

Original agreement and case files absent. Commissioned roles and noncompliance are attributed accounts. The believed toll has unresolved age/civilian/combatant definitions and individual cases could not be verified.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Amnesty annual report with bounded estimates and access limits. · HR-ARCHIVE-B08-FAMILY-AI-CHAD

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B08-SRC-TD-AI1980@85447741dd879b4d

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 85447741dd879b4dd29c4dd55d53fd74f2761521b64afb94d11df7c2c6faf0e3. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 25 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

More than a thousand were believed killed, not independently confirmed as civilian or child-only deaths. Amnesty could not verify/document individual execution or disappearance cases.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B18-TD-COMBAT · exact wording SHA-256 d776c9df333274eafc865170cc360ec982831da83c476f71e2c55934c524d2dc

Report a correction →
context

Amnesty’s 1981 report describes FAN forces led by Defence Minister Habré fighting FAP forces supporting President Goukouni. It reports that Libyan troops intervened in support of Goukouni in December 1980 and FAN withdrew from N’Djamena. It identifies no Libyan personal authoriser or prisoner-execution order.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Reported Libyan intervention and FAN withdrawal month; no named Libyan personal authorization..

Date basis and original source clocks

Reported Libyan intervention and FAN withdrawal month; no named Libyan personal authorization.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Amnesty International Report1981,Chad ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: printed35/PDF23,Chadparagraphs

Source establishes: Amnesty1981describes Habré-led FAN fighting pro-Goukouni FAP, Libyan intervention in December and FAN withdrawal.

Document date: 1981 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Chad account, printed pages 35–36 on physical PDF pages 23–24, including continuation.

Access limitations

No exhumation, autopsy or individual order records were obtained. More than 100 remains are not all proven FAN executions or civilians. Later 1981 allegations are outside the approved selected account.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Amnesty report of conflict and competing remains accounts. · HR-ARCHIVE-B08-FAMILY-AI-CHAD

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B08-SRC-TD-AI1981@b90c32f71f4a3012

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: b90c32f71f4a3012dee688f57a81f623c7ee8889aa62af9cd1280e5fbb99d36e. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 23 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

No Libyan personal authorizer or prisoner-execution instruction established. Reported faction leadership and intervention are not personal casualty allocation.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B18-TD-INTERVENTION · exact wording SHA-256 1bc4b785a1d779cdbcdf7af97aaca608018f0426e5814c913882e8080a2eeb38

Report a correction →
decision

Amnesty’s 1980 report describes an August 1979 Lagos agreement creating a coalition led by Goukouni Oueddei as president, with Habré as defence minister and Kamougué as vice-president. It says prisoner-release and military-withdrawal commitments were not fully observed.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Reported agreement month; exact day unknown..

Date basis and original source clocks

Reported agreement month; exact day unknown.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Amnesty International Report1980,Chad ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: printed38-39/PDF25,Chadsection

Source establishes: The report describes the August Lagos coalition roles and noncompliance with prisoner-release and military-withdrawal commitments.

Document date: 1980 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Chad account, printed pages 38–39 on physical PDF page 25.

Access limitations

Original agreement and case files absent. Commissioned roles and noncompliance are attributed accounts. The believed toll has unresolved age/civilian/combatant definitions and individual cases could not be verified.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Amnesty annual report with bounded estimates and access limits. · HR-ARCHIVE-B08-FAMILY-AI-CHAD

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B08-SRC-TD-AI1980@85447741dd879b4d

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 85447741dd879b4dd29c4dd55d53fd74f2761521b64afb94d11df7c2c6faf0e3. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 25 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Original accord absent; reported roles and commitments are not individual private killing instructions. Release and withdrawal commitments were not fully observed.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B18-TD-LAGOS · exact wording SHA-256 d7e32e96f385dde17635560b6870f396e86d9b075bb7bfe9fb304f13e67346ae

Report a correction →
context

Amnesty’s release of 30 May 2016 reports that the Extraordinary African Chambers in Dakar convicted Habré and imposed life imprisonment for crimes committed in Chad during 1982–1990. That later case does not establish the separate 1979–1980 allegations reviewed here.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Date of the reported verdict for1982–1990; not a judgment about1979–1980..

Date basis and original source clocks

Date of the reported verdict for1982–1990; not a judgment about1979–1980.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Hissene Habre verdict:landmark decision,30May2016 ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: openingandverdictparagraph

Source establishes: Amnesty’s30May2016release reports the EAC conviction/life sentence, identifies1982–1990scope and notes appeal rights.

Document date: 2016-05-30 · Publication date: 2016-05-30

Actual review scope: Release dated 30 May 2016, opening/verdict, 1982–1990 scope and explicit appeal right.

Access limitations

Original Extraordinary African Chambers judgment and statute were not reviewed. Amnesty contributed trial research; this is not an independent judicial merits review. The dated verdict does not adjudicate 1979–1980 or establish unchanged present finality.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Contemporary Amnesty report of a court verdict. · HR-ARCHIVE-B08-FAMILY-AI-CHAD

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B08-SRC-TD-AI2016SCOPE@aa4901536cba47ce

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: aa4901536cba47ce4d53bb83f8beac4c4a99d588382397a71538e6340fba567e. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Original EAC judgment/statute and later procedural history not reviewed. The dated release notes appeal rights; no unchanged present finality or application to1979–1980.

Legal distinction

Neutral report of an Extraordinary African Chambers verdict for1982–1990, not an ICC finding or a conviction covering the earlier events here.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B18-TD-LATERCOURT · exact wording SHA-256 763b26f3c7178076b3e5292d3c65f4722c04762714d2e33b37dc3986c9de6e86

Report a correction →
human consequence

UNHCR reports that Cameroon sought urgent assistance after an estimated one hundred thousand refugees arrived from Chad near the end of its 1979–1980 reporting period. An emergency allocation followed in April 1980. This is an approximate refugee population, not mortality or an all-child count.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Context collection; no single event date assigned.

Date basis and original source clocks

Arrivals near end of reporting period to31March1980; assistance allocation followed inApril. Exact arrival dates unknown.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

UNHCR Report,A/35/12,1980 ↗

Publisher: UNHCR

Exact passage: para165finalCameroonparagraph,printed30/PDF37

Source establishes: UNHCR paragraph165records Cameroon’s request after an estimated100,000refugees arrived from Chad and an emergency allocation in April1980.

Document date: 1980 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: A/35/12, physical pages 37, 43 and 52; paragraphs 165, 202 and 275–280 as specified by each binding.

Access limitations

Same A/35/12 edition as B17, not a new independent dataset. Original registration files were not obtained. Stocks, assistance-planning caseloads and flows are different; no exact Chad arrival day is established.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Contemporary UNHCR operational report. · HR-ARCHIVE-B08-FAMILY-UN-ANNUAL1980

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B08-SRC-UN1980@423cba623f23102c

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 423cba623f23102c3ca45f906fecf8d6063fe8c55a4ddbc9fd2509f1dd50803c. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 37 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Approximate refugee population near a report-period boundary, not an exact arrival day, mortality or an all-child count.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B18-TD-REFUGEES · exact wording SHA-256 0fbffdf06ef1abd4ebb7d7768531e67aadd64213127101980e69d243f8c71b22

Report a correction →
human consequence

After FAN withdrew, Amnesty reports that more than one hundred corpses and skeletons were found near the Chari River. It relays observers’ view that these were executed prisoners and FAN’s contrary claim that they were its soldiers killed in fighting. Individual identities, death dates and statuses are unresolved.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Context collection; no single event date assigned.

Date basis and original source clocks

Discovery after FAN withdrawal; exact discovery day, individual death dates and statuses unresolved.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Amnesty International Report1981,Chad ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: printed35-36/PDF23-24,paragraphShortlyaftertheFAN andcontinuation

Source establishes: The report describes over100corpses/skeletons and retains observer and FAN explanations without resolving them.

Document date: 1981 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Chad account, printed pages 35–36 on physical PDF pages 23–24, including continuation.

Access limitations

No exhumation, autopsy or individual order records were obtained. More than 100 remains are not all proven FAN executions or civilians. Later 1981 allegations are outside the approved selected account.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Amnesty report of conflict and competing remains accounts. · HR-ARCHIVE-B08-FAMILY-AI-CHAD

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B08-SRC-TD-AI1981@b90c32f71f4a3012

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: b90c32f71f4a3012dee688f57a81f623c7ee8889aa62af9cd1280e5fbb99d36e. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 23, 24 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

No exhumation/autopsy records, individual identities, death dates or statuses established. Discovery count is not a proven execution or civilian total.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Observers interpreted the remains as executed prisoners; FAN claimed its soldiers had died in fighting.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B18-TD-REMAINS · exact wording SHA-256 9b30b5805155f16b4f55992544ca40270c75c7873ba3470f78d3e7c09cef5d3c

Report a correction →
decision

IHRDC reproduces an order attributed to Khomeini, dated 18 August 1979, directing army and police units toward Paveh with tanks and equipped troops, and requiring the government to dispatch Revolutionary Guards. It threatens consequences for disobedience. The dispatch order does not itself sentence each detainee or initiate the entire Kurdish conflict.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Date attributed to the dispatch order; no whole-conflict initiation or completed implementation inferred..

Date basis and original source clocks

Date attributed to the dispatch order; no whole-conflict initiation or completed implementation inferred.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Haunted Memories: The Islamic Republic’s Executions of Kurds in 1979 ↗

Publisher: Iran Human Rights Documentation Center

Exact passage: printed9/PDF15, translateddirective andfootnote49Kayhan18August

Source establishes: IHRDC reproduces the18Augustdirective toward Paveh,including army/police,tanks,equipped troops,Guard dispatch and threatened consequences for disobedience.

Document date: 2011-09 · Publication date: 2011-09

Actual review scope: Appendix2 and the specified Paveh, Sanandaj, doctor and interview passages; each claim retains its exact locator.

Access limitations

Reproduced translations, contemporary charges and later interviews are distinct evidence. Original orders, individual case files and full raw interview records were not newly authenticated. Charges are not established guilt; conflicting chronology and accounts remain unresolved.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Human-rights investigation reproducing documents, contemporary reporting and later interviews. · HR-ARCHIVE-B09-FAMILY-IHRDC-KURDS

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B09-SRC-IR-IHRDCPDF@9b1390bbc24114d9

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 9b1390bbc24114d9b77e6473a41914cc73e6b823a704b89082fa810a22a9698e. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 15 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Reproduced translated dispatch directive,not authenticated original military paperwork. A dispatch order is not each detainee’s sentence or the start of the entire conflict.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B19-IR-ADVANCE · exact wording SHA-256 f0a09e843128aff07da60e10d89bcaf13595df97ef4adac12057dbe77781c6ec

Report a correction →
decision

Published translations of Khomeini’s note dated 24 February 1979 commission Sadegh Khalkhali to issue Sharia sentences after trial proceedings. The short reproduced note contains no named death sentence. Its date does not establish the first informal appointment or retrospectively authorise every earlier execution.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Published note date,not necessarily first informal appointment..

Date basis and original source clocks

Published note date,not necessarily first informal appointment.

Sources (2) · exact passages & limitations

Haunted Memories: The Islamic Republic’s Executions of Kurds in 1979 ↗

Publisher: Iran Human Rights Documentation Center

Exact passage: Appendix2 printed51-52/PDF57-58,reproduced note/Englishtranslation

Source establishes: The reproduced note commissions Khalkhali to issue Sharia sentences after trial proceedings; the short note has no named death sentence.

Document date: 2011-09 · Publication date: 2011-09

Actual review scope: Appendix2 and the specified Paveh, Sanandaj, doctor and interview passages; each claim retains its exact locator.

Access limitations

Reproduced translations, contemporary charges and later interviews are distinct evidence. Original orders, individual case files and full raw interview records were not newly authenticated. Charges are not established guilt; conflicting chronology and accounts remain unresolved.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Human-rights investigation reproducing documents, contemporary reporting and later interviews. · HR-ARCHIVE-B09-FAMILY-IHRDC-KURDS

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B09-SRC-IR-IHRDCPDF@9b1390bbc24114d9

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 9b1390bbc24114d9b77e6473a41914cc73e6b823a704b89082fa810a22a9698e. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 57, 58 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Decree: Formation of the Islamic Revolutionary Court, Sahifeh volume 6, p 193 ↗

Publisher: Khomeini text attributed in Sahifeh, English transcription hosted by emam.com

Exact passage: fullEnglishdecree andmetadata, Sahifehvol6p193

Source establishes: The published English decree and metadata supply24February1979and the same note,not an independent record of every later execution.

Document date: 1979-02-24 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Full English note and metadata, Sahifeh volume6 page193, as pinned in the prior source review.

Access limitations

Same underlying note as the reproduced appendix; not independent corroboration of every later action. The short note has no named death sentence and does not establish every earlier informal appointment.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Published English translation and metadata for a reproduced appointment note. · HR-ARCHIVE-B09-FAMILY-KHOMEINI-APPOINTMENT

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B09-SRC-IR-APPOINTMENT@5662ac6ebe901e81

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 5662ac6ebe901e81929e60dac1d8ae28b3362e22a05ed4a4b98844d5772fd7c4. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Same underlying note in published editions; original paper,signature and Persian handwriting not authenticated. No named death sentence or first informal appointment date established.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B19-IR-APPOINT · exact wording SHA-256 5c74b99a04b457f31aa0e05b70ad39c0f9bc05157aaecfcf8626a2ff69f1df39

Report a correction →
decision

Amnesty reproduces Khomeini’s 22 August 1979 statement requiring coordinated armed forces and revolutionary proceedings for disobedience. The same statement offers a conditional pardon for surrender and handing over arms, and instructs allocation of one day’s oil revenue for Kurdistan. These are announced orders and conditions, not proof every promise or later operation was implemented as stated.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Statement date; conditions,pardon and aid provisions remain with coercive language..

Date basis and original source clocks

Statement date; conditions,pardon and aid provisions remain with coercive language.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Law and Human Rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran, MDE 13/03/80 ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: AppendixC printed189-191/PDF97-98,fulltextof22Auguststatement

Source establishes: Amnesty reproduces the full22Auguststatement on coordinated forces,proceedings for disobedience,conditional pardon and allocation of one day’s oil revenue.

Document date: 1980-02 · Publication date: 1980-02

Actual review scope: Specified AppendixC statement and Reuters/state-radio, doctor and rebel passages, with uncertainty notes.

Access limitations

Original news recordings, charges and execution records were not separately authenticated. State-radio and rebel allegations may overlap; unresolved doctor dates are not silently harmonized or counted twice.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Amnesty contemporary investigation/update with reproduced statements and nested news accounts. · HR-ARCHIVE-B09-FAMILY-AI-IRAN1980

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B09-SRC-IR-AI1980@17c1d8264612c7ec

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 17c1d8264612c7ecf6d3ac945a04946e6a3d5b60ccd8f7ce777873d0b3761020. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 97, 98 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Orders and conditions are announced,not proof all promises or later operations were implemented. Pardon and aid provisions remain attached.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B19-IR-AUG22 · exact wording SHA-256 6103f8c7116dc2828f46557957b8342d921fd59a6d91e66fa462802d776e2c67

Report a correction →
human consequence

Navareh’s interview, as published by IHRDC, recalls a twelve-year-old boy detained for possessing political flyers in Sanandaj; his father accompanied him so he would not face jail alone. The reviewed passage establishes neither an execution nor an injury outcome for the child.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Context collection; no single event date assigned.

Date basis and original source clocks

Exact injury/detention dates in the witness passage are not established here.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Haunted Memories: The Islamic Republic’s Executions of Kurds in 1979 ↗

Publisher: Iran Human Rights Documentation Center

Exact passage: printed28/PDF34,firstparagraph

Source establishes: The interview recalls a twelve-year-old detained for political flyers and his father accompanying him; no execution or injury outcome for the boy is supplied.

Document date: 2011-09 · Publication date: 2011-09

Actual review scope: Appendix2 and the specified Paveh, Sanandaj, doctor and interview passages; each claim retains its exact locator.

Access limitations

Reproduced translations, contemporary charges and later interviews are distinct evidence. Original orders, individual case files and full raw interview records were not newly authenticated. Charges are not established guilt; conflicting chronology and accounts remain unresolved.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Human-rights investigation reproducing documents, contemporary reporting and later interviews. · HR-ARCHIVE-B09-FAMILY-IHRDC-KURDS

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B09-SRC-IR-IHRDCPDF@9b1390bbc24114d9

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 9b1390bbc24114d9b77e6473a41914cc73e6b823a704b89082fa810a22a9698e. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 34 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Witness recollection; later injury/execution outcome unknown. Father’s accompaniment is not necessarily detention.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B19-IR-CHILD-DETENTION · exact wording SHA-256 788f29b6fa372251c3bd20cc38f0e57ebae55be7e265125c61861a2e295dfb27

Report a correction →
context

The sources give incompatible chronologies for Dr Rashvand-Sardari: IHRDC places him among the 21 August Paveh group, while Amnesty relays a report dating his execution to 27 August and questions its link to a Tehran hospital protest. This apparent overlap is not counted as two deaths. Specific execution motives and the doctor’s alleged armed activity are unresolved.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Context collection; no single event date assigned.

Date basis and original source clocks

IHRDC places the doctor in21Augustgroup; Amnesty relays27Augustreport. Unique linkage and reconciled occurrence day unverified.

Sources (2) · exact passages & limitations

Haunted Memories: The Islamic Republic’s Executions of Kurds in 1979 ↗

Publisher: Iran Human Rights Documentation Center

Exact passage: printed15-18/PDF21-24,doctoraccount/defences andfootnotes98,104-107

Source establishes: IHRDC’s doctor narrative and defences place him among the21AugustPaveh group. Alleged armed activity and motives remain unresolved.

Document date: 2011-09 · Publication date: 2011-09

Actual review scope: Appendix2 and the specified Paveh, Sanandaj, doctor and interview passages; each claim retains its exact locator.

Access limitations

Reproduced translations, contemporary charges and later interviews are distinct evidence. Original orders, individual case files and full raw interview records were not newly authenticated. Charges are not established guilt; conflicting chronology and accounts remain unresolved.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Human-rights investigation reproducing documents, contemporary reporting and later interviews. · HR-ARCHIVE-B09-FAMILY-IHRDC-KURDS

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B09-SRC-IR-IHRDCPDF@9b1390bbc24114d9

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 9b1390bbc24114d9b77e6473a41914cc73e6b823a704b89082fa810a22a9698e. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 21, 22, 23, 24 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Law and Human Rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran, MDE 13/03/80 ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: printed192/PDF99,DrRashvand-Sardarireceivedreport andAIuncertaintynote

Source establishes: Amnesty relays a report of27Augustexecution and questions its link to a Tehran hospital protest; not a verified second death.

Document date: 1980-02 · Publication date: 1980-02

Actual review scope: Specified AppendixC statement and Reuters/state-radio, doctor and rebel passages, with uncertainty notes.

Access limitations

Original news recordings, charges and execution records were not separately authenticated. State-radio and rebel allegations may overlap; unresolved doctor dates are not silently harmonized or counted twice.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Amnesty contemporary investigation/update with reproduced statements and nested news accounts. · HR-ARCHIVE-B09-FAMILY-AI-IRAN1980

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B09-SRC-IR-AI1980@17c1d8264612c7ec

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 17c1d8264612c7ecf6d3ac945a04946e6a3d5b60ccd8f7ce777873d0b3761020. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 99 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Chronology and apparent identity overlap are unresolved. Do not add an extra death or adopt alleged motives/armed activity as fact.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

IHRDC places the doctor in the21Augustgroup; Amnesty relays a27Augustexecution report and questions the hospital-protest link.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B19-IR-DOCTOR · exact wording SHA-256 b913082c4a1090f6824c3c982950edf15caaaf8fcc585bcbfde64896d4afcbe2

Report a correction →
human consequence

In IHRDC’s interview, surviving detainee Jamil Navareh describes a gunshot injury to his hand and detention alongside wounded Ahsan Nahid. He also relays Naser Salimi’s denial that Salimi’s hand injury came from combat. These accounts do not establish that every wound had the same cause or that every bandaged prisoner was a combatant.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Context collection; no single event date assigned.

Date basis and original source clocks

Exact injury/detention dates in the witness passage are not established here.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Haunted Memories: The Islamic Republic’s Executions of Kurds in 1979 ↗

Publisher: Iran Human Rights Documentation Center

Exact passage: printed26-29/PDF32-35,Navarehinterview andconflictingSalimiaccounts

Source establishes: Navareh’s published interview describes his hand injury,detention with wounded Nahid and the relayed Salimi denial; it does not classify all bandaged prisoners as combatants.

Document date: 2011-09 · Publication date: 2011-09

Actual review scope: Appendix2 and the specified Paveh, Sanandaj, doctor and interview passages; each claim retains its exact locator.

Access limitations

Reproduced translations, contemporary charges and later interviews are distinct evidence. Original orders, individual case files and full raw interview records were not newly authenticated. Charges are not established guilt; conflicting chronology and accounts remain unresolved.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Human-rights investigation reproducing documents, contemporary reporting and later interviews. · HR-ARCHIVE-B09-FAMILY-IHRDC-KURDS

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B09-SRC-IR-IHRDCPDF@9b1390bbc24114d9

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 9b1390bbc24114d9b77e6473a41914cc73e6b823a704b89082fa810a22a9698e. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 32, 33, 34, 35 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Firsthand hand-injury account and relayed Salimi denial have different evidentiary voices. No aggregate wound total or common injury cause is established.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Salimi’s relayed denial disputes a combat-origin interpretation of his wound.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B19-IR-INJURIES · exact wording SHA-256 6f754cf105a567ace34fae3123e3875649e60a22beff73b775914e06ae80b6fe

Report a correction →
decision

IHRDC reports that Khalkhali sentenced nine men at Paveh and that they were executed before noon on 21 August 1979. Amnesty’s contemporary update also relays a Reuters/state-radio report of nine executions that day and identifies Khalkhali as sentence-giver. These are attributed reports of a judicial decision and event, not an AI finding of criminal guilt or nine verified civilian or child deaths.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Reported Paveh sentencing/execution day; before-noon local period has unverified timezone..

Date basis and original source clocks

Reported Paveh sentencing/execution day; before-noon local period has unverified timezone.

Sources (2) · exact passages & limitations

Haunted Memories: The Islamic Republic’s Executions of Kurds in 1979 ↗

Publisher: Iran Human Rights Documentation Center

Exact passage: printed14-15/PDF20-21,Paveh andfootnotes93-98

Source establishes: IHRDC reports Khalkhali sentencing nine men and execution before noon on21August.

Document date: 2011-09 · Publication date: 2011-09

Actual review scope: Appendix2 and the specified Paveh, Sanandaj, doctor and interview passages; each claim retains its exact locator.

Access limitations

Reproduced translations, contemporary charges and later interviews are distinct evidence. Original orders, individual case files and full raw interview records were not newly authenticated. Charges are not established guilt; conflicting chronology and accounts remain unresolved.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Human-rights investigation reproducing documents, contemporary reporting and later interviews. · HR-ARCHIVE-B09-FAMILY-IHRDC-KURDS

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B09-SRC-IR-IHRDCPDF@9b1390bbc24114d9

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 9b1390bbc24114d9b77e6473a41914cc73e6b823a704b89082fa810a22a9698e. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 20, 21 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Law and Human Rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran, MDE 13/03/80 ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: AppendixC printed191/PDF98, Reuters21Augustpassage

Source establishes: Amnesty’s contemporary update relays the Reuters/state-radio account of nine executions and Khalkhali as sentence-giver. Shared reporting ancestry is not automatically independent corroboration.

Document date: 1980-02 · Publication date: 1980-02

Actual review scope: Specified AppendixC statement and Reuters/state-radio, doctor and rebel passages, with uncertainty notes.

Access limitations

Original news recordings, charges and execution records were not separately authenticated. State-radio and rebel allegations may overlap; unresolved doctor dates are not silently harmonized or counted twice.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Amnesty contemporary investigation/update with reproduced statements and nested news accounts. · HR-ARCHIVE-B09-FAMILY-AI-IRAN1980

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B09-SRC-IR-AI1980@17c1d8264612c7ec

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 17c1d8264612c7ecf6d3ac945a04946e6a3d5b60ccd8f7ce777873d0b3761020. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 98 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Attributed sentencing/event accounts,not independent criminal guilt or verified civilian/child classifications. Source ancestry may overlap; no original court files or authenticated private execution instruction.

Legal distinction

Source-attributed public sentencing act is distinct from an AI finding of criminal wrongdoing.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B19-IR-PAVEH · exact wording SHA-256 f8c62dae51499e8512d744fc732230438cf472027b83774f0f9cdebfe7cfceed

Report a correction →
human consequence

Amnesty relays a Kurdish spokesman’s 27 August 1979 claim that rebels executed four Revolutionary Guards in retaliation. It separately reports Iran Radio’s later allegation of fifteen or sixteen executions without details. Those are attributed, potentially overlapping accounts, not additive confirmed deaths or personal orders by an identified Kurdish leader.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Context collection; no single event date assigned.

Date basis and original source clocks

27August and5September are account/report dates,not independently verified execution dates.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Law and Human Rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran, MDE 13/03/80 ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: printed193/PDF99,paragraphExecutionswerealsostagedbytherebels

Source establishes: Amnesty separately relays the spokesman’s27Augustclaim of four and Iran Radio’s later claim of fifteen or sixteen executions without details.

Document date: 1980-02 · Publication date: 1980-02

Actual review scope: Specified AppendixC statement and Reuters/state-radio, doctor and rebel passages, with uncertainty notes.

Access limitations

Original news recordings, charges and execution records were not separately authenticated. State-radio and rebel allegations may overlap; unresolved doctor dates are not silently harmonized or counted twice.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Amnesty contemporary investigation/update with reproduced statements and nested news accounts. · HR-ARCHIVE-B09-FAMILY-AI-IRAN1980

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B09-SRC-IR-AI1980@17c1d8264612c7ec

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 17c1d8264612c7ecf6d3ac945a04946e6a3d5b60ccd8f7ce777873d0b3761020. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 99 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Spokesman and later radio accounts may overlap; no additive confirmed toll or identified personal Kurdish authorization established. Fifteen or sixteen are discrete alternatives.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B19-IR-REBEL · exact wording SHA-256 7ac68138f1bc4d6a5d502db6c38dd8319acdcbc918b400abba948ad0a2028a74

Report a correction →
decision

IHRDC reports that Khalkhali’s Sanandaj proceedings on 27 August 1979 produced eleven executions at 16:30 and twelve acquittals. It reproduces contemporary charges and later photographer and reporter accounts. The accusations are not independently established guilt; the twelve acquitted are not counted as killed.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Reported Sanandaj proceedings/execution day;16:30local clock has unverified timezone..

Date basis and original source clocks

Reported Sanandaj proceedings/execution day;16:30local clock has unverified timezone.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Haunted Memories: The Islamic Republic’s Executions of Kurds in 1979 ↗

Publisher: Iran Human Rights Documentation Center

Exact passage: printed23-25/PDF29-31,Sanandaj,footnotes143-155

Source establishes: IHRDC reports eleven executions at16:30and twelve acquittals following Khalkhali’s27Augustproceedings,with attributed contemporary charges and later accounts.

Document date: 2011-09 · Publication date: 2011-09

Actual review scope: Appendix2 and the specified Paveh, Sanandaj, doctor and interview passages; each claim retains its exact locator.

Access limitations

Reproduced translations, contemporary charges and later interviews are distinct evidence. Original orders, individual case files and full raw interview records were not newly authenticated. Charges are not established guilt; conflicting chronology and accounts remain unresolved.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Human-rights investigation reproducing documents, contemporary reporting and later interviews. · HR-ARCHIVE-B09-FAMILY-IHRDC-KURDS

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B09-SRC-IR-IHRDCPDF@9b1390bbc24114d9

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 9b1390bbc24114d9b77e6473a41914cc73e6b823a704b89082fa810a22a9698e. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 29, 30, 31 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Original court files,recordings and full photo identities not authenticated. Contemporary charges are not established guilt, and twelve acquitted are not killed.

Legal distinction

Neutral attributed proceedings and outcome record; no independent AI criminal-guilt determination.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B19-IR-SANANDAJ · exact wording SHA-256 409efc5e61757f3c4faa12e4f9c190e36edaad92c996d5bacb6cd101e914c34e

Report a correction →
context

Amnesty’s 1990 article gives Eren’s official age at execution as nineteen but raises serious doubt whether he had reached eighteen at the alleged offence. It reports his protest of innocence and witness evidence inconsistent with his guilt. Neither the age doubt nor his denial is a later acquittal or proof he was seventeen when executed.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Later article date; age at alleged offence and at execution are different questions..

Date basis and original source clocks

Later article date; age at alleged offence and at execution are different questions.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Amnesty International Newsletter, February 1990, Erdal Eren ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: printed6/PDF6,rightcolumn finalage/offence/witnessparagraphs andErenletter

Source establishes: The Eren article gives the reported official age,doubts about age at offence,the letter and relevant witness discussion.

Document date: 1990-02 · Publication date: 1990-02

Actual review scope: February 1990 newsletter, physical/printed page 6, full Eren article, age/offence/witness discussion and letter.

Access limitations

Original birth record, trial/appeal records and later judicial disposition were not obtained. Official age at execution and uncertainty about age at offence are different; denial and witness material do not establish a later acquittal.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Later Amnesty newsletter account of Eren’s execution, age doubts and defence. · HR-ARCHIVE-B09-FAMILY-AI-TURKEY

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B09-SRC-TR-AI1990@83b685c2f9f224af

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 83b685c2f9f224af46ade69c5659e486bbecaa9421615bf42f7b274b4c3dca43. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 6 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Official nineteen at execution is not independently verified actual age. Doubt about under-eighteen status at the alleged offence is not proof of seventeen at execution or a later acquittal.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

The article reports innocence protests and witness evidence inconsistent with guilt; adjacent cases are not Eren evidence.

Legal distinction

Recorded doubts and defence evidence,not a new legal acquittal or AI ruling on guilt.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B19-TR-AGE · exact wording SHA-256 a07f28dad6a6d498ff7e2f08b20b6aeb0194fe34dd25de8019995ef93ebdb0e2

Report a correction →
context

Amnesty records Erdal Eren’s March 1980 death sentence, its annulment on legal grounds, and its reimposition in November by the body it calls the Council of the Offices of the Military Court of Appeal. This preserves the reported appeal stages rather than treating the first sentence as continuously final.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Context collection; no single event date assigned.

Date basis and original source clocks

March sentence andNovemberreimposition are separate months; exact intervening annulment date unknown.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Amnesty International Report 1981, Turkey ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: printed326/PDF168, paragraphBetween12September

Source establishes: The passage distinguishes Eren’s March sentence,legal annulment and November reimposition by the named appellate body.

Document date: 1981 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Turkey section, printed pages 323–326 on physical PDF pages 166–168, with continuation and dates.

Access limitations

Underlying government complaint list, investigation records, original appeal/approval instruments and original custody materials were not obtained. Pre-coup and post-coup cohorts, claims and procedures remain distinct; government announcements are not completed prosecutions.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Contemporary Amnesty report with investigative, government and court-stage accounts. · HR-ARCHIVE-B09-FAMILY-AI-TURKEY

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B09-SRC-TR-AI1981@b90c32f71f4a3012

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: b90c32f71f4a3012dee688f57a81f623c7ee8889aa62af9cd1280e5fbb99d36e. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 168 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Original files absent. Preserve the reported court-body title and sequence; first sentence is not continuously final.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B19-TR-APPEAL · exact wording SHA-256 7fccee0caa373612f42475f0fbd1ce3b196451b0fc6fcd778d62d509668da024

Report a correction →
human consequence

Amnesty’s 1981 report says it published eight names in November 1980 of people alleged to have died after torture since 12 September. That group includes publisher Ilhan Erdost, reported beaten to death by soldiers at Mamak military prison on 7 November. The named case is included in the eight.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Context collection; no single event date assigned.

Date basis and original source clocks

Names published inNovember1980for deaths alleged since12September; case-specific7Novemberdate is separate.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Amnesty International Report 1981, Turkey ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: printed324/PDF167, paragraphOn9October throughBybeginningApril

Source establishes: The report describes the November eight-name publication and Ilhan Erdost’s reported7Novemberdeath at Mamak.

Document date: 1981 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Turkey section, printed pages 323–326 on physical PDF pages 166–168, with continuation and dates.

Access limitations

Underlying government complaint list, investigation records, original appeal/approval instruments and original custody materials were not obtained. Pre-coup and post-coup cohorts, claims and procedures remain distinct; government announcements are not completed prosecutions.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Contemporary Amnesty report with investigative, government and court-stage accounts. · HR-ARCHIVE-B09-FAMILY-AI-TURKEY

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B09-SRC-TR-AI1981@b90c32f71f4a3012

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: b90c32f71f4a3012dee688f57a81f623c7ee8889aa62af9cd1280e5fbb99d36e. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 167 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Eight names concern attributed allegations since the coup. Erdost’s reported death is included,not a ninth; no individual soldier or private senior order established.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B19-TR-CUSTODY · exact wording SHA-256 3f0f886c834faa2da0beff0c7cf9eb64457b78589b7cccd5c014363e3a99177b

Report a correction →
context

Amnesty records that Turkish authorities later said the reported custody deaths had been investigated and that some people would be prosecuted. The announcement does not establish completed prosecutions, convictions or effective prevention of further abuse.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Context collection; no single event date assigned.

Date basis and original source clocks

Exact date of later government announcement unknown.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Amnesty International Report 1981, Turkey ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: printed324/PDF167,sentenceTheTurkishauthoritieslaterannounced

Source establishes: The authorities’ later announcement says the deaths had been investigated and some people would be prosecuted.

Document date: 1981 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Turkey section, printed pages 323–326 on physical PDF pages 166–168, with continuation and dates.

Access limitations

Underlying government complaint list, investigation records, original appeal/approval instruments and original custody materials were not obtained. Pre-coup and post-coup cohorts, claims and procedures remain distinct; government announcements are not completed prosecutions.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Contemporary Amnesty report with investigative, government and court-stage accounts. · HR-ARCHIVE-B09-FAMILY-AI-TURKEY

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B09-SRC-TR-AI1981@b90c32f71f4a3012

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: b90c32f71f4a3012dee688f57a81f623c7ee8889aa62af9cd1280e5fbb99d36e. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 167 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Announced investigation and promised prosecutions do not establish completed prosecutions,convictions or prevention.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B19-TR-CUSTODY-RESPONSE · exact wording SHA-256 b1bb00a5ee05b01ec48704c5ceed431a32f821203a5c3c2860b6f625cbcf0abe

Report a correction →
decision

Amnesty reports that, after the coup of 12 September 1980, Armed Forces Chief of Staff General Kenan Evren announced that legislative and executive powers would be held by a National Security Council he headed. This is a reported public transfer of powers, not proof of his personal authorship of every later custody or execution decision.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Reported public transfer-of-powers announcement after the coup..

Date basis and original source clocks

Reported public transfer-of-powers announcement after the coup.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Amnesty International Report 1981, Turkey ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: printed323/PDF166, Turkey opening paragraph

Source establishes: The report’s opening records Evren’s roles and the public announcement of legislative/executive powers held by the council.

Document date: 1981 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Turkey section, printed pages 323–326 on physical PDF pages 166–168, with continuation and dates.

Access limitations

Underlying government complaint list, investigation records, original appeal/approval instruments and original custody materials were not obtained. Pre-coup and post-coup cohorts, claims and procedures remain distinct; government announcements are not completed prosecutions.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Contemporary Amnesty report with investigative, government and court-stage accounts. · HR-ARCHIVE-B09-FAMILY-AI-TURKEY

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B09-SRC-TR-AI1981@b90c32f71f4a3012

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: b90c32f71f4a3012dee688f57a81f623c7ee8889aa62af9cd1280e5fbb99d36e. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 166 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Original proclamation absent. Reported public transfer of powers is not proof of private authorship of every custody or execution decision.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B19-TR-EVREN · exact wording SHA-256 776b26f0a98673ca772d805af9cd6d5d62a66ef168a1fd57a1f3ac0b5140643c

Report a correction →
human consequence

Amnesty’s February 1990 newsletter dates Eren’s execution to 13 December 1980. Its 1981 report places him last among four men executed between 12 September and 13 December 1980. His death is included in that four-person group, not an additional fifth execution.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Reported Eren execution date; not an additional fifth execution..

Date basis and original source clocks

Reported Eren execution date; not an additional fifth execution.

Sources (2) · exact passages & limitations

Amnesty International Newsletter, February 1990, Erdal Eren ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: printed6/PDF6, Erenarticle opening

Source establishes: The newsletter supplies13Decemberexecution date.

Document date: 1990-02 · Publication date: 1990-02

Actual review scope: February 1990 newsletter, physical/printed page 6, full Eren article, age/offence/witness discussion and letter.

Access limitations

Original birth record, trial/appeal records and later judicial disposition were not obtained. Official age at execution and uncertainty about age at offence are different; denial and witness material do not establish a later acquittal.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Later Amnesty newsletter account of Eren’s execution, age doubts and defence. · HR-ARCHIVE-B09-FAMILY-AI-TURKEY

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B09-SRC-TR-AI1990@83b685c2f9f224af

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 83b685c2f9f224af46ade69c5659e486bbecaa9421615bf42f7b274b4c3dca43. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 6 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Amnesty International Report 1981, Turkey ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: printed326/PDF168, paragraphBetween12September

Source establishes: The annual account places Eren last among four men executed between12September and13December; it establishes the overlapping cohort context.

Document date: 1981 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Turkey section, printed pages 323–326 on physical PDF pages 166–168, with continuation and dates.

Access limitations

Underlying government complaint list, investigation records, original appeal/approval instruments and original custody materials were not obtained. Pre-coup and post-coup cohorts, claims and procedures remain distinct; government announcements are not completed prosecutions.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Contemporary Amnesty report with investigative, government and court-stage accounts. · HR-ARCHIVE-B09-FAMILY-AI-TURKEY

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B09-SRC-TR-AI1981@b90c32f71f4a3012

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: b90c32f71f4a3012dee688f57a81f623c7ee8889aa62af9cd1280e5fbb99d36e. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 168 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Eren is included in the four-person cohort; do not add him as a fifth. Sources are the same Amnesty reporting family.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B19-TR-EXECUTION · exact wording SHA-256 f730b165873bc54b87d6c6bbdb4aa8160c88ca8a1bf74e61ecf379942b59f476

Report a correction →
context

Amnesty records Ambassador Vahap Asiroglu’s 23 July 1980 statement that fourteen of thirty-nine torture complaints had been closed for lack of evidence and twenty-five remained under investigation. Amnesty says it did not receive the requested complaint list or further information. These are complaints and a government account of investigations, not death counts or independently established exonerations.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Reported ambassador’s response date, not dates of complaint outcomes or deaths..

Date basis and original source clocks

Reported ambassador’s response date, not dates of complaint outcomes or deaths.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Amnesty International Report 1981, Turkey ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: printed324/PDF166,23Julyresponse andfollowing paragraph

Source establishes: The passage records the23Julyresponse concerning39complaints,14closed and25continuing,with Amnesty’s information gap.

Document date: 1981 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Turkey section, printed pages 323–326 on physical PDF pages 166–168, with continuation and dates.

Access limitations

Underlying government complaint list, investigation records, original appeal/approval instruments and original custody materials were not obtained. Pre-coup and post-coup cohorts, claims and procedures remain distinct; government announcements are not completed prosecutions.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Contemporary Amnesty report with investigative, government and court-stage accounts. · HR-ARCHIVE-B09-FAMILY-AI-TURKEY

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B09-SRC-TR-AI1981@b90c32f71f4a3012

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: b90c32f71f4a3012dee688f57a81f623c7ee8889aa62af9cd1280e5fbb99d36e. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 166 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Complaints and government-reported investigation outcomes are not deaths or independent exonerations. Amnesty did not receive the requested list or further information.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B19-TR-GOV-RESPONSE · exact wording SHA-256 30fe96f5fa1b2f9567b14a138314f4516956d0067d59c4aa4c1f10492d601dc4

Report a correction →
decision

Amnesty’s 1981 report says Turkey’s National Security Council approved Eren’s death sentence on 12 December 1980. The source names a collective institution; it does not provide an original approval instrument, individual votes or a personal execution order by Evren.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Reported collective approval date; original instrument and individual votes absent..

Date basis and original source clocks

Reported collective approval date; original instrument and individual votes absent.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Amnesty International Report 1981, Turkey ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: printed326/PDF168, paragraphBetween12September

Source establishes: The report states the National Security Council approved Eren’s death sentence on12December1980.

Document date: 1981 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Turkey section, printed pages 323–326 on physical PDF pages 166–168, with continuation and dates.

Access limitations

Underlying government complaint list, investigation records, original appeal/approval instruments and original custody materials were not obtained. Pre-coup and post-coup cohorts, claims and procedures remain distinct; government announcements are not completed prosecutions.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Contemporary Amnesty report with investigative, government and court-stage accounts. · HR-ARCHIVE-B09-FAMILY-AI-TURKEY

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B09-SRC-TR-AI1981@b90c32f71f4a3012

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: b90c32f71f4a3012dee688f57a81f623c7ee8889aa62af9cd1280e5fbb99d36e. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 168 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Collective council approval only; original instrument,individual votes and a personal Evren execution order are absent.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B19-TR-NSC · exact wording SHA-256 556c415420cc3696225489e659507521ca075cec1b9526ddb303081e1b1db3fa

Report a correction →
human consequence

By July 1980, Amnesty says it had detailed information on ten deaths alleged to have resulted from torture in the preceding six months. Its May investigation preceded the September coup. These are reported allegations, not ten individually adjudicated killings attributable to the later military leadership.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Context collection; no single event date assigned.

Date basis and original source clocks

Information held byJuly1980about the preceding six months; exact observation endpoints unspecified.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Amnesty International Report 1981, Turkey ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: printed323-324/PDF166, mission andparagraph Allegations of torture

Source establishes: The report describes ten deaths alleged to result from torture during the preceding six months and the earlier May investigation.

Document date: 1981 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Turkey section, printed pages 323–326 on physical PDF pages 166–168, with continuation and dates.

Access limitations

Underlying government complaint list, investigation records, original appeal/approval instruments and original custody materials were not obtained. Pre-coup and post-coup cohorts, claims and procedures remain distinct; government announcements are not completed prosecutions.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Contemporary Amnesty report with investigative, government and court-stage accounts. · HR-ARCHIVE-B09-FAMILY-AI-TURKEY

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B09-SRC-TR-AI1981@b90c32f71f4a3012

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: b90c32f71f4a3012dee688f57a81f623c7ee8889aa62af9cd1280e5fbb99d36e. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 166 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Ten alleged torture deaths known byJuly are not individually adjudicated killings; the investigation preceded the coup and cannot be assigned to later leaders from chronology.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B19-TR-PRE-TORTURE · exact wording SHA-256 a9611cca50f54ce3bbf9b4462faf0dfd5925718295fc14b756bf568fba041fe9

Report a correction →
decision

The1986Animas judgment reproduces a presidential marginal instruction dated14August1979 directing Military Commission27 to retain a case rather than transfer it to a civil court, citing the complainant’s fears of injustice. This is a forum-retention decision, not an order for the underlying1971killing.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Instruction date reproduced in a later court judgment; forum retention,not an underlying killing instruction..

Date basis and original source clocks

Instruction date reproduced in a later court judgment; forum retention,not an underlying killing instruction.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Animas v Minister of National Defense, GRL-51747,29 December 1986 ↗

Publisher: Philippines Supreme Court, Gutierrez Jr. opinion; reproduced by Lawphil

Exact passage: factualhistory paragraphsBeforetrialcouldproceed andquotednote;laterparagraphThereasongivenbytheAugust14

Source establishes: The judgment reproduces the14August1979presidential marginal instruction retaining a case before Military Commission27.

Document date: 1986-12-29 · Publication date: 1986-12-29

Actual review scope: Specified factual history,presidential marginal instruction,jurisdiction analysis and disposition.

Access limitations

Procedural forum-retention/transfer acts do not establish guilt for the underlying1971killing. Office-only identification of the defence minister is not expanded to a named personal authorizer.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Philippine Supreme Court judgment and reproduced procedural history. · HR-ARCHIVE-B10-FAMILY-PH-ANIMAS-COURT

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B10-SRC-PH-ANIMAS1986@d5b03e7034215b3a

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: d5b03e7034215b3ad3dee1028908c188664d704dcb69052cb29efc730652e84e. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Forum decision,not an order for the underlying1971killing. Original handwritten note not authenticated.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B20-PH-ANIMAS · exact wording SHA-256 ca27e9d899fb05348b231ce8709e392dd2b2e6e94a48d3f3be5cb7951033a68e

Report a correction →
context

The Animas judgment of29December1986 orders the criminal case transferred to the appropriate civil court and addresses the insufficient basis for military jurisdiction. This procedural ruling does not decide guilt for the underlying1971murder or constitute an international criminal verdict.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Supreme Court procedural judgment date,not adjudication of the1971murder..

Date basis and original source clocks

Supreme Court procedural judgment date,not adjudication of the1971murder.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Animas v Minister of National Defense, GRL-51747,29 December 1986 ↗

Publisher: Philippines Supreme Court, Gutierrez Jr. opinion; reproduced by Lawphil

Exact passage: jurisdictionanalysis anddispositiveparagraph

Source establishes: The judgment’s jurisdiction analysis and disposition order transfer to an appropriate civil court.

Document date: 1986-12-29 · Publication date: 1986-12-29

Actual review scope: Specified factual history,presidential marginal instruction,jurisdiction analysis and disposition.

Access limitations

Procedural forum-retention/transfer acts do not establish guilt for the underlying1971killing. Office-only identification of the defence minister is not expanded to a named personal authorizer.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Philippine Supreme Court judgment and reproduced procedural history. · HR-ARCHIVE-B10-FAMILY-PH-ANIMAS-COURT

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B10-SRC-PH-ANIMAS1986@d5b03e7034215b3a

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: d5b03e7034215b3ad3dee1028908c188664d704dcb69052cb29efc730652e84e. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Procedural jurisdiction ruling does not decide guilt for the1971murder or constitute an international criminal verdict.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B20-PH-ANIMAS-OUTCOME · exact wording SHA-256 78cbd41b56276cf8f62633d7a3782bb7b3c0db9728efa642e7d19ad855ffafc2

Report a correction →
decision

The joint circular dated1April1979, transcribed under Supreme Court Circular13, names Defence Minister Juan Ponce Enrile as a co-signer of rules implementing Letter of Instructions772. The rules address civil-court referral and arrest/search/seizure orders while retaining military-custody exceptions. The reproduced signature is not an authenticated autograph.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Joint circular date,distinct from1978LOI and6Aprilcourt transmission..

Date basis and original source clocks

Joint circular date,distinct from1978LOI and6Aprilcourt transmission.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Supreme Court Circular 13,6 April 1979 reproducing 1 April joint circular and LOI 772 ↗

Publisher: Philippines Supreme Court/joint ministerial circular, transcribed by ChanRobles

Exact passage: LOI772clauses1-3;jointcircularclauses1-6 andrepresented signatories

Source establishes: The transcription names Enrile as co-signer of implementing rules and retains civil-referral provisions and military-custody exceptions.

Document date: 1979-04-01 · Publication date: 1979-04-06

Actual review scope: Letter of Instructions772,1April1979joint circular clauses and signatures,6Aprilcourt transmission.

Access limitations

The repository is not the issuing authority; reproduced signature is not an authenticated autograph. Rules include military-custody exceptions; publication does not prove every transfer/release occurred or identify every later act’s personal author.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

ChanRobles legal-repository transcription of a court circular and reproduced implementing rules. · HR-ARCHIVE-B10-FAMILY-PH-LOI772

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B10-SRC-PH-CIRCULAR1979@d79ff88ab4ada9a7

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: d79ff88ab4ada9a7e26cbe063a0316bba20518344349ef7767585d214dc7440f. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

ChanRobles is not the issuing court or an autograph authenticator. LOI,circular and court-transmission dates differ; implementation not presumed.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B20-PH-CIRCULAR-ENRILE · exact wording SHA-256 a594121884a260fc53da9512f46aa60dde8df0f80264dec9157ddd2781a3de37

Report a correction →
decision

The same transcribed1April1979joint circular names Catalino Macaraig Jr., Acting Minister of Justice, as a co-signer of the implementing rules. It does not establish his personal authorship of every arrest or prove every transfer or release was implemented.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Joint circular date,distinct from1978LOI and6Aprilcourt transmission..

Date basis and original source clocks

Joint circular date,distinct from1978LOI and6Aprilcourt transmission.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Supreme Court Circular 13,6 April 1979 reproducing 1 April joint circular and LOI 772 ↗

Publisher: Philippines Supreme Court/joint ministerial circular, transcribed by ChanRobles

Exact passage: jointcircularclosing signatures and6April1979courttransmission

Source establishes: The same joint circular closing names Acting Minister of Justice Macaraig as co-signer.

Document date: 1979-04-01 · Publication date: 1979-04-06

Actual review scope: Letter of Instructions772,1April1979joint circular clauses and signatures,6Aprilcourt transmission.

Access limitations

The repository is not the issuing authority; reproduced signature is not an authenticated autograph. Rules include military-custody exceptions; publication does not prove every transfer/release occurred or identify every later act’s personal author.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

ChanRobles legal-repository transcription of a court circular and reproduced implementing rules. · HR-ARCHIVE-B10-FAMILY-PH-LOI772

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B10-SRC-PH-CIRCULAR1979@d79ff88ab4ada9a7

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: d79ff88ab4ada9a7e26cbe063a0316bba20518344349ef7767585d214dc7440f. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Same instrument,not independent corroboration of every arrest or proof all transfers/releases occurred.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B20-PH-CIRCULAR-MACARAIG · exact wording SHA-256 0accf53218aa1b2d3e0f241f26236d6b568ab76ae382737f2b80d9398707aeb9

Report a correction →
decision

The Olaguer majority records subversion charges filed on30May1980 on Judge Advocate General Hamilton Dimaya’s recommendation. Its footnote2identifies him as the office-holder at that time. These are reported prosecution acts; charges are not proof the defendants committed them.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Prosecution acts as recorded in the later majority judgment; charges are not guilt..

Date basis and original source clocks

Prosecution acts as recorded in the later majority judgment; charges are not guilt.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Olaguer v Military Commission 34, GRL-54558/L-69882,22 May 1987 ↗

Publisher: Philippines Supreme Court, Gancayco majority; reproduced by Lawphil

Exact passage: majority paragraphOnMay30 andfootnote2

Source establishes: The majority’s factual history and footnote2identify Dimaya’s recommendation preceding the filed subversion charges.

Document date: 1987-05-22 · Publication date: 1987-05-22

Actual review scope: Specified prosecution/commission history,footnotes2–3,superveningevents/releasehistory andWHEREFOREdisposition.

Access limitations

Majority holdings are separated from charges and other opinions. Tribunal creation is not a1980deathsentence; vacating a1984sentence does not prove an execution or a fact-trial acquittal.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Philippine Supreme Court majority judgment with footnoted office-holder identifications. · HR-ARCHIVE-B10-FAMILY-PH-OLAGUER-COURT

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B10-SRC-PH-OLAGUER1987@4301aeed2f7bf02a

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 4301aeed2f7bf02aee8289e2b9e5e4eed64d6c6eebaa8354cea09980c3dd4f77. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Recommendation and charges are prosecution acts,not established defendant guilt.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B20-PH-DIMAYA · exact wording SHA-256 8aabb9bbedef8b91db5a935d1f823675a508ddb1053d15baf46081aad2c6e050

Report a correction →
decision

The same Olaguer majority records defence-minister approval of the1980prosecution and identifies Juan Ponce Enrile in footnote2. That act-specific identification does not assign him every detention injury, a whole-conflict death toll or an order to torture.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Prosecution acts as recorded in the later majority judgment; charges are not guilt..

Date basis and original source clocks

Prosecution acts as recorded in the later majority judgment; charges are not guilt.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Olaguer v Military Commission 34, GRL-54558/L-69882,22 May 1987 ↗

Publisher: Philippines Supreme Court, Gancayco majority; reproduced by Lawphil

Exact passage: majority paragraphOnMay30 andfootnote2

Source establishes: The same majority history and footnote2identify Enrile’s approval of the prosecution.

Document date: 1987-05-22 · Publication date: 1987-05-22

Actual review scope: Specified prosecution/commission history,footnotes2–3,superveningevents/releasehistory andWHEREFOREdisposition.

Access limitations

Majority holdings are separated from charges and other opinions. Tribunal creation is not a1980deathsentence; vacating a1984sentence does not prove an execution or a fact-trial acquittal.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Philippine Supreme Court majority judgment with footnoted office-holder identifications. · HR-ARCHIVE-B10-FAMILY-PH-OLAGUER-COURT

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B10-SRC-PH-OLAGUER1987@4301aeed2f7bf02a

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 4301aeed2f7bf02aee8289e2b9e5e4eed64d6c6eebaa8354cea09980c3dd4f77. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Act-specific approval does not establish every detention injury,a torture order or a personal death total.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B20-PH-ENRILE · exact wording SHA-256 665eb812c23a46e6cd11500494b92152de3202f2237b055ad6862d16a91ef9c3

Report a correction →
decision

The Olaguer majority records creation of Military Commission34 on13June1980 and identifies its creator, then AFP Chief of Staff Romeo Espino, in footnote3. Creating the tribunal was not a death sentence issued in1980.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Tribunal creation date,not a1980deathsentence..

Date basis and original source clocks

Tribunal creation date,not a1980deathsentence.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Olaguer v Military Commission 34, GRL-54558/L-69882,22 May 1987 ↗

Publisher: Philippines Supreme Court, Gancayco majority; reproduced by Lawphil

Exact passage: majority paragraphOnJune13 andfootnote3

Source establishes: The majority history and footnote3identify Espino as the chief of staff creating Military Commission34.

Document date: 1987-05-22 · Publication date: 1987-05-22

Actual review scope: Specified prosecution/commission history,footnotes2–3,superveningevents/releasehistory andWHEREFOREdisposition.

Access limitations

Majority holdings are separated from charges and other opinions. Tribunal creation is not a1980deathsentence; vacating a1984sentence does not prove an execution or a fact-trial acquittal.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Philippine Supreme Court majority judgment with footnoted office-holder identifications. · HR-ARCHIVE-B10-FAMILY-PH-OLAGUER-COURT

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B10-SRC-PH-OLAGUER1987@4301aeed2f7bf02a

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 4301aeed2f7bf02aee8289e2b9e5e4eed64d6c6eebaa8354cea09980c3dd4f77. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Tribunal creation is not a1980deathsentence or private instruction for every later act.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B20-PH-ESPINO · exact wording SHA-256 d3566f7066dfe20b13e694657bb8b5be1bf28176d07b1165fc22969623509922

Report a correction →
human consequence

Amnesty reports a June1980instruction centralising approval of ASSO detainee releases in the president. It records132participants in Bicutan’s3–21November hunger strike, five becoming seriously ill and54detainees previously recommended for release. Recommendations and assurances are not completed releases; illness is not five deaths.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Reported Bicutan hunger-strike period; release recommendations are not completed releases..

Date basis and original source clocks

Reported Bicutan hunger-strike period; release recommendations are not completed releases.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Amnesty International Report 1981, Philippines ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: printed252/PDF131,Juneinstruction andhungerstrikeparagraphs

Source establishes: The report distinguishes aJune1980release-approval instruction,132hunger strikers,five seriously ill and54previous release recommendations.

Document date: 1981 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Philippines account,printed pages250–253 on physical PDF pages130–131,with specified clauses.

Access limitations

Underlying release registers and individual case files absent. Recommendations,announcements,former detainees and completed releases differ and may overlap. Mixed/student status does not establish childhood;1972/1975starting points are not moved to1976.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Contemporary Amnesty annual report with detention,release and protest accounts. · HR-ARCHIVE-B10-FAMILY-AI-PHILIPPINES

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B10-SRC-PH-AI1981@b90c32f71f4a3012

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: b90c32f71f4a3012dee688f57a81f623c7ee8889aa62af9cd1280e5fbb99d36e. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 131 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Recommendations and assurances are not completed releases; five seriously ill is not five dead. Original instruction/issuer record absent.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B20-PH-HUNGER · exact wording SHA-256 5fbc9180dd937e32bd9d9b7eff98f15f5f545095e446dfde06557f26301ecae2

Report a correction →
decision

The Animas judgment says the defence minister ordered civil-court transfer on30June1979, then superseded that order on22August to implement the president’s retention instruction. The passage identifies the office without personally naming that minister.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Context collection; no single event date assigned.

Date basis and original source clocks

Separate30Juneand22August1979orders; no single continuous act.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Animas v Minister of National Defense, GRL-51747,29 December 1986 ↗

Publisher: Philippines Supreme Court, Gutierrez Jr. opinion; reproduced by Lawphil

Exact passage: paragraphBeforetrialcouldproceed

Source establishes: The factual history describes the minister’s transfer order and its later supersession to implement retention.

Document date: 1986-12-29 · Publication date: 1986-12-29

Actual review scope: Specified factual history,presidential marginal instruction,jurisdiction analysis and disposition.

Access limitations

Procedural forum-retention/transfer acts do not establish guilt for the underlying1971killing. Office-only identification of the defence minister is not expanded to a named personal authorizer.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Philippine Supreme Court judgment and reproduced procedural history. · HR-ARCHIVE-B10-FAMILY-PH-ANIMAS-COURT

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B10-SRC-PH-ANIMAS1986@d5b03e7034215b3a

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: d5b03e7034215b3ad3dee1028908c188664d704dcb69052cb29efc730652e84e. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Office is unnamed in this act-specific passage; do not supply Enrile from another case or office association.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B20-PH-MINISTER-TRANSFER · exact wording SHA-256 e4936dcae7ef5f6e0d127db0c74340bd96251280a0d79d4efb68e42535df046b

Report a correction →
human consequence

Amnesty’s1982introduction says de Vera’s two companions, Rolando Federis and Flora Coronacion, remained missing and were presumed dead. The reproduced statement says they were taken away on17October1976. These are source-dated disappearances, not two independently confirmed deaths or a verified current missing-person status.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Context collection; no single event date assigned.

Date basis and original source clocks

Reported17October1976transfer is separate from missing/presumed-dead status described by the1982source.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Report of an Amnesty International Mission to the Republic of the Philippines, ASA 35/25/82 ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: printed1/PDF4 andprinted108-109/PDF58,transfer/missingpassages

Source establishes: The introduction gives the source-dated missing/presumed-dead status; the statement describes the companions’ transfer.

Document date: 1982-08 · Publication date: 1982-09

Actual review scope: Introduction and specified reproduced de Vera statement,with its printed date and continuation.

Access limitations

Underlying raw statement/medical/investigation records were not independently authenticated. No individual officer guilt is adopted. Source-dated missing/presumed-dead status is not confirmed deaths or verified present status.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Amnesty report reproducing a received survivor statement and source-dated disappearances. · HR-ARCHIVE-B10-FAMILY-AI-PHILIPPINES

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B10-SRC-PH-AI1982@bf76fa1bf21715f9

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: bf76fa1bf21715f9507b58c0220db9580f5754ca12f54e9d78c260cde9a44730. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 4, 58 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Not two independently confirmed deaths,a verified under-eighteen count or current missing-person status.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B20-PH-MISSING · exact wording SHA-256 6d20539990958fd7f21f6c474bb4756bf485d7b81b6d14fe654cd96511a8a8d0

Report a correction →
context

On22May1987, the Olaguer majority declared Commission34’s civilian proceedings unconstitutional and void, prohibited further pursuit of that case and vacated its4December1984death sentence. It separately dismissed habeas petitions as moot after releases. Vacating the sentence is not evidence of an execution or a fact-trial acquittal.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Majority judgment date; vacatur and habeas mootness are distinct..

Date basis and original source clocks

Majority judgment date; vacatur and habeas mootness are distinct.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Olaguer v Military Commission 34, GRL-54558/L-69882,22 May 1987 ↗

Publisher: Philippines Supreme Court, Gancayco majority; reproduced by Lawphil

Exact passage: majoritysuperveningevents/releasehistory andWHEREFOREdispositiveparagraph

Source establishes: The majority disposition voids civilian proceedings,prohibits further pursuit and vacates the1984sentence; habeas petitions are separately moot after releases.

Document date: 1987-05-22 · Publication date: 1987-05-22

Actual review scope: Specified prosecution/commission history,footnotes2–3,superveningevents/releasehistory andWHEREFOREdisposition.

Access limitations

Majority holdings are separated from charges and other opinions. Tribunal creation is not a1980deathsentence; vacating a1984sentence does not prove an execution or a fact-trial acquittal.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Philippine Supreme Court majority judgment with footnoted office-holder identifications. · HR-ARCHIVE-B10-FAMILY-PH-OLAGUER-COURT

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B10-SRC-PH-OLAGUER1987@4301aeed2f7bf02a

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 4301aeed2f7bf02aee8289e2b9e5e4eed64d6c6eebaa8354cea09980c3dd4f77. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Vacatur is not execution or a fact-trial acquittal. Majority,quoted older cases and separate opinions remain distinct.

Legal distinction

Dated Supreme Court majority holding,not an international criminal verdict or a finding of officials’ criminal guilt.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B20-PH-OLAGUER-OUTCOME · exact wording SHA-256 6865154da06d74dcc3bd83310891b97b6dae930c31f6981fcdd4dbb974e4f84d

Report a correction →
human consequence

Amnesty’s annual report places more than230reported disappearance cases in1975–1980 and approximately seventy thousand detentions across martial law beginning in1972. Its late1980/early1981release and amnesty announcements include former detainees and overlap. These series are not restricted1976–1980death totals or additive newly released-person counts.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Context collection; no single event date assigned.

Date basis and original source clocks

Disappearance cases span1975–1980; detention series begins1972; late1980/early1981announcements may overlap.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Amnesty International Report 1981, Philippines ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: printed250-253/PDF130-131,detention/disappearance/releaseparagraphs

Source establishes: The annual account gives longer-period disappearance/detention series and distinguishes overlapping release/amnesty announcements.

Document date: 1981 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Philippines account,printed pages250–253 on physical PDF pages130–131,with specified clauses.

Access limitations

Underlying release registers and individual case files absent. Recommendations,announcements,former detainees and completed releases differ and may overlap. Mixed/student status does not establish childhood;1972/1975starting points are not moved to1976.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Contemporary Amnesty annual report with detention,release and protest accounts. · HR-ARCHIVE-B10-FAMILY-AI-PHILIPPINES

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B10-SRC-PH-AI1981@b90c32f71f4a3012

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: b90c32f71f4a3012dee688f57a81f623c7ee8889aa62af9cd1280e5fbb99d36e. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 130, 131 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Not a bounded1976–1980deathtotal or additive new-release count. Cases,persons,former detainees and completed releases differ.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B20-PH-SCOPE · exact wording SHA-256 f496bae878df32f1d51a5ab42fc34d13722d19d9a707cb49e5723838cc4d59ee

Report a correction →
human consequence

Amnesty reports22mostly-student arrests in Cebu on20–21May1980 after slum-clearance protests, and at least sixty student arrests in Manila between June and September. Student status does not establish childhood; these separate cohorts are not a complete national arrest total or a death count.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Context collection; no single event date assigned.

Date basis and original source clocks

Cebu20–21May1980andManilaJune–Septemberare separate cohorts with separate event windows.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Amnesty International Report 1981, Philippines ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: printed251/PDF130,paragraphLargenumbersofpeople

Source establishes: Amnesty reports22mostly-student Cebu arrests and at least60Manila student arrests in their stated windows.

Document date: 1981 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Philippines account,printed pages250–253 on physical PDF pages130–131,with specified clauses.

Access limitations

Underlying release registers and individual case files absent. Recommendations,announcements,former detainees and completed releases differ and may overlap. Mixed/student status does not establish childhood;1972/1975starting points are not moved to1976.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Contemporary Amnesty annual report with detention,release and protest accounts. · HR-ARCHIVE-B10-FAMILY-AI-PHILIPPINES

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B10-SRC-PH-AI1981@b90c32f71f4a3012

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: b90c32f71f4a3012dee688f57a81f623c7ee8889aa62af9cd1280e5fbb99d36e. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 130 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Student status does not establish childhood. No complete national arrest total,unique combined population or death count.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B20-PH-STUDENTS · exact wording SHA-256 19a2fdb80396f6f89d018d4a7843fc4877dc65a27a8da1f2eadb7ef99b879c5c

Report a correction →
human consequence

Amnesty reproduces Adora Faye de Vera’s account of arrest with two companions at Lucena railway station on1October1976 and secret detention involving torture and sexual violence before her30June1977release. This is a received survivor account, not an adjudicated finding about individual officers.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Survivor’s reported arrest-to-release interval; individual acts are received testimony,not adjudicated officer guilt..

Date basis and original source clocks

Survivor’s reported arrest-to-release interval; individual acts are received testimony,not adjudicated officer guilt.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Report of an Amnesty International Mission to the Republic of the Philippines, ASA 35/25/82 ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: introduction printed1/PDF4;statement printed106-109/PDF57-58

Source establishes: Amnesty’s introduction and reproduced statement supply the reported arrest,secret detention,violence and release account.

Document date: 1982-08 · Publication date: 1982-09

Actual review scope: Introduction and specified reproduced de Vera statement,with its printed date and continuation.

Access limitations

Underlying raw statement/medical/investigation records were not independently authenticated. No individual officer guilt is adopted. Source-dated missing/presumed-dead status is not confirmed deaths or verified present status.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Amnesty report reproducing a received survivor statement and source-dated disappearances. · HR-ARCHIVE-B10-FAMILY-AI-PHILIPPINES

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B10-SRC-PH-AI1982@bf76fa1bf21715f9

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: bf76fa1bf21715f9507b58c0220db9580f5754ca12f54e9d78c260cde9a44730. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 4, 57, 58 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Received survivor testimony,not an adjudicated individual-officer finding. Original medical/affidavit records and personal-act corroboration absent; private addresses and officer lists not exported.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B20-PH-VERA · exact wording SHA-256 daefaf16b6b86a0c66533f9cef79d781d623ca503cd343e50ddc34998945831b

Report a correction →
context

The report’s Table 2 prints age-column totals of nineteen under twelve months, 173 aged one–ten and 284 aged eleven–twenty. Independently adding its visible village rows gives 26, 208 and 369 instead. All printed age totals sum to 3,353, while the row cells sum to 4,146. These are table inconsistencies, not corrected historical child-death counts.

AI reviewed — bounded documentary finding
verified source table transcription and arithmetic not verified casualty census · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Context collection; no single event date assigned.

Date basis and original source clocks

Retrospective report/table account; event years1977–1978are distinct from publication and table-arithmetic review.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

The Neglected Genocide, AHRC-PUB-004-2013 ↗

Publisher: Asian Human Rights Commission; co-publisher Human Rights and Peace for Papua/ICP; editors TAPOL and John Stewart Sloan

Exact passage: Table 2, printed page 18 / physical PDF page 24, visually checked; arithmetic comparison from the pinned prior A4 review, not a corrected historical casualty total.

Source establishes: Visually checkedTable2and the prior arithmetic receipt establish an internal printed-table inconsistency,not a corrected under-eighteen death total.

Document date: 2013 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Specified methodology,1977clash,official statements,policy andTables1–2; exact physical/printed locators retained.

Access limitations

Original operational orders,news accounts and full raw interviews were not independently authenticated. Source legal labels are not adopted as judicial findings. Reported names/table totals are not independently verified unique deaths. Visible age-table arithmetic conflicts with printed totals; no corrected child-death census is inferred.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Retrospective human-rights report combining interviews,older accounts and official statements. · HR-ARCHIVE-B10-FAMILY-AHRC-PAPUA

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B10-SRC-WP-AHRC2013@b34f96494d70db9d

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: b34f96494d70db9d815b1c5ac01373a56bd083af9f376a9413721ea25d3982bc. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 24 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Pinned prior A4 review checked transcription and arithmetic,not corrected historical casualties. Eleven–twenty mixes children and adults.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Printed totals19/173/284differ from visible-row sums26/208/369; all printed-age totals3353differ from row-cell sum4146.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B20-WP-AGES · exact wording SHA-256 339752919f40888fcbf975b7c99b1dd9830dbe2c5586a315f08f7cd61f15534c

Report a correction →
context

AHRC relays Ambassador Busiri Surjowinoto’s description of nonlethal plastic bombs intended to flush out guerrillas who had kidnapped officials. The description is an attributed official claim, not independently established safety or an explanation of every bombing allegation.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Underlying newspaper date,not the date or proved effect of every alleged weapon use..

Date basis and original source clocks

Underlying newspaper date,not the date or proved effect of every alleged weapon use.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

The Neglected Genocide, AHRC-PUB-004-2013 ↗

Publisher: Asian Human Rights Commission; co-publisher Human Rights and Peace for Papua/ICP; editors TAPOL and John Stewart Sloan

Exact passage: printed12/PDF18,ambassadorparagraph andfootnote45,PostCourier26July1978

Source establishes: AHRC relays the ambassador’s account of allegedly nonlethal plastic bombs intended to flush out guerrillas,with underlying newspaper date.

Document date: 2013 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Specified methodology,1977clash,official statements,policy andTables1–2; exact physical/printed locators retained.

Access limitations

Original operational orders,news accounts and full raw interviews were not independently authenticated. Source legal labels are not adopted as judicial findings. Reported names/table totals are not independently verified unique deaths. Visible age-table arithmetic conflicts with printed totals; no corrected child-death census is inferred.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Retrospective human-rights report combining interviews,older accounts and official statements. · HR-ARCHIVE-B10-FAMILY-AHRC-PAPUA

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B10-SRC-WP-AHRC2013@b34f96494d70db9d

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: b34f96494d70db9d815b1c5ac01373a56bd083af9f376a9413721ea25d3982bc. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 18 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Attributed ambassador’s description,not independently established weapon safety or the explanation of every allegation.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B20-WP-BUSIRI · exact wording SHA-256 8ee0ff81f62f02ba453bb6778cb1bbe33b716f143974c0ffc0466855d63fc733

Report a correction →
context

The AHRC report relays an account of OPM members attacking military officers at Kobakma on 20 April 1977, with one officer killed and two seriously injured. It separately relays a Papuan’s death by military shooting and the government’s contrary description of a tribal fight. These accounts do not identify a personal authorisation or establish the start of the entire conflict.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Reported Kobakma clash date; separate shooting and competing government account retain their own limits..

Date basis and original source clocks

Reported Kobakma clash date; separate shooting and competing government account retain their own limits.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

The Neglected Genocide, AHRC-PUB-004-2013 ↗

Publisher: Asian Human Rights Commission; co-publisher Human Rights and Peace for Papua/ICP; editors TAPOL and John Stewart Sloan

Exact passage: printed9/PDF15,20Aprilparagraph andfootnotes19-21

Source establishes: The cited passage relays the20Aprilattack with one officer killed/two seriously injured,a separate Papuan shooting death and the contrary government description.

Document date: 2013 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Specified methodology,1977clash,official statements,policy andTables1–2; exact physical/printed locators retained.

Access limitations

Original operational orders,news accounts and full raw interviews were not independently authenticated. Source legal labels are not adopted as judicial findings. Reported names/table totals are not independently verified unique deaths. Visible age-table arithmetic conflicts with printed totals; no corrected child-death census is inferred.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Retrospective human-rights report combining interviews,older accounts and official statements. · HR-ARCHIVE-B10-FAMILY-AHRC-PAPUA

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B10-SRC-WP-AHRC2013@b34f96494d70db9d

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: b34f96494d70db9d815b1c5ac01373a56bd083af9f376a9413721ea25d3982bc. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 15 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Retrospective relay of different accounts. No identified personal authorizer or beginning of the entire conflict established. Separate Papuan shooting date not resolved here.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

The government described a tribal fight,where the report also relays military and OPM accounts.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B20-WP-CLASH · exact wording SHA-256 52d1f41d0babde1e5341b819db22af637fe43caf079224b3c1fbd1e2db4ee80c

Report a correction →
context

AHRC relays regional commander Imam Munandar’s June 1978 statement that conditions were excellent and development unobstructed. This is a reported official account, not independent proof that abuses had not occurred or an alternative casualty census.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Reported official-statement month,not proof conditions were safe..

Date basis and original source clocks

Reported official-statement month,not proof conditions were safe.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

The Neglected Genocide, AHRC-PUB-004-2013 ↗

Publisher: Asian Human Rights Commission; co-publisher Human Rights and Peace for Papua/ICP; editors TAPOL and John Stewart Sloan

Exact passage: printed9/PDF15,June1978paragraph andfootnote22

Source establishes: AHRC relays the regional commander’sJune1978statement that conditions were excellent and development unobstructed.

Document date: 2013 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Specified methodology,1977clash,official statements,policy andTables1–2; exact physical/printed locators retained.

Access limitations

Original operational orders,news accounts and full raw interviews were not independently authenticated. Source legal labels are not adopted as judicial findings. Reported names/table totals are not independently verified unique deaths. Visible age-table arithmetic conflicts with printed totals; no corrected child-death census is inferred.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Retrospective human-rights report combining interviews,older accounts and official statements. · HR-ARCHIVE-B10-FAMILY-AHRC-PAPUA

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B10-SRC-WP-AHRC2013@b34f96494d70db9d

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: b34f96494d70db9d815b1c5ac01373a56bd083af9f376a9413721ea25d3982bc. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 15 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Attributed official reassurance,not independent verification of no abuses or an alternative casualty census. Do not project this office backward to1977.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B20-WP-MUNANDAR · exact wording SHA-256 f5771932cc4eae07a6b3ab0c73ab04404591f0f94440e0706bdcf4c0b5c3650c

Report a correction →
context

AHRC relays commander Santosa’s claim that the military used plastic explosives with little destructive effect, alongside witness accounts of bombs. This official account does not resolve which weapons were used in each1977–1978incident.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Context collection; no single event date assigned.

Date basis and original source clocks

Exact statement date not established in this selected record.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

The Neglected Genocide, AHRC-PUB-004-2013 ↗

Publisher: Asian Human Rights Commission; co-publisher Human Rights and Peace for Papua/ICP; editors TAPOL and John Stewart Sloan

Exact passage: printed12/PDF18,denialparagraph andfootnote44

Source establishes: The report relays Santosa’s statement about plastic explosives and contrasting witness accounts.

Document date: 2013 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Specified methodology,1977clash,official statements,policy andTables1–2; exact physical/printed locators retained.

Access limitations

Original operational orders,news accounts and full raw interviews were not independently authenticated. Source legal labels are not adopted as judicial findings. Reported names/table totals are not independently verified unique deaths. Visible age-table arithmetic conflicts with printed totals; no corrected child-death census is inferred.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Retrospective human-rights report combining interviews,older accounts and official statements. · HR-ARCHIVE-B10-FAMILY-AHRC-PAPUA

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B10-SRC-WP-AHRC2013@b34f96494d70db9d

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: b34f96494d70db9d815b1c5ac01373a56bd083af9f376a9413721ea25d3982bc. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 18 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Official weapons description and witness bombing accounts do not resolve every incident’s weapon or effect.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Witness accounts describe bombs alongside the commander’s limited-destructive-effect claim.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B20-WP-SANTOSA · exact wording SHA-256 0505f483d833a3bdd2785bd8fcff309e8f7982419241634077628f7ed582aa31

Report a correction →
decision

AHRC reports that Defence Minister and Commander-in-Chief M. Jusuf launched Operasi Senyum in November1978, with stated aims of reducing military operations and interference with local culture. A later government claim of success does not independently establish that abuses ended.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Reported Operasi Senyum launch month; aims and claimed success are not independently verified outcomes..

Date basis and original source clocks

Reported Operasi Senyum launch month; aims and claimed success are not independently verified outcomes.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

The Neglected Genocide, AHRC-PUB-004-2013 ↗

Publisher: Asian Human Rights Commission; co-publisher Human Rights and Peace for Papua/ICP; editors TAPOL and John Stewart Sloan

Exact passage: printed18/PDF24,OperasiSenyumparagraph andfootnotes78-80

Source establishes: The report attributes Operasi Senyum’sNovember1978launch to the defence minister/commander-in-chief and gives stated de-escalation/cultural-interference aims.

Document date: 2013 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Specified methodology,1977clash,official statements,policy andTables1–2; exact physical/printed locators retained.

Access limitations

Original operational orders,news accounts and full raw interviews were not independently authenticated. Source legal labels are not adopted as judicial findings. Reported names/table totals are not independently verified unique deaths. Visible age-table arithmetic conflicts with printed totals; no corrected child-death census is inferred.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Retrospective human-rights report combining interviews,older accounts and official statements. · HR-ARCHIVE-B10-FAMILY-AHRC-PAPUA

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B10-SRC-WP-AHRC2013@b34f96494d70db9d

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: b34f96494d70db9d815b1c5ac01373a56bd083af9f376a9413721ea25d3982bc. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 24 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Reported launch and aims,not verified cessation of abuses or independently confirmed government success.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B20-WP-SENYUM · exact wording SHA-256 939096bbdeca80ab80931824bcaf3bd6c6413723caa881cd00191bfa409f8c38

Report a correction →
human consequence

AHRC says its investigation assembled 4,146 names of people reported killed in the Central Highlands in 1977–1978, drawing on survivor interviews and older records in fifteen areas. Its Wosilimo table gives 835, while one survivor claimed at least 4,000 in that village. These source quantities have unresolved scope and method differences.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Source-defined reported subject years,not a verified continuous operation or complete death census..

Date basis and original source clocks

Source-defined reported subject years,not a verified continuous operation or complete death census.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

The Neglected Genocide, AHRC-PUB-004-2013 ↗

Publisher: Asian Human Rights Commission; co-publisher Human Rights and Peace for Papua/ICP; editors TAPOL and John Stewart Sloan

Exact passage: methodology printed2/PDF8;printed8/PDF14,table1 andfootnote14

Source establishes: Methodology andTable1describe4,146names,15areas,the835Wosilimo table entry and a different survivor claim.

Document date: 2013 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Specified methodology,1977clash,official statements,policy andTables1–2; exact physical/printed locators retained.

Access limitations

Original operational orders,news accounts and full raw interviews were not independently authenticated. Source legal labels are not adopted as judicial findings. Reported names/table totals are not independently verified unique deaths. Visible age-table arithmetic conflicts with printed totals; no corrected child-death census is inferred.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Retrospective human-rights report combining interviews,older accounts and official statements. · HR-ARCHIVE-B10-FAMILY-AHRC-PAPUA

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B10-SRC-WP-AHRC2013@b34f96494d70db9d

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: b34f96494d70db9d815b1c5ac01373a56bd083af9f376a9413721ea25d3982bc. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 8, 14 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Reported names,not an independent unique-victim/civilian census. Underlying interviews/older records and Wosilimo coverage are not fully audited.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Wosilimo table quantity835differs from one survivor’s at-least4000claim; method and scope unresolved.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B20-WP-TOTAL · exact wording SHA-256 80cbb7c36baab944939dd5ba90eb45f7a1f616c369c119506f6355bd7f0e31d3

Report a correction →
decision

The Secretary-General’s31May1979report describes continuing differences over a body to trace missing people from both communities. It says agreement was reached on a proposal at the18–19May meeting and Turkish Cypriot leader Denktash undertook to submit it to the appropriate authorities. Submission was not proof the body had been finally established or a count of the dead.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Two-day meeting; precise moment of submission undertaking not established..

Date basis and original source clocks

Two-day meeting; precise moment of submission undertaking not established.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

U Noperationin Cyprus, S/13369,31 May 1979, period 1 December 1978-31 May 1979 ↗

Publisher: UnitedNationsSecretary-General

Exact passage: paras38-39,printed10/PDF10 andpara51finalsentence/PDF13

Source establishes: The report describes the proposal and Denktash’s undertaking at the18–19Maymeeting;report date31Mayis separate.

Document date: 1979-05-31 · Publication date: 1979-05-31

Actual review scope: S/13369,cover/reporting period and paragraphs26,29–30,38–39,41and51 on physical pages8,10,11and13.

Access limitations

The1,548remaining and1,551assistance figures have unresolved definition/date differences. Undertakings,permissions and assurances are not completed institutions,permanent return or verified restitution. Deployment map and later missing-person history not reviewed for activation.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

UN Secretary-General report of negotiations and bounded human observations. · HR-ARCHIVE-B11-FAMILY-UN-CYPRUS

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B11-SRC-CY-UN1979@a5a794241abfc73b

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: a5a794241abfc73b3422daba56d50d67b224958fbae46d6c0f74ed9fbc7b8632. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 10, 13 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Undertaking to submit an agreed proposal,not proof a final tracing body was established or a dead-person count. Both communities’ missing people remain in scope.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B21-CY-MISSING · exact wording SHA-256 5fb32a47077cecebf184fd207e3cafcac14790e768bb818071fb6b81ecfc4bab

Report a correction →
human consequence

The1979UN report records fifteen Greek Cypriot transfers from north to south and1,548remaining in the north. Its aid section instead lists1,551Greek Cypriots and about606Maronites receiving assistance there, and about23,000Turkish Cypriots listed as displaced and needy. The internal1,548/1,551difference is unresolved; these measures are not added.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: UN report period;flows,stocks,school figures and permissions retain distinct definitions..

Date basis and original source clocks

UN report period;flows,stocks,school figures and permissions retain distinct definitions.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

U Noperationin Cyprus, S/13369,31 May 1979, period 1 December 1978-31 May 1979 ↗

Publisher: UnitedNationsSecretary-General

Exact passage: paras29,41,printed8/PDF8 andprinted11/PDF11

Source establishes: Paragraphs29and41supply the fifteen transfers,remaining/aid populations,Maronite estimate and displaced-needy Turkish Cypriot estimate.

Document date: 1979-05-31 · Publication date: 1979-05-31

Actual review scope: S/13369,cover/reporting period and paragraphs26,29–30,38–39,41and51 on physical pages8,10,11and13.

Access limitations

The1,548remaining and1,551assistance figures have unresolved definition/date differences. Undertakings,permissions and assurances are not completed institutions,permanent return or verified restitution. Deployment map and later missing-person history not reviewed for activation.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

UN Secretary-General report of negotiations and bounded human observations. · HR-ARCHIVE-B11-FAMILY-UN-CYPRUS

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B11-SRC-CY-UN1979@a5a794241abfc73b

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: a5a794241abfc73b3422daba56d50d67b224958fbae46d6c0f74ed9fbc7b8632. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 8, 11 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Transfer flow,remaining stock and aid populations are different. No forced-removal label,extra three persons or additive total inferred.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

The1,548remaining figure and1,551assistance figure differ internally;date/definition reason unresolved.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B21-CY-POPULATION · exact wording SHA-256 f84c04238fdfec3729ac91f981ef5606f235bbb7ecab886e570f481175b2d805

Report a correction →
context

The UN report records continued removal of movable property from premises in Varosha. It relays Turkish Cypriot authorities’ statement that records were kept and certain property would be accounted for after a political agreement. The assurance is not verified restitution, nor does the passage identify a personal removal order or quantify affected households.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: UN report period;flows,stocks,school figures and permissions retain distinct definitions..

Date basis and original source clocks

UN report period;flows,stocks,school figures and permissions retain distinct definitions.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

U Noperationin Cyprus, S/13369,31 May 1979, period 1 December 1978-31 May 1979 ↗

Publisher: UnitedNationsSecretary-General

Exact passage: para26,printed8/PDF8

Source establishes: Paragraph26describes continued movable-property removal fromVaroshaand relays the authorities’ assurance about records/future accounting.

Document date: 1979-05-31 · Publication date: 1979-05-31

Actual review scope: S/13369,cover/reporting period and paragraphs26,29–30,38–39,41and51 on physical pages8,10,11and13.

Access limitations

The1,548remaining and1,551assistance figures have unresolved definition/date differences. Undertakings,permissions and assurances are not completed institutions,permanent return or verified restitution. Deployment map and later missing-person history not reviewed for activation.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

UN Secretary-General report of negotiations and bounded human observations. · HR-ARCHIVE-B11-FAMILY-UN-CYPRUS

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B11-SRC-CY-UN1979@a5a794241abfc73b

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: a5a794241abfc73b3422daba56d50d67b224958fbae46d6c0f74ed9fbc7b8632. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 8 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Authority assurance of records/accounting is not verified restitution. No individual removal order or affected-household number established.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B21-CY-PROPERTY · exact wording SHA-256 961f474376ae041750003218717a98bc4fec84342fc31eaa78ce8e6816b439ad

Report a correction →
context

The UN Secretary-General’s30April1977report records a Greek Cypriot territorial proposal and a Turkish Cypriot constitutional proposal, with conflicting principles and substantial gaps. Both sides described their proposals as negotiable. The annexed territorial map is a proposal, not an agreed boundary or UN sovereignty determination.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Reported negotiating round,not an agreed territorial settlement..

Date basis and original source clocks

Reported negotiating round,not an agreed territorial settlement.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Secretary-General report, S/12323,30 April 1977 ↗

Publisher: UnitedNationsSecretary-General

Exact passage: paras7-13,printed2-3/PDF2-3;AnnexBmapidentifiedonly

Source establishes: Paragraphs7–13record the round,distinct proposals,negotiability,objections and gaps;annex map was identified only as a proposal.

Document date: 1977-04-30 · Publication date: 1977-04-30

Actual review scope: S/12323,paragraphs7–13,physical pages2–3; annex identified only as a proposal.

Access limitations

The report records positions and negotiability,not UN adoption of a border. No full map digitization or sovereignty adjudication is approved.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

UN Secretary-General report of negotiating positions. · HR-ARCHIVE-B11-FAMILY-UN-CYPRUS

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B11-SRC-CY-UN1977@16bfb23f5f9c7c0b

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 16bfb23f5f9c7c0b7c688e604f4fc917b413f3c6f554c97b8530e0684b077a7a. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 2, 3 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Annex is a proposal,not an agreed boundary or UN sovereignty determination. Both sides described their positions as negotiable.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Greek Cypriot territorial and Turkish Cypriot constitutional proposals had conflicting principles and substantial gaps.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B21-CY-PROPOSALS · exact wording SHA-256 61d8bbce73d519f61d43b49556ce08e7782de937fa0d55baa128ec9d8be6ae47

Report a correction →
human consequence

The UN report describes fifty-eight Ayia Trias pupils with one teacher and164Rizokarpaso pupils with five teachers, while permission for a secondary class remained denied. It also records permission for193Christmas and196Easter child visits to northern homes. Those holiday groups may overlap; these are education and family-contact observations, not child deaths.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: UN report period;flows,stocks,school figures and permissions retain distinct definitions..

Date basis and original source clocks

UN report period;flows,stocks,school figures and permissions retain distinct definitions.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

U Noperationin Cyprus, S/13369,31 May 1979, period 1 December 1978-31 May 1979 ↗

Publisher: UnitedNationsSecretary-General

Exact passage: para30,printed8/PDF8

Source establishes: Paragraph30gives pupil/teacher figures,denied secondary-class permission and separate Christmas/Easter child-visit permissions.

Document date: 1979-05-31 · Publication date: 1979-05-31

Actual review scope: S/13369,cover/reporting period and paragraphs26,29–30,38–39,41and51 on physical pages8,10,11and13.

Access limitations

The1,548remaining and1,551assistance figures have unresolved definition/date differences. Undertakings,permissions and assurances are not completed institutions,permanent return or verified restitution. Deployment map and later missing-person history not reviewed for activation.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

UN Secretary-General report of negotiations and bounded human observations. · HR-ARCHIVE-B11-FAMILY-UN-CYPRUS

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B11-SRC-CY-UN1979@a5a794241abfc73b

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: a5a794241abfc73b3422daba56d50d67b224958fbae46d6c0f74ed9fbc7b8632. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 8 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Education and family-contact observations,not child deaths. Holiday permissions can overlap and are not permanent return or proof every permitted visit occurred.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B21-CY-SCHOOLS · exact wording SHA-256 a133767b3035b5ead5701a264cd817297d92decb38df0b06560f9201f6e879f4

Report a correction →
context

Amnesty reports that three prison guards were convicted of ill-treatment in June1980 and received short prison terms and fines, including Machava Central Prison’s chief prison officer. These reported national convictions do not establish that all abuses were remedied or that the president was criminally convicted.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Reported conviction month..

Date basis and original source clocks

Reported conviction month.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Amnesty International Report 1981, Mozambique ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: printed68/PDF40,June1980paragraph

Source establishes: Amnesty reports three prison-guard convictions,short terms and fines,including the chief prison officer.

Document date: 1981 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Mozambique account,printed pages67–68 on physical pages39–40,including continuations.

Access limitations

Original journalist report,accurate national census,judgments and personal approval records absent. The seven-execution aggregate crosses1980–1981; a later appeal to the president is not proof of personal execution authorization.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Amnesty report with camp estimates,court accounts and separate execution cohorts. · HR-ARCHIVE-B11-FAMILY-AI-MOZAMBIQUE

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B11-SRC-MZ-AI1981@b90c32f71f4a3012

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: b90c32f71f4a3012dee688f57a81f623c7ee8889aa62af9cd1280e5fbb99d36e. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 40 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Original judgments absent. Neutral domestic-proceedings account,not a presidential conviction or proof all abuse was remedied.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B21-MZ-ACCOUNTABILITY · exact wording SHA-256 deba5801b0fdaa40af156d4ec61676cf792319caf005c89c4826d25dd75cb58c

Report a correction →
human consequence

Amnesty’s1981report says accurate camp populations and identities were unknown. It relays an unnamed US journalist’s May1980estimate of up to ten thousand detainees, including up to three thousand for political reasons. The journalist had visited one camp; this was not a verified national census or a death count.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Unnamed journalist’s estimate month after visiting one camp; not a national census..

Date basis and original source clocks

Unnamed journalist’s estimate month after visiting one camp; not a national census.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Amnesty International Report 1981, Mozambique ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: printed67/PDF39,lastMozambiqueparagraph

Source establishes: The report relays an unnamed journalist’s up-to10000total and up-to3000political subset,while accurate populations remained unknown.

Document date: 1981 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Mozambique account,printed pages67–68 on physical pages39–40,including continuations.

Access limitations

Original journalist report,accurate national census,judgments and personal approval records absent. The seven-execution aggregate crosses1980–1981; a later appeal to the president is not proof of personal execution authorization.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Amnesty report with camp estimates,court accounts and separate execution cohorts. · HR-ARCHIVE-B11-FAMILY-AI-MOZAMBIQUE

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B11-SRC-MZ-AI1981@b90c32f71f4a3012

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: b90c32f71f4a3012dee688f57a81f623c7ee8889aa62af9cd1280e5fbb99d36e. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 39 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

One-camp visit and limited access,not a verified national census or a death count.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B21-MZ-CAMPS · exact wording SHA-256 2612cac79e590c2d71cb215a4d916d2d8d816446a59ac9c06b77d52697bc7b3a

Report a correction →
human consequence

Amnesty’s at-least-seven execution aggregate spans three people sentenced and executed in October1980 and four in February1981. It says the three October defendants were executed within days of sentence. Seven is not a pure1980total, and a clemency appeal to Machel does not authenticate his personal execution approval.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Context collection; no single event date assigned.

Date basis and original source clocks

SeparateOctober1980andFebruary1981execution groups; source minimumseven crosses years.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Amnesty International Report 1981, Mozambique ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: printed68/PDF40,executionparagraphs

Source establishes: The report distinguishes threeOctoberexecutions and fourFebruaryexecutions and their cross-year aggregate.

Document date: 1981 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Mozambique account,printed pages67–68 on physical pages39–40,including continuations.

Access limitations

Original journalist report,accurate national census,judgments and personal approval records absent. The seven-execution aggregate crosses1980–1981; a later appeal to the president is not proof of personal execution authorization.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Amnesty report with camp estimates,court accounts and separate execution cohorts. · HR-ARCHIVE-B11-FAMILY-AI-MOZAMBIQUE

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B11-SRC-MZ-AI1981@b90c32f71f4a3012

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: b90c32f71f4a3012dee688f57a81f623c7ee8889aa62af9cd1280e5fbb99d36e. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 40 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Seven is not a pure1980total. Clemency appeals to Machel do not authenticate his approval.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B21-MZ-EXEC1980 · exact wording SHA-256 70a22ede7bc14ba2adcd1d38ad34619c8273c29ee34a303ae1a1bf476ac5e1ea

Report a correction →
human consequence

Amnesty’s1979report dates the first ten Maputo executions to1April1979 and reports ten more in mid-April. Africa Watch’s1991account dates the first ten’s sentence and execution to31March1979. The first two descriptions apparently concern the same cohort; the one-day discrepancy remains unresolved.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Apparently same first-ten cohort; AfricaWatch31March versusAmnesty1April unresolved..

Date basis and original source clocks

Apparently same first-ten cohort; AfricaWatch31March versusAmnesty1April unresolved.

Sources (2) · exact passages & limitations

Amnesty International Report 1979, Mozambique ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: printed26-27/PDF19,Mozambiqueopening

Source establishes: The report dates first ten to1Apriland ten more to mid-April1979.

Document date: 1979 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Mozambique account,printed pages26–27 on physical page19.

Access limitations

Original tribunal/execution records absent. The first-ten date differs by one day from Africa Watch; apparent same cohort is not counted twice.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Contemporary Amnesty annual report. · HR-ARCHIVE-B11-FAMILY-AI-MOZAMBIQUE

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B11-SRC-MZ-AI1979@524dff9fe507dabe

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 524dff9fe507dabe0f2a3a1658a1afe441641f17e57011f896afb6c1b90d0ba8. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 19 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Mozambique:Newconstitutionprotectsbasicrights; Butpoliticalprisonersstillsufferunfairtrials ↗

Publisher: AfricaWatch/HumanRightsWatch

Exact passage: printed3/PDF3,Thelegalsystem firstparagraph continuation

Source establishes: The retrospective account dates first-ten sentence/execution to31March1979; not a newly identified extra cohort.

Document date: 1991-02-11 · Publication date: 1991-02-11

Actual review scope: Publisher PDF cover and legal-system discussion on printed/physical pages2–3.

Access limitations

Prior A4 review read the actual publisher PDF; no source-body byte hash was obtained. Original1979records absent. February/March establishment and31March/1Aprilexecution discrepancies remain unresolved. Later report-current law is not adopted as1979law.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Africa Watch report with retrospective tribunal/execution history. · HR-ARCHIVE-B11-FAMILY-AFRICAWATCH-MZ

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B11-SRC-MZ-HRW1991@live-access-1fe469841946f0ed

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: Not established. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 3 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

No original execution records or reconciled first-group day. Do not multiply the first ten across publishers.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

31Marchversus1April1979first-group date remains unresolved.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B21-MZ-FIRST-EXECUTIONS · exact wording SHA-256 c018124c619362adc21e90c45deaef9bad17230fcdde498ead86daea259544af

Report a correction →
context

Articles48–52of Mozambique’s Law2/79 assign preparatory investigation to SNASP and ordinary jurisdiction to Provincial People’s Tribunals, with a constitutional-suspension exception. They provide five days to appeal and require Supreme People’s Tribunal confirmation before a death sentence can be executed. These provisions are not evidence that every safeguard was implemented or that the separate military tribunal followed this process.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Printed law date from the existing approved law record; not evidence of implementation..

Date basis and original source clocks

Printed law date from the existing approved law record; not evidence of implementation.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Lei dos Crimes contra a Seguranca do Povo e do Estado Popular, Lei 2/79 ↗

Publisher: Comissao Permanente da Assembleia Popular, official pamphlet; printed presidential name SamoraMoisesMachel

Exact passage: printed59-60/PDF61-62,articles48-52

Source establishes: Articles48–52describe investigation,jurisdiction,appeal and Supreme Tribunal confirmation,with a constitutional-suspension exception.

Document date: 1979-03-01 · Publication date: 1979-10

Actual review scope: Law heading and specified articles48–52,printed pages59–60 on physical pages61–62,with pamphlet colophon.

Access limitations

Historical repository is not the issuing authority. Original signed law/gazette autograph not authenticated; selective Portuguese review,not a certified translation or full current-law analysis. Ordinary-law safeguards and a separate military tribunal are distinct.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Reproduction of an official Portuguese law in a historical repository. · HR-ARCHIVE-B11-FAMILY-MZ-LAW

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B11-SRC-MZ-LAW1979@0837a80601541f37

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 0837a80601541f37f018aa01003e3edad443a212365547e7cd87f6fd64a89f87. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 61, 62 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Selective Portuguese reading,not certified/current-law advice. Ordinary safeguards do not prove compliance or apply automatically to the separate military tribunal.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B21-MZ-ORDINARY-PROCESS · exact wording SHA-256 bbe2c2a9dc58d9b667a80d17eff1171ac95c4b1fd437d471e433dd114287d8fa

Report a correction →
context

Amnesty’s1981report relays refugees’ December1980allegations of MRM atrocities against civilians around Espungabera. It separately reports government forces destroying an MRM base in July. These are source-attributed accounts of different phases, with no named individual order-giver established.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Context collection; no single event date assigned.

Date basis and original source clocks

Julybaseoperation andDecemberrefugeeallegations are distinct accounts.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Amnesty International Report 1981, Mozambique ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: printed67/PDF39,firstMozambiqueparagraph

Source establishes: Amnesty separately reports government destruction of anMRMbase and refugees’ later atrocity allegations.

Document date: 1981 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Mozambique account,printed pages67–68 on physical pages39–40,including continuations.

Access limitations

Original journalist report,accurate national census,judgments and personal approval records absent. The seven-execution aggregate crosses1980–1981; a later appeal to the president is not proof of personal execution authorization.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Amnesty report with camp estimates,court accounts and separate execution cohorts. · HR-ARCHIVE-B11-FAMILY-AI-MOZAMBIQUE

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B11-SRC-MZ-AI1981@b90c32f71f4a3012

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: b90c32f71f4a3012dee688f57a81f623c7ee8889aa62af9cd1280e5fbb99d36e. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 39 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

No named individual order-giver or verified aggregate death number established.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B21-MZ-OTHER-ARMED-ACTS · exact wording SHA-256 2f5a0627df2f5895408e775676ba60e6096278c104220b05d1f73594eb9c2aa3

Report a correction →
decision

Amnesty says President Samora Machel personally initiated an early1980purge over alleged corruption, maladministration and negligence in state enterprises, with more than fifty officials arrested. This is an attributed administrative campaign and arrest observation, not proof every accusation was true or that he ordered torture or executions.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Reported early1980campaign; only conservative year bounds,no invented day or quarter..

Date basis and original source clocks

Reported early1980campaign; only conservative year bounds,no invented day or quarter.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Amnesty International Report 1980, Mozambique ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: printed64/PDF38,paragraphDespite thesereleases

Source establishes: Amnesty explicitly attributes initiation of the early1980administrative campaign to Machel and reports over50officialarrests.

Document date: 1980 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Mozambique account,printed pages63–64 on physical pages37–38.

Access limitations

Original orders and case lists not obtained. Restricted residence,resettlement,announced release and unrestricted freedom differ. Corruption accusations are not proved guilt.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Amnesty annual report of release announcements and administrative arrests. · HR-ARCHIVE-B11-FAMILY-AI-MOZAMBIQUE

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B11-SRC-MZ-AI1980@85447741dd879b4d

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 85447741dd879b4dd29c4dd55d53fd74f2761521b64afb94d11df7c2c6faf0e3. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 38 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Accusations are not proved guilt; no private torture/execution order or personal death total.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B21-MZ-PURGE · exact wording SHA-256 2ec3522df3f67d1aa7c270df0a5edbed926eb4bbc1c530aea7fe7d1fb197405d

Report a correction →
decision

Amnesty reports Machel’s October1979announcements releasing about600pre-independence deserters and more than500Unango camp inmates. The Unango group was told to remain locally and assist development. A later announcement about resettling the600does not add another600people or establish unrestricted freedom.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Reported release-announcement month; completion and restrictions remain qualified..

Date basis and original source clocks

Reported release-announcement month; completion and restrictions remain qualified.

Sources (2) · exact passages & limitations

Amnesty International Report 1980, Mozambique ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: printed63-64/PDF37-38,OctoberNiassatourpassages

Source establishes: Amnesty reports Octoberannouncements for about600deserters and over500Unangoinmates,with local residence/development restrictions.

Document date: 1980 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Mozambique account,printed pages63–64 on physical pages37–38.

Access limitations

Original orders and case lists not obtained. Restricted residence,resettlement,announced release and unrestricted freedom differ. Corruption accusations are not proved guilt.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Amnesty annual report of release announcements and administrative arrests. · HR-ARCHIVE-B11-FAMILY-AI-MOZAMBIQUE

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B11-SRC-MZ-AI1980@85447741dd879b4d

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 85447741dd879b4dd29c4dd55d53fd74f2761521b64afb94d11df7c2c6faf0e3. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 37, 38 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Amnesty International Report 1981, Mozambique ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: Printed68/physical40,opening resettlement paragraph

Source establishes: The later resettlement announcement concerns the same600cohort,not600newreleases.

Document date: 1981 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Mozambique account,printed pages67–68 on physical pages39–40,including continuations.

Access limitations

Original journalist report,accurate national census,judgments and personal approval records absent. The seven-execution aggregate crosses1980–1981; a later appeal to the president is not proof of personal execution authorization.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Amnesty report with camp estimates,court accounts and separate execution cohorts. · HR-ARCHIVE-B11-FAMILY-AI-MOZAMBIQUE

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B11-SRC-MZ-AI1981@b90c32f71f4a3012

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: b90c32f71f4a3012dee688f57a81f623c7ee8889aa62af9cd1280e5fbb99d36e. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 40 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Release,residence restrictions and resettlement are different. The same600are not counted again in the later announcement.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B21-MZ-RELEASES · exact wording SHA-256 3f5e8916e7f7b0c3e6009290334fdb72efba483ba1d4bd98b1b90be84fec0a44

Report a correction →
context

Amnesty describes a Revolutionary Military Tribunal established in March1979, hearing cases in secret without defence counsel. Africa Watch instead dates its establishment to February1979 and describes no right of appeal. The month is unresolved; ordinary Law2/79appeal provisions cannot simply be assigned to this separate tribunal.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Context collection; no single event date assigned.

Date basis and original source clocks

Amnesty saysMarch1979establishment;AfricaWatch saysFebruary1979. Exact month unresolved.

Sources (2) · exact passages & limitations

Amnesty International Report 1981, Mozambique ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: printed68/PDF40,lastMozambiqueparagraph

Source establishes: Sources describe the separate tribunal and differing establishment months,with secret/no-counsel/no-appeal accounts.

Document date: 1981 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Mozambique account,printed pages67–68 on physical pages39–40,including continuations.

Access limitations

Original journalist report,accurate national census,judgments and personal approval records absent. The seven-execution aggregate crosses1980–1981; a later appeal to the president is not proof of personal execution authorization.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Amnesty report with camp estimates,court accounts and separate execution cohorts. · HR-ARCHIVE-B11-FAMILY-AI-MOZAMBIQUE

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B11-SRC-MZ-AI1981@b90c32f71f4a3012

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: b90c32f71f4a3012dee688f57a81f623c7ee8889aa62af9cd1280e5fbb99d36e. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 40 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Mozambique:Newconstitutionprotectsbasicrights; Butpoliticalprisonersstillsufferunfairtrials ↗

Publisher: AfricaWatch/HumanRightsWatch

Exact passage: printed2-3/PDF2-3,RevolutionaryMilitaryTribunalparagraph

Source establishes: Sources describe the separate tribunal and differing establishment months,with secret/no-counsel/no-appeal accounts.

Document date: 1991-02-11 · Publication date: 1991-02-11

Actual review scope: Publisher PDF cover and legal-system discussion on printed/physical pages2–3.

Access limitations

Prior A4 review read the actual publisher PDF; no source-body byte hash was obtained. Original1979records absent. February/March establishment and31March/1Aprilexecution discrepancies remain unresolved. Later report-current law is not adopted as1979law.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Africa Watch report with retrospective tribunal/execution history. · HR-ARCHIVE-B11-FAMILY-AFRICAWATCH-MZ

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B11-SRC-MZ-HRW1991@live-access-1fe469841946f0ed

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: Not established. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 2, 3 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

February/Marchmonth unresolved. Do not silently assign ordinary Law2/79appeals to this tribunal.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Amnesty:March1979;AfricaWatch:February1979.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B21-MZ-TRIBUNAL · exact wording SHA-256 e19529bc63d487e4708efe00f35e4de21c5a7684e2e86be62532006e9a7d1889

Report a correction →
human consequence

Case8481 reproduces a complaint alleging roughly nine hundred people missing at Caracoles, with separate lists of dead, wounded and detained people. The IACHR expressly says it could not precisely establish the events or their extent. Missing is not nine hundred verified deaths or permanent disappearances.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Context collection; no single event date assigned.

Date basis and original source clocks

Exact event day and extent not reconciled;government reply and later study dates are separate source clocks.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

IACHR Bolivia, Chapter II: right to life ↗

Publisher: Inter-American Commission on Human Rights

Exact passage: B3,Case8481,initial complaint and Commission paragraphs after named lists

Source establishes: Case8481reproduces the roughly900missing complaint and separate status lists while the Commission expressly limits its ability to establish extent.

Document date: Not established · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Case7458Commission conclusion and death accounts;Case8481complaint,status lists and explicit limits assessing extent.

Access limitations

No original autopsy/deposition or full list deduplication. Named lists are not redistributed.900missing is not900confirmed deaths;calendar/weekday inconsistencies remain. Government counteraccount retained.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

IACHR institutional findings with separately identified complaints and testimony. · HR-ARCHIVE-B12-FAMILY-IACHR-BO

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B12-SRC-BO-CH2EN@ed16dd0aac8edc3d

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: ed16dd0aac8edc3dafa236f8657326e12a4bae07d56042addb09cccb2e9a8b8c. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Missing is not900verified deaths or permanent disappearances. Lists are not exported or fully deduplicated.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B22-BO-COMPLAINT · exact wording SHA-256 af72685cb1c852d81bd53f4bb5a7c1b568e2849c5fbffd9130a353c8ada645fc

Report a correction →
human consequence

The IACHR contrasts Arce’s figure of no more than five hundred arrests, Colonel Mario Escobar’s later no-more-than2,500, and Amnesty’s estimate of1,000–2,000political prisoners after a November1980visit. Cumulative arrests and current prisoner stock have different dates and definitions; they are not additive.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Context collection; no single event date assigned.

Date basis and original source clocks

Official cumulative-arrest statements andNovember1980prisoner-stock estimate have different dates and definitions.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

IACHR Bolivia, Chapter III: personal security and integrity ↗

Publisher: Inter-American Commission on Human Rights

Exact passage: B1,contradictory official arrest statements andAmnestyvisit

Source establishes: The Commission contrasts official500/2500upper arrest claims with Amnesty’s1000–2000prisoner-stock estimate.

Document date: Not established · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: B1official arrest statements and Amnesty prisoner-stock estimate;personal-abuse candidate not approved.

Access limitations

Arrest flows and prisoner stocks differ. Original medical/deposition evidence and narrow personal-act corroboration absent;Arce personal-abuse record stays excluded.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

IACHR account of conflicting arrest and detention estimates. · HR-ARCHIVE-B12-FAMILY-IACHR-BO

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B12-SRC-BO-CH3EN@9bfbf03f2bea4bfa

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 9bfbf03f2bea4bfa5e578c1c222a19d35d808947b6f1c9abe9a2f5546a92a0d3. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Different denominators,not additive or a death count. No personal abuse finding from the count statements.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B22-BO-DETENTION · exact wording SHA-256 25016654e22d58bebeedbe1a7f4e24c2d85849b391ddcd3e442af32af2ce9483

Report a correction →
human consequence

Amnesty reports that Luis Espinal was found dead on22March1980 and relays the La Paz Medical College’s finding of torture. This predates the17Julycoup. The reviewed passage identifies no killer or personal instruction by García Meza or Arce.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Body-found date,not an independently established exact death day..

Date basis and original source clocks

Body-found date,not an independently established exact death day.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Amnesty International Report1980, Bolivia ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: printed112/PDF62,Espinal paragraphs

Source establishes: Amnesty reports Espinal found dead and relays the medical college’s torture finding.

Document date: 1980 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Bolivia account,printed page112 on physicalPDF62,Novembercoup andEspinal passages.

Access limitations

Reporting period May1979–April1980is not full1980. Original medical/autopsy and individual order records absent;Espinal’s death predates theJulycoup.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Contemporary Amnesty annual report. · HR-ARCHIVE-B12-FAMILY-AI-BO

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B12-SRC-BO-AI1980@85447741dd879b4d

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 85447741dd879b4dd29c4dd55d53fd74f2761521b64afb94d11df7c2c6faf0e3. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 62 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Original medical/autopsy record absent. Death predates theJulycoup;no killer or instruction byGarcíaMezaorArceestablished.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B22-BO-ESPINAL · exact wording SHA-256 f058e2a83ece4b516e9a46de427534ed8a8fd892b0fa0305f3a119ddbcf85478

Report a correction →
decision

The IACHR introduction identifies General Luis García Meza Tejada as taking power on17July1980 by deposing Lidia Gueiler’s government. The English and Spanish texts are editions of one report, not two independent investigations or a personal criminal judgment.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Reported takeover andCOBraid day,not a single personal shooting order..

Date basis and original source clocks

Reported takeover andCOBraid day,not a single personal shooting order.

Sources (2) · exact passages & limitations

Informe sobre Bolivia, introducción ↗

Publisher: Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos

Exact passage: A1

Source establishes: The introduction identifies GarcíaMeza’s takeover by deposingGueiler on17July.

Document date: Not established · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: A1coup identity andA3governmentreply dated14November1980,with methods and reporting scope.

Access limitations

No authorized IACHR in-country visit;UN/Amnesty visits are distinct. Government accounts are not Commission findings. Collection/header dates are inconsistent and not silently repaired.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Official Spanish IACHR web introduction and reproduced government reply. · HR-ARCHIVE-B12-FAMILY-IACHR-BO

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B12-SRC-BO-INTROSP@c0f59923297bf9e5

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: c0f59923297bf9e56b3ac67c5ca856d4aa7ec8cb54158871d78d8584711dc68e. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

IACHR Bolivia report, English introduction ↗

Publisher: Inter-American Commission on Human Rights

Exact passage: A1

Source establishes: The introduction identifies GarcíaMeza’s takeover by deposingGueiler on17July.

Document date: Not established · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: A1coup/identity passage,read against the Spanish version and visible web header.

Access limitations

Not a second independent investigation. English1985header and1981collection/citation remain unresolved;no original print cover or private coup order obtained.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

English web edition of the same IACHR report. · HR-ARCHIVE-B12-FAMILY-IACHR-BO

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B12-SRC-BO-INTROEN@7aed29c37644f687

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 7aed29c37644f687b69822b87619484edf35d13491acfc8079684fb28d7df32c. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Two language editions are one report,not independent investigations or a personal criminal judgment.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B22-BO-GARCIA · exact wording SHA-256 4d3db55f0765b5ee8ae9a703dcf6876fb031eb97b5b9dbe1eec6ed4b1e084342

Report a correction →
human consequence

The government reply of14November1980, reproduced by the IACHR, reports four civilians, an army officer and a soldier killed at Caracoles during disorders. This is the government’s account; other sources dispute the event’s scale and circumstances. Alternative figures are not added.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Context collection; no single event date assigned.

Date basis and original source clocks

Government reply dated14November1980;actual event day unresolved.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Informe sobre Bolivia, introducción ↗

Publisher: Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos

Exact passage: A3,reproduced14November1980CerrutoCalderónreply,part(a)

Source establishes: The reproduced reply gives four civilian,one officer and one soldier deaths.

Document date: Not established · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: A1coup identity andA3governmentreply dated14November1980,with methods and reporting scope.

Access limitations

No authorized IACHR in-country visit;UN/Amnesty visits are distinct. Government accounts are not Commission findings. Collection/header dates are inconsistent and not silently repaired.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Official Spanish IACHR web introduction and reproduced government reply. · HR-ARCHIVE-B12-FAMILY-IACHR-BO

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B12-SRC-BO-INTROSP@c0f59923297bf9e5

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: c0f59923297bf9e56b3ac67c5ca856d4aa7ec8cb54158871d78d8584711dc68e. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Government account,not independently reconciled total. Alternative reports differ and are not added.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Other sources dispute scale and circumstances.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B22-BO-GOV-CARACOLES · exact wording SHA-256 c60a1fd20272120cb79f0ca7b51cad2f8097371da056bfcd2543b9e98f37ac84

Report a correction →
decision

The IACHR attributes a nationwide judicial reappointment on17September1980 under Decree17612to the president, including Supreme Court members and other judges. This falls within the separately evidenced García Meza government; appointment does not establish a personal instruction for every judicial act.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Reported nationwide judicial reappointment date..

Date basis and original source clocks

Reported nationwide judicial reappointment date.

Sources (2) · exact passages & limitations

IACHR Bolivia, Chapter I: political and legal system ↗

Publisher: Inter-American Commission on Human Rights

Exact passage: C4,paragraph beginning On September17,1980

Source establishes: The Commission attributes the17Septemberreappointments to the president in the separately evidenced government context.

Document date: Not established · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: ChapterI.C4,union-suspension and judicial-appointment passages,with incumbent established by the introduction.

Access limitations

Original gazette and signers absent.1981institutions are not backdated to1980;appointments are not private instructions for every judicial act. Same collection date anomaly retained.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

IACHR report of public institutional acts. · HR-ARCHIVE-B12-FAMILY-IACHR-BO

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B12-SRC-BO-CH1EN@4b308af742b1093f

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 4b308af742b1093f1d445bba6361de84db52a0fb8fe97b8803abeda430de84f9. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

E/CN.4/1500: study by Special Envoy Héctor Gros Espiell ↗

Publisher: United Nations

Exact passage: PDF13/printed11,item10

Source establishes: The Commission attributes the17Septemberreappointments to the president in the separately evidenced government context.

Document date: 1981-12-31 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: E/CN.4/1500 cover dated31December1981and selected physical pages13,15,25and39.

Access limitations

Source ID1982is not issuance date. Caracoles figures cite an Amnesty memorandum and are not independent verification of each quantity. Later names have unresolved statuses;original private orders and forensic records absent.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

UN Special Envoy study with nested source accounts. · HR-ARCHIVE-B12-FAMILY-UN-BO

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B12-SRC-BO-UN1982@5afa6c0c21921f50

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 5afa6c0c21921f5048e350aa4177040ae69afb6c1de6d2d4a2607daf9be84b23. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 13 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Appointments do not establish a personal instruction for every later judicial act.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B22-BO-JUDICIARY · exact wording SHA-256 577abc7b83e48b8a256caae048cb50f0a07de9fe9ab0d2037ee9a108ecf33eb8

Report a correction →
decision

The UN study dates Colonel Alberto Natusch Busch’s overthrow of Walter Guevara to1November1979 and his return of government to Congress to16November. Amnesty reports an upper estimate of200unarmed civilians killed by the army during that coup. Coup leadership does not establish each shooting order or an independently verified personal death total.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Reported coup day; return toCongress is a separate16Novemberevent..

Date basis and original source clocks

Reported coup day; return toCongress is a separate16Novemberevent.

Sources (2) · exact passages & limitations

E/CN.4/1500: study by Special Envoy Héctor Gros Espiell ↗

Publisher: United Nations

Exact passage: PDF39,political rights paragraph(c)

Source establishes: The study dates overthrow to1November1979and return toCongress to16November.

Document date: 1981-12-31 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: E/CN.4/1500 cover dated31December1981and selected physical pages13,15,25and39.

Access limitations

Source ID1982is not issuance date. Caracoles figures cite an Amnesty memorandum and are not independent verification of each quantity. Later names have unresolved statuses;original private orders and forensic records absent.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

UN Special Envoy study with nested source accounts. · HR-ARCHIVE-B12-FAMILY-UN-BO

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B12-SRC-BO-UN1982@5afa6c0c21921f50

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 5afa6c0c21921f5048e350aa4177040ae69afb6c1de6d2d4a2607daf9be84b23. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 39 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Amnesty International Report1980, Bolivia ↗

Publisher: Amnesty International

Exact passage: printed112/PDF62,Bolivia opening

Source establishes: Amnesty reports an upper estimate of200unarmed civilians killed by the army during that coup,not personal allocation.

Document date: 1980 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Bolivia account,printed page112 on physicalPDF62,Novembercoup andEspinal passages.

Access limitations

Reporting period May1979–April1980is not full1980. Original medical/autopsy and individual order records absent;Espinal’s death predates theJulycoup.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Contemporary Amnesty annual report. · HR-ARCHIVE-B12-FAMILY-AI-BO

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B12-SRC-BO-AI1980@85447741dd879b4d

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 85447741dd879b4dd29c4dd55d53fd74f2761521b64afb94d11df7c2c6faf0e3. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 62 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Coup leadership is not each shooting instruction or a verified personal toll.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B22-BO-NATUSCH · exact wording SHA-256 9d739160f94cc744e07b6d4f76d4a09d5268115476e2781a4f56a217ee46d4e0

Report a correction →
human consequence

In Case7458, the IACHR concludes that irregular conduct by government agents caused Marcelo Quiroga Santa Cruz’s death during the17July1980raid on COB headquarters. It also reports that miner leader Gualberto Vega died in the operation. The Commission called for investigation of responsibility rather than identifying a named shooter or convicting a senior official.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Reported takeover andCOBraid day,not a single personal shooting order..

Date basis and original source clocks

Reported takeover andCOBraid day,not a single personal shooting order.

Sources (2) · exact passages & limitations

IACHR Bolivia, Chapter II: right to life ↗

Publisher: Inter-American Commission on Human Rights

Exact passage: B2,Case7458,introduction and final paragraphs after witness narrative

Source establishes: Case7458states the Commission’s institutional conclusion and records the two named deaths.

Document date: Not established · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Case7458Commission conclusion and death accounts;Case8481complaint,status lists and explicit limits assessing extent.

Access limitations

No original autopsy/deposition or full list deduplication. Named lists are not redistributed.900missing is not900confirmed deaths;calendar/weekday inconsistencies remain. Government counteraccount retained.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

IACHR institutional findings with separately identified complaints and testimony. · HR-ARCHIVE-B12-FAMILY-IACHR-BO

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B12-SRC-BO-CH2EN@ed16dd0aac8edc3d

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: ed16dd0aac8edc3dafa236f8657326e12a4bae07d56042addb09cccb2e9a8b8c. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Informe sobre Bolivia, introducción ↗

Publisher: Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos

Exact passage: A3,reproduced14November1980governmentreply,LaPazQuirogaentry

Source establishes: The reproduced14Novembergovernmentreply supplies the contrary official account,not independent corroboration of the Commission’s finding.

Document date: Not established · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: A1coup identity andA3governmentreply dated14November1980,with methods and reporting scope.

Access limitations

No authorized IACHR in-country visit;UN/Amnesty visits are distinct. Government accounts are not Commission findings. Collection/header dates are inconsistent and not silently repaired.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Official Spanish IACHR web introduction and reproduced government reply. · HR-ARCHIVE-B12-FAMILY-IACHR-BO

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B12-SRC-BO-INTROSP@c0f59923297bf9e5

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: c0f59923297bf9e56b3ac67c5ca856d4aa7ec8cb54158871d78d8584711dc68e. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

No named shooter or senior-official criminal conviction in this account. Original autopsy/deposition absent.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

The reproduced government reply presents a resistance-based account;not an independent investigation.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B22-BO-QUIROGA · exact wording SHA-256 9bd1366803739785f326e720971e9f23d40dae71f3751996c68e621ed836b42d

Report a correction →
human consequence

The UN study relays a Caracoles account of eight civilians killed, eighteen missing and thirteen prisoners, citing an Amnesty memorandum. It separately adds five names supplied during a later visit. Their statuses are not independently reconciled; one appears as wounded in the IACHR complaint, so thirteen deaths cannot be derived by adding the names.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Context collection; no single event date assigned.

Date basis and original source clocks

Exact event day and extent not reconciled;government reply and later study dates are separate source clocks.

Sources (2) · exact passages & limitations

E/CN.4/1500: study by Special Envoy Héctor Gros Espiell ↗

Publisher: United Nations

Exact passage: PDF25/printed25,paragraph(c) andfootnote27

Source establishes: The study relays eight civilian deaths,eighteen missing,thirteen prisoners and later names,with unresolved statuses.

Document date: 1981-12-31 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: E/CN.4/1500 cover dated31December1981and selected physical pages13,15,25and39.

Access limitations

Source ID1982is not issuance date. Caracoles figures cite an Amnesty memorandum and are not independent verification of each quantity. Later names have unresolved statuses;original private orders and forensic records absent.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

UN Special Envoy study with nested source accounts. · HR-ARCHIVE-B12-FAMILY-UN-BO

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B12-SRC-BO-UN1982@5afa6c0c21921f50

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 5afa6c0c21921f5048e350aa4177040ae69afb6c1de6d2d4a2607daf9be84b23. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 25 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

IACHR Bolivia, Chapter II: right to life ↗

Publisher: Inter-American Commission on Human Rights

Exact passage: B3,Case8481,woundedlist including MartínUruiola/Urquiola

Source establishes: The wounded-list entry contradicts treating every later added name as an additional death;private list not redistributed.

Document date: Not established · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: Case7458Commission conclusion and death accounts;Case8481complaint,status lists and explicit limits assessing extent.

Access limitations

No original autopsy/deposition or full list deduplication. Named lists are not redistributed.900missing is not900confirmed deaths;calendar/weekday inconsistencies remain. Government counteraccount retained.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

IACHR institutional findings with separately identified complaints and testimony. · HR-ARCHIVE-B12-FAMILY-IACHR-BO

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B12-SRC-BO-CH2EN@ed16dd0aac8edc3d

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: ed16dd0aac8edc3dafa236f8657326e12a4bae07d56042addb09cccb2e9a8b8c. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

No combined thirteen-death inference from adding five names. Shared Amnesty ancestry is not independent validation.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

One later name appears as wounded in the IACHR complaint.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B22-BO-UN-CARACOLES · exact wording SHA-256 2a4ae3fc87082b774fe86d7b4c1eb1485552c13d0caaf633997f0fc8c4291b33

Report a correction →
decision

The IACHR describes Decree17531of21July1980 suspending the leadership of trade unions and other associations; the UN study also lists suspension and restructuring of trade-union activity. This is a reported institutional measure, not a verified personal killing instruction.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Reported union-leadership suspension decree date..

Date basis and original source clocks

Reported union-leadership suspension decree date.

Sources (2) · exact passages & limitations

IACHR Bolivia, Chapter I: political and legal system ↗

Publisher: Inter-American Commission on Human Rights

Exact passage: C4,Decree17531 paragraph

Source establishes: The Commission describesDecree17531suspending organizational leadership;theUNstudy also lists union suspension/restructuring.

Document date: Not established · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: ChapterI.C4,union-suspension and judicial-appointment passages,with incumbent established by the introduction.

Access limitations

Original gazette and signers absent.1981institutions are not backdated to1980;appointments are not private instructions for every judicial act. Same collection date anomaly retained.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

IACHR report of public institutional acts. · HR-ARCHIVE-B12-FAMILY-IACHR-BO

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B12-SRC-BO-CH1EN@4b308af742b1093f

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 4b308af742b1093f1d445bba6361de84db52a0fb8fe97b8803abeda430de84f9. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): Not established · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

E/CN.4/1500: study by Special Envoy Héctor Gros Espiell ↗

Publisher: United Nations

Exact passage: PDF13/printed11,item4

Source establishes: The Commission describesDecree17531suspending organizational leadership;theUNstudy also lists union suspension/restructuring.

Document date: 1981-12-31 · Publication date: Not established

Actual review scope: E/CN.4/1500 cover dated31December1981and selected physical pages13,15,25and39.

Access limitations

Source ID1982is not issuance date. Caracoles figures cite an Amnesty memorandum and are not independent verification of each quantity. Later names have unresolved statuses;original private orders and forensic records absent.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

UN Special Envoy study with nested source accounts. · HR-ARCHIVE-B12-FAMILY-UN-BO

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B12-SRC-BO-UN1982@5afa6c0c21921f50

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 5afa6c0c21921f5048e350aa4177040ae69afb6c1de6d2d4a2607daf9be84b23. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 13 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Original decree/signers absent. Institutional legal measure,not a verified personal killing instruction.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B22-BO-UNION · exact wording SHA-256 0348fa2c2c0600a3ac1ad425893ecc5ebf42f488fbeb32f543d7ed7151ce3b65

Report a correction →
context

Resolution203of30April2004 provisionally reformulates the charge as coauthorship of aggravated homicide with dolo eventual. Judge Bonavota dissents that death had not been sufficiently established to justify replacing the deprivation-of-liberty charge. This is a provisional charging decision with a dissent, not a final conviction or acquittal.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Provisional charging decision with dissent,not final conviction..

Date basis and original source clocks

Provisional charging decision with dissent,not final conviction.

Sources (1) · exact passages & limitations

Resolución203,30April2004, LJU14901 reproduction ↗

Publisher: Tribunal de Apelaciones en lo Penal de3er Turno; La Justicia Uruguaya reproduction

Exact passage: PDF1,14-15,majorityRESUELVEandBonavotaDISCORDE

Source establishes: Resolution203reformulates a provisional charge and includesBonavota’s dissent about death proof.

Document date: 2004-04-30 · Publication date: 2004-04-30

Actual review scope: Header and majorityRESUELVE/Bonavotadissent on physical pages1and14–15,visually reviewed.

Access limitations

Provisional charge and dissent,not final conviction or acquittal. Other appendix material not adopted;original signed paper absent.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Reproduction of provisional charging resolution203. · HR-ARCHIVE-B12-FAMILY-UY-INTERLOC

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B12-SRC-UY-INTERLOC2004@560a173b96c55e19

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 560a173b96c55e19a41ad5c8e5372701a404257a4aff4033a4dcecbd053ebf80. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 1 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Provisional charge and dissent,not final conviction or acquittal;not a2012dissent.

Contradictory evidence / review limits

Bonavota considered death insufficiently established to replace deprivation-of-liberty charge.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B22-UY-2004 · exact wording SHA-256 e6a775662d869b1e9410b3c220ec6a15a4e4026a4da8dd7cbbe03bcf2bd87e2b

Report a correction →
context

Official and judicial records describe Elena Quinteros’s forcible removal from the Venezuelan embassy gardens in Montevideo on28June1976. The2019official file preserves24or26Juneinitial-arrest accounts; the2010court finds24June. Those alternatives do not establish a two-day duration or settle every unit attribution.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Embassy-garden removal day; earlier arrest accounts have separate24/26Junealternatives..

Date basis and original source clocks

Embassy-garden removal day; earlier arrest accounts have separate24/26Junealternatives.

Sources (2) · exact passages & limitations

Ficha: Quinteros Almeida, Elena Cándida, updated June2019 ↗

Publisher: Uruguay Secretaría de Derechos Humanos para el Pasado Reciente

Exact passage: PDF1-5,detention andembassy accounts

Source establishes: Official file and court describe embassy-garden removal,with source-specific earlier-arrest dates.

Document date: 2019-06 · Publication date: 2019-06

Actual review scope: Physical pages1–7and20,last-seen/death accounts and remains-status section;the actual pinned PDF has78pages.

Access limitations

Underlying witness,archive and forensic originals absent.24/26Junearrest alternatives and unit attributions remain source-specific;no current status or confirmed incineration. No private identifiers/source body exported.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Official Uruguayan historical case file,updatedJune2019. · HR-ARCHIVE-B12-FAMILY-UY-OFFICIAL-FILE

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B12-SRC-UY-QUINTEROS2019@a0236c29bb4bffe4

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: a0236c29bb4bffe4bdd2a142fd39689597d8e11d7ddbc764ff4cbfb163b0c1fa. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Sentencia4/2010, IUE17-414/2003,21April2010 ↗

Publisher: Juzgado Letrado de Primera Instancia en lo Penal de1er Turno, Montevideo

Exact passage: RESULTANDOIII,PDF6-8

Source establishes: Official file and court describe embassy-garden removal,with source-specific earlier-arrest dates.

Document date: 2010-04-21 · Publication date: 2010-04-21

Actual review scope: Header,selected proved facts and memorandum/cipher passages,death-proof discussion,reasoningIXandFALLOas precisely located.

Access limitations

Not all71pages or full legal theory reviewed. Original certified file,exhibits and autographs not authenticated. Prosecutor/defence arguments are not all court-proved facts;liability is distinct from a personal execution instruction.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Identified reproduction of trial judgment4/2010. · HR-ARCHIVE-B12-FAMILY-UY-TRIAL

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B12-SRC-UY-TRIAL2010@6ae05b06d73a99d4

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 6ae05b06d73a99d4f5eb04782e75bf55c65a6e1e339dc616f62e00cee7acc489. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 6, 7, 8 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Official24/26Junealternatives and court24Junefinding are not harmonized as a duration;unit attributions remain source-specific. No embassy-sovereignty claim.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B22-UY-ABDUCT · exact wording SHA-256 7ad74e65a3c6a10acaa92639c8e67582919876abc924d84c55bba74f5d2f93d8

Report a correction →
context

Sentence22/2012of16February2012confirms the judgment against Blanco. The scanned appeal header and final disposition, and the Supreme Court’s subsequent procedural account, agree on that stage. This is a dated appeal outcome, not a claim to have exhaustively reviewed all appellate reasoning.

AI reviewed — source-attributed account
exact attributed primary record reported observation or finding · revision 1. Independently human-reviewed: no.

Replay date basis: Dated appeal confirmation;full reasoning not exhaustively reviewed..

Date basis and original source clocks

Dated appeal confirmation;full reasoning not exhaustively reviewed.

Sources (2) · exact passages & limitations

Sentencia22/2012,16February2012, appellate court third turn ↗

Publisher: Tribunal de Apelaciones en lo Penal de3er Turno

Exact passage: visuallyreviewedPDF2,datedheader/parties,andPDF31,FALLA

Source establishes: Scanned header/disposition and Supreme Court procedural account identify confirmation of the judgment.

Document date: 2012-02-16 · Publication date: 2012-02-16

Actual review scope: Physical page2dated header/parties/IUEand page31final disposition,compared with Supreme Court procedural account.

Access limitations

Middle29pages not fully reviewed;no exhaustive appellate-reasoning claim. Identity matched through unredacted header/IUE,not guessed from initials. Autographs not authenticated.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Scanned appellate judgment with bounded visual review. · HR-ARCHIVE-B12-FAMILY-UY-APPEAL

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B12-SRC-UY-APPEAL2012@97ca80daa3e0a32d

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 97ca80daa3e0a32d456401cb34b250ce250f3b63cdbb9272b08b47eaf24a9e9c. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 2, 31 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Sentencia899/2012,5November2012, cassation ↗

Publisher: Suprema Corte de Justicia, Uruguay

Exact passage: PDF1-2,RESULTANDOI-II

Source establishes: Scanned header/disposition and Supreme Court procedural account identify confirmation of the judgment.

Document date: 2012-11-05 · Publication date: 2012-11-05

Actual review scope: Header,IUE,procedural history and selected grounds/holding on physical pages1–3and6.

Access limitations

Host filename differs from actual judgment number;actual header899is retained. Anonymized identity is linked through case/sentence references,not guessed. No present legal-status,sentence-execution or general international-law advice inferred.

Original source URL ↗

Provenance, custody and reuse

Six-page reproduction of Supreme Court cassation judgment899/2012. · HR-ARCHIVE-B12-FAMILY-UY-SCJ

Edition: HR-ARCHIVE-B12-SRC-UY-SCJ2012@5c2ebe464240cfec

Original custody hash: Not established. Reviewed artifact hash: 5c2ebe464240cfec2cde46b25a6fd36748738caae925e42f41aa5a8073d34957. A copy hash does not authenticate an original.

Physical PDF page(s): 1, 2 · Printed page(s): Not established. The literal locator above is authoritative; no page number was inferred.

Evidence stance: supports_precise_source_attributed_record

Citation/link only; no original source, image, list, private audit text or reuse licence redistributed.

Source links and factual paraphrases only. Full source documents and caches are not redistributed. Separately credited identity portraits are supplied only where their reuse has been checked.

Uncertainty

Middle appeal pages not exhaustively reviewed;the procedural stage is supported without adopting every appellate argument.

Legal distinction

Attributed historical account, not an independent finding of individual criminal guilt. Documentary, institutional, political and legal stages remain distinct.

Casualty scope: Source-defined non-additive observations only. No personal casualty allocation, summed competing totals, under-eighteen conversion or zero from unknown data.

Record A4-B22-UY-APPEAL · exact wording SHA-256 8d9a56c54cb22a0b2b8fbe061921d502c2512ae4448d90085f24ec0fd46fec3e

Report a correction →